Participation, transparency, accountability: The role of freedom of information in REDD+ Key messages - May 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Advertisements

Governance for REDD+ Crystal Davis Governance of Forests Initiative World Resources Institute REDD Civil Society Coordination Seminar CIFOR campus, Bogor.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Progress with Due Diligence Activities in Panama Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC5) La Lopé National Park, Gabon.
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
URUGUAY’s efforts to address synergies among the Conventions Workshop on synergies and cooperation with other conventions 2-4 July 2003 Espoo, Finland.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogues on R-PP preparation Consultation, Participation & Outreach Plan August, 13 – 14, 2009.
Operationalising Carbon Finance in Ghana. Roundtable Meeting November 2008 The Role of Governance and Institutions in REDD Operationalising Carbon.
BUILDING CONSENSUS ON COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WITHIN LAND REFORMS AND THE EXTRACTIVE SECTOR IN KENYA CONFERENCE SAROVA PANAFRIC HOTEL, MARCH TH 2015.
KEY ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN REDD+ AND FCPF Joan Carling, AIPP.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Using Country Systems to Manage Climate Change Finance A Global Forum M onitoring Tracking quantity and quality of climate expenditure, accountability.
RRI Promoting Rights and Development through Climate and REDD+ Initiatives Progress and Steps Forward 28 October 2013 Oslo, Norway.
Mitigating the Social Impact of Oil Operations 18th World Energy Conference Eleodoro Mayorga Alba World Bank October 22, 2001.
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
GEF Policies and Processes in GEF 4 Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Europe and the CIS 7-8 March 2007, Istanbul.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Module 23 Environmental Safeguards Accreditation Training, January 21 – 25, 2013 Public Consultation.
The Forest Carbon Partnership Facility FCPF Consultations with Indigenous Peoples and Forest Dwellers: Main Messages and Follow up Steering Committee Meeting.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW Meeting, April – May 2013.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
MAKING THE FOREST SECTOR TRANSPARENT PROJECT (MFSTP) Forest Governance Scorecards in Ghana Presentation At The West Africa Forest Governance Forum 7 th.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
CED 410: The Global Seminar Spring 2015 Emily J. Wornell.
Aid Transparency: Better Data, Better Aid Simon Parrish, Development Initiatives & IATI Yerevan, 4 October 2009.
Why do corruption risks need to be addressed now? What are corruption risks in REDD+? What are risk mitigation actions? What are the tools? Who can prevent.
Recommendations on Monitoring and Tracking Quantity and Quality of Climate Expenditure, Accountability and Transparency Group 5.
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies Presenter: Johnson Appavoo Presentation prepared.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
4.4 Developing Tanzania REDD+ Safeguards Process and Lessons Learned.
PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT (PGA) OVERVIEW OF PILOT RESEARCH IN CROSS RIVER STATE, NIGERIA Tony Atah, UN-REDD+ Stakeholder Engagement Specialist.
5. Presentación general de la iniciativa REDD+ SES 5. Presentation of the REDD+ SES Initiative.
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course Module 3: Developing the SAP.
Entry points for gender equality & women’s empowerment concepts in REDD+
Why do corruption risks need to be addressed now? What are corruption risks in REDD+? What are risk mitigation actions? What are the tools? Who can prevent.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
Towards a culture of good governance: Implementing the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure Marcela Villarreal, Ph.D. Director.
Complementary Financing for the Investment Case
Advocacy-driven monitoring Chatham House 2015 David Young
Engaging Civil Society in Priorities for Strengthening Governance over Public Resources March 5, 2003.
Stakeholder consultations
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Overview of the international climate policy & finance framework and the building of the REDD+ mechanism Josep A. Garí Africa Advisor, UN-REDD Programme.
Process Lesson learnt Nguyen Thi Thu Huyen Programme Manager
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Building Coalitions for Change Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making Experience from OECD countries Directorate for Public.
Civil society demands for key changes in GEF 5 Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation Washington DC 9 November.
Bradley Reed USGS Climate and Land Use Change
UN REDD FAO-UNDP-UNEP July 2008
Supported By.
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
GLOBAL PREVENTION COALITION
Consultation & Participation
Ousseynou Nakoulima, Chantal Naidoo & Louise Brown 7 October 2014
A short introduction to the Convention
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Why anti-corruption for REDD+ ?
Setting UP Multi Stakeholder Processes for responsible land governance
UNODC SMALL GRANTS SCHEME
Ousseynou Nakoulima, Chantal Naidoo & Louise Brown 7 October 2014
9-1-1 Implementation NWT Association of Communities 2017 Annual General Meeting This topic is about the GNWT’s effort to implement a territory-wide Basic.
Joining Forces for Responsible Leadership to Enhance Good Governance:  Citizens, Public Officials, Private Sector and the Press What Governments are.
Investing in Source Water Protection
The Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice(ANEEJ),
UNODC SMALL GRANTS SCHEME
Lessons learned from REDD+ readiness processes
Twelfth Policy Board Meeting 8 July, 2014 Lima, Peru
Presentation transcript:

