Experimental tests of wakefields and material damage for ILC spoilers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collimation in the ILC BDS Carl Beard ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory People Requirement Recent Successes Future Aims.
Advertisements

Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
08/01/2007Juan Luis Fernandez-Hernando End Station A Measurements on Collimator Wakefields 4th Wakefield Interest Group - CI 05/03/2008 Luis Fernandez-Hernando,
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Joanne Beebe-Wang 7/27/11 1 SR in eRHIC IR Synchrotron Radiation in eRHIC IR and Detector Background Joanne Beebe-Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory 10/
ATF2 Interaction Point Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Status T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Komamiya ( Univ. of Tokyo ), T. Suehara, Y.
Collimator Damage Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Cockcroft Institute “All Hands Meeting”, January 2006.
CLIC collimator survival IWLC 2010 J.L. Fernández-Hernando – ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute (Daresbury Lab.) 21/10/2010 J.L. Fernández-HernandoASTeC/CI21/10/2010.
Yury CHESNOKOV Crystal Collimation workshop, March 7, 2005 CALIBRATION of CMS CALORIMETERS with LHC PROTON BEAM DEFLECTED BY CRYSTAL CALIBRATION of CMS.
R.M. Jones (University of Manchester/Cockcroft Inst.) on behalf of CLIC Collaboration., ESTB Workshop, SLAC, 17 th March Collimator Wakefield Measurements.
MERLIN 3.0 only considers first order (dipole) modes. Kick is linearly proportional to offset. For offsets close to the axis this is a reasonable approximation.
The Compendium of formulae of kick factor. PLACET - ESA collimation simulation. Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
Personal summary of work carried out at Daresbury Laboratory: ILC/CLIC, NLS, ALICE and ITER Luis Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
IPBSM status and plan ATF project meeting M.Oroku.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Philip Burrows ECFA LC Workshop, Warsaw, 10 June Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University G. Christian, C. Clarke, B. Constance, H.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Plans for collimator survival and SLAC tests J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
1 Collimator Design Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester, UK Annual EuroTev meeting - Frascati, Italy, January 2008.
1 Collimator Design Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester, UK Annual EuroTev meeting - Frascati, Italy, January 2008.
Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline A. Lyapin, Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline 1 S. Boogert, J. Snuverink (JAI/RHUL, UK)
Proposal of Halo collimation system for ATF2 A.Faus-Golfe, N. Fuster-Martínez J. Resta-López (IFIC) P. Bambade, S. Liu, S. Wallon (LAL) 113/02/1417th ATF2.
Heat load of the radiation cooled Ti target of the undulator based e+ source Felix Dietrich (DESY, TH-Wildau),Sabine Riemann(DESY), Andriy Ushakov(U- Hamburg),
Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Coherent Diffraction Radiation experiment Konstantin Lekomtsev, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman, Pavel Karataev, Maximilian Micheler John Adams Institute at.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Collimator design and short range wakefields Adriana Bungau University of Manchester CERN, Dec 2006.
2 nd EuroTeV Annual Meeting, Daresbury 9 th January 2007 WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Beam Delivery System collimators J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
PROBLEM 1 Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Collimation for the Linear Collider, Daresbury.1 Adam Mercer, German Kurevlev, Roger Barlow Simulation of Halo Collimation in BDS.
ILC-BDS Collimators - Simulation and Experiment Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Group Annual Meeting December, 2007, Manchester Adriana Bungau.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Nigel Watson / Birmingham CollimationCollimation EDR to specify and find optimal solutions for  Damage survival, 2 (1) bunches at 250 (500) GeV  Jaw.
Simulating Short Range Wakefields Roger Barlow XB10 1 st December 2010.
G.Kurevlev - Daresbury meeting Collimators Material Damage Study Previous results In our group - Adriana Bungau’s thesis - heat deposition on.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Nigel Watson, 17 Nov 2008 ILC08/LCWS08 FNAL ILC: Beam Delivery System Collimation System Outline Comments on changes since EDR plan Nigel Watson / Birmingham.
