Jody Ondich POET Peer Review Coordinator

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing the Quality of Online Courses Rayane Fayed Instructional Designer American University of Beirut June 2013.
Advertisements

Course Selected Institutions decide to examine an online or hybrid course as part of a peer review. Since institutions make a significant investment in.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
FLY Teacher Induction. Purpose of Teacher Induction Develop and continue lifelong learning for both the new teachers and mentor teachers to improve student.
Fostering Student Success through in-house faculty development programming Hanna Erpestad, Dean of Liberal Arts and Sciences Kelli Hallsten-Erickson, CTL.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT. Cycle of Assessment Course Goals/ Intended Outcomes Means Of Assessment And Criteria For Success Summary of Data.
Quality Bucks Inter-Collegiate Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Group Seminar Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
Mentor Overview.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
Your English Department Agreed to do WHAT? Dr. Thomas Polito Department of Agronomy Department of Ag Education & Studies Dr. Dave Roberts Department of.
Online Course Quality and Peer Review Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project “QUALITY MATTERS” Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Custom Faculty Development: Reach Faculty Where They Live Linda A. Leake, M. Ed. Instructional Designer/Blackboard Support Specialist University of Louisville.
Quality Matters and Online Courses in Sakai Brian Dashew, Instructional Designer, Marist College Dr. Reba-Anna Lee, Assistant Director for Academic Technology.
Welcome to NROC An Introduction to the The National Repository of Online Courses Featuring NROC Courses and the NROC Network Module 1.
+ What DL Support Services are available for Minnesota ABE? Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
Amy Jo Swing Online Faculty Development Coordinator A Creative Approach to Online Excellence.
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
Innovative Projects for Collaborating with Faculty Friday, September 26, 2014 Presented by: Todd Conaway, Instructional Designer Teaching & eLearning Support.
Innovative Techniques and Emerging Issues Confronting Classroom Teaching R. Elaine Turner, PhD University of Florida.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Blended and Flipped Learning Models for International and Multidisciplinary Graduate Program on Language Education in Teaching, Coaching and Training Careers.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
Lisa Cheney-Steen, Co-Director Learning Technologies Colorado Community Colleges Online Terri Rowenhorst, NROC Membership Director Monterey Institute for.
The Assessment of Teaching with Technology Dan Talley Dakota State University June 4, 2004.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Assessment in Action: A Journey toward Transforming an Academic Library's Value Danielle Theiss Dion Library Director, University of Saint Mary formally.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Assessment in First Courses of Statistics: Today and Tomorrow Ann Ooms University of Minnesota.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Making an Old Enemy Your Friend
Colorado Community Colleges Online
Developing a Template for Use Across Departments in Temple University's College of Public Health Lorraine Ford, Assistant Director of Information Technology;
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
Implementing QM towards Program Certification
Creating an Individual Professional Development Plan in an IEP
Campuses in Brainerd and Staples Minnesota.
Using Evidence to Inform Continuous Improvement in Online Course Design ……………… Kay Shattuck, Director of Research, Quality Matters.
Beyond the “A” Word Assessment that Empowers Faculty to
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Creating a Pathway to Quality Design For Online and Blended Courses
CTE Academy: Engaging Faculty in a Culture of Continuous Improvement
Jumping on the QM Bandwagon
Converging Instructional Technology to Encourage Faculty Adoption
The Lycurgus Group: Instructional Effectiveness Survey System
Online Teaching Conference
Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System
Continuing to Advance the Culture of Assessment in Massachusetts
League for Innovation in the Community College March 29, 2010
Tools for Infusing QM Standards into the Course Development Process
Faculty Development AQIP Project Team
A five-year community effort to improve geoscience literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports.
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Faculty Perspectives on the Gold Review
TENN TLC addresses retention
Professional Standards
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Quality Matters Overview
Sherrell Wheeler Director of Online Quality Assurance
COURSE EVALUATION Spring 2019 Pilot August 27, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Jody Ondich POET Peer Review Coordinator The POETry of Collaboration: Collaborative Training, Evaluation and Progress Through the POET Program Jody Ondich POET Peer Review Coordinator

