Persistent Identifiers, Discoverability, and Open Science Fiona Murphy, Institute for Environmental Analytics, University of Reading, Reading, UK, fionalm27@gmail.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why self-archive? Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management.
Advertisements

V v Title, title, very long title with scientific words… Authors names, title; Authors names, title; Another Authors names, title; Authors names, title;
– – Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators INTRODUCTION This editable template is a common poster size (48" x 36") and orientation.
UCL Library Services and Research Data Management – a case study Martin Moyle UCL Library Services ODE Workshop, LIBER Conference, 27 June 2012.
Title of the Research or Study Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators UNIT/PROGRAM/COUNTY NAME 1 UNIT/PROGRAM/COUNTY NAME 2 UNIT/PROGRAM/COUNTY NAME.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN ECOLOGY | DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES INTRODUCTION This editable template is a common poster size (44" x 34") and.
Title of the Research Study Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators INTRODUCTION This editable template is in the most common poster size (48” x 36”)
Updates from the library. ORCiD Update
OARDC OR EXTENSION IDENTIFICATION HERE
RDA-WDS Publishing Data IG Data Bibliometrics Working Group.
V v Mammography Screening Recommendations and Reading Level: Comparing Imaging Centers and Non Imaging Centers Haleigh Shadley, Veronica Irvin, PhD, MPH,
Sara Bowman Center for Open Science | Promoting, Supporting, and Incentivizing Openness in Scientific Research.
ODIN – ORCID and DATACITE Interoperability Network ODIN: Connecting research and researchers Sergio Ruiz - DataCite Funded by The European Union Seventh.
Title of the Research Study Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators INTRODUCTION This editable template is in the most common poster size (48” x 36”)
Role of librarians in improving the research impact and academic profiling of Indian universities J. K. Vijayakumar Ph. D Manager, Collections & Information.
Sara Bowman Center for Open Science | Promoting, Supporting, and Incentivizing Openness in Scientific Research.
At the end of each trial, the correct category was revealed and the subjects recorded the accuracy of their category guess. Persistent Identifiers, Discoverability,
At the end of each trial, the correct category was revealed and the subjects recorded the accuracy of their category guess. Persistent Identifiers, Discoverability,
At the end of each trial, the correct category was revealed and the subjects recorded the accuracy of their category guess. Persistent Identifiers, Discoverability,
Data Publication (in H2020)
Featured Project Title Classroom, Teachers and Collaborators
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
RDA US Science workshop Arlington VA, Aug 2014 Cees de Laat with many slides from Ed Seidel/Rob Pennington.
Persistent Identifiers, Discoverability, and Open Science
A Publisher’s Perspective
Achieving Open Science
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
Data Sharing Now and in the Future
Transparency increases the credibility and relevance of research
ACS 2016 Moving research forward with persistent identifiers
Persistent Identifiers, Discoverability, and Open Science

Value proposition for the app
Title of the Research Study Presenter, Associates, and Collaborators
Title of the Research Study
Title of the Research Study Presenter, Associates, and Collaborators
Open Science at the Royal Society Dr Stuart Taylor Publishing Director
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Title of the Research Study
Title of the Research Study
Update on Coalition on Publishing Data in the Earth and Space Sciences (COPDESS) and other efforts Brooks Hanson Director, Publications, AGU
Title of the Research Study
Title of the Research Study
Title of the Research Study Presenter, Associates, and Collaborators
Metadata for research outputs management
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Title of the Research Study Presenter, Associates, and Collaborators
Title of the Research Study
Title of the Research Study
Title of the Research Study Presenter, Associates, and Collaborators
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Title of the Research Study Presenter, Associates, and Collaborators
Classroom Management Assessment:
Jeremy M. Berg Editor-in-Chief, Science family of journals
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Title of the Research Study Presenter, Associates, and Collaborators
Bird of Feather Session
Title of the Research Study
Title of the Research Study
Washington State University
Title of the Research Study Presenter, Associates, and Collaborators
Research Study Title Presenter name, Associates and Collaborators
Title of the Research Study
Title of the Research Study
Data + Research Elements What Publishers Can Do (and Are Doing) to Facilitate Data Integration and Attribution David Parsons – Lawrence, KS, 13th February.
Presentation transcript:

