Figure 1. Competition for establishing neural connections

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neural Network of C. elegans is a Small-World Network Masroor Hossain Wednesday, February 29 th, 2012 Introduction to Complex Systems.
Advertisements

Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems.
Figure 4. NMDAR subunit protein levels in control and schizophrenic subjects. Scatter plots showing (A) NR1, (B) NR3A, and (C) NR3A/NR1. Small circles.
Figure 1. Anatomical location and somatodendritic morphology of retrogradely labeled corticospinal neurons. (A) An epifluorescence image of a coronal brain.
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
From: The Geographic Imagination of Civil War-Era American Fiction
Figure 1. Transfection leads to a vast overexpression of PKMζ and the dominant negative form of PKMζ (DN) in comparison with control. Following transfection.
From: Growing and Slowing Down Like China
Fig. 3. ACE outperforms plmDCA in recovering the single variable frequencies for models describing (a) ER005, (b) LP SB, (c) PF00014, (d) HIV.
Fig. 1. Sample NGS data in FASTQ format (SRA's srr032209), with parts being shortened and numbered: (1) read identifiers; (2) sequence of bases; (3) ‘+’
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 1 The pattern reversal stimuli
Figure 3. Definition of the outside distance, Dout, as the sum of the distances from each of the two protein binding sites to their corresponding.
Figure 1 Individual Lifted from Group Photograph
Fig. 1 Overview of model components to identify if hormonal pleiotropy constrains or facilitates phenotypic responses to selection. The environment imposes.
Figure 2 Nonparametric thin-plate spline visualizations of the response surface for each pair of traits. The unbroken line gives the WHR that intersects.
Fig. 2. Leaf area (A), dry (B) and fresh mass (C) in relation to leaf volume in all studied species. The inset in (B) demonstrates the correlation between.
From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates
Figure 1. (A) Mean MPPF BPND concentration at basal state in ASD patients group (N = 18), color bar = MPPF BPND value. The color bar represents.
Figure 2 Distribution of Annual Household Income for Jordan Overall, Camp Refugees, and Camp Poor From: A Profile of Poverty for Palestinian Refugees in.
Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.
Fig. 1. The required sample sizes nPPV and nNPV versus the sample allocation fraction P for the case study. From: Sample size for.
Figure 1. Whisker-evoked intrinsic signal in S1
Figure 1. Spine synapse density in LgDel mice is lower than in WT mice throughout postnatal development. (A) 3D reconstructed dendritic segments of WT.
FIG. 1. Various models of rate variation across sites and lineages
From: Dynamic Dependence and Diversification in Corporate Credit*
From: The Effect of Vapor of Propylene Glycol on Rats
From: Social enviroment influences aphid production of alarm pheromone
Maturation of a Recurrent Excitatory Neocortical Circuit by Experience-Dependent Unsilencing of Newly Formed Dendritic Spines  Michael C. Ashby, John T.R.
Network Science: A Short Introduction i3 Workshop
Signal, Noise, and Variation in Neural and Sensory-Motor Latency
Department of Computer Science University of York
In Vivo Measurement of Cell-Type-Specific Synaptic Connectivity and Synaptic Transmission in Layer 2/3 Mouse Barrel Cortex  Aurélie Pala, Carl C.H. Petersen 
Lav R. Varshney, Per Jesper Sjöström, Dmitri B. Chklovskii  Neuron 
Figure 3. Values of the correction factor kmtx,j for the sixty energy channels j = 1,…,60. The values for ten iteration steps are shown. In addition, the.
From: String Generation for Testing Regular Expressions
Shaul Druckmann, Dmitri B. Chklovskii  Current Biology 
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages e7 (May 2017)
Ben Scholl, Xiang Gao, Michael Wehr  Neuron 
Anastasia Baryshnikova  Cell Systems 
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Linking Memories across Time via Neuronal and Dendritic Overlaps in Model Neurons with Active Dendrites  George Kastellakis, Alcino J. Silva, Panayiota.
Figure 1 Study area in Northern Wisconsin, USA, where we simulated the dispersal of 15 translocated American martens ... Figure 1 Study area in Northern.
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Sparseness and Expansion in Sensory Representations
Rosanna P. Sammons, Claudia Clopath, Samuel J. Barnes  Cell Reports 
Modeling the Spatial Reach of the LFP
Mechanisms of Connectome Development
Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Figure 1 Three example candidate spike ripple events
Joshua A. Goldberg, Uri Rokni, Haim Sompolinsky  Neuron 
Lav R. Varshney, Per Jesper Sjöström, Dmitri B. Chklovskii  Neuron 
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Yann Zerlaut, Alain Destexhe  Neuron 
Cian O’Donnell, Terrence J. Sejnowski  Neuron 
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.
