Probing Students' Mathematical Difficulties in Introductory Physics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Math 2204 Unit 4: Trigonometric equations. Section 4.1 Trigonometric Equation.
Advertisements

Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence.  Nursing students are showing difficulty passing a 20 question test encompassing basic math skills.  In.
Math Placement and PACe Program Overview
Ka-fu Wong © 2007 ECON1003: Analysis of Economic Data Supplement11-1 examples Supplement 11: Testing hypothesis examples.
Polytechnic Summit  Master of Science in Construction Management  Operations Management- MGMT820 ▪ Hybrid Course ▪ Only on-line offering in the.
EngageNY.org Scoring the Regents Examination in Algebra I (Common Core)
Background Knowledge PrecalculusHonors Precalculus GEOMETRY – Successful completion of the course with a grade of B- or higher Solid understanding of:
Students worked through two to four representations of each quiz. In many cases, student solution strategies varied strongly from representation to representation.
Hybrid Visual-Tutorial Instruction Model to Learn the Concept of Density Sergio Flores Physics Department University of Texas at El paso.
Teaching Functions.
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
Student difficulties with graphical representation of vector products: crossing and dotting beyond t’s and i’s* Warren M. Christensen, Ngoc-Loan Nguyen,
Student Learning of Calorimetry Concepts Ngoc-Loan P. Nguyen and David E. Meltzer Iowa State University Supported by NSF DUE-# Project Description:
Physics Education: An Expanding Research Field within the Physics Department David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
Addressing Learning Difficulties with Circuits: An “Aufbau*” Approach David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University * “Aufbau”
Are there “Hidden Variables” in Students’ Initial Knowledge State Which Correlate with Learning Gains? David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy.
- Stuart Boersma, Central Washington Univ. - Caren Diefenderfer, Hollins University - Shannon Dingman, U. of Arkansas - Bernie Madison, U. of Arkansas.
Identifying and Addressing Student Learning Difficulties in Calorimetry and Thermodynamics Ngoc-Loan Nguyen and David E. Meltzer Department of Physics.
Students' Ideas About Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics* Warren Christensen and David E. Meltzer Iowa State University PERG *Supported in part.
Recurrent Areas of Confusion in Student Learning of Thermodynamics David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy and Thomas J. Greenbowe Department.
Quantitative Foundations for Telecommunications TCOM 575 Syllabus for Fall 2008.
Assessment of Instructional Effectiveness in a Physics Course for Preservice Teachers David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
 The graduation rate for students requiring remediation in more than one level of English, Reading, and Mathematics is near ZERO.  Those students.
Tracking Your Student Data and Refining Your Course Redesign Phoebe Rouse Louisiana State University DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS.
Intuitive and Rule-based Reasoning in the Context of Calorimetry Warren M. Christensen, Ngoc-Loan P. Nguyen, and David E. Meltzer Department of Physics.
Investigation of Diverse Representational Modes in the Learning of Physics and Chemistry David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State.
Students’ Conceptual Difficulties in Thermodynamics for Physics and Chemistry: Focus on Free Energies David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Learning Gains in Physics in Relation to Students' Mathematics Skills David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
Developing Improved Curricula and Instructional Methods based on Physics Education Research David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State.
Investigations of Learning Difficulties in Thermodynamics for Physics and Chemistry David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy And Thomas J.
Diagnostic Testing David E. Meltzer University of Washington.
REMEDIAL MATH Everything you need to know about placing into NSC’s Foundational Math Program.
Variability in Student Learning Associated with Diverse Modes of Representation David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
FOUNDATIONAL MATHEMATICS Everything you need to know about placing into NSC’s Foundational Math Program.
What’s Entropy? Student Understanding of Thermodynamics in an Introductory Physics Course* Warren Christensen Iowa State University PERG David Meltzer.
Solution to Questions 1 and 2: Students' Use of Rule-based Reasoning in the Context of Calorimetry and Thermal Phenomena* Ngoc-Loan P. Nguyen, Warren M.
Adapting PER Strategies for Middle-School Science Classes David E. Meltzer Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College Arizona State University Supported in part.
Student understanding of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics in an introductory physics course * Warren Christensen and David E. Meltzer Iowa.
Students’ Reasoning Regarding Fundamental Concepts in Thermodynamics: Implications for Instruction David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning  The pre-requisites for this chapter have not been seen since grade 7 (factoring, line constructions,..);
Use of Pre-Instruction Tests to Predict Student Course Performance David E. Meltzer Arizona State University Supported in part by NSF DUE #
Investigating and Addressing Learning Difficulties in Thermodynamics David E. Meltzer Department of Physics University of Washington Seattle, Washington.
Active-Learning Curricula for Thermodynamics in Physics and Chemistry David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy And Thomas J. Greenbowe Department.
David E. Meltzer and Matthew I. Jones Arizona State University
Bridges 2 Success: WSU and Sinclair Co-Requisite Remediation Project
David E. Meltzer Arizona State University USA
David E. Meltzer and Matthew I. Jones Arizona State University
Science and Math Presentation
College Readiness: What skills do they need?
Mrs. Rangarajan & Mr.Chew
Marla M. Bell Associate Dean of Student Success
Algebraic Reasoning Inquiry Project
Lab Component for Developmental Courses: New Policies and Procedures
Exploration of Physics Students' Mathematical Difficulties
Math Curriculum “The philosophy of the Core Plus Mathematics Program is that students are working in groups to identify, investigate, and explore the.
University of Washington
Boston Tutoring Services: The Redesigned SAT
Course Assessment Overview
Professor Smith teaches the lecture portion.
Why? Why do we provide for Talent Development opportunities in Cobb County? Meet the needs of high-achieving/highly- able students who have not qualified.
Modular Course Overview Algebra and Trig. I
Gender Differences in High School Preparation for University Introductory Physics Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University of.
Why? Why do we provide for Talent Development opportunities in Cobb County? Meet the needs of high-achieving/highly- able students who have not qualified.
Impact on Learning: Feedback in On-line Assignments
Transition into Year 10/10A Mathematics 2019
Pre-Calculus Second Semester Review 2013
Succeeding in the PACe Program
Future Freshmen (Class of 2015!) & Parents … Welcome to Science!
Unit 9 – Circular Trigonometry Section Trigonometric Values
Learning Community II Survey
Presentation transcript:

Probing Students' Mathematical Difficulties in Introductory Physics David E. Meltzer and Matthew I. Jones Arizona State University Supported in part by NSF DUE #1504986

Motivation Instructors often report apparent difficulties, among introductory university physics students, with mathematical skills and concepts normally taught in high school or earlier. The difficulties have apparently not been effectively addressed in students’ previous mathematical education. Physics instructors therefore desire a means for addressing and correcting these difficulties within the context of physics classes themselves.

Our Approach Investigate difficulties with mathematical skills and reasoning among students in introductory physics courses Use written diagnostic instruments, oral interviews, focus groups Address students’ mathematical difficulties within the context of physics classes themselves, using both paper and on-line instructional materials In-class and/or in-recitation instruction; supplementary remote instruction using written and on-line materials

Initial Work Administer written diagnostic to 257 students in algebra- and calculus-based physics classes during Spring 2016 Carry out individual interviews with 12 students enrolled in those or similar courses during same period

Written Diagnostic Questions involving trigonometry (4 items), vectors (3 items), algebra (4 items); calculators allowed Administered as no-credit quiz during first week labs and/or recitation sections in four courses (first- and second-semester algebra- and calculus-based introductory physics) at Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Trigonometry Questions with sample student responses

Results on Trigonometry Questions Calculus-based physics, second semester [N = 29] 3 or 4 items correct: 76% All 4 items correct: 59% Calculus-based physics, first semester [N = 104] 3 or 4 items correct: 62% All 4 items correct: 45%

Results on Trigonometry Questions Algebra-based physics, second semester [N = 52] 3 or 4 items correct: 38% All 4 items correct: 23% Algebra-based physics, first semester [N = 72] 3 or 4 items correct: 28% All 4 items correct: 15%

Results on Trigonometry Questions Most common error, by far: item left blank Other discernable errors: use of incorrect trig function (e.g., cosine instead of sine), calculator on radians, algebra errors Interview sample (one item different): 3 of 4 algebra- based students made at least one error; only 1 of 8 calculus-based students made any errors

Vector Direction Question

Vector Direction Question

For comparison… A very similar question administered to students at Iowa State University in 2003:

Vector Direction, ISU Diagnostic (2003) 2. List all the vectors that have the same direction as the first vector listed, A. If there are none, please explain why. Explain

Vector Direction, ISU Diagnostic (2003) 2. List all the vectors that have the same direction as the first vector listed, A. If there are none, please explain why. Explain

Results on Vector Direction Calculus-based physics, second semester [N = 29] Correct, ASU (2016): 66% [Correct, Iowa State item #2 (2003): 77%] Calculus-based physics, first semester [N = 104] Correct, ASU (2016): 51% [Correct, Iowa State item #2 (2003): 71%]

Results on Vector Direction Algebra-based physics, second semester [N = 52] Correct, ASU (2016): 40% [Correct, Iowa State item #2 (2003): 64%] Algebra-based physics, first semester [N = 72] [Correct, Iowa State item #2 (2003): 55%]

Vector Direction, Most Common Error

Vector Direction, Most Common Error ✓ X

Algebra: Simultaneous Equations

Algebra: Simultaneous Equations

Results on Algebra Question Calculus-based physics, second semester [N = 29] Correct: 76% Calculus-based physics, first semester [N = 104] Correct: 57%

Results on Algebra Question Algebra-based physics, second semester [N = 52] Correct: 31% Algebra-based physics, first semester [N = 72] Correct: 28%

Notable Observation On all types of questions, students frequently self-corrected careless errors during the interviews, while such errors were common on the written instruments.

Summary Errors on basic math skills are common among introductory university physics students, including skills needed for many standard physics problems. Errors are frequently due to weakness with basic operations, and/or carelessness. Basic skills practice will likely be necessary as part of remedial treatment, in part to reduce prevalence of careless errors.