Participation, transparency, accountability: The role of freedom of information in REDD+ Key messages - May 2013

How fundamental is access to REDD+ information? Access to information (A2I) is a prerequisite for transparency, accountability and meaningful engagement of stakeholders, all underpinning the success of REDD+ It is part of human rights, anti-corruption and environmental international conventions and treaties to which the overwhelming majority of REDD+ countries have committed Systems to provide information about safeguards are called for in the Cancun Agreements

Information about …what ? How REDD+ works and how it will affect local and indigenous communities What funding is received for REDD+ and how it is used Which government agencies, non-governmental organizations or representatives of the private sector are legitimate intermediaries or interlocutors How are decisions made, including on land tenure, benefit sharing and selection of demonstration sites What are the (predicted or observed) environmental and social impacts of REDD+ activities

Information about what ? (c’td) How the right to free, prior and informed consent is implemented How funds or benefits flow from the national to the local level – including the amounts, frequencies and beneficiaries What are the methods, data and assumptions that underlie results-based estimates How safeguards are addressed and respected What are REDD+ related legal rights, such as carbon rights when/if they are developed, and what the modalities are for exercising them

How ? Good practices in REDD+ countries developing and implementing A2I laws Make most of the information available proactively rather than by request Ensure the format and languages are adapted to different stakeholders : publishing online in national language(s) is rarely sufficient Have dedicated information officers accountable for information flows Set clear time limits and low or no fees to access information Organize awareness campaigns to empower civil society on how to access and request information Check the effectiveness of information channels: monitor how information is used, when, and by who

Experiences in REDD+ countries Half of REDD+ countries have A2I laws… .. but their application to climate change, forests and REDD+ varies widely All countries preparing for REDD+ have Information, Education and Communications plans that constitute a basis for A2I Countries are exploring innovative online systems : REDD+ registries, National Forest Management systems, REDD+ information web sites, REDD+ online listserv, discussion fora…

What can REDD+ countries do ? Examine their obligations under national A2I laws for REDD+ Develop plans, with stakeholders, to define what information is needed when and in which format With clear roles and responsibilities and dedicated personnel Learning from their own experience on how information reaches (or not) stakeholders Use best practices in the implementation of A2I laws to inform safeguard information systems

What (else) can REDD+ countries do ? Establish transparency platforms that allow for feedback : web-based, cell-phone based, posters, institutionalized dialogues, regular town hall meetings etc REDD+ information resides (or will) with various government, civil society and private sector stakeholders: coordinated efforts to avoid fragmentation of information are necessary

Access to information in [country] If Cameroon, Colombia, DRC, Ecuador, Guatemala, Indonesia, Kenya, Mexico, Peru, or the Philippines : Please consult the report If another UN-REDD partner country, please contact estelle.fach@undp.org: short A2I analyses are available upon request

How can UN-REDD help? Access to information laws, when they exist in a REDD+ country, are part of legal preparedness for REDD+ Targeted support is available , e.g. to conduct national consultations to answer questions on what information, when, to whom and how Technical inputs can be offered on draft regulations/measures on access to REDD+ information Support to the development of SIS can include technical inputs to make sure safeguards information reaches the right stakeholders in the right timeframe

English: full report // executive summary // press release For questions please contact estelle.fach@undp.org Access the report (right click and select “open hyperlink”): English: full report // executive summary // press release Français : étude entière // résumé Español : informe // resumen