Outstanding Problems in Neutrino Physics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrino mixing angle θ 13 In a SUSY SO(10) GUT Xiangdong Ji Peking University University of Maryland.
Advertisements

Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003.
Measuring CP violating phase from long baseline neutrino experiments Naotoshi Okamura (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) ICFP2005 Oct. 07, NCU.
Mass-varying neutrino oscillations Danny Marfatia University of Kansas with V. Barger and K. Whisnant (hep-ph/ )
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 6 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
A LOOK INTO THE PHYSICS OF NEUTRINOS J A Grifols, UAB Viña del Mar, Dec 06.
NEUTRINO PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY STEEN HANNESTAD, Aarhus University BLOIS, 31 MAY 2012 e    
LBL neutrinos; looking forward to the future Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Model building: “The simplest neutrino mass matrix” see Harrison and Scott: Phys. Lett. B594, 324 (2004), hep-ph/ , Phys. Lett. B557, 76 (2003).
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Neutrino oscillation physics II Alberto Gago PUCP CTEQ-FERMILAB School 2012 Lima, Perú - PUCP.
February 23, 2005Neutrino Telescopes, Venice Comparing Solar and KamLAND Data Comparing Solar and KamLAND Data Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Prospects in Neutrino Physics Prospects in Neutrino Physics J. Bernabeu U. Valencia and IFIC December 2007 December 2007.
C. W. Kim KIAS The Johns Hopkins University Neutrino Physics and Cosmology SDSS-KSG Workshop.
Weighing neutrinos with Cosmology Fogli, Lisi, Marrone, Melchiorri, Palazzo, Serra, Silk hep-ph , PRD 71, , (2005) Paolo Serra Physics Department.
1 Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser Scottish Summer School August 11,
Application of neutrino spectrometry
Neutrino oscillation physics Alberto Gago PUCP CTEQ-FERMILAB School 2012 Lima, Perú - PUCP.
Prospects in Neutrino Physics Prospects in Neutrino Physics J. Bernabeu U. Valencia, IFIC and CERN Pontecorvo School September 2007.
G G G Fermion Masses: Arbitrary L R Quark Masses: Observed: Observed: m(c) : m(t) = m(u):m(c) m(c) : m(t) = m(u):m(c) 1/207 1/207 1/207 1/207.
NEUTRINOS: PAST PRESENT FUTURE Heidi Frank Merritt Fest
M. Wójcik Instytut Fizyki, Uniwersytet Jagielloński Instytut Fizyki Doświadczalnej, Uniwersytet Warszawski Warszawa, 10 Marca 2006.
THE CONNECTION OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS WITH COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPHYSICS STEEN HANNESTAD CERN, 1 OCTOBER 2009 e    
1 Neutrino Physics 2 Pedro Ochoa May 22 nd What about solar neutrinos and the solar neutrino problem? KamLAND uses the entire Japanese nuclear.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman HEPAP July 24, 2003 Bethesda Reactor Detector 1Detector 2 d2d2 d1d1.
May 19, 2005UAM-IFT, Madrid : Neutrino physics in underground labs Carlos Pena Garay IAS ~
Θ 13 and CP-Violation in the Lepton Sector SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
WG1 NuFact04, Osaka, July Neutrino mass and Cosmology: current bounds and future sensitivities Sergio Pastor (IFIC) ν.
Cosmological aspects of neutrinos (II) Sergio Pastor (IFIC Valencia) JIGSAW 2007 TIFR Mumbai, February 2007 ν.
Neutrino physics: The future Gabriela Barenboim TAU04.
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis International workshop on double beta decay searches Oct SNU Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul National University of.
Neutrino Physics Now and in Near Future Hisakazu Minakata U. Sao Paulo.
1 A.Zalewska, Epiphany 2006 Introduction Agnieszka Zalewska Epiphany Conference on Neutrinos and Dark Matter, Epiphany Conference on Neutrinos.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
NEUTRINO MASS, MIXING & OSCILLATION
NEUTRINO OSCILLATION MEASUREMENTS WITH REACTORS
Beyond the Standard Model- The elusive neutrinos -
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
Jan Hamann Rencontres de Moriond (Cosmology) 21st March 2016
Flavor Mixing of quarks.
(Xin-Heng Guo, Bing-Lin Young) Beijing Normal University
Neutrinos and the Evolution
Sterile Neutrinos and WDM
LBL Oscillation H. Minakata (Tokyo Metropolitan U.)
The Physics of Neutrinos
Neutrino oscillations with the T2K experiment
Neutrino mass and mixing: 2006 Status
NNN05, Aussois, John Ellis, April 7th 2004
Report of the T2KK Workshop
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
T2KK (without reactor) solves 8-fold degeneracy
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Neutrino oscillation physics
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis
Neutrino Masses and Mixings
Neutrino Oscillations
Neutrino Mass Bounds from Onbb Decays and Large Scale Structures
Will T2KK see new physics?
Search for Lepton-number Violating Processes
Cosmological/phenomenological implications of neutrino oscillations
Presentation transcript:

Outstanding Problems in Neutrino Physics ( Future Direction in Neutrino Physics ) C. W. Kim KIAS, Johns Hopkins

Outstanding Questions m , m , m ? Mixing matrix elements, in particular θ ? Dirac or Majorana ? CP violation ? Normal or inverted hierarchy ? How to detect relic neutrinos ? …… Why are neutrino masses so small ? Why is the mixing matrix so different from that of quark sector ? ………… 1 2 3 * 13 * *

0.22 (3 sigma)

Bounds on masses

Δm = 8 x (1±0.09) x 10 eV Δm = 2.4 x (1± ) x 10 eV 2 -5 2 2 2 -3 SOL 0.21 ) x 10 eV ATM 0.26

Normal Inverted m m 3 2 m m 2 1 m 1 m 3 m (eV) m (eV) 3 1

If ∑ m j < 8 x 10 eV, the inverted hierarchy is ruled out !! -3 If ∑ m j < 8 x 10 eV, the inverted hierarchy is ruled out !! There are at least two neutrinos which are heavier than 8 X 10 eV . -3 No lower bound for the lightest neutrino !!

Limits on sin θ 13

Limits on = sin θ U e3 13 Recall: Jarlskog Rephasing Invariant J ~ sin θ sin δ 13 CP - Reactor ν disappearance expt. (CHOOZ,Palo Verde) e 2 2 2 2 sin θ = 4 U ( 1 - U )= sin (2 θ ) e3 e3 13 ⇒ 2 -2 U < 5 X 10 ( 3 σ ) or e3 o U < 0.22 ( 3 σ ) or θ < 13 e3 13 Global fit: K2K : Absence of ν ν ( limits on 4 U U ) S-K ATM : Constraint on Δ m SOL ν, KamLAND : Survival prob. of ν depends on U 2 2 μ e μe e3 2 31 2 e e3

U ≈ θ θ θ ≈ 45 < 13 ≈ 35 Mixing Matrix √ 3 1 sin θ13 e 2 2 1 √ 1 3 o o o θ θ θ ≈ 45 < 13 ≈ 35 12 23 13 Bi-large mixing with U =0, θ = θ , θ = θ = π/6 e3 23 ATM 12 SOL

Future LBL Experiments Beam Detector Channels L (km) E (GeV) Start * NuMI MINOS ν 730 3.5 2005 ν μ e,μ CNGS OPERA,ICARUS ν ν 732 18 2007 μ e,τ ν T2K(OA) S-K 295 0.7 2009 ν μ e,μ NOvA Low –Z Calori. ν ν ~ 800 2 >2010 μ e,μ ~ (OA) .... * * