Connecting Freight and Land Use Planning Through a Regional Freight Priority Network Christine Sherman, RSG Wednesday, May 17, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
URBAN FREIGHT Getting kicked to the curb?. How will we live?
Advertisements

Cobb County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Board of Commissioners Briefing January 22, 2008.
Talking Freight Seminars November 19, 2008 Caroline A. Mays, AICP Atlanta Regional Commission Integrating Freight and Land Use in the Atlanta Region.
Dubai Government Policies for Enhancing the Competitiveness of Multimodal Transportation and Logistics Cluster June 2014.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Talking Freight April 15, General Themes Seen in Reauthorization Proposals/Positions Defining a federal role in freight and goods movement given.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Infrastructure – Mission to Preserve & Renew. Infrastructure – Transportation funding must be sufficient to both repair and sometimes replace our highway,
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
FREIGHTSUPPORTIVE LAND USE PLANNINGGUIDELINESFREIGHTSUPPORTIVE PLANNINGGUIDELINES FHWA Talking Freight Series May 18/05 Video Seminar on Context Sensitive.
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board December 6th, 2013 Ashley Probart Deputy Director Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board Primary Freight.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
Project Overview I – 70 Dedicated Truck Lanes Update: 3/19/2008 For FHWA Talking Freight Webinar Keith J. Bucklew Indiana Dept. of Transportation.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Regional Visions: 50-Year Transportation Demand Modeling Florida Model Task Force Meeting December 13, 2006.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
Summary of the WILMAPCO Congestion Management Process Prepared for T3 Webinar September 18, 2007.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Global Solution for Local Problems: Atlanta Aerotropolis 2014 AMPO Conference October 23, 2014 Nancey Green Leigh, PhD, FAICP Professor and Associate Dean.
Office of Freight Management and Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C FHWA Freight Intermodal.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
MAP 21 Freight Talking Freight December 14, 2011 Leo Penne AASHTO.
Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
Congestion Management Process / Performance Measures Report
Hennepin County Freight Study Committee
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Intermodal Freight Program Coordinator
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
IndyMPO Regional Freight Plan
Performance-Based Planning:
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Performance-Based Planning:
Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Southern California Transportation Outlook to the year 2040
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
Truck parking – analytical challenges
Neighborhood Pedestrian Fatality Risk
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC EXPANSION
Florida’s Multimodal Mobility Performance Measures Program
VicRoads – Movement & Place
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS.
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Texas FREIGHT AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE: FREIGHT MOBILITY & border master planS 1st Annual Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Management & Planning Conference.
Draft OKI Prioritization Process
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
VicRoads – Movement & Place
2016 SCORT Annual Meeting Federal Grant Opportunities
Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2
Laurie Leffler, Division Administrator
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Design Criteria CTC 440.
MPO Board Presentation
Webinar: Responding to the FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures:
Presentation transcript:

Connecting Freight and Land Use Planning Through a Regional Freight Priority Network Christine Sherman, RSG Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Overview Study Area/Regional Freight & Goods Movement Plan Objectives for Freight Priority Network Freight-Related Land Use Methodology & Typologies Freight Priority Network Methodology & Typologies Recommendations Performance Measures Freight & Land Use Toolbox Future Application

The Capital District Transportation Committee (CDTC) CDTC (Albany) Regional Freight Network Serves local businesses and residents Is a gateway to/from Canadian markets via the I-87 corridor Provides access to/from global markets via the Port of Albany and Albany Intl. Airport Includes diverse freight centers: Manufacturing Warehousing Transportation Natural resources COUNTIES: Albany Rensselaer Saratoga Schenectady

CDTC Regional Projections

The CDTC Regional Freight and Goods Movement Plan Targeted to assess the state of freight infrastructure and trends in the region and develop recommendations for investment Plan Development Phases: Stakeholder Engagement Data Collection/Organization Review/Analysis of Existing Conditions, Trends, Forecasts Identification of Gaps & Needs Recommendations

The CDTC Regional Freight and Goods Movement Plan Targeted to assess the state of freight infrastructure and trends in the region and develop recommendations for investment Plan Development Phases: Stakeholder Engagement Data Collection/Organization Review/Analysis of Existing Conditions, Trends, Forecasts Identification of Gaps & Needs Recommendations INCLUDED: Review & Revision of the Region’s “Freight Priority Network”

