Stone Soup Conservation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rethinking Outreach in the 21st Century
Advertisements

J. David Tàbara Institute of Environmental Science and Technology Autonomous University of Barcelona Integrated Climate Governance.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America Step 7 Identify Population Objectives Population Objective is set here.
Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.
Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative James Broska Science Coordinator
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Integration and Prioritization of Science Support Needs.
Stone Soup Conservation Responding to Landscape Challenges In the Plains and Prairie Potholes LCC Rick Nelson, Coordinator Plains and Prairie Potholes.
Sustaining Biological Diversity and Ecological Functions in the Face of Large-scale Change: Future Challenges in Natural Resource Management. Pat Leahy.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
The Fundamentals of Conservation Design Image by Rex Johnson.
Strategic Site Selection at the Landscape Level Michael McCollum, McCollum Associates and Deborah Mead, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Banking.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
2 Recognized by John C. Fremont as an area of interior drainage 145,546 square miles Precipitation, generally 7-12 inches annually Recognized by John.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Californialcc.org Climate Smart Conservation and Tools for Adaptive Management 1 Debra Schlafmann, Coordinator May 16, 2013.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
Texas Forest Service Tennessee Kentucky Wildlife Mgt Institute The Nature Conservancy US Geological Survey Ducks Unlimited Mississippi Arkansas Louisiana.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
Natural England State of the Natural Environment, Strategic Direction refresh, and Manifesto Dr Helen Phillips, Chief Executive, Natural England.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
Convening Partners to Define the Landscape of the Future: Steps toward multi-partner Landscape Conservation Design June 2015 Steering Committee Workshop.
CLIMATE CHANGE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Climate Change Adaptation Across the Landscape Michelle Selmon Regional Climate Change Specialist June.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Incorporating Climate Change into Department Activities Panel Presentation North Pacific LCC Steering Committee.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Tools to Inform Protection, Restoration, and Resilience in the Hudson River Estuary The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
North Slope Science Initiative Dr. John F. Payne, Executive Director Dr. Denny Lassuy, Acting Deputy Director North Slope Science Initiative
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Strengthening the Science-Management Bond in the Wildlife Profession Eric Hellgren Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.
LCC NETWORK STRATEGIC PLANNING Orientation Webinar for Strategic Planning Training and Workshop Participants July 21, 2014 Presenter: Michael Gale, LCC.
Progress Relative to the Northeast Conservation Framework and Strategic Plan Setting the Stage for Conservation Design and Delivery Andrew Milliken North.
Today’s managers & leaders are challenged unlike any of the past generations in their roles.
Aquatic and Riparian Conservation Strategy
Landscape Conservation Strategy
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Rebecca Tharme Riverfutures Limited – UK
Pacific Northwest Conservation Blueprint
Alan Duncan NBDC Reflection Workshop Nov 2012
TSMO Program Plan Development
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Managing Change and Other Keys to Successful Implementation
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Developing an Integrated
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
Delivering Conservation
A Funders Perspective Maria Uhle Co-Chair, Belmont Forum Directorates for Geosciences, US National Science Foundation.
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
Regional workshop on Approaches to the implementation and monitoring of community-based ecosystem approach to fisheries management (CEAFM): finding common.
“The Anatomy of Grass root Capacity Building for Sustainable Management of Natural capital in the Nile Basin” -A Political Economy Approach Donald Kasongi.
Native Fish Conservation Areas Partnership Proposal
Environment and Development Policy Section
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Monitoring Biodiversity in Protected and
Strategy April 2018 – March 2022.
Presentation transcript:

Stone Soup Conservation Responding to Landscape Challenges In the Plains and Prairie Potholes LCC Rick Nelson, Coordinator Plains and Prairie Potholes LCC Bismarck, ND

Presentation Outline Background – Why Why I’m in the business Why LCC’s Why the PPP-LCC Foundational Pieces How are we different than other conservation partnerships? Where we’ve been and where we’re going Integration of decision analysis Projects of interest Questions

Conservation is a Core Value

Some see things as they are and say why?

I see things as they could be and say why not?

