4-24-17 NATIONAL PIGS-IN-A-BLANKET DAY PROPERTY A SLIDES 4-24-17 NATIONAL PIGS-IN-A-BLANKET DAY

Music to Accompany Last Class The Best of Don McLean featuring “American Pie” & “Vincent” Now on Course Page All Info Memos Complete except Chapter 2 Tempest Write-Up Comments & Models for Relevant Parts of 2014, 2015, 2016 Exams except 2015 Problem 2B (= Rev Prob 1G) Comments & Models for All Sample Exam Bank Qs

Review Problem 5M (S137) Implied Easements Generally Client Chris purchased warehouse from PPC & now using it. DDD owns adjoining lot; doing construction DDD discovers that water/sewer pipes serving C warehouse run through DDD lot. (Client would be Dominant Tenement) No evidence of express easement. Two parcels once had single owner. All four types possible General Background?

SEQUOIA: Review Problem 5M: E-by-I & E-by-N SEQUOIAS

Review Problem 5M (Sequoia) Easement-by-Implication One parcel is split in two Prior Use (“Quasi-Easement”) Intent to continue prior use *Apparent, visible or reasonably discoverable *Some degree of necessity Some states treat 4 & 5 as separate elements; some treat as evidence of intent Generally? Elements: Legal  Factual? Run to Current Owners?

Review Problem 5M (Sequoia) Easement-by-Necessity One parcel is split in two Landlock: One resulting parcel is cut off from key access (e.g. to roads or sewer system) by the other resulting parcel (alone or in combination with parcels owned by 3d parties). At time parcels split, access necessary to enjoyment of landlocked parcel [Can Cross-Reference Earlier Discussions] Generally? Elements: Legal  Factual? Run to Current Owners? (Good-Bye to Sequoia)

OLYMPIC: Review Problem 5M: E-by-E & E-by-P EEL GLACIER

Review Problem 5M (Olympic) Easement-by-Prescription [Actual] Use of Pathway Open & Notorious Continuous Exclusive (Some states) Adverse/Hostile [Can Cross-Reference Earlier Discussions] Generally? Elements: Legal  Factual? Run to Current Owners?

Review Problem 5M (Olympic) Easement-by-Estoppel An owner may be estopped from barring a 2d party access to the owner’s property where The owner apparently allows 2d party to use the property (Apparent License) 2d party reasonably and detrimentally relies on this [Can Cross-Reference Earlier Discussions] Generally? Elements: Legal  Factual? Run to Current Owners? (Good-Bye to Olympic)

Review Session Monday (5/1) 2pm Here Video & Slides Posted on Course Page Afterward Primarily Exam Technique General Advice Then for Each Type of Q: Advice/Common Problems Specifics Related to This Year’s Qs/Instructions After That, I’ll Take Your Qs 1st on Technique Then on Substance

Office Hours (Also on Course Page) Today 9:45-11:15 Saturday 1-5 Sunday 1-5 Monday (5/1) 9-1 Tuesday (5/2) 9-1, 2-6 I’ll Take E-Mail Qs (if Reasonable in Quantity & Scope) Sent by 6:00 pm, Tuesday 5/2

The Wonderful Land Law of Oz PROPERTY A: FINAL EXAM The Wonderful Land Law of Oz

The Wonderful Land Law of Oz Seven Characters = Seven Questions PROPERTY A: FINAL EXAM The Wonderful Land Law of Oz Seven Characters = Seven Questions Q1 = Cowardly Lion Q2A =Witch of the North Q2B=Scarecrow Q2C = Munchkins Q2D = Wizard Q3 = Tin Woodman Q4 = Witch of the West

Balanced Topical Coverage: PROPERTY A: FINAL EXAM Balanced Topical Coverage: Each Chapter (Except 3) Tested in Two or Three Different Parts of Qs/Problems

WHAT IS PROPERTY?

WHAT IS PROPERTY?

WHAT IS PROPERTY?

WHAT IS PROPERTY?

ACADIA Acadia Sunrise

BADLANDS NORBECK PASS

EGRET IN MANGROVE SWAMP EVERGLADES EGRET IN MANGROVE SWAMP

OLYMPIC EEL GLACIER

SEQUOIA SEQUOIAS