Objectives for a Revised Freight Priority Network (FPN) Identify critical freight highway infrastructure in the region using a quantitative, repeatable method → FPN classification Incorporate land use into the methodology Examine the existing conditions of the FPN Analyze trends/forecasts that may impact the FPN Develop performance measures related to the FPN Highlight and prioritize freight infrastructure for improvements and investment

FPN Methodology Incorporating Land Use 1 Identify Critical Freight-Related Land Uses 2 Identify Critical Freight-Related Infrastructure 3 Develop an Integrated Network that Highlights Critical Infrastructure to Assist in Project/Program Planning and Prioritization

Freight-Related Land Use Methodology Analysis of major freight-related facilities in the region Analysis of freight-supported businesses in the region

Freight-Related Land Use Typologies REGIONAL GATEWAY Large freight facilities National/international cargo Ready access to major freight routes REGIONAL DISTRIB. HUB Large warehouses, logistics facilities Truck/rail movements Ready access to major freight routes MANUFACTURING CENTER Major manufacturer(s) Specialized freight movement Ready access to suppliers/shippers SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL CENTER Cluster(s) of retailers May include large retailers/consumer services Adjacent to high volume roadways URBAN CORE Multiple shippers/receivers in compact area Interface of logistics with bikes/pedestrians Minimal parking

Freight Priority Network Methodology Analysis of NYSDOT truck count data Review of National Highway System (NHS) designation requirements Use of example sources of truck route designation FHWA’s “Freight Story 2008” (8,500 trucks per day) LA Metro’s Los Angeles County Strategic Goods Movement Arterial Plan (500-750 trucks per day) 2009 Southeastern Massachusetts MPO (400 trucks per day or 5% of total traffic) Assessment of the interaction of the CDTC regional system’s freight-related infrastructure and land uses

Freight Priority Network Typologies MAJOR ROUTES Access-Controlled 4,000+ AADTT All Interstates 15%+ Truck Traffic % MINOR ROUTES Major & Minor Arterials 3,000+ AADT 1,000+ AADTT 15%+ Truck Traffic % Connects to Regional Gateway, Regional Dist. Hub, Manufacturing Ctr. CONNECTOR ROUTES Minor Arterials & Collectors 100-1,000 AADTT 15%+ Truck Traffic % Connects to: Regional Gateway AADTT = Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic AADT = Annual Average Daily Traffic (All Vehicles)

LAND USE FPN Comprehensive Overview of the Region’s Key Freight Facilities and Infrastructure

Example Recommendations PROJECTS NS Intermodal Facility Access Improvements NY 67 Modernization I-87 Exit 16 Overpass Replacement Freemans Bridge Road Grade Crossing Separation Port Truck Parking Expansion PROGRAMS Public Official Training and Model Ordinance Development Truck Stop Restoration FPN Bridge Improvement Prioritization Interstate Lighting Program Capital Region ITS CVO Enhancement

Performance Measures Infrastructure–Bridges: Percent Good/Fair/Poor bridges on the FPN Infrastructure–Pavement: Appropriate pavement metrics (IRI) on the FPN Safety: Number of fatal and serious injury CVO crashes on the FPN Mobility: Vehicle-hours of delay applied to truck percentage Reliability: Planning Time Index and/or Travel Time Index (measure variability in travel time on a given facility over time) Environmental Impact: Freight-related emissions and energy consumption (mainly modeled) Shipping Mode: Tonnage and value shipped by each mode in region by year

Freight & Land Use Toolbox REGULATORY TOOLS PLANNING TOOLS Road Use Agreements Local Truck Routes Community Benefit Agreements Freight Overlay Districts Light & Noise Pollution Controls Special Tax Districts Other Local Policy Approaches Freight-related Traffic Impact Analysis Off-peak Delivery Programs Vegetated Buffer Zones Freight Clusters Collaborate Crossing Improvements FPN-Centric Growth Industrial Infill Incentives Delivery Consolidation Programs

Future Applications Methodology in place for CDTC to use in future planning efforts and studies Framework for periodic review of: Freight-related facilities and businesses NYSDOT traffic counts and CVO traffic counts Conditions on FPN roadways (e.g., bridges, pavements, crashes)

Questions? ?

Contacts CHRISTINE SHERMAN www.rsginc.com CONSULTANT Christine.Sherman@rsginc.com 240.283.0635 www.rsginc.com