Why Are “We” Doing This? The future in the modern imagination has always stretched out ahead like a broad highway drawing us onward with the promise of tomorrow. Now rather suddenly, as it becomes impossible to ignore dramatic physical changes taking place across the Earth, the future looms like an urgent question. Whatever the coming century brings, it will not unfold smoothly as some improved but largely familiar versions of life as we know it. This is the only thing that seems certain. Dianne Dumanoski, The End of the Long Summer I promised a bit of background related to why we’re doing this. Why do we need a new approach. How many of you are starting to feel just a bit overwhelmed by the number of stressors that are impacting those natural resources that are near and dear to us – I certainly know that I’m sensing that “the times they are a changing!”…

Landscape Conservation Cooperatives: Geographic Areas If a map is worth 1000 words (and I think many of them are) here are 1,000 words that describe where the LCC’s are located. Boundaries are designed to be porous – If this approach to conservation is going to work (and I know it will) this has to be an integrated, national, network of conservation efforts. Mention that the Dakota Chapter’s LCC is most definitly the PPP-LCC

Landscape Conservation Cooperatives A Functional Conservation Network Vision: “Landscapes capable of sustaining natural and cultural resources for current and future generations."

Landscape Conservation Cooperatives A Functional Conservation Network Mission A network of cooperatives depends on LCCs to: Develop and provide integrated science-based information about the implications of climate change and other stressors for the sustainability of natural and cultural resources; Develop shared, landscape-level, conservation objectives and inform conservation strategies that are based on a shared scientific understanding about the landscape, including the implications of current and future environmental stressors; Facilitate the exchange of applied science in the implementation of conservation strategies and products developed by the Cooperative or their partners; Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of LCC conservation strategies in meeting shared objectives; Develop appropriate linkages that connect LCCs to ensure an effective network.

“Our” Challenges Land use changes/Habitat fragmentation Genetic isolation Invasive Species Water Scarcity Energy Development Climate change – direct and compounding effects Economics – Budgets These challenges will be compounded by continued growth, and growing affluence in human populations and the associated demands on land and water resources. Our vision and our determination must be equal to these challenges. Temperature Change,° C 1958-2008

Institutional Change is hard - But landscape level changes are happening all around us…are we aware, are we doing anything about it, is the agency “nimble” enough to respond to these types of threats to our misson? Change is also coming to sleepy little ND. This is 6,000 wells on our way to 50,000….

Foundational Framework Landscape Scale Conservation The LCC Network and Landscape Scale Conservation

Why is Landscape Scale Conservation and an Adaptive Approach Important? Political boundaries - We’re facing challenges that are immense in scale and cross political boundaries. Agency/Organizational silos - Cross-organizational coordination is critical to assuring the most efficient use of limited resources to address issues that cross agency missions. Nonstationarity - Adaptive management approaches provide the best chance to address large-scale issues effectively in an unpredictable future.

Strategic Habitat Conservation: This slide is to make sure everyone is on the same page with understanding SHC, particularly the priority species boxes. Over the course of the day we will discuss how surrogate species fits into this part with another graphic. This SHC approach has been referred to as our business model…I think that turns some people off – they don’t think of conservation of fish and wildlife as a business…and businesses are those entities that pollute and destroy the environment….well, they also do a lot of critical thinking about how to solve problems and believe it or not - - - we can learn from business. Many of our folks think that nothing changes when it comes to conservation – in fact where I live and work, North Dakota, people thought that nothing would EVER change….Custer joke??? While this may look like a complicated way to embrace and implement the Service’s Mission – it’s proven, it’s accountable, it will help our agency be contemporary in our approach to conservation and, if we do this right, we should be able to continue to prove how our mission is relevant to the American people.

How to flourish in an era of rapid change? Build a Strategy Network* vision, opportunity, agility, inspired action, community Convene many change agents from within the ranks. Draw attention to front-line concerns. View the future from multiple angles. Focus passion and intelligence on the biggest opportunities. Think creatively to solve wicked problems. Eliminate collaborative barriers between organizations. Promote a useful flow of information and activity. *Accelerate! J.P. Kotter. Reprint R1211B. Harvard Business Review, Nov 2012. Just a reminder that the LCC’s have several fundamental characteristics that describe their roles. 15

The LCC Niche Geographic scale Work across taxa Forward looking Decision focused Adaptable Integrate human dimensions components (economics, social science, etc…) Here it is in a nutshell – the LCC niche’. I don’t think you can underestimate that last facet enough. In the FWS, up to now, we’ve had extremely limited ability to examine the human dimension aspects of conservation – social science, economics have up to now been considered taboo…this is changing. Remember Archemedies Boast – “Give me a place to stand and I shall move the earth”…Well the leadership at the FWS and Interior is providing this “place to stand” and a lever to use as a tool….now it’s up to us to “move the earth”.

