SMR 21/09/2017 P. Fessia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CFS TIME SCHEDULE EDR - CFS Europe – Kick-Off Meetings Kick-Off Meetings, CERN, 3, 4, 5 September ILC PROJECT ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT CFS Europe.
Advertisements

ITIL: Service Transition
GDE Meeting B Barish 16-Aug-05 The GDE – who, what and how? The BCD – what is it? Internal Organization toward BCD What do we want out of Snowmass? How.
Information Technology Project Management – Fourth Edition
Chapter Thirteen Maintaining and Upgrading a Network.
1 | 3GPP2 TSG-X Discussion | December GPP2 X R1 TITLE: TITLE: M2M Deployment Scenarios for 3GPP2SOURCE Mike Dolan, Alcatel-Lucent,
Field Questions. –Asked by sub or GC when discrepancy in construction docs or existing site conditions Design change verification request Field information.
Process Protocol Demonstrator Implementation of the Process Protocol at the Britannia Walk Development Stuart Carmichael Process Network 7 March 2002.
HL-LHC Configuration Management Keywords : HW Baseline, Naming, Parameters, Layout DB, Change Control The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC)
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Configuration Management QMS Training.
R2E Report M. Brugger for the R2E Study Group RadWG Meeting, August 20 th 2009.
Microsoft Project – Tutorial 4 Leveling Overallocations In some cases, a resource could be assigned more work in a given time period than it has working.
CLIC Project breakdown structure: organization, documentation and cost estimate Beam Instrumentation Workshop, June 2-3, 2009 CLIC Project breakdown structure:
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Configuration Management and Change Control Change is inevitable! So it has to be planned for and managed.
Mobility Management in 16m System Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/780r3 Date Submitted: Source: Yanling Lu, Luciano Sarperi, Mythri Hunukumbure,
R2E Mitigation Project P5 Relocation Options - Discussion R2E Mitigation Project CMS Relocation Options Towards An R2E Baseline 1 M. Brugger for the R2E.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Integrated Change Control 1 MEC-8. Processing of a Change Processing of a Change 2 Assess Impact within KA Change Request Implemented Change Create a.
MVC WITH CODEIGNITER Presented By Bhanu Priya.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Project Breakdown Structure Tracing changes to our different baselines I. Bejar Alonso and Project Office TCC – 14 th January 2016.
Proposal for rerouting of buried electrical networks and optical fibres at Point 1 LS2 Committee meeting S. Bertolasi on behalf on EN/EL WP17.2 HL-LHC.
WP 17.1 Civil Engineering Platform height / vs option Status on M. Manfredi on behalf of WP17.1 team.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
ITIL: Service Transition
East Area Renovation Project Team meeting # 2 – EDMS News
Conventional Facility & Siting (CF&S) Overview for the Positron Source
CONS and HL-LHC day Analysis of needs from BE-CO
TC activities.
Completion and Pre-Exploitation Costs for the Initial ATLAS Detector
Managing the Project Lifecycle
PS-CT: ERD-2 switch tank harmonization
Equipment simplified model SMR UR safety
Risk Identification HL-LHC Detector Upgrades Project
Integration Management
Installation of an Instrument on a CERN machine
Chapter 18 Maintaining Information Systems
Document Plan & Milestones WP7
Software Configuration Management
Accelerator and Experiment Interface Session: LS2, LS3
Y. Muttoni - J.P. Corso TS Workshop Archamps
LS2 LHC forward experiments
A very first look at siting issues
Current Status Future Progress Monitoring
FEASIBILITY STUDY Feasibility study is a means to check whether the proposed system is correct or not. The results of this study arte used to make decision.
Tracking time spent here with us today WO# Task code: 886
Overview & baseline of LS2 and roadmap for CRG
Francesco Forti University and INFN, Pisa
The DBD: Outline and Scope
Mastering Change Control
Benoît DAUDIN (GS-AIS-PM – CERN) 22-March-2012
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, 2004.
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF –NM (Process Reengineering & Optimization of O&M Functions for New Mexico) Phase II.
Key Value Indicators (KVIs)
DSC Governance Sub Group Recommendations
SD5953 Successful Project Management STATUS TRACKING & REPORTING
START OF REVISION OF UR TUNNEL INTEGRATION
Experimental Internet Resource Allocations
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
HL-LHC Quality management
HL-LHC - WP15 modifications Coffrets Prise C4L8
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
ECR on pole order of the HL-LHC IT circuit and resulting implications
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
Information system analysis and design
Presentation transcript:

SMR 21/09/2017 P. Fessia

General SMR status 11 SMRs created Published in https://espace.cern.ch/HiLumi/WP15/Lists/List_SMR/AllItems.aspx Basics of Space Modification Request It shall be generated when the installation volume, allocated in the baseline to an equipment/system, shall be changed and that such change has an impact on other WP/systems/infrastructure. In specific cases, it could be used to track changes also if changes do not impact other WP/systems/infrastructure SMR summarizes the Reasons of changes The list of changes The impact on cost and planning in particular focusing on project cost and schedule variance (also putting in evidence limitations of damages in case the variation is adopted) Responsibility: the WP asking for the space allocation change. Integration can be exceptionally responsible in very complex cases, but normally it is not Responsible shall find the information in due time and keep the document updated When approved by the Project Office triggers the HL-ECR Aim to make it easer and faster to get to the HL-ECR. To be seen if the objective is reached

Status N object 2 UL displacement P5 3 UL displacement P1 4 Underground infrastructure P1 5 Underground infrastructure P5 6 PM17 infrastructures 7 PM57 infrastructure 8 SD57 cryo routing under floor 9 Technical galleries and HL building interfaces P5 10 11 Modification loading carrying structure SD 17 and SD metallic structure 12 Modification loading carrying structure SD 57 and SD metallic structure

UL SMR The reasons

It is proposed to change move the cores of 4 m toward the LHC arc . Proposed change It is proposed to change move the cores of 4 m toward the LHC arc . This impacts civil engineering, cable routing path and the QXL path. Impact on the LHC infrastructure removal. (This impact is there as soon as we move of 1 m) WP6a estimate that 4 m are enough to cover all possible future needs In addition the UL of the left side is moved of other 2 m (not the cores only the UL) to make fully symmetric the QXL installation around the IP

What is asked today? As SMB would like to move ahead on sound basis for the discussions with the consultant. They ask the release of this necessary change in order to proceed If the approval is granted we will modify the SMR into ECR and we will proceed for its formal approval