May 31, 2005Mike Hildreth – ATF 2005 Energy Spectrometry and ATF Components of the nano-BPM Test Program and Plans for Future Tests Mike Hildreth University.
F.Staufenbiel / EuCARD 2 / Heat load and stress studies of the ILC collimator G. Moortgat-Pick 1;2 S. Riemann 2, F. Staufenbiel 2, A. Ushakov.
Jonathan Smith, 27 th August 2008, Uppsala 1 Optimal Collimators for the ILC Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft Institute)
G.Kurevlev - Manchester meeting1 Collimators Material Damage Study Previous results In our group - Adriana Bungau’s thesis - heat deposition on.
Towards Improved Collimation for the ILC
EUROTeV Diagnostics WP5
Status of Collimator Damage Studies
Dielectric Wakefield R&D programme at Daresbury Lab.
Radiation damage simulations for CLIC and ILC spoilers and ATF tests
Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Collimator design and short range wakefields
Peter Loveridge High Power Targets Group
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
WG2 Summary: Diagnostics, measurements, and commissioning
Nigel Watson (Birmingham) LAL, 16-May-2006
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
Undulator Physics Issues Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS July 11, 2007
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Experimental tests of wakefields and material damage for ILC spoilers J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop The collimator mission is to clean the beam halo from e- or e+ off orbit which could damage the equipment and mainly to stop the photons generated during the bending of the beam towards the Interaction Point. These photons, if not removed, would generate a noise background that would not allow the detectors to work properly. The spoiler serves as protection for the main collimator body as it will disperse the beam, reducing the beam energy density by multiple Coulomb scattering, in case of a direct bunch hit avoiding severe radiation damage. Task 5.3 Programme Highlights T480 data analysis/test beam at ESA Mafia/GdfidL simulations of T480 Collimators Beam damage simulations (FLUKA/Geant4, ANSYS) Beam damage test beam at ATF (phase 1) J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop Starting point Long, shallow tapers (~20mrad?), reduce short range transverse wakes High conductivity surface coatings Robust material for actual beam spoiling Long path length for errant beams striking spoilers Large c0 materials (beryllium…, graphite, ...) Require spoilers survive at least 2 (1) bunches at 250 (500) GeV Design approach Consider range of constructions, study relative resiliance to damage (melting, fracture, stress) Particularly important for beam-facing surfaces (wakefields) Also within bulk (structural integrity, heat flow) Design external geometry for optimal wakefield performance, reduce longitudinal extent of spoiler if possible Use material of suitable resistivity for coating Design internal structure using in initial damage survey seems most appropriate. a 0.6c0 J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Temperature increase from 1 bunch impact Summary of simulations Temperature increase from 1 bunch impact Exceeds fracture temp. 2mm depth 10mm depth 250 GeV e- 1119 µm2 500 GeV e- 79.56.4 µm2 Solid Ti alloy 420 K 870 K 850 K 2000 K Solid Al 200 K 210 K 265 K 595 K Solid Cu 1300 K 2700 K 2800 K 7000 K Graphite+Ti option 1 325 K 640 K 380 K 760 K Beryllium+Ti  option 1 - 675 K Graphite+Ti option 2 290 K 575 K 295 K 580 K Graphite+Al option 2 170 K 350 K 175 K 370 K Graphite+Cu option 2 465 K 860 K 440 K Graphite+Ti option 3 300 K Exceeds melting temp. J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Material damage test beam at ATF The purpose of the first test run at ATF is to: Make simple measurements of the size of the damage region after individual beam impacts on the collimator test piece. This will permit a direct validation of FLUKA/ANSYS simulations of properties of the materials under test. Allow us to commission the proposed test system of vacuum vessel, multi-axis mover, beam position and size monitoring. Validate the mode of operation required for ATF in these tests. Ensure that the radiation protection requirements can be satisfied before proceeding with a second phase proposal. Assuming a successful first phase test, the test would be to measure the shock waves within the sample by studying the surface motion