LAA Closure: Lessons from the Pivotal Studies & Three Advisory Panels

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATCHMAN™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
Advertisements

Protecting Against Stroke
PROTECT-AF (LAA Closure with Watchman vs Warfarin in AF and Stroke) A long-term (45-month) follow-up analysis of device therapy with Watchman vs warfarin.
Protect AF Late Breaking Trial: Randomized Prospective Trial of Percutaneous LAA Closure vs Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in AF ACC & i2 Summit 2009 Orlando,
ARISTOTLE TRIAL Dr R Nyabadza GPST1 Ward 32. Structure AF, stroke and CHA 2 -DS 2 VASC Anticoagulant choices ARISTOTLE trial Cost NICE guidance and the.
AF and NOACs An UPDATE JULY 2014
Improving Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin and its newer alternatives
Bridging Oral Anticoagulation with Low Molecular Weight Heparin: Experience in 367 Patients with Renal Insufficiency Heyder Omran, Giso von der Recke,
Left atrial appendage occlusion: Ready for prime time? David Hildick-Smith Sussex Cardiac Centre Brighton, UK.
Rhythm and Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation Tom Wallace, MD Cardiac Electrophysiology CHI St. Vincent Heart Clinic Arkansas.
The Case for Rate Control: In the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Charles W. Clogston, M.D. Cardiologist CHI St. Vincent Heart Clinic Arkansas April.
SCRIPPS CLINIC A Cost Analysis of Bleed Complications from Two Stroke Prevention Strategies in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Left Atrial Appendage.
The Management of AF Warfarin New anticoagulants 16 Sept 2011.
EWOLUTION: 3-months outcome of Left Atrial Appendage Closure with the WATCHMAN device in Europe Thrombus at the device, leakage at follow-up, device embolisation,
Vivek Y. Reddy, MD Helmsley Trust Professor of Medicine
The Efficacy of Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review Karim Bouferrache Pacific University.
© free-ppt-templates.com 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of Valvular Heart Disease Guideline of 2014 DR. OMAR SHAHID TR CARDIOLOGY SZH.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
How to Increase Your Patient Volume and Screening Efficiency
Cara Coffelt, PharmD PGY-1 Pharmacy Resident
Postulated Association Between AF and Stroke
Post-FDA Approval, Initial US Clinical Experience with Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Vivek Y. Reddy.
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
LAAC: What Does the Post Marketing Data Tell Us?
Case 66 year old male with PMH of HTN, DM, ESRD on renal replacement TIW, stroke in 2011 with right side residual weakness, atrial fibrillation, currently.
Reducing Death and Disability Sheila Glenn
Post-FDA Approval, Initial US Clinical Experience with Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Vivek Y. Reddy.
WATCHMANTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Management of Patients on Chronic Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
Identifying patients with atrial fibrillation and "truly low" thromboembolic risk who are poorly characterized by CHA2DS2-VASc: Superior performance of.
Update on the Watchman Device CRT 2010 Washington, DC
Occlusion: Patient Selection Are the Data Supportive?
The efficacy and safety of oral Rivaroxaban in patients with permanent inferior vena cava filter: a pilot case-control study Lobastov K., Barinov V.,
CRT 2017: Putting LAA closure in the age of DOACs into perspective
When should aspirin be dropped from triple therapy?
How to Screen Patients for LAAC
Heart Valve Thrombosis & Neuro-Outcomes
Exploring Factors Associated with Preferential Prescribing of Apixaban Over Warfarin in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Scott McColgana,
How Do We Incorporate Patient Perspectives Into Clinical Trial Design?
Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Prevention of Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation Thank you for inviting me here – it’s a real pleasure to be able to.
David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
Insights from the NCDR® STS/ACC TVT Registry.
Sameer Gafoor, MD Swedish Medical Center, Seattle WA
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
No evidence that AF type significantly impacts stroke risk
US Early Feasibility Studies (EFS)
Percutaneous Device Occlusions for Left Atrial Appendage (LAA)
Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation in Europe:
Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Barriers to Oral Anticoagulant Use for Stroke Prevention in AF
Fibrillazione atriale
Selecting NOACs for High-Risk Patients
Assessing the Risk for Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Left atrial appendage closure: A new technique for clinical practice
Watching for the Patient With AF: Latest Advances and Technologies
How and why this study may change my practice ?
Atrial Fibrillation.
Identifying High-Risk AF Patients
Left atrial appendage exclusion: An alternative to anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation  Kareem Bedeir, MBChB, MS, David R. Holmes, MD,
Improving Outcomes in AF: Do the NOACs Hold Their Promise In The Real World?
ACC 2003 Late Breaking Trials
5 Good Minutes on Atrial Fibrillation-related Stroke
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for The Unmet Clinical Needs of Stroke Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation  David R. Holmes, MD, Mohamad Alkhouli,
A Viable Option for Stroke Risk Reduction
The CHA(2)DS2-(VASc) stroke risk and HAS-BLED bleeding risk index are calculated by totalling the scores for each risk factor present.68–71 The lower graph.
Presentation transcript:

LAA Closure: Lessons from the Pivotal Studies & Three Advisory Panels Keith Dawkins MD FRCP FACC FSCAI Global Chief Medical Officer Executive Vice President Boston Scientific Corporation

Conflict of Interest Boston Scientific Corporation Employee Stockholder

Global Burden of Atrial Fibrillation Individuals with AF = 33.5 million Incidence ↑ Prevalence ↑ Disease Burden ↑ AF-Related Mortality ↑ Chugh SS: Circ 2014;129:837-847

AF associated Mortality Age-Adjusted Mortality (per 100,000 Population) Year Chugh SS: Circ 2014;129:837-847

Atrial Fibrillation & Anticoagulation Atrial Fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia Fivefold increase in stroke when AF is present INR levels outside the therapeutic range (2.0-3.0) occurs in ~50% of patients According to HAS-BLED, 61% of pts currently on Warfarin for AF are at moderate risk of bleeding and an additional 19% are at high risk Risk of Thromboembolism in AF vs. Risk of Bleeding with Anticoagulants Camm AJ: Euro Heart J 2010;31:2369-2429 Pisters R: Chest 2010;138:1093-1100

Warfarin Use in General Practice Initiation of Warfarin 41,000 chronic AF treated by GPs in the UK Administrative database Study Diagnosed after Jan 2000 Percent (%) Years after diagnosis 2 4 6 20 40 60 80 100 Age 40 – 64 Age 85 + Age 80 – 84 Age 75 – 79 Age 70 – 74 Age 65 – 69 Gallagher AM: J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:1500-1506

Why do Physicians Underuse Warfarin in AF? Most Cited Reasons: Bleeding Risk Advanced Age Other factors influencing prescriptions: Previous Falls Perceived Fall Risk Comorbidities (cognitive impairment, alcohol) Inability to comply with monitoring/treatment Pugh D: Age and Ageing 2011;40:675-683

Atrial Fibrillation & Anticoagulation High Prevalence High Cost Low Medication Adherence Poor Monitoring Behavior Poor Patient Understanding Kneeland PP: Patient Prefer Adherence 2010;4:51-60

The Watchman™ Device Features 160μm membrane Nitinol Frame in 5 Sizes Delivered via 14Fr catheter Repositionable and retrievable Average procedure takes 35-60 minutes 160μm membrane Polyethyl Terephthalate (PET) cap designed to block emboli and promote healing at 45 days Nitinol Frame in 5 Sizes Radially expands to maintain position in the LAA 10 Active Fixation Anchors Designed to maintain position within the LAA

LAAC Prevents Propagation of Left Atrial Thrombosis in AF

Watchman™ Device Implant LV Watchman Device

The Watchman™ Journey… CE-Mark 1st FDA Panel BSC Acquires Atritech 2nd FDA Panel 3rd FDA Panel ? Approval 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 PROTECT AF Trial Enrollment PREVAIL Trial Enrollment Watchman™ has been commercialized in 77 Countries

Watchman™ Clinical Program Pilot Early feasibility with >6 years of follow-up n=66 PROTECT-AF Watchman™ primary efficacy, CV death, and hemorrhagic stroke superior to warfarin at 5 years n=800 CAP Registry Significantly improved safety results n=566 ASAP Expected rate of stroke reduced by 77% in patients contraindicated to warfarin n=150 Positive #3 FDA Panel October 8, 2014 PREVAIL Improved implant success procedure safety confirmed with new and experienced operators n=461 CAP2 Continued improvement in implant success and procedure safety. n=579 EWOLUTION Currently enrolling 1000 patients, 50 sites, 16 countries n=633 WASP Currently enrolling 300 patients, 6 Asia-Pacific countries n=108 Over 3300 patients with >6000 patient-years of follow-up

Watchman™ Favorable Procedural Safety Profile Patients with Safety Event (%) PROTECT AF (N=232) (N=231) 1st Half 2nd Half CAP (N=566) PREVAIL (N=269) CAP2 (N=579) All Device and/or procedure-related serious adverse events within 7 Days

Watchman™ Peer-Reviewed Publications

Left Atrial Appendage Closure ESC Guidelines (2012) 2005 Recommendations Class Level Interventional, percutaneous LAA closure may be considered in patients with a high stroke risk and contraindications for long-term oral anticoagulation IIb B Eur Heart J 2012:33;2719–2747

Watchman™ Therapy… Is not designed to be a broad replacement for oral anticoagulation Is intended for patients: At an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism Recommended and deemed suitable candidates for warfarin Having an appropriate rationale to seek a non-pharmacologic alternative to warfarin 

Conclusions Eight clinical trials including 3,000 patients and >6,000 patient-years of data support Watchman™ use for the Primary Endpoint (All-Cause Stroke, Systemic Embolism, Cardiovascular death), with superiority for Cardiovascular Mortality, Hemorrhagic Stroke, and Disabling Stroke (post hoc analysis) We seek Watchman™ labeling related to the clinical trial population – i.e. patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high risk based on CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores, who are suitable for Warfarin, and who have an appropriate rationale to seek an invasive and experimental non-pharma alternative to Warfarin Patients doing well on oral anticoagulants should continue on anticoagulants….