Persistent Identifiers, Discoverability, and Open Science Fiona Murphy, Institute for Environmental Analytics, University of Reading, Reading, UK, fionalm27@gmail.com Kerstin Lehnert, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, NY, USA, lehnert@ldeo.columbia.edu Brooks Hanson, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, USA, BHanson@a gu.org David Mellor, Center for Open Science, Virginia, USA, david@cos.io Twitter: @EvoMellor Problem Statement The traditional research paper is the only widely accreditable research output. Because of this, researchers face few incentives to make other parts of their research accessible. Solutions Funders need to recognize a wide range of research outputs (including data collection, management planning and enrichment, reviews, software, etc) as contributing to the knowledge cannon. The goals of reproducibility and interoperability should be woven into research funding calls. Producers of these outputs should be rewarded accordingly. Altmetrics to form part of the assessment framework in a transparent form Researchers to be encouraged to submit a range of outputs for assessment Editors need to know how data can be cited Publishers need to inform authors and editors about data publication, draw up and enact practical policies, and work with partners to ensure robust links between publications and related outputs housed by other platforms. All stakeholders need to share best practices for citing data, and other materials. Suggest Best Practices for Journals The Coalition on Publishing Data in the Earth and Space Sciences (COPDESS) develops and recommends best practices for journal author instructions around data and identifiers as a resource to the community. These best practices are consistent with and based on the COPDESS Statement of Commitment and have been developed with guidance from participants in COPDESS. Data Policy Statement Data Citation Sample Citation and Identification Crossref Funder Registry ORCIDs Data Policy Statement: XXX journal has endorsed the Statement of Commitment of the Coalition on Publishing Data in the Earth and Space Sciences (COPDESS).  All data and software necessary to understand, evaluate, replicate, and build upon the reported research must be made available and accessible at the time of publication as far as possible. Data should, to the extent possible, be stored in appropriate domain repositories that are widely recognized and used by the community, follow leading practices for data curation, and can provide additional data services. Best Practices: Include a prominent statement about data availability and link to COPDESS. Encourage editors, reviewers, and staff to evaluate data and affirm availability. Statement above is one minimal version of data availability requirements.  Other examples are provided here: http://www.copdess.org/datapolicies/ Software availability should be included as part of data availability. Adoption and Next Steps Work with funders to incentivize the sharing, publication and re-use of data We need to work with relevant societies, publishers and with individual journal editors to ensure these policies are widely disseminated and, where necessary, that community responses can refine or adapt them to become more suitable for specific disciplines. Training, researchers, peer review. What Can You Do? Contact details Lost Knowledge The data used in publications can often be hard to access. Data collected but never used in a publication are even harder to use. Other parts of the research lifecycle face similar obstacles: if they’re not included in the final publication, they will be lost. TOP Eight Standards: Citation Standards Data Transparency Analytical Methods and Code Transparency Research Material Transparency Design and Analysis Transparency Preregistration of Studies Preregistration of Analysis Plans Replication Three Levels: Disclosure, Requirement, Verification Logistical Challenges Technical and Educational This isn’t simply a technical challenge, although it has technical aspects. For reproducibility and interoperability to be meaningful and well-understood, appropriate standards need to be agreed. Amongst these, Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) could well form a key part. However, in order to do so they need to be understood by the respective research communities. In addition, workflows need to be optimized (and as far as possible automated) for accurate use and, if there are implications for workloads, consideration given to resourcing and training requirements. Head 3, to label the table below Signatories Eight Standards: Citation Standards Data Transparency Analytical Methods and Code Transparency Research Material Transparency Design and Analysis Transparency Preregistration of Studies Preregistration of Analysis Plans Replication Three Levels: Disclosure, Requirement, Verification Head 3, to label the table below Head 3, to label the table below small copyIm ipit, quam aliquis nullan volobor am quat vulla faci bla feuisl ea facidunt luptatin ut prat. Henim do conse feum nim velessim nulla augiat, quat acil ulla acin henim irit alit praesto commod te doloborperos acilla facincin henit lan henim ilit atincil laortisl enit praestie molore feugiam ver in eummy nos dolortisi bla faci Rit dolesendus, tet endenis ea volupta eperere ssenem nam hictus. small copyIm ipit, quam aliquis nullan volobor am quat vulla faci bla feuisl ea facidunt luptatin ut prat. Henim do conse feum nim velessim nulla augiat, quat acil ulla acin henim irit alit praesto commod te doloborperos acilla facincin henit lan henim ilit atincil laortisl enit praestie molore feugiam ver in eummy nos dolortisi bla faci UNIT/PROGRAM/COUNTY NAME 1 UNIT/PROGRAM/COUNTY NAME 2 UNIT/PROGRAM/COUNTY NAME 3