VENNS DIAGRAM METHOD FOR TESTING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Advertisements

Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Part 2 Module 3 Arguments and deductive reasoning Logic is a formal study of the process of reasoning, or using common sense. Deductive reasoning involves.
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Euler’s circles Some A are not B. All B are C. Some A are not C. Algorithm = a method of solution guaranteed to give the right answer.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
PHIL 120: Jan 8 Basic notions of logic
Chapter 16: Venn Diagrams. Venn Diagrams (pp ) Venn diagrams represent the relationships between classes of objects by way of the relationships.
Logic In Part 2 Modules 1 through 5, our topic is symbolic logic. We will be studying the basic elements and forms that provide the structural foundations.
Introduction to Venn Diagrams SP This is a Venn diagram for two terms. We can conceive of every element of S as being within the boundary of the S circle.
Categorical Syllogisms
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
SORTING DATA VENN DIAGRAMS.
Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1, Unit 1C, Slide 1 Thinking Critically 1.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
Reasoning Top-down biases symbolic distance effects semantic congruity effects Formal logic syllogisms conditional reasoning.
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
4 Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Diagramming Universal-Particular arguments The simplest style of nontrivial argument is called a Universal-Particular argument. Earlier in Part 2 Module.
Chapter 17: Missing Premises and Conclusions. Enthymemes (p. 168) An enthymeme is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. There are systematic.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
McGraw-Hill ©2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 13 Applications of Venn Diagram.
Lesson 6 Parallel and Perpendicular lines
1 Thinking Critically Sets and Venn Diagrams.
The set of whole numbers less than 7 is {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}
Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
Deductive and Inductive REASONING
Testing for Validity with Venn Diagrams
SHORTER TRUTH TABLE METHOD OR REDUCTIO-AD-ABSURDUM
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Venn Diagrams 1= s that are not p; 2= s that are p; 3= p that are not s S P.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Predicate Logic Splitting the Atom.
Logic In Part 2 Modules 1 through 5, our topic is symbolic logic.
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
Diagramming Universal-Particular arguments
4 Categorical Propositions
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Section 3.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (2/2).
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

VENNS DIAGRAM METHOD FOR TESTING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY WOMEN’S COLLEGE, TINSUKIA A PRESENTATION BY DR. BUDUL CHANDRA DAS. ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY WOMEN’S COLLEGE, TINSUKIA TINSUKIA – 786125 ASSAM bcd.wc.tsk@gmail.com

CONCEPT OF CLASS IN VENN’S DIAGRAM INSIDE THE CIRLE WILL INDICATE THE CLASS OF “MEN” AND OUTSIDE OF IT WILL INDICATE THE CLASS OF “NON-MEN” IN VENN’S DIAGRAM CIRCLES REPRESENT CLASS AND MEN ONE CIRCLE REPRESENT TWO CLASSES NON-MEN LET THE ABOVE CIRCLE REPRESENT THE CLASS OF MEN THUS IT WILL REPRESENT TWO CLASSES “MEN” & “NON-MEN”

TWO OVERLAPPING CIRCLES WILL REPRESENT FOUR CLASSES USING “M” FOR “MUSICIAN” & “S” “SINGER” LET US CONSIDER THESE TWO CIRCLES REPRESENTING THE CLASSES OF “MUSICIAN” & “SINGER” Means Only Musician but Not-Singer M M S S Means Not-Musicians but Only Singer M but Not-S M but Not-S MS MS Not-M but S Not-M but S Neither M nor-S Neither M nor-S Who are both Musician & Singer THESE ARE THE 4 CLASSES THESE ARE THE 4 CLASSES Who are neither Musician nor Singer NOW THE FOUR CLASSES WILL BE

THREE OVERLAPPING CIRCLES WILL PRODUCE 8 (EIGHT) CLASSES A CLASS OF THOSE WHO ARE MUSICIAN SINGER & LYRICIST AT THE SAME TIME A CLASS OF THEM WHO ARE NITHER MUSICIAN NOR SINGER NOR LYRICIST MEANS WHO ARE MUSICIAN BUT NEITHER SINGER NOR LYRICIST MEANS WHO ARE SINGER BUT NEITHER MUSICIAN NOR LYRICIST MEANS WHO ARE MUSICIAN & SINGER BUT NOT LYRICIST MEANS WHO ARE LYRICIST & SINGER BUT NOT MUSICIAN M S M&S But Not-L S but neither M nor L M but neither S nor L MSL L&M But Not-S L&S But Not-M L but neither M norS Neither M nor L nor S L NOW THE PRODUCED 8 CLASSES ARE AS SHOWN LET THE CIRCLES REPRESENTING THE CLASSES ARE MUSICIAN (M), SINGER (S) & LYRICIST (L) MEANS WHO ARE LYRICIST & MUSICIAN BUT NOT SINGER MEANS WHO ARE LYRICIST & MUSICIAN BUT NOT SINGER MEANS WHO ARE LYRICIST & MUSICIAN BUT NOT SINGER MEANS WHO ARELYRICIST BUT NEITHER MUSICIAN NOR SINGER