Distinct Translaminar Glutamatergic Circuits to GABAergic Interneurons in the Neonatal Auditory Cortex  Rongkang Deng, Joseph P.Y. Kao, Patrick O. Kanold 
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Representation of Color Stimuli in Awake Macaque Primary Visual Cortex
Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.
Figure 1 Global neuroanatomical correlates of gf and gc
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Synaptic Connectivity and Neuronal Morphology
Xiaowei Chen, Nathalie L. Rochefort, Bert Sakmann, Arthur Konnerth 
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2003)
Class-Specific Features of Neuronal Wiring
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Competition for establishing neural connections Figure 1. Competition for establishing neural connections. (A) An axonal growth cone can establish a synaptic connection with a dendritic spine if there is available space. (B) If all available dendritic spaces are already occupied by competing neurons, the potential synapse will not be established and the axon will continue its search and eventually establish connections with other neurons in its path. From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 2. Connection lengths in cortical and neuronal networks Figure 2. Connection lengths in cortical and neuronal networks. Connection length distributions (×) fitted with a Gamma function (see Table 2 for fit coefficients). (A) Macaque cortical network. (B) Rat supragranular neuronal network. (C) Caenorhabditis elegans local network. (D) Caenorhabditis elegans global network. From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 3. Spatially sparse population Figure 3. Spatially sparse population. (A) Network of 400 nodes and 264 unidirectional connections. (B) Distribution of connection lengths (×) with the Gamma fit indicated as a line (a = 1.5; b = 11.1; c = 11.3; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96). (C) Network of 400 nodes with potential occupation and 217 unidirectional connections. (D) Distribution of connection lengths (x) with the Gamma fit indicated as a line (a = 1.5; b = 15.0; c = 12.6; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.98). From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 4. Spatially dense population Figure 4. Spatially dense population. (A) Network of 1000 nodes and 796 connections. (B) Distribution of connection lengths (x) with the Gamma fit indicated as a line (a = 1.5; b = 6.8; c = 10.5; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.97). (C) Network of 1000 nodes with potential blocking and 690 unidirectional connections. (D) Distribution of connection lengths (x) with the Gamma fit indicated as a line (a = 1.5; b = 12.5; c = 11.7; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.97). From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 5. Evolution of population size Figure 5. Evolution of population size. (A) Network of 1000 nodes and 809 connections. (B) Distribution of connection lengths (x) with the Gamma function fit indicated as a line (a = 1.5; b = 6.4; c = 10.0; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.97). (C) Network of 1000 nodes with potential occupation and 697 unidirectional connections. (D) Distribution of connection lengths (x) with the Gamma fit indicated as a line (a = 1.5; b = 12.6; c = 12.1; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.98). From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 6. Dependence of filling fraction and edge density on the number of neurons. (A) Filling fraction, which is the proportion of successfully established connections after axon–cell contact, depends on the number of neurons (vertical bars indicate the standard deviation while lines show the average over 10 generated networks). (B) The edge density—the number of existing edges in the network (i.e., connected neuron pairs) divided by the number of all possible edges—decreases for larger numbers of neurons (average and standard deviation as in (A); solid line: complete network; dashed line: network without isolated nodes). From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 7. Histogram of connection lengths Figure 7. Histogram of connection lengths. Connection lengths were measured for 10 generated networks resulting in the average distributions shown here. (A) Maximally 1 afferent synapse on a neuron. (B) Maximally 10 afferent synapses on a neuron. The longest possible connection in the embedding space would be 140 units long. Note that due to increased competition for free places, there were more long-distance connections, up to 100 units long, in scenario (A), whereas connections in (B) were only up to 20 units long. From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 8. Variation of axon collaterals (outgoing synapses) and available places for synapse establishment. The median filling fraction of 20 generated networks with 1000 neurons for each parameter pair is indicated by the gray level. The maximum number of outgoing synapses denotes how many connections a single neuron can maximally establish. The number of maximum free places for synapses shows how many places each neuron has available for incoming connections. From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 9. Influence of competition on the filling fraction Figure 9. Influence of competition on the filling fraction. The x-axis shows the ratio between outgoing axon collaterals and maximally available places at potential target neurons of Figure 8. The filling fraction decays with this ratio and follows an exponential function f(r) = 1.125 exp(−r), R<sup>2</sup> = 0.91 (solid line). From: A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(12):3001-3010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp071 Cereb Cortex | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org