S.1012.22, F.S., Requirements for Employee Compensation and Salary Schedules Florida Department of Education May 23, 2012 1 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Education Personnel Information Reporting System Upgrades The Departments goal is for LEAs to have the ability to continually update.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools 2011 Legislative Session Summary Report District Advisory Council May 12 th 2011.
Renee L. Wallace Associate Vice President Academic Personnel Services August 9, 2013.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Natasa Mauko Slovenian Association of Disabled Students.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Presented by Dr. Joe Robinson SENATE BILL Senate Bill 2033 Became Effective on May 28, 2010 Senate-Coffee, Jolley, Ford, Rice and Leftwich House-Benge.
Return-to-Work Law Louisiana Association of School Business Officials (LASBO) Fall Workshop November 7, 2012.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
1 FY 2014 Merit Presentation July 2, AGENDA – MERIT PROCESS  Merit Policy Overview and Timeline  Templates and Instructions, Forms Signature.
CONTRACT SETTLEMENT THE LANGUAGE Limits on IEP, 504 and PST meetings during planning Planning time for Part Time Teachers Guarantee interview.
Education Jobs Fund Program 1. Agenda Overview Application Process Uses of Funds Maintenance of Effort Accountability and Reporting 2.
 The District School Board of Pasco County Kevin Shibley, Esq., Assistant Superintendent for Administration Betsy Kuhn, Esq., Director, Office for Employee.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
“Teachers do make a difference…” - Jere Brophy, 1979.
Teacher Quality Initiative Evaluating Current Practice, SB 6, and the 2011 initiative 1.
FASPA Conference October, 2010 Implementing a Salary Differential Program.
1 Douglas County Schools Colorado A Strategic Approach to Teacher Compensation & Appraisal.
Overview of SB 736 Legislation Pertaining to Personnel Evaluation Systems and Race to the Top 1.
Our Shared Agenda: Empowering Effective Teaching Florida Educational Negotiators Annual Conference.
Performance Pay Volusia County Schools August 2015.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
MFP 101: Seven Easy Steps to Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula LEADS Conference July 26, 2006.
1 Employee Pay: Changes and Transitions April 2, 2014.
DOE STAFF DATABASE: Overview of Changes Presenter : Teresa R. Sancho FAMIS 2011 CONFERENCE Tallahassee, Florida June 2011.
1 Components Preparation  Traditional higher education  Alternative certification  District-based preparation Sourcing  Marketing  Recruitment  Screening.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Budget and Legislative Update Alexis Schauss Director of School Business.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
ASW Update PANC April 19, ASW Timeline for Implementation
Agreement in principle between the Government, represented by the Conseil du trésor, and the organisations forming the CSN-FTQ-SISP Common Front.
CC Response to DOL Overtime Regulations
Non-Educator Merit Pay Plan
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Mason County Schools August 11, 2016
Merit & Incentive Pay Based on High Stakes Testing
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
GASBO Conference November 10, 2016 Angela Palm
Overview Background UPS Operational Policy TC 4
SB 1664 Changes to Personnel Evaluations
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Title I A Comparability Report
Salary Based Apportionment and Benefit Apportionment
Area Lead Presentation
Superintendent’s Funding Request FY19
Best Practices in Payroll/Personnel Implementing Pay Raises
Bonnie R. Nelson Professor Associate Librarian for Information Systems
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Teacher Instructional Hours and Assigned Time
2017 Summer Salary Additional Compensation
Pension Retirement Calculation Impacts
Proposed Expenditure Budget
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
Best and Brightest Teacher Scholarship Program
RETIREMENT | SECOND HALF 3rd quarter
Compensation Plan May 8, 2017.
Mason County Schools August 11, 2016
HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Differentiated Pay Plan Proposal
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
University of Pittsburgh
General Appropriations Act July 2019
The Best and Brightest 2017 ANNUAL F.E.N. CONFERENCE
Presentation transcript:

S.1012.22, F.S., Requirements for Employee Compensation and Salary Schedules Florida Department of Education May 23, 2012 1 1

Evaluation Classifications for Instructional Personnel & School Administrators S.1012.34(2)(e), F.S. – Must differentiate among four levels of performance as follows: Highly Effective Effective Needs Improvement (or for instructional personnel in the first three years of employment who need improvement, developing) Unsatisfactory 2 2

Changes in Employee Compensation - Types Salary Adjustments – change in base salary that is not a bonus and becomes part of the employee’s permanent base salary By schedule (Grandfather or Performance) Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) May not discriminate among comparable classes of employees based upon the salary schedule under which they are compensated May not exceed 50% of the annual adjustment provided to instructional personnel rated as effective Supplements – annual addition to the base salary for a negotiated term as long as the employee continues to be employed for the purpose of the supplement. Does not become part of the employee’s continuing base salary Is considered compensation for purposes of s.121.021(22), F.S. (FRS) Examples: Assignment to a Title I eligible school Assignment to a low performing school Advanced degree held in the individual’s area of certification (exception for employees hired before July 1, 2011) Additional Responsibilities Critical shortage areas 3 3

Two Basic Schedules for Salary Adjustments for Instructional Personnel Grandfathered Salary Schedule Limited to school employees hired before July 1, 2014 who remain on a continuing contract or professional services contract; and All classroom teachers of courses for which the district has not yet implemented required local assessments for measuring student growth Must base a portion of each employee’s compensation on the employee’s evaluation Must provide differentiated pay based on district determined factors, including, but not limited to, additional responsibilities, school demographics, critical shortage areas, and level of job performance difficulties. Performance Salary Schedule Must be adopted by July 1, 2014 For all instructional personnel on annual contract or hired on or after July 1, 2014, and instructional personnel on continuing or professional services contract who choose to “opt in”. Any employee who opts in to the performance salary schedule may not return to the grandfathered salary schedule. Employee salary equals base salary plus adjustments: Annual performance adjustment for an employee rated as highly effective must be greater than the highest annual salary adjustment for an employee of the same classification through any other salary schedule adopted by the district. Annual performance adjustment for an employee rated as effective must be equal to at least 50% and no more than 75% of the annual adjustment provided for a highly effective employee of the same classification. Annual performance adjustments may not be provided for an employee who receives an evaluation other than highly effective or effective for the year. Employees are eligible for salary supplements. 4 4

Parity for Performance Salary Schedules S. 1008.22(1)(c)(5)(c)(IV), F.S. – “….If budget constraints in any given year limit a district school board’s ability to fully fund all adopted salary schedules, the performance salary schedule shall not be reduced on the basis of total cost or the value of individual rewards in a manner that is proportionately greater than reductions to any other salary schedules adopted by the district.” 5 5

The information contained in this table is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. 6 6

7 The information contained in this table is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. 7

8 The information contained in this table is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. 8

9 The information contained in this table is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. 9

Calculated Full Cost of Salary Schedules 10 The information contained in this table is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. 10

Calculated Full Cost of Salary Schedules, cont’d 11 The information contained in this table is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. 11

Application of Performance Parity Provision 12 The information contained in this table is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. 12

Application of Performance Parity Provision, cont’d 13 The information contained in this table is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. 13

Some Factors to Consider When Negotiating Future Salary Schedules Timing of Salary Adjustments At the beginning of the school year based on prior year performance evaluations costs are easier to calculate due to known inputs At the end of school year based on performance during the school year would require budgeting based on projected performance evaluations retroactive for the entire period? Does budget determine the salary schedules, or do salary schedules determine the budget?   Pro-ration provisions may be an important tool to ensure required parity between performance & grandfather schedules when the amount available for salary adjustments is insufficient to fully fund scheduled steps.