Present Status of the Virgo Experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Advertisements

24. June 2004 Andreas Freise Status of VIRGO A. Freise For the Virgo Collaboration European Gravitational Observatory SPIE Glasgow 2004.
Status of the Virgo Commissioning G.Losurdo – INFN Firenze/Urbino for the Virgo Collaboration.
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
GWDAW 16/12/2004 Inspiral analysis of the Virgo commissioning run 4 Leone B. Bosi VIRGO coalescing binaries group on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
F. Frasconi I.N.F.N. Pisa for the Virgo Collaboration TAUP2007 Sendai, September 11-15, 2007 VIRGO EXPERIMENT VIRGO: a large interferometer for Gravitational.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress and plans ILIAS, Jan 23 rd 2007 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
VSR1 summary - post VSR1 Commissioning plans E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) LSC-Virgo meeting Oct 22 nd, 2007.
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
COMMISSIONING PROGRESS G.LOSURDO – INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
Francesco Fidecaro Advanced Virgo Review, Cascina, November 3, 2008 Virgo brief status report.
Status of Virgo Gabriele Vajente INFN Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration 11 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis.
Interferometric detector for GW: status and perspectives Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze-Urbino
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
The status of Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze-Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration Workshop on GW detection– Gingin, Oct. 4-7, 2005.
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Perugia Couplings of angular noises into dark fringe Diffused light studies.
07. July 2004 Andreas Freise Status of VIRGO A. Freise For the Virgo Collaboration European Gravitational Observatory.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Environmental noise studies at VIRGO Environmental contributions to Virgo readout noise (C-runs) many sources identified through coherency analyses with.
Status of VIRGO Francesco Fidecaro (after Lisa Barsotti) - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration Aspen - January 19 th, 2005.
04. November 2004 A. Freise A. Freise, M. Loupias Collaboration Meeting November 04, 2004 Alignment Status.
LISA October 3, 2005 LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna Gravitational Physics Program Technical implications Jo van.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
Paolo La Penna Injection optics for Advanced VirgoLSC/VIRGO joint meeting, Cascina, 25/05/ Advanced VIRGO Input optics LIGO-G Z.
1 The Virgo noise budget Romain Gouaty For the Virgo collaboration GWADW 2006, Isola d’Elba.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Noise analysis in Virgo Cascina, 7-8 July 2004 Analysis of noise in VIRGO.
Lisa Barsotti - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration CASCINA - January 24 th, 2005 ILIAS  Locking of Full Virgo Status of VIRGO.
Status of VIRGO Lisa Barsotti - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration ANNECY - December 15 th, 2004  Status of the Commissioning.
LIGO-G Z The Status of VIRGO E. Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration GWADW 2004, Aspen From the CITF to VIRGO Commissioning of the Fabry-Perot.
1 LESSONS FROM VIRGO+ May 17th 2010 E. Calloni for the Virgo collaboration.
M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Frascati Noise Analysis Tools at Virgo.
Status of Virgo GWDAW12 Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec Leone B. Bosi INFN and University of Perugia (Italy) On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
The VIRGO detection system
L’Interferometro Virgo Michele Punturo INFN Perugia a nome della Collaborazione Virgo.
The quest for gravitational waves. 2 The Universe has been studied essentially through EM radiation. GWs have a different origin. The Scientific Motivation.
MG 11 - Berlin Virgo status Marie-Anne Bizouard (LAL-Orsay) on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
1 The status of VIRGO E. Tournefier LAPP(Annecy)-IN2P3-CNRS Journées SF2A, Strasbourg 27 juin – 1er juillet 2005 The VIRGO experiment The commissioning.
Automation of the Lock Acquisition of the 3 km Arm Virgo Interferometer F. Carbognani for The Virgo Collaboration ICALEPCS - Geneva 14 October, 2005.
The VIRGO DATA ANALYSIS Fulvio Ricci
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Virgo Status Detector Status Computing Data Analysis status and Plans
Evolution of the Virgo detector: The Virgo+ plans
Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec 13-16
Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
GEO – VIRGO joint noise hunting project
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
The views of Virgo collaboration groups on upgraded/advanced Virgo
Status at the Prague meeting
Presentation transcript:

