IOOS National Glider Data Assembly Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASIAES Project Overview Satellite Image Network for Natural Hazard Management in ASEAN+3 region Pakorn Apaphant Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development.
Advertisements

WOCE Global Data V3 WOCE-DPC Report Nathan Bindoff and David M. Legler Co-Chairs, WOCE DPC WOCE Conference November 2002 All of it.
Groom-gliders data-management workshop Brest, December 2012 Groom gliders data management n In 2012 : vertical profiles from 26 platforms.
Air-Deployable Profiling Floats
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Integrated Ocean Observing System Glider Data Assembly Center (IOOS-GDAC) John Kerfoot (RU-COOL) Derrick Snowden, Becky Baltes (IOOS) Kyle Wilcox (ASA)
U.S. IOOS ® National Glider Network Zdenka Willis Director, US IOOS Program Office Presented to the GROOM General Assembly – 5 June
Farm Service Agency Lender’s training for Electronic Submission of Guarantee Fees Implementation Date: September 23, 2009.
Argo a year ago. 500 floats. Regional coverage only.
The SouthEast Coastal Ocean Observing SECOORA Meeting Regional Association (SECOORA) June 11-12, 2007 SECOORA Data Management and Communications SECOORA.
Systems Oceanography: Observing System Design. Why not hard-wire the system? Efficiency of interface management –Hard-wire when component number small,
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
Comprehensive Large Array-data Stewardship System (CLASS) Web Site Tutorial Visit CLASS Site at
IQuOD Data Flow Tim Boyer NODC. Inflow How will IQuOD quality controlled data get into the World Ocean Database?
GHRSST Data Access Tutorial GHRSST Data Access How to Access GODAE High Resolution SST Products from the GDAC and LTSRF Kenneth.
Metadata Guides for Smarties Marine Metadata Initiative URL:
UNCW Ocean Observing: Providing Infrastructure, Data, and Products to Support State and Federal Agency Needs AQUARIUS NOAA’s Undersea Research Center (NIUST,
Observing System Monitoring Center Integrating data and information across observing system networks.
ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE DATA CENTER ‘Best’ Practices for Aggregating Subset Results from Archived Datasets Walter E. Baskin 1, Jennifer Perez 2 (1) Science.
Integrated Ocean Observing System -- IOOS -- United States Contribution to the Global Ocean Observing System Kurt Schnebele Ocean.US Deputy of Data Management.
Glider data (*.*bd files) via Iridium or rsync from WHOI, Umaine or UMaryland Disk NetCDF/Acquire WMO ID IOOS Glider DAC ERDDAP OPeNDAP sequence or download.geoJson,.json.nc,.ncCF,.ncCFMA.csv,.tsv,
Enhancements to a Community Toolset for Ocean Model Data Interoperability: Unstructured grids, NCTOOLBOX, and Distributed Search Rich Signell (USGS), Woods.
Integrated Model Data Management S.Hankin ESMF July ‘04 Integrated data management in the ESMF (ESME) Steve Hankin (NOAA/PMEL & IOOS/DMAC) ESMF Team meeting.
EGO – COST - Groom-gliders Kiel meeting Kiel, June 2014 Data-management activity n Within Groom and with COST support, the glider data- management group.
LEO meters Ocean models predicted currents and temperatures to direct ship and aircraft observations during LEO field program (Rutgers-LEO)
Animal Telemetry Photo: PNNL. Building a Marine Life Observing System: Tracking Animals Should be A Part of IOOS TAGGING OF PACIFIC PELAGICS Leveraging.
1 NATIONAL CENTERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION NCEI-IOOS Project Updates Mathew Biddle May 28th, 2015 IOOS DMAC Meeting, IOOS.
IOOS National Glider Data Assembly Center