with a laser-based system, such as VISAR (or LDV), for single bunch and multiple bunches at approximate ILC bunch spacing. Material damage test beam at ATF Simulations with FLUKA of melted surface on the Ti alloy target against the beam parameters. J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop Second phase of radiation damage test beam at ATF2-KEK: Will be used to study the stress waves generated by a bunch hitting the material and this data will be compared to FLUKA + ANSYS simulations. beam (George Ellwood) J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Precision encoded actuators with bi directional repeatability to <10mm (<5mm possible?). Note with 10mm over 300mm span, 0.03mrad angle control is possible on pitch of collimator surfaces Flexural Section (wakefield taper) Peripheral cooling sufficient? Angle varies from 0 at max aperture opening to 90mrad ~5o (full included angle (or ±20mrad about axis) Vessel (wire seal UHV compatible) Vented Side Grill for Wakefield continuity and pumping Spoiler Block 21mm width Ti EntranceTransition Flare From 20mm diameter to 30(h)x40(w)mm rectangular section. Inclined Wakefield Collimator Block Bulk Material – Be, semi-transparent to 500GeV electrons. Converging in 2 steps of opening angle 65mrad (3.7o) & 40mrad (2.3o) nearer the spoiler block (note: opening angle = ± 32.5mrad & ±20mrad about central axis respectively) then diverges at same angular rate downstream of the spoiler block J.L. Fernandez-Hernando EPAC08, WEPP168 Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Beam Parameters at SLAC ESA and ILC Repetition Rate 10 Hz 5 Hz Energy 28.5 GeV 250 GeV Bunch Charge 2.0 x 1010 Bunch Length 300 mm Energy Spread 0.2% 0.1% Bunches per train 1 (2*) 2820 Microbunch spacing - (20-400ns*) 337 ns *possible, using undamped beam J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop “wakefield box” ESA beamline J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop BPM A run with the beam going through the middle of the collimator (or without the collimator) is used as reference for the next run where the collimator will be moved vertically. This run also serves to calculate the resolution of each BPM. BPM The analysis will do a linear fit to the upstream and downstream BPM data separately, per each pulse (bunch) . For this fit the data is weighted using the resolution measured for each BPM. The slopes of each linear fit are subtracted obtaining a deflection angle. This angle is transformed into V/pC units using the charge reading and the energy of the beam. All the reconstructed kicks are averaged per each of the different collimator positions and a cubic, or linear fit of the form: y’ = A3·y3 + A1·y + A0 or y’ = A1·y + A0 (only to collimator positions from -0.6 mm to 0.6 mm) is done to the result. The error in the kick reconstruction at each collimator position weights the different points for the fit. The kick factor is defined as the linear term of the fit (A1). J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Error*sqrt(chisq/ndf) GdfidL 1 mm (V/pC/mm) Kick (V/pC/mm) Error (V/pC/mm) GdfidL 500 um (V/pC/mm) Error*sqrt(chisq/ndf) GdfidL 1 mm (V/pC/mm) col1 1.2 0.3 1.4 0.01 1.1 0.005 col2 1.9 0.2 4.2 0.09 2.0 0.05 Col3 (1m) 4.4 6.8 0.13 2.8 0.20 col4 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.03 0.0007 col5 4.9 5.7 0.17 0.57 col6 1 0.1 2.3 0.32 1.0 0.06 col7 3.5 3.1 0.11 col8 1.7 0.07 col9 col10 0.31 col11 col12 col13 4.1 3.3 col14 2.6 col15 1.6 3.7 0.23 2.7 Col 16 J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop GdfidL does not include resistive or surface effects.

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop

Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop Conclusions: A spoiler with a central Ti alloy body and Be tapers emerges as the most reasonable material configuration. Ti alloy and graphite core it is also an option. Analysis of T480 wakefield test beams. Reconstructed kick factor with errors below 10% (in most cases). Uniformity of results using different analysis methods. Phase 1 of the damage tests on Ti alloy at ATF. Outlook: Phase 2 of the damage tests at ATF2 were stress-waves will be measured. Benchmarking both FLUKA and ANSYS simulations. Analysis of activation and dose rate to prototype model due to beam halo and photons using FLUKA (geometry is done, still working on halo modelling). J.L. Fernandez-Hernando Uppsala EUROTeV Workshop