Present Status of the Virgo Experiment Raffaele Flaminio EGO - CNRS/IN2P3 Summary I. The Virgo experiment - Detector design - The actors - Main construction steps II. Detector commissioning - Commissioning plan overview - Main results Next steps III. Data analysis preparation - Conclusions Cascina, July 8th, 2004

I. The Virgo experiment Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Virgo: Interferometer design Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Virgo: Laser 20W, Nd:YVO4 laser, two pumping diodes Injection locked to a 1W Nd:YAG master laser Required power stability: 10-8 Required frequency stability: mHz Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Virgo: Input Mode-Cleaner Input mode-cleaner: curved mirror Input mode-cleaner: dihedron Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Virgo: Mirrors Material: fused silica Dimension: 35 cm diameter, 10 cm thick Mass: ~21 Kg Surface deformation < l/100 Anti-reflective coating ~ 10-4 Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Virgo: Suspensions Multi stage pendulum pre-isolator: inverted pendulum cantilever springs for vertical isolation cascade of six stages height ~ 10 m Expected attenuation > 1014 @ 10 Hz Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Virgo: Output Optics Output Mode-Cleaner Detection bench Light filtering with output mode-cleaner 3.6 cm long monolithic cavity Light detection with InGaAs photodiodes 3 mm diameter, quantum efficiency > 90% Detection bench Cascina, July 8th, 2004 Output Mode-Cleaner

Virgo: Planned Sensitivity First attempt to extend detection band down to 10 Hz ! Cascina, July 8th, 2004

The Virgo collaboration French-Italian collaboration supported by CNRS in France and INFN in Italy Composed by 11 laboratories: About 170 people participated to the construction of Virgo Main responsibilities: INFN Pisa Seismic isolation, Vacuum INFN Florence/Urbino Seismic isolation INFN Frascati Alignment INFN Napoli Environmental monitoring, Alignment INFN Perugia Mirror suspension INFN Rome Mirror suspension and Control LAPP Annecy DAQ, Detection, Vacuum chambers LAL Orsay Global control, Tube, Baffles OCA Nice Laser and Injection IPNL Lyon Mirror coatings ESPCI Paris Mirror metrology LAPP Annecy, INFN Firenze, INFN Frascati, IPN Lyon, INFN Napoli, Observatoire de Nice, LAL Orsay, ESPCI Paris, INFN Perugia, INFN Pisa, INFN Roma Cascina, July 8th, 2004

The construction of Virgo Planning driven by the construction of the infrastructures 1996 - 1998 Construction of central area 1999 - 2002 Construction of the arms and the terminal buildings Installation and commissioning of the central interferometer 2001 - 2003 Vacuum tubes installation 2002 - 2003 Installation of final mirrors and of terminal suspensions 2003 - ….. Detector commissioning ‘Central area’ available since 1998 Cascina, July 8th, 2004

European Gravitational Observatory What is EGO ? Consortium settled up by the CNRS and the INFN Main objectives of EGO ? 1) to support the commissioning of Virgo, its operation, maintenance and upgrades 2) to create and run a computing center for the analysis of data, 3) to ensure the maintenance of the site and the related infrastructures 4) to promote R&D useful for the detection of gravitational waves Large support given to the commissioning activities: Support to most of the main Virgo sub-systems Leading role in: alignment, injection control, suspension control, data storage and vacuum Interferometer operation Cascina, July 8th, 2004