1 Implementing QA/QC Standards for In Situ Ocean Sensors Using OGC-Sensor Web Enablement a.k.a. QARTOD to OGC a.k.a. Q2O Project Status Brief to NOAA IOOS.
MARACOOS Stakeholder Input Session MARACOOS as the Backbone of Ocean Observing in the MidAtlantic: recent developments around support of marine fisheries.
An Introduction to the Argo Data Sytem South Pacific Workshop 11 – 14 October 2005 Mark Ignaszewski FNMOC.
Robert Grumbine National Weather Service RA-IV WIGOS Implementation Workshop (English), December, Willemstad Curaçao United.
Catalog-driven workflows using CSW Rich Signell, USGS, Woods Hole, MA, USA Filipe Fernandes, SECOORA, Brazil Kyle Wilcox, Axiom Data Science, Wickford,
Access to IOOS Data Relevant to OOI Kathleen Bailey NOAA/NOS/IOOS January 6, 2016.
Data Management System to Collect, Quality Control, Distribute, and Archive Near Real-time Marine Data Jeremy J. Rolph, Jacob T. Rettig, Mark A. Bourassa,
IOOS Compliance Checker Luke Campbell, Software Engineer, RPS ASA.
Argo Programme – activities in Japan – Keisuke Mizuno (JAMSTEC) Argo is a global array of 3,000 free-drifting profiling floats that measure temperature.
National Data Buoy Center Ian Sears National Data Buoy Center An Overview of Quality Control Procedures for Buoy Data.
1. 2 NOAA’s Mission To describe and predict changes in the Earth’s environment. To conserve and manage the Nation’s coastal and marine resources to ensure.
NOAA EDMC Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Karen Stocks OOI CI Data Curator University of California, San Diego Ocean Observatories.
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ® ) National Glider Data Assembly Center.
IOOS National Glider DAC: Demonstration and Update April, 7th 2016 | Becky Baltes and Luke Campbell.
From Regional and National to Global 1. Ocean observations for societal benefit Climate, operational ocean services, ocean health USA Committee for the.
OceanSITES: New Perspectives Nathan Anderson. Overview Summary of the Documentation – Data Providers’ Guide* – How to participate in OceanSITES (recently.
The Historic Flight of RU27: The First Underwater Robot
2009 IOOS Regional Coordination Workshop Thursday, August 27
Quality Assurance of Real-Time Oceanographic Data
GDWG Agenda Item: Tools for GRWG activities
GSICS Collaboration Servers a Vehicle for International Collaboration Status 2011 Peter Miu EUMETSAT.
Argo & Google Ocean.
Jon Turton (JCOMM OCG Vice-Chair)
IOOS National Glider Data Assembly Center
OceanDocs Digital Repository of Marine Science Research Outputs
Inventory Database Participation for SECOORA Members
Multi-year Trends and Event Response
Developing a National Plan for Glider Operations: Data Management
US IOOS®, NDBC, CO-OPS Partnership Discussion
Hawaii to Guam For this project I was not given a specific time, type of glider used or purpose of mission…
Google Earth: Satellite & Glider Data
VCI Overview Sonja Vrcic
DAAC Data Investigation: Harmful Algal Blooms Scenario (Walker, Duguay, Shuman) Data Sets Required: Near Real Time: SST (current/anomaly), Wind speed.
Prepared by: Jennifer Saleem Arrigo, Program Manager
Contributions to WIGOS David Meldrum, vice chair, JCOMM OCG
Data Management Writers Workshop
Compliance Checker Presented by Luke Campbell (RPS)
ExPLORE Complex Oceanographic Data
ARGO, Profiling Floats, and Iridium
Visualization of Global Argo Metadata:
Project Status Brief to NOAA IOOS Program February 18, 2011
COLLABORATION AND ENGAGEMENT WITH CROSS-CUTTING WMO PRIORITIES; WIGOS MAIN OBSERVING COMPONENTS GLOBAL CRYOSPHERE WATCH 25 Jan 2019 Árni Snorrason Chair,
Presentation transcript:

IOOS National Glider Data Assembly Center Metadata, Archiving and Community Tools April 6, 2017 14:00 – 15:00 EST

Topics QARTOD QC Quality Metadata and NCEI Archiving Process Development of Community Tools

Data Quality Control Supplied by: Criteria Data provider DAC For all QARTOD CTD parameters/variables, if the variable:ancillary_variables attribute contains variables, assume QC has been implemented by the data provider If variable:ancillary_variables is left blank, QARTOD tests will be applied by the DAC and appended to the data provider NetCDF files.

Improving Metadata Archiving Goal: “to preserve data and associated information for future users…” “To accomplish this goal, the expert knowledge of the data provider must be acquired and preserved with the data” https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/archive Metadata is only as good as you make it. This will require additional time (although not as much as you’d think)

Common Metadata Issues Glider names Incorrect WMO id Provider Name Project Summary Acknowledgment CF Standard Names

Glider Name Use the name provided by the data provider on the deployment registration page Capital or lowercase, exactly as entered on the deployment registration page

WMO ID WMO ids are not required for DAC submission and NCEI archiving If specified, must match the WMO id that has been previously assigned to that glider deployed in the same WMO id region Only near real-time datasets with valid WMO ids are transmitted to GTS Older deployments that do not include a WMO id are still accepted by the DAC and archived by NCEI

Institution/Provider Names Required global attribute Use the provider name you would like, but consistency matters. Institution/Provider name should not contain the street address Archiving and searching for deployments by provider name requires consistency

Institution/Provider Examples Coastal Ocean Observation Lab, Rutgers University, USA Rutgers University Coastal Ocean Observation Lab, Rutgers University, 71 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 RU

Project Name Required global attribute Project should contain the official project name and acronym, if applicable.

Project Examples “TEMPESTS: The Experiment to Measure and Predict East Coast STorm Strength” “SECOORA: SouthEast Coastal Ocean Observing Regional Association” “This is where the project should go”

Summary The summary attribute is used by NCEI as the official description of the dataset. This is what everyone sees when they search NCEI for glider datasets and, utlimately, how the dataset is identified. A useful summary or abstract explaining the purpose of the deployment, the type of data included in the file and any additional information deemed useful to the data user.

Summary Examples “Seaglider La Push NANOOS line, Washington. Glider covering a 200km SW-NE transect off La Push (Olympic Peninsula), Washington, as part of the Northwest Association of Networked Ocean Observing Systems (NANOOS). Glider deployments complement two NANOOS moorings off La Push at the onshore (NE) end of the transect, and provide observations on dissolved oxygen and oceanographic conditions in this dynamic upwelling region that interacts with waters in the Salish Sea. Operated by the University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory (UW-APL) and funded by NOAA via the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS), with previous support from the Murdock Charitable Trust and the UW.” “This is a summary of the Originator, Group, Mission or whatever” “Glider profile data from <Insert University Here>.”

https://gliders.ioos.us/map/ Acknowledgment Acknowledges funding agencies https://gliders.ioos.us/map/ 2 ways to provide acknowledgement: “Attribution” input element on deployment registration page “Acknowledgment” global attribute in data provider NetCDF files Regardless of which method is used, no need to start with “Funding provided by…”. Just state the funding agencies or any other parties.

CF Standard Names Standard name indicates correct spelling http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-standard-names/42/build/cf-standard-name-table.html Standard name indicates correct spelling For NCEI archiving and CF-compliant purposes, these names have to be properly spelled. If they are not, the are not “standard” names.

Community Tools IOOS NetCDF compliance checker: https://github.com/ioos/compliance-checker IOOS Glider DAC plugin: https://github.com/ioos/cc-plugin-glider GCOOS/SECOORA Slocum Toolbox https://github.com/SECOORA/GUTILS Process binary or ascii Slocum glider files to IOOS Glider DAC-compliant NetCDF files Python 2 or 3 compliant Currently does not provide QC, but support is planned Need to build raw seaglider and spray glider (others?) raw data file readers to provide support for these glider types (Need example files from the community). Plan is for pull request merge by April 14. Future webinar and/or python notebooks on usage

IOOS DAC 2017 Goals Acceptance of delayed mode datasets Acceptance of native glider data files and creation of IOOS Glider DAC-compliant NetCDF files GTS proof What are the priorities from the community?