Safety and Reliability Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability and Safety Analysis. Abstract Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze Use the robot to generate an ASCII representation of the.
Advertisements

V i t a l i s ECE Spring 2013 TEAM 13 Presenter: Yi Shen Wireless Biometric Sensor Team Members: Aakash Lamba Di Mo Shantanu Joshi Yi Shen Reliability.
Reliability and Safety Analysis Team 12: Android Street Car Zongyang Zhu.
8. Failure Rate Prediction Reliable System Design 2011 by: Amir M. Rahmani.
Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister, Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips Group Nine Reliability and Safety Analysis DART.
RELIABILITY & SAFETY ANALYSIS PRESENTED BY: ANDREW BATEK Team # 15: Acoustic Storm Interweaving the impressive visual power of electricity and the visceral.
Team 13 John Ashmore, Brian Bell, Jason Giles, Jing Li.
ECE 477 R ELIABILITY & S AFETY A NALYSIS Team 5 – myATM Xue Yuan Wong.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
Technical Communication Skills Practicum (TCSP) Presented by Nuhairi & Azad Team 10: “Hazard Rover” 2/21/2007.
Kian Hui Wong Chia Siong Goh Wan Qi Choo Jun Jun Peh Presenter: Kian Hui Wong.
Pop’em Drop’em Robots TCSP #8 – Reliability & Safety Analysis Duncan Swartz.
P ROJECT PRINT TCSP 8 – R ELIABILITY & S AFETY A NALYSIS Team 8 – Siddharth Bhosale.
James Crosetto BS (Computer Science and Computer Engineering) Jeremy Ellison BS (Computer Science and Computer Engineering) Seth Schwiethale BS (Computer.
Team 13 Michael Stuckenschneider Loren Garby Arin Chakraverty Janell Niekamp.
Design Constraint Analysis Team KANG Group 1. Sentry Gun Design and build a turret and armature structure with the ability to detect, track and fire upon.
TCSP – Reliability and Safety. Reliability Analysis Major component chosen for analysis:Major component chosen for analysis: Switching Regulators (LM2679SD-5.0,
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Spring 2008 Alan BernsteinIan AlsmanIlya VeygmanDarshan Shah.
Reliability Analysis - Overview 4 main components considered Glove Micro - PIC24FJ128GA310 Base Micro - PIC18F87K90 3.3V Power Supply - CC3-0503SR-E 5V.
Solar Telematics System
Madalina Vintila David Wilkinson Michelle Zhang Zac Greenawalt.
Team 9 - Scribacious Rabble Safety and Reliability Analysis Mitchell Erdbruegger (presenting) Paul Rosswurm William Hess Ben Kobin.
RCD Laser System Corey Lane, Ryan Scott, Danny Barjum.
Grant Thomas Anthony Fennell Justin Pancake Chris McCord TABLEGAMES UNLIMITED.
Matt Waldersen (Presenting) TJ Strzelecki Rick Schuman Krishna Jharjaria.
Bryan McDonnel Michael Mize Ryan Taylor (presenter) Miles Whittaker
The “Drink Mixer” Reliability and SafetyAnalysis.
Team 5 Reliability & Safety TCSP. High Criticality = λ < Low Criticality = λ < High Criticality determined by constant vehicular movement.
Wall-E Prototype I TCSP #8 Safety and Reliability Analysis Team 1 Xin Jin Ranmin Chen Hang Xie Zelun Tie.
 Today we will cover:  Voltage regulators  Sensors  motordrivers iBOT1.
Home Enhancement Suite Presenter: Allen Humphreys William Bouchonnet, Daniel Sabo, Nathan Irvin.
Nathan Begle, Jiaqi Jiang, Chang Yoon Kim Presenter: Jordan Gaines.
Josh Marchi, Jeff King, Paul Rosenberger, Dan Chambers – RM&S Analysis–
Amey Rane Madhur Srivastava Tejas Pandit Varun Sivakumar.
(Left to Right) Matt Finn Brian Crone Samuel Oshin Yonatan Feleke.
 ACCELEROMETER  TRANSMITTER- BLOCK DIAGRAM  RECEIVER- BLOCK DIAGRAM  COMPONENTS DESCRIPTION- ENCODER TRANSMITTER RECEIVER OPTICAL SENSOR.
DOODLE DRIVE Presenter: Peachanok Lertkajornkitti Team 6 Reliability and Safety Analysis.
Team 3 ATV Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.
SWISH SLEEVE Safety and Reliability Analysis Stephen MacNeil, Michael Kobit, Sriharsh Achukola, Augustus Hong.
Railway Level Crossing Gate Operation Remotely by Android.
Arduino Based Industrial appliances control system by decoding dual tone multi frequency signals on GSM / CDMA network. Submitted by:
Autonomous Rescue Vehicle (Team 10)
FMECA chart April 12, 2006 The J Team Jennifer Tietz Jared Suttles
MIG 200P training manual Shanghai WTL Welding Equipment Manufacture Co.,Ltd March.2011.
Team 16 : Project Minotaur Presenter : John Hubberts
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 04  Spring 2010
Reliability and Safety Analysis
Field Effect Transistors (FETs)
Software Design Team KANG Group 1.
Remote Override of Traffic Signal in Emergency
Tracking Camera Platform
D.H.S. Digijock Home Security
ECE 477 Design Review Team 21 - Spring 2013
Safety and Reliability
Group 11.
ECE 477 Digital Systems Senior Design Project  Spring 2008
Reliability & Safety Analysis
Preliminary PCB Layout and Design: Team 16
Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
ECE 477 Senior Design Group 1  Spring 2008
Team We Ate 9 FMECA Worksheet.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 1  Spring 2008
Reliability and Safety Analysis
Dong-Han Ryu Yukeun Sim Shiv Biddanda Po-Cheng (Robert) Wang
The Two Wheel Deal Group 12 Greg Eakins Eric Geier Pete Dudash
Safety Analysis Ian Bacon Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Eric Yee.
Reliability & Safety Analysis
Team 2: Bluetooth Mass Storage Device
(Shock Absorber Tester)
Presentation transcript:

Safety and Reliability Analysis Team KANG Group 1

10.22 Failures/Million hours MTTF 9.78E4 hours ~ 11.2 years MC9S12XD Microcontroller Reliability Analysis λp = (C1πT + C2πE)πQπL (Microcircuit Model) Parameter Value Justification / Assumptions C1 0.280 16 Bit Microprocessor, MOS ([1], Section 5.1) C2 0.077 144 Pin, Nonhermetic SMT Packaging, Value determined by interpolation ([1], Section 5.9) πT 3.1 Digital MOS Device Assumptions: TJ=125C. ([1], Section 5.8) πE 2.0 Ground Fixed Environment ([1], Section 5.10) πQ 10.0 Commercial Component ([1], Section 5.10) πL 1.0 Years in Production >= 2 ([1], Section 5.10) λp 10.22 Failures/Million hours MTTF 9.78E4 hours ~ 11.2 years

Justification / Assumptions GAL26CV12 PLD Reliability Analysis λp = (C1πT + C2πE)πQπL (Microcircuit Model) Parameter Value Justification / Assumptions C1 .0017 PLA, 1000 Gates, MOS ([1], Section 5.1) C2 .013 28 Pin, Nonhermetic DIP Packaging ([1], Section 5.9) πT 3.1 Digital MOS Device Assumptions: TJ=125C. ([1], Section 5.8) πE 2.0 Ground Fixed Environment ([1], Section 5.10) πQ 10.0 Commercial Component ([1], Section 5.10) πL 1.0 Years in Production >= 2 ([1], Section 5.10) λp .3127 Failures/ Million hours MTTF 3.20E6 hours ~ 365.1 years

Justification / Assumptions TIP122 (Darlington NPN Expitaxial Transistor) Reliability Analysis λp = λbπTπAπQπE (Transistor Model) Parameter Value Justification / Assumptions λb .012 NPN, Si MOSFET ([1], Section 6.4) πT 5.1 Assumptions: TJ=125C. ([1], Section 6.4) πA 4.0 Power MOSFET, Assumption: PR = 6 V * 6 A = 30 W ([1], Section 6.4) πQ 8.0 Assumption: Plastic (worst case scenario) ([1], Section 6.4) πE 6.0 Ground Fixed Environment ([1], Section 6.4) λp 11.75 Failures/Million hours MTTF 8.51E4 hours ~ 9.7 years

MAX3232 Level Translator Reliability Analysis λp = (C1πT + C2πE)πQπL (Microcircuit Model) Parameter Value Justification / Assumptions C1 0.040 Linear MOS, 399 Transistor count ([1], Section 5.1) C2 0.072 16 Pin, Nonhermetic SMT Packaging ([1], Section 5.9) πT 0.98 Linear MOS Device Assumptions: TJ= 85C. ([1], Section 5.8) πE 2.0 Ground Fixed Environment ([1], Section 5.10) πQ 10.0 Commercial Component ([1], Section 5.10) πL 1.0 Years in Production >= 2 ([1], Section 5.10) λp 1.83 Failures/Million hours MTTF 5.46E5 hours ~ 62.3 years

Safety Analysis – FUNCTIONAL BLOCKS A. Microcontroller B. Sensors C. Fire Control D. Motor Control/Motor Driver E. User Interface F. Video G. RAM H. Power

F D E C A B H G

Levels of Criticality Criticality Failure Effect Maximum Probability Low Device stops functioning or is damaged, but reparable p ≥ 10-6 High Irreparable damage to the device and harm to user p ≤ 10-9

Failure No. Failure Mode Possible Causes Failure Effects Method of Detection Criticality Remark A1 MCU Failure Short of bypass caps Failure of MCU Unpredictability of MCU Dead MCU Human Damage Observation High Can be lethal to humans B1 Failure of friendly Detection Failure of IR Transmitter or Receiver Gun functions as if everything is enemy Friendlies get shot once motion sensor is tripped in auto-mode B2 Failure of Enemy Detection Failure of Motion Sensors Enemy not detected, user at harms way C1 Gun shoots unpredictably TIP122 failure MCU failure User harm Friendly can get shot even if IR remote works D2 Unpredictable motion of gun Failure of GAL Gun can move to friendly and shoot

Failure No. Failure Mode Possible Causes Failure Effects Method of Detection Criticality Remark D4 Unpredictable motion of camera Failure of driver Failure of GAL Video Alg run where the camera moves Enemy Evades Observation High E1 User Interface communication failure MAX3232 failure Shorted bypass Manual override failure H3 AC line failure Bad power splitting Shorted PCB Device will be irreparable

Questions?