II. Detector commissioning Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Commissioning plan overview Phase A: Commissioning of interferometer arms Phase B: Commissioning of the recombined interferometer Phase C: Commissioning of the recycled interferometer Status today: - phase B near to completion - moving to phase C Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Commissioning plan overview Phase A: Commissioning of interferometer arms Phase B: Commissioning of the recombined interferometer Phase C: Commissioning of the recycled interferometer Status today: - phase B near to completion - moving to phase C Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Commissioning plan overview Phase A: Commissioning of interferometer arms Phase B: Commissioning of the recombined interferometer Phase C: Commissioning of the recycled interferometer Status today: - phase B near to completion - moving to phase C Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Commissioning plan overview Phase A: Commissioning of interferometer arms Phase B: Commissioning of the recombined interferometer Phase C: Commissioning of the recycled interferometer Status today: - phase B near to completion - moving to phase C Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Cavities alignment & locking Power fluctuations due to: - laser frequency noise (above few Hz) - mirror angular motions (below few Hz) As soon as injection and north arm suspensions became available (September 2003) 1) Cavity alignment 2) North cavity locking using B1’ 3) Output mode-cleaner locking 4) North cavity lock using B1 Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Laser frequency noise reduction Laser frequency noise induced by input mode-cleaner control noise Noise reduced when control gain/bandwidth reduced Cascina, July 8th, 2004 Peaks height might be a problem for recycling locking ..… work in progress

Automatic alignment: principle Anderson technique: - Modulation frequency coincident with cavity TEM01 mode - Two quadrants looking at the cavity transmission (at two different Guoy phases) - Four signals to control the 2x2 mirror angular positions (NI & NE) Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Automatic alignment: results Automatic alignment operated on both arms - bandwidth ~ 3-4 Hz - control precision ~ 0.1 mrad rms It allows to: - switch completely OFF local controls on all four cavity mirrors stabilize power stored in the cavity increase locking duration Cascina, July 8th, 2004

‘Tide control’ Earth tide > Mirror actuators range ( ~ 100 mm) Move low frequency component of the correction to the top of the inverted pendulum Cavity transmission Correction to the mirror Suspension point position 6 h Cavity transmission Correction to the mirror Suspension point position 24 h Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Laser frequency stabilization First test with North arm cavity - North cavity error signal sent to the input mode-cleaner (below 200 Hz) and to the laser (above 200 Hz) - Reference cavity error signal used to control cavity length at DC Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Commissioning runs: C1, C2 & C3 Three commissioning runs performed since November ( ~ 1 each 2 months) Each run last 3-4 days Goals: - Verify ITF cavities performances on longer time scales - Provide real data to the collaboration C1 (14-17/11/2003) - North cavity and OMC locked C2 (20-23/02/2004) - C1 + Automatic alignment - West arm locked C3 (23-27/04/2004) - C2 + Laser frequency stabilization C1 C2 C3 Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Interferometer lock acquisition Each cavity locked independently Dark fringe locked with B2 or B1’ Main outcome: - B1’ signal very sensitive to alignment - due to the use of Anderson technique - effect disappear if B1 is used - simulation work in progress to understand what will happen in the recycled interferometer First lock on Feb the 27th Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Status of recombined interferometer today Interferometer locked with B1 and B2 Output mode-cleaner locked to the TEM00 mode Automatic alignment on both arms Tidal control on both arms Laser frequency stabilized to cavities common mode ITF common mode locked to reference cavity Cascina, July 8th, 2004

C4 run: Summary Configuration: recombined ITF with ‘nearly’ complete control system Duration: 5 days, 24-29 June 2004 (last week) Test periods at the beginning and at the end of the run 9 losses of lock during quiet periods (all understood, one due to an earthquake in Alaska) Longest locked period: ~ 28 h, relatively stable noise level Cascina, July 8th, 2004

C4 run: ITF sensitivity ‘without power recycling’ C3 (April 2004) C4 (June 2004) Cascina, July 8th, 2004