Research Based: Online Learning Consortium: Sharing Effective Practices A non-profit U.S. consortium of institutions and organizations committed to sharing effective e-learning practices: http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/ 2002 Report: “Five Pillars of Quality Online Education” - Research-based, 40 experts consulted Sloan is now Online Learning Consortium http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/

Five Pillars of Quality Online Education Adapted from Sloan-C effective practices: http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/about/quality-framework-five-pillars/ Access Learning effectiveness QUALITY Faculty satisfaction Scale (Institutional cost Effectiveness) Our POET program focuses on lots of these: helping faculty (satisfaction), making courses and teaching better for students (satisfaction), cost effectiveness (so much less than QM), learning… Student satisfaction

LSC’s 3-part Quality Plan Part One: Administrative Tool for Evaluating Online Courses Developed by faculty and dean in 2010 Implemented in 2011   Lake Superior College Program for Online Excellence in Teaching (POET™).

LSC’s 3-part Quality Plan Part One: Administrative Tool for Evaluating Online Courses Pre-Evaluation Faculty Worksheet Dean's Evaluation Form   Lake Superior College Program for Online Excellence in Teaching (POET™).

LSC’s 3-part Quality Plan Part Two: Comprehensive Online Instructor Training Includes online teaching pedagogy and specific LE training Four levels of training began Spring 2015   Lake Superior College Program for Online Excellence in Teaching (POET™).

LSC’s 3-part Quality Plan Part Two: Comprehensive Online Instructor Training Level 1 Description and Outcomes Level 2 Description and Outcomes Level 3 Description and Outcomes Level 4 Description and Outcomes   Lake Superior College Program for Online Excellence in Teaching (POET™).

LSC’s 3-part Quality Plan Part Three: Online Peer Review For continuous quality control and improvement To have instructors learn from each other while improving courses   Lake Superior College Program for Online Excellence in Teaching (POET™).

LSC’s 3-part Quality Plan Part Three: Online Peer Review Confidentiality Form for Peer Reviewers Instructor Worksheet Lake Superior College Program for Online Excellence in Teaching (POET™).

LSC’s 3-part Quality Plan Part Three: Online Peer Review Peer Review Process Summary Peer Review Rubric Peer Review Rubric with Annotations Rubric for Classroom Supplement   Lake Superior College Program for Online Excellence in Teaching (POET™).

Why Peer Review? Improves quality of course design and teaching Both peer reviewers and those reviewed share ideas and materials: Improves Pedagogy Part of AQIP: emphasizes continuous improvement Communication and collaboration across departments, divisions, and sections of the college community

Online Peer Review Met/not met essential standards—23 Best practices--13 Integrated best practices in online teaching/pedagogy with online universal course design Stipend for lead reviewer $150 5 reviews will be led by Peer Review Coordinator/semester Other teams can be lead by a Peer Reviewer Faculty led and driven, no administrative oversight The 3 Ps: Peer Support, Pedagogy and Professionalism Always review a live course—confidentiality essential for students Before only 14 standards were considered “essential” Also got rid of technology section since all of it involves technology Added teaching criteria…

Tips for Peer Reviewing Approach review as if you were a student Look at Discussion student questions first—what confuses them? Look at introductory materials carefully Look at instructor feedback Look for ADA issues Think about both positives and suggestions for improvement in feedback to instructor

POET Website: http://www.lsc.edu/poet Contacts Amy Jo Swing Jody Ondich Hanna Erpestad English Instructor and Philosophy/Humanities Dean of Fine Arts and Sciences POET Training Coordinator POET Peer Review E-Learning Administrator Lake Superior College Lake Superior College Lake Superior College Duluth, Minnesota Duluth, Minnesota Duluth, Minnesota a.swing@lsc.edu j.ondich@lsc.edu h.erpestad@lsc.edu 218.733.7670 218.733.6918 218.733.7667 POET Website: http://www.lsc.edu/poet