Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
Structural design of EuCARD2 magnets
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
Some considerations and back-of-the-envelope computations on the multipole correctors Giovanni Volpini, CERN, 7 March 2013.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
ASC 2014Nb 3 Sn Block Coil Dipoles for a 100 TeV Hadron Collider – G. Sabbi 1 Performance characteristics of Nb 3 Sn block-coil dipoles for a 100 TeV hadron.
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 26-28, 2006Gian Luca Sabbi HQ Design Study (WBS ) LARP Collaboration Meeting April 26-28, 2006 N. Andreev, E.
New options for the new D1 magnet Qingjin Xu
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
D2 CONFIGURATIONS P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova  Starting from previous studies done at CERN, BNL and BLNL, possile cross sections of D2 dipole.
ECC Clément Lorin – Maria Durante Acknowledgements: Fresca2 team.
E. Todesco INTERACTION REGION MAGNETS E. Todesco On behalf of the WP3 collaboration CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CERN, 27 th October 2015.
4th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting D2 Design, Status, Plan P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova Presented by E.Todesco (CERN)  INFN Genova is.
Case study 1 : Quadrupole for Hi-Lumi LHC upgrade CAS Erice 2013 Group 1B A. Shornikov, T. Spina, Y. Arimoto, P. V. Gade, K. Brodzinski.
Cosine-theta configurations for S.C. Dipole Massimo Sorbi on behalf of: INFN LASA & Genova Team Giovanni Bellomo, Pasquale Fabbricarore, Stefania Farinon,
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Protection heater design for MQXF outer layer *Using long Super- Heating Stations for ensuring quenhces at low currents* Tiina Salmi, Tampere.
Comparison of magnet designs from a circuit protection point of view Arjan Verweij, CERN, TE-MPE with input from M. Prioli, R. Schmidt, and A. Siemko A.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
MQXFS1 Protection heater delays vs. Simulations 9 May 2016 Tiina Salmi, Tampere university of technology Acknowledgement: Guram Chlachidze (FNAL), Emmanuele.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
HO correctors update Massimo Sorbi and Marco Statera
16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis
Summary of FCC Week – Magnets
Protection of FCC 16 T dipoles
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
Segreti, Lorin, Durante 11 July 2017
At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders,
16 T Nb3Sn block dipole EuroCirCol
CERN-INFN, 23 Febbraio 2017 Stato del programma 16 T Davide Tommasini.
Cosq configuration - Mechanics
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
Quench protection of the MAGIX high-order correctors
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
Naoyuki Amemiya Kyoto University
HTS/LTS Hybrid Test Results and Common Coil Design Update
FCC-hh 16 T, 1.9 K INFN Team October 2015.
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
D2 and Q4 orbit corrector status
Block design status EuroCirCol
16T Cosθ Dipole Configuration
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
MQXF coil cross-section status
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
HL-LHC IR Corrector Magnets Conceptual Design & Construction Activity
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

EuroCircol – The Cosine-theta Configuration: Electromagnetic Design Ver. 2.1 Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team: Giovanni Bellomo, Barbara Caiffi, Pasquale Fabbricatore, Stefania Farinon, Vittorio Marinozzi, Giovanni Volpini Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

Main design parameters Magnetic design Protection Outline: Main design parameters Magnetic design Protection Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

Constraints for the magnet design 1.1 Main design parameters Constraints for the magnet design Bore inner diameter 50 mm Beam distance 250 mm Bore nominal field 16 T Operating temperature 1.9 K Oper. point on the load line (with “self field”) ≤86 % Strand number per cable ≤60 Cable insulation thickness 0.15 mm Cu/NCu ≥0.8 Field harmonics (geometric/saturation) ≤3/10 units Peak temperature (105 % of operating current) ≤350 K Yoke outer radius 400 mm Maximum voltage to ground ~1 kV 88% before 1.0 before Magnetic design for a double aperture magnet Mechanical design for a single aperture magnet Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

Additional costrains (reviewer suggestions): Maximum strand diameter: 1.2 mm Minimum dimensions of wedge between blocks: ~1 mm Other costrains: Number of layers: (even)  4 This drive to have an optimized value of current of ~10.5 kA and so a number of strands < 40. Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