C4 run: Noise Sources Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Next steps Lock recycled interferometer Planned strategy: based on the LIGO experience WE NE Present status: - State 2: locked - State 3: locked for 10 min with WE mirror misaligned Potential problem due to light backscattered inside the input mode-cleaner Short term solution: reduce light entering the interferometer Mid-term solution: add optical isolation between the interferometer and the input mode-cleaner Next week: try to lock state 4 Cascina, July 8th, 2004

III. Data analysis preparation Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Data analysis organization Six working groups settled up inside Virgo since 1998 h Reconstruction: chair F.Marion (LAPP Annecy) Noise analysis (data quality): chair J.Y.Vinet (OCA, Nice) Coalescing binaries: chair A.Vicere (INFN Florence/Urbino) Burst: chair P.Hello (LAL, Orsay) Periodic sources: chair S.Frasca (INFN Rome) Stochastic background: chair G.Cella (INFN Pisa) Hardware and Software infrastructure developed for On-line/In-Time analysis: h Reconstruction Data quality Coalescing binaries Burst Cascina, July 8th, 2004

On-line/In-time analysis Software architecture All parts available Each box runs properly in standalone mode Connection between all boxes running Full connection has to be tested under realistic conditions Connection to DAQ foreseen in the next fall Hardware architecture 300 GFlops PC’s farm being deployed at EGO Mainly needed for coalescing binaries search Will be fully available next year Line Removal Whitening Trigger Manager Merlino Burst Merlino CB MBTA h reconstruction Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Mock Data Challenge Main purpose: test the full In-Time chain 3 MDC since the beginning of 2004 (January, March and June) Common work between h Reconstruction, Coalescing binaries and Burst groups Several configurations: “Theoretical” Virgo noise Noise spectral density as during Virgo run E4 Noise as generated by a simulation of full Virgo in the current configuration Include some non-stationarities (power modulations) and non-linearities (ARCH models) Losses of lock Main purpose: test the full In-Time chain Cascina, July 8th, 2004

‘Real Data Challenge’ Data analysis people re-starting use of real data (it had been done in the past using CITF data) Injection of fake signals (burst and coalescing binaries) during C3 and C4 Made acting on mirrors using the coils Will be done with an independent optical calibrator as soon as sensitivity allows it Bring Data Analysis people closer to the real data Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Off-line analysis Use of national computing centers: - CC/In2p3 in Lyon - CNAF in Bologna So far mainly used to test algorithm for periodic sources search Roma, Bologna, Napoli (about 30 machines) within INFN-Grid Lyon (25 processors) as a classic batch system Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Collaborative data analysis LIGO-Virgo MoU proposal “Topic driven” collaboration, focused initially on a two well defined subjects (inspirals+bursts) Real analysis will start when a comparable sensitivity will be reached In the meantime: open meetings between the people involved joint working groups will write a white paper Responsibles for the joint working groups (Virgo side): A. Vicere, B. Mours (inspirals) P. Hello, L. Brocco (bursts) The activity is coordinated by the data analysis coordinator. Full ability of anyone in the collaboration to participate in any analysis, accordingly with the internal rules of each experiment. Meeting at Cascina two weeks ago Need to start an effort at an European level Hope WG2 of ILIAS-GWA will help Cascina, July 8th, 2004

Conclusions Construction of Virgo completed - Last suspension assembly completed in November 2003 Detector commissioning started in October 2003 - Commissioning of the 3 km arms completed - Recombined interferometer control 95% completed (noise identification starting) - Commissioning of recycled interferometer starting Data analysis preparation progressing Hope to have first scientific run in 2005 Cascina, July 8th, 2004

IMC- ITF spurious fringes backscattering Input laser beam ITF reflected beam Backscattering on mode-cleaner mirror  fringes at ITF input  spurious signals in mode-cleaner control  input mode-cleaner lock losses Consequences: need to misalign recycling mirror  reduction of recycling gain lock acquisition longer  smaller duty cycle fringes Possible solutions: 1) use of Faraday isolator 2) better mode-cleaner mirror Solution 2) adopted so far Cascina, July 8th, 2004