The LCC Network LCCnetwork.org If a map is worth 1000 words (and I think many of them are) here are 1,000 words that describe where the LCC’s are located. Boundaries are designed to be porous – If this approach to conservation is going to work (and I know it will) this has to be an integrated, national, network of conservation efforts. Mention that the Dakota Chapter’s LCC is most definitly the PPP-LCC LCCnetwork.org

Plains and Prairie Potholes LCC Where we’ve been and where we’re headed

PPP LCC Science Needs 25 uncertainties identified in first DA workshop Reduced these to 7 (in order of importance): Species responses to stressors Energy development Decision makers Land use under policy scenarios Emerging threats Invasive species Hydrology

First 5 years of the PPP-LCC Accomplishments Funded 40+ research projects Decision Analysis and SDM Workshops – focus science needs. Hosted Connections Workshop Working with NCCSC on integration Collaborating on numerous multi-lcc efforts to knit the network together So… I’ve covered a bit of the philosophy about “why” we need a new approach to addressing landscape scale stressors across the conservation community – what has the LCC accomplished in it’s first year and a half. (READ LIST?)

Projects of importance to the PPP LCC Partners include… Effects of oil and gas development on grassland birds Pattern tile drainage & wetland consolidation Native Prairie Adaptive Management Bats, Birds & Wind Sagebrush habitat – grazing impacts. Grassland Conversion Risk Analysis Assist with updated SWAP’s Grassland bird conservation on working landscapes: spatial analysis linking populations to habitats Invasive species connections to energy development Fish Passage in response to climate change Aquatic Habitat models – NFHAP

Connections II Workshop Goal: “Connect” the why and what of specific research with how managers can use the research products – from science production to application. Expected Outcome: Participants will know how to use recent results of PPP LCC science in conservation plans and actions.

Connections II Workshop Bob Gresswell, Bob Bramblett, Kathy Chase: Predicting effects of climate change on native fishes in northern Great Plains streams Matt Blank: Maintaining Migratory pathways of imperiled large river and small stream prairie fishes in the face of climate change and energy development Ben Rashford: Targeting grassland conservation: An estimate of land-use conversion risk in the northern Great Plains Vicky Dreitz: Assessing Land Use Practices on the Ecological Characteristics of Sagebrush Ecosystems: Multiple Migratory Bird Responses Todd Preston: Presence and Abundance of Non-Native Plant Species Near Oil Well Pads in Native Prairie Landscapes

Connections II Workshop Doug Johnson, Sarah Thompson: Effects of Oil and Gas Development on Grassland Birds in North Dakota Max Post Van der Burg: Developing a Foundation for Strategic Management and Mitigation of Energy Development in the Northern Great Plains Megan Cross. Megan shared with the group an update on her human dimensions work at the University of Minnesota. Megan is focusing on three counties in MN, ND, IA and the decisions that landowners make related to entering (or not entering) into a conservation reserve program contract. Larry Gigilotti and Lily Sweikert: Human Dimensions of Habitat Loss in the Plains and Prairie Potholes LCC

How can we work together across the continent? Multi-LCC projects How can we work together across the continent? How can we use decision-making tools for strategic adaptation to land use and climate impacts? How can we combine efforts across the Mississippi River Basin to connect conservation areas? Least tern meta-population monitoring design Pintails – linking regional management to continental scale. Using LCMap host CHAT Sage-Steppe Partner Forum Cross LCC project reviews

Focus for 2014 and Beyond 1. Information related to land use, land use policy and factors influencing land use and land conversion, including potential impacts to aquatic systems. Improve our estimate of rates of change – linking high resolution images to large landscape questions to assist in conservation planning. This could include work on synthesizing what is known about land use changes (habitat loss). Improve our estimates of risk related to landscape scale change Improve our understanding of interrelationship between land-use change and decisions made by landowners related to these changes Information related to landowner decision making that will help the partnership improve and/or incentivize conservation. PPP LCC Strategic Plan - 2015

Why?

The conservation community has achieved great things through the efforts of many agencies and organizations. And, conservation success will be measured as our willingness to be innovative, try new approaches, make modifications as needed, embrace change, shift from reactive to proactive conservation, and use any and all possible methods to ensure success. But, the 21st Century issues we face place us in “a whole other world” and our traditional and highly successful place based strategies may not be well suited to meeting landscape scale, 21st Century challenges. Therefore, “we” are building the LCC Network to successfully navigate an unknown and uncertain future.

≠ Relevant and “Relateable” Conservation in an era of rapid and disruptive change . Our conservation passion ≠ Public understanding or support ≠ Will the public understand and support what we’re all striving for – and will they take action on behalf of natural resource conservation….well, this may be our best shot at tipping that scale in our favor. What a different world we would live in IF – WHEN! The goals/values of the people that work in conservation match the goals/values of the American Public.

LCCnetwork.org PlainsandPrairiePotholesLCC.org Feedback and Questions LCCnetwork.org PlainsandPrairiePotholesLCC.org