Report back: Group 2 Teaching, Learning & Technology (TLT) Area 2: T&L.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Advertisements

The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
What is the relationship between the HE qualifications framework and quality assurance? Stephen Adam, June 2011.
Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
The CeQuInt Assessment Frameworks Axel Aerden & Maria E. Weber.
Educational Teams: Variation at McGill Teaching in a different way Lynn McAlpine McGill University Canada
Alexandria, 2005 NQAAC Quality Assurance and Accreditation for Higher Education Dr. Salwa EL Magoli National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee.
Facilitators: Janet Lange and Bob Munn
University of the West of England, Bristol of the West of England Quality Assurance in the UK Stephen Ryrie Associate.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Partnership between the NYCI, the Health Service Executive and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs National Youth Health Programme Kevin O’ Hagan.
Skilling SA in the Context of Ageing Raymond Garrand Chief Executive, DFEEST.
Professor Dolina Dowling
Sharifah Hapsah Shahabudin Vice Chancellor 11 th Malaysian Education Summit 2007 Malaysian Education: Winning in the Global Race 11 th Malaysian Education.
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
Concepts related to the quality of learning at university (from Entwistle et al., 2002).
Re-accreditation Workshop Private Higher Education Institutions 6 August 2008.
January 28,  112 Participating Teachers—up from 94  53 Support Providers  Program Assessment  New EL Standards.
1 Governance: L&T Faculty L&T committee (QE) –Chair L&T committee of each Department –Director, Students –Representative of LTC –BESS coordinator –Associate.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Dolina Dowling December 2010 Presentations 2, 3 1
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Council on Higher Education: Annual Report Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 12 October 2010.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
CHE Business Plan Mission The mission of the CHE is to contribute to the development of a higher education system that is characterised by.
Comité de deuda pública Public Debt Committee Strategic Plan Presented by Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada.
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Checklist of quality aspects The checklist is intended to aid subpanels when reading self-evaluation reports and formulating questions for the site visit.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
1 UST Support for Institutional Effectiveness: Information for Academic OA Plan Writers.
Better Benchmarking: A discussion on what works and what could work better Ben Daniel (HEDC) Judy Fisher (Library) Simon Hart (Library) Emerson Pratt (ITS)
Cooperative Education Unit PGCHE Class 2016 Sophia Shuungula and Martha Namutuwa Industry Liaison Officers 19 May 2016.
Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion The HEQC Audit 23 January 2006.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Denise Chalmers HERDSA 2017, Sydney 28 June, 2017
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
STRATEGIC HR PLANNING.
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
External Verification Report 2014/15
The strategy for lifelong learning
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Report back: Group 3 Deliverables Area 2: Programme Management
The UKPSF and the HEA Fellowship scheme
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
The Policy Support Instrument Early Experience

QPO Facilitated Faculty Led Institutional Review
External Examiner Reports
Tools for Assessing readiness of member organization
February 21-22, 2018.
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY
Cyclical Program Review
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Follow up workshop on the Evaluation of AUT STEM Programme
Presented by Planning & Research
Presentation transcript:

Report back: Group 2 Teaching, Learning & Technology (TLT) Area 2: T&L

Overall comment Teaching, Learning & Technology

Overall comment Lots of information but lack of evidence re: evidence of unique ways to impact on HE environment clarity on initiatives launched to stimulate a vibrant intellectual culture institutional incubators 4 new ideas examples of institutional success stories Limited analysis of information Limited benchmarking Limited plans (strategies) for improvements What they say about T&L in their mission statement is not portrayed in the portfolio Teaching, Learning & Technology

Additional information Clarification required Teaching, Learning & Technology

Additional information or clarification Staff development strategy & policy Workplace skills plan Assessment tool 4 lecturer performance & improvement plan Annual training report Annual enrolment plan Selection criteria 4 students Implementation report Foundation programmes Teaching, Learning & Technology

Key lines of enquiry Teaching, Learning & Technology

Key lines of enquiry Profile of student intake Selection processes Definition of graduation and success rates Integration of the development of the academic managers and leaders Impact studies on strategies implemented Mentorship strategy? Succession planning? How do they know their graduates are sought after in the market? Teaching, Learning & Technology

What to pursue & who to interview @ site visit Teaching, Learning & Technology

What to pursue & who to interview Students – Library & technology service? Students and lecturers w r t utilistaion of technology in classroom etc New inducted lecturers Deans and HOD’s re implementation of staff development policy Training manager re policies and strategies Skills development facilitator Previously disadvantaged students re support & experience Teaching, Learning & Technology

Other comments Teaching, Learning & Technology

Other comments Congratulations on acknowledging weaknesses in policies and procedures eg central academic development unit Need for specific action plans to address it Improve benchmarking Employment equity strategy - maintain quality Invest in a strategy to become a learning institution in stead of being an institution of learning Improve data capturing, stats analysis and reporting Improve tracking systems and interventions (staff & students) Teaching, Learning & Technology

Criterion 3 The arrangements for the quality assurance of and support for teaching & learning enhance quality and allow for its continuous monitoring Teaching, Learning & Technology

Institution’s submission Audit portfolio analysis – confidential  Institution’s submission Auditor comments Information provided Information missing A B Teaching, Learning & Technology

Criterion 4 Academic support services adequately support teaching and learning needs and help give effect to teaching and learning objectives Teaching, Learning & Technology

Institution’s submission Audit portfolio analysis – confidential  Institution’s submission Auditor comments Information provided Information missing A B Teaching, Learning & Technology