THREE OVERLAPPING CIRCLES WILL PRODUCE 8 (EIGHT) CLASSES M S S but neither M nor L M&S But Not-L M but neither S nor L THESE ARE THE 8 CLASSES PRODUCED BY 3 OVERL-APPING CIRCLES MSL L&M But Not-S L&S But Not-M L but neither M norS Neither M nor L nor S L

Customary in venn’s diagram HORIZENTAL PARRALLEL LINES REPRESENTS X X - MARK REPRESENTS A “NON-EMTY CLASS” HORIZENTAL PARRALLEL LINES REPRESENTS “EMPTY CLASS”

Diagram of the 4 standard-form categorical propositions : "All Singers are Musician" A Proposition Symbolically : "All S are M S M MEANS THOSE ARE SINGER ARE ALSO MUSICIAN i.e. S but Not-M NOW THE PORTION WHICH IS OF SINGER BUT NOT OF MUSICIAN WILL BE EMPTY i.e. Thus the Venn's diagrammatic Equation for A-Proposition will be: ‾‾ SM=0

CAN NOT BE THE MEMBER OF THE CLASS OF MUSICIAN E Proposition : “No Singers are Musician" Symbolically : “ No S are M ” S M MEANS THOSE WHO ARE SINGER CAN NOT BE THE MEMBER OF THE CLASS OF MUSICIAN i.e. SM Thus the Venn's diagrammatic Equation for A-Proposition will be: SM = 0

X SM = 0 : “Some Singers are Musician" I Proposition : “Some Singers are Musician" Symbolically : “ Some S are M ” S M MEANS THERE ARE SOME MEMBERS WHO ARE SINGER & ALSO MUSICIAN THIS CLASS OF SINGER AND MUSICIAN WILL BE NON-EMPTY SM X Thus the Venn's diagrammatic Equation for I-Proposition will be: SM = 0

Diagram of the four standard-form categorical propositions A Proposition: "All Singers are Musician" or : "All S are M" SINGER MUSICIAN S but not-M

Diagram of or : “ No S are M" E Proposition: “ No Singers are Musician" or : “ No S are M" SINGER MUSICIAN S M

Diagram of I Proposition : “Some Singers are Musician" or : “Some S are M" MUSICIAN SINGER SM X VENNS DIAGRAM EQUATION FOR ‘O’ PROPOSITION : S M = O

Diagram of O Proposition : “Some Singers are not Musician" or : “Some S are not M" MUSICIAN SINGER X S but not- M VENNS DIAGRAM EQUATION FOR ‘O’ PROPOSITION : S M = O

TESTING A CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM Convert the argument as per equations Draw 3 overlapping circles Diagram the universal premise first Diagram the other premise See whether the diagram corresponds to what the conclusion asserts If so, the syllogism is valid; if not, it is invalid.

Testing a Categorical Syllogisms (A) All Singers are Musician (A) All Musician are Lyricist or (A) Therefore, All Lyricist are Musician (A) All S are M (A) All M are L or (A) Therefore, All L are M (A) S M = O M L = O (A) L M = O

L S M (A) S M = O (A) M L = O (A) L M = O DIAGRAM OF 1st PREMISE S L M 2nd PREMISE ( The Conclusion demanding portion) Not corresponding to the demand of the Conclusion. So, the argument is INVALID M

demand of the Conclusion. So, the argument is VALID ANOTHER ARGUMENT Some Reformers are Fanatics Some R are F R F = O All Reformers are Idealists All R are I R I = O Some Idealists are Fanatics Some I are F I F = O F I The Conclusion demanding portion FIR I F Diagram of the Universal proposition 1st FIR X Corresponds here the demand of the Conclusion. So, the argument is VALID R

THANKS TO ALL OF YOU