The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Causality Inferences. Objectives: 1. To understand the concept of risk factors and outcome in a scientific way. 2. To understand and comprehend each and.
Advertisements

FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH ISSUES © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference Confounds and The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference Probabilistic vs. Deterministic Causality Four Criteria.
Case Studies Pat McGee. Why Research? ● To distinguish between rival plausible hypotheses. [Campbell 1994] ● To attack proposed scientific theories. [Popper.
Design Conditions & Variables Explicating Design Variables Kinds of “IVs” Identifying potential confounds Why control “on the average” is sufficient Characteristics.
Prelude to the Research Validity Lecture A RH: is a guess about the relationships between behaviors In order to test our RH: we have to decide on a research.
COMM 250 Agenda - Week 13 Housekeeping RAT6 – Today RP2 – Graded & Returned to You Today Finn’s Peer Evaluation Form Lecture Naturalistic Inquiry (A Bit.
Today's topics ● Causal thinking, theories, hypotheses ● Independent and dependent variables; forms of relationships ● Formulating hypothesis; hypothesis.
Lecture Outline I. Building Blocks A. “Variables” are Entities that Can Assume DIFFERENT Values whereas “Constants” Have only ONE Value. 1. Height is.
Types of validity we will study for the Next Exam... internal validity -- causal interpretability external validity -- generalizability statistical conclusion.
ObservationsInferences vs.
An Examination of Science. What is Science Is a systematic approach for analyzing and organizing knowledge. Used by all scientists regardless of the field.
 Descriptive Methods ◦ Observation ◦ Survey Research  Experimental Methods ◦ Independent Groups Designs ◦ Repeated Measures Designs ◦ Complex Designs.
Aim: What factors must we consider to make an experimental design?
Graduate School for Social Research Autumn 2015 Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry socialinquiry.wordpress.com Causality.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent variable.
Political Science 30: The Grammar of Hypotheses Interested in interning with San Diego City Councilman Carl DeMaio? If so, contact Ingrid at
COMM 250 Agenda - Week 5 Housekeeping Hand Back: TP1, TP2 Shoot Rest of the Team Pictures Lecture / Class RAT2 RQs, Hypotheses IV, DV, & Operationalizations.
Political Science 30 Political Inquiry The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference To rent SPSS for a PC for $40, go to
Analytical Thinking What This Course Is About: Using Elements Of Social Science To Critically Examine American Society. Goal: Becoming “American Mythbusters”
Political Science 30 Political Inquiry Experiments.
Logic of Control & Sampling Chs. 4 & 6. The Case of the Surgeon… Test Group & Control Group (We need a comparison!) ▫Test Group=The subjects who receive.
Approaches to social research Lerum
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Political Science 30: The Grammar of Hypotheses
Sample Power No reading, class notes only
Introduction to Regression Analysis
The Logic of Scientific Causal Inference
Inference and Tests of Hypotheses
Political Science 30 Political Inquiry
Chapter 10 Causal Inference and Correlational Designs
Chapter 4: Studying Behavior
The Scientific Method and SCIENCE!!!!!!.
Psychology and Research Methods
Bi-variate #1 Cross-Tabulation
Detecting Causal Relations
DUET.
In other words the relationship between variables
Module 02 Research Strategies.
The Fundamentals of Political Science Research, 2nd Edition
In other words the relationship between variables
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
The Fundamentals of Political Science Research, 2nd Edition
Just What Is Science Anyway???
Control Tables March 7, 2011.
Scientific Variables.
In other words the relationship between variables
The Nature of Science How can you differentiate between science and non-science using the scientific method?
Association to Causation
Conducting Sociological Research
Chapter 1.1 – What is Science?
Tue 8-10, Period III, Jan-Feb 2018
Political Science 30: Political Inquiry
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 33
The Power of Observation and The Scientific Method
Power.
Political Science 30: Political Inquiry
What is science?.
Critical Appraisal วิจารณญาณ
Chapter 3 The Idea Of Causation on Social Research
8th Grade Science Content Strand 1 1a relates to all other objectives
Non-Experimental designs: Correlational & Quasi-experimental designs
Research Design Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry
Experiment Basics: Variables
Research Methods & Statistics
What is science? What is scientific inquiry?
Regression Part II.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 33
Research Method II Rules of Constructing Causal Theory
In other words the relationship between variables
Presentation transcript:

The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference Political Science 30 Political Inquiry The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

Lecture Outline Confounds and The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference Probabilistic vs. Deterministic Causality Four Criteria for Showing Causality

A confounding variable causes changes in the dependent variable is correlated with one of the independent variables is “causally prior” to that independent variable. Chronologically or logically, it comes first. Wealth Prior Current Revolution Health Revolution

The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference Problem. We cannot rerun history to see whether changing the value of an independent variable would have changed the value of the dependent variable. Solution #1. Give up.

The Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference Solution #2. Design your research in a way that comes as close as possible to rerunning history. Observe the effects of changes in one independent variable when all other independent variables remain the same, or Measure other independent variables, then use statistical techniques to hold them constant.

Probabilistic vs. Deterministic Causality (Definitions) “Probabilistic” means that when the values that an IV takes on increase, this usually results in the values of the DV increasing (or, usually, decreasing) “Deterministic” means that when the values that an IV takes on increase, this always results in the values of the DV increasing (or, always, decreasing)

Why Political Science is Satisfied with a Probabilistic Notion of Cause Like many other sciences that study complex systems, we care about necessary or sufficient causal factors that make an effect more likely, not just iron laws. More education more likely to vote. Cities that rely more on sales tax more likely to subsidize WalMarts Males of a species larger and more aggressive than females in a species

Four Criteria for Showing Causality #1 Temporal Ordering #2 Correlation #3 Causal Mechanism #4 Rule out Confounds

Criterion #1. Temporal Ordering The hypothesized cause (IV) must come before the effect (DV). Students decide whether or not to sit in the front of class before the get their final grade. Campaign contributions on the eve of an election can’t cause a Congresswoman’s voting record in the previous session. Political science has lots of tricky “chicken-and-egg” situations.

Criterion #2. Correlation Two variables are “correlated” when changes in one variable occur together with changes in the other (Louise White) Correlation is roughly synonymous with association and co-variance. A correlation between two variables can be positive or negative.

Criterion #3. Causal Mechanism You have to be able to tell a plausible story that connects the IV to the DV This story often includes an “intervening variable” that gets us from the IV to the DV Students who sit up front are able to hear better, see better, and better comprehend the lecture (plausible story) Students who sit up front of the class absorb more of my genius by osmosis (not plausible)

Criterion #4. Rule Out Confounds If there is a confound that is causally prior to both an IV and a DV, then the correlation we observe between the IV and the DV may be spurious. A possible confound is that more dedicated students are more likely to: a. sit up front, and b. perform well on the test. The observed correlation between their seating choice and their performance may be spurious.