GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Advertisements

Use of Mechanistic Modeling to Enhance Derivation of Great Bay TN Criteria and Inform Restoration Strategy Thomas W. Gallagher,
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
ANTIDEGRADATON and NITROGEN IN GREAT BAY Paul Currier, P.E., P.G. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services NHEP Technical Advisory Committee.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
New Hampshire Estuaries Project September 30, 2005 Estuarine Nutrient Criteria Presentation to New Hampshire Estuaries Project Technical Advisory Committee.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
Nutrient Standards – Where will they lead? OWEA / WEF Webinar February 24, 2011 Dan Dudley, Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water.
Nutrient Criteria for New Hampshire’s Estuaries Background Information Phil Trowbridge NH DES / NHEP September 30, 2005.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
Florida Numerical Nutrient Criteria Southwest Florida Water Resources Conference Scott I. McClelland Vice President November 20, 2009.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Great Bay Municipal Coalition New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association June 13, 2013 Dean Peschel Peschel Consulting
Proposed Nutrient Criteria for NH’s Estuaries Philip Trowbridge, P.E. NH Estuaries Project / NH DES November 17, 2008.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Rhode Island Estuarine Waters CHRP/Managers Meeting October 8, 2009.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
Nutrient Criteria Development Update Emily McArdle Nutrient Criteria Coordinator | Water Quality Standards Group
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Canal Restoration Regulatory Background The Clean Water Act, an introduction: Basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into U.S. waters,
Innovative Data Management and Planning Strategies for TMDL Compliance
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Nutrient Benchmark Development
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Great Salt Lake Water Quality Strategy Update
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Phosphorus and Suspended Solids TMDL For the Lower Fox River/Green Bay Area of Concern – Putting the Pieces Together Bud Harris, P. Sager, D. Scheberle,
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Criteria and their Assessment:
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
TOWARDS THE GOAL OF SETTING NUTRIENT CRITERIA FOR THE DELAWARE ESTUARY
Request for Approval to Proceed to Public Hearing on the Triennial Review of Surface Water Quality Standards.
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Marco island water quality monitoring
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Southeast Watershed Alliance March 9, 2011 Paul M. Currier, PE,PG Watershed Management Bureau NH Department of Environmental Services

WQS Essentials Purpose: “…provide for the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife…” WATER QUALITY STANDARDS are STATE law and rule EPA reviews and approves the standards for consistency with the federal CLEAN WATER ACT THREE COMPONENTS Designated Uses [aquatic life / biological integrity, recreation, and others] Criteria to support the Uses [Measurable attributes of a waterbody] Antidegradation Little Bay October 2001 - Chris Nash

KINDS OF CRITERIA NARRATIVE [“Class B waters shall contain no phosphorus or nitrogen in such concentrations that would impair any existing or designated uses, unless naturally occurring.”] NUMERIC […“class B waters shall have a dissolved oxygen content of at least 75% of saturation, based on a daily average, and an instantaneous minimum dissolved oxygen concentration of at least 5 mg/l.”]

Biological Integrity Narrative “The surface waters shall support and maintain a balanced, integrated, and adaptive community of organisms having a species composition, diversity, and functional organization comparable to that of similar natural habitats of a region” [e.g. Eelgrass cover is a measure of this in the Great Bay Estuary; a macroinvertebrate Index of Biological Integrity is a measure of this in wadeable streams]

Important Points NARRATIVE criteria must be TRANSLATED into quantitative terms to be used for ASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT means evaluating WATERBODIES to see if criteria are met for a particular designated use Collecting data [sampling / monitoring] Analyzing the data in a standardized way Comparing the analysis to WQS criteria The CALM [Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology]: a compendium of protocols for monitoring and analysis of data from waterbodies to produce assessments (on the DES website) Contains TRANSLATORS for narrative criteria

ASSESSMENT: Application of Criteria Statewide waterbody catalog Assessment Units [=Waterbodies]: Homogeneous pieces of surface water that can be monitored / assessed as one unit Statewide assessment every 2 years “305(b) report” and “303(d) list : FOR EACH ASSESSMENT UNIT, Assemble all relevant data, apply the CALM, and report whether or not criteria for the designated uses are met Result can be: FULLY SUPPORTING,NOT SUPPORTING, OR INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION / NOT ASSESSED 2010 report is on the web Report Cards on ONESTOP for surface water AUs

303(d) LIST A list of ASSESSMENT UNITS that are IMPAIRED [= flunk one or more criteria] by POLLUTANTS Pollutants: things like nutrients, BOD, TSS, temperature, toxics PROCESS Identify pollutants [sometimes need stressor analysis] Do a TMDL [Total Maximum Daily Load] study to: Estimate maximum pollutant load that will meet WQS Allocate the load between point sources (Wasteload Allocation) and nonpoint sources (Load Allocation) Prepare and carry out a TMDL implementation plan

NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEFINITION Numeric nutrient criteria define levels of nutrients (i.e., nitrogen and phosphorus) protective of the designated uses of water bodies from over-enrichment Over-enrichment of water bodies by nitrogen and phosphorus typically stimulates plant and microbial growth, and can result in biological and physical responses that adversely affect water quality and aquatic life. The USEPA guidance recommends development of criteria for both total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP), the primary causal constituents, and for chlorophyll a and water clarity, the primary response constituents FROM: Empirical Approaches to Establishing Numeric Nutrient Criteria for Southwest Florida Estuaries, Janiki Environmental, Inc, July 10, 2010

Figure 1: Assessment Zones in the Great Bay Estuary From DES’ nutrient criteria report

EXAMPLE: Oyster River

Oyster River Aquatic Life Impairments (2010 assessment) Chlorophyll – A [annual median > 10 ug/l] Dissolved Oxygen Saturation [daily mean < 75%] Estuarine Bioassessments [eelgrass loss] Light Attenuation Coeff. [Kd <0.75(depth dependent)] Nitrogen (total) [Annual median < 0.30 mg/l] Oxygen, dissolved [instantaneous min. < 5 mg/l] Note: although these criteria are all monitored and assessed separately, there are Significant interactions among them.

IMPORTANT POINT The Great Bay estuary is not homogeneous. Each assessment unit has an individual assessment and will need an individual TMDL and implementation plan. NPDES permits will utilize best available information Water Quality Standards Translators / CALM TMDLs [but permits won’t wait for them] Any other pertinent information

CURRENT STATUS “Nutrient Criteria” [really translators for nitrogen, chl-a, and Kd] published June, 2009 Most Great Bay estuary AUs have been assessed for aquatic life as of 2010 assessment, and are listed as impaired for aquatic life due to nutrient criteria N-STEPS peer review completed Draft “Analysis of Nitrogen Loading Reductions…” published Dec, 2010 Load Allocation study in progress Discussions underway about additional review Stressor analysis [sometimes called cause and effect analysis] Nannie Island, 2001 Chris Nash