1.2 Main design parameters Critical current density in S.C. fraction, on extracted strands, i.e. including cable degradation Jc @ 16T, 1.9 K ~2250 A/mm2 Jc @ 16T, 4.2 K ~1500 A/mm2 Jc @ 18T, 4.2 K ~890 A/mm2 Jc @ 18T, 1.9 K ~1500 A/mm2 Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

Configuration: 16T-22b-36-optd5f6 Main characteristics: 2 double-pancakes 2 conductor size Splitting of pole blocks to decrease peak-field B peak 16.37 T (with strand ’’self-field’’) Turn number: Layer 1: 13 Layer 2: 20 Layer 3: 30 Layer 4: 38 Tot: 202/ap. high-field cond. low-field cond. Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

including the ’’self-field’’ 2.1 Magnetic design – cross section Cable 1 (inner) Cable 2 (outer) Strand number 22 36 Strand diameter 1.1 mm 0.712 mm Bare width 13.2 mm 13.5mm Bare inner thickness 1.892 mm 1.225 mm Bare outer thickness 2.072 mm 1.343 mm Insulation 0.15 mm Keystone angle 0.5° Cu/NCu 0.85 2.15 Operating current 11180 A 11180A Copper current density 1165 A/mm2 1143 A/mm2 Operating point on LL (1.9 K) 86% Wedge minimum thikness: 0.80 mm In LHC: 0.70 mm In D11: 0.98 mm including the ’’self-field’’

2.2 Magnetic design – iron yoke Possible lay-out of iron yoke for the positioning of collar in double aperture Collar + Bladder & key Inductance@Iop (1 ap) Stored energy (1 ap) 19.9 mH/m 1.3 MJ/m Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

Fringing field < 0.1 T at 200 mm from yoke 2.3 Magnetic design – field quality b2 optimization not performed Persistent currents not considered NORMAL RELATIVE MULTIPOLES @ 16 T: b 1: 10000 b 2: 10.83 b 3: -0.31 b 4: -0.25 b 5: 0.82 b 6: -0.01 b 7: 0.92 b 8: -0.00 b 9: 0.80 b10: 0.00 b11: 1.09 b12: 0.00 b13: -0.15 b14: 0.00 b15: 0.01 Fringing field < 0.1 T at 200 mm from yoke Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

Data for FCC-hh collider 2.4 Magnetic design – strand area Conductor 1: 22 strands  = 1.1 mm Cu/NCu = 0.85 Jcu = 1143 A/mm2 Strand Area = 27.6 cm2/apert. Weight (FCC) = 3.14 ktons Conductor 2 36 strands  = 0.712 mm Cu/NCu = 2.15 Jcu = 1165 A/mm2 Strand Area= 39.0 cm2/apert. Weight (FCC) = 4.44 ktons COND. AREA (double ap.): = 133.2 cm2 FCC-hh dipoles: COND. MASS: = 7.59 ktons Data for FCC-hh collider Number of dipole units 4578 Dipole lenght 14.3 m Conductor density 8.7 kg/dm3 Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

2.5 Magnetic design – strand area Massimo Sorbi, 1st Review of EuroCirCol WP5 , 11-13 May 2016 2.5 Magnetic design – strand area Option to reduce cost Conductor 2 23 (SC)+13 (Cu) strands  = 0.712 mm Cu/NCu in S.C. strand= 1.0 Jcu = 1165 A/mm2 Strand Area (SC)= 24.9 cm2/apert. Strand Area (Pure Cu) = 14.1 cm2/apert. SC strand weight (FCC) = 2.84 ktons Pure Cu strand weight (FCC) = 1.61 ktons Pure Cu cost << SC cost Stability as in cable 1 (Cu/NCu = 1) Current diffusion time in the Cu strands to be evaluated and compared with discharge time Zero order evaluation seems ok (few ms) TOTAL SC STRANDS: = 7.59 5.98 ktons (-21%) Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016

Simulations from Coodi (Tiina Salmi) 3.1 Protection Simulations from Coodi (Tiina Salmi) Main assumptions: No energy extraction Quench induced in the whole magnet 40 ms after initial quench start Inductance dependence on the current Material properties from NIST Results (105 % of Iop): Hot spot temperature: 344 K Maximum voltage to ground: 0.77 kV Layer-to-layer max voltage: 0.91 kV Turn-to-turn max voltage: 86 V More details in the Tiina Salmi EuroCirCol presentations Massimo Sorbi, US-EuroCirCol video-meeting, 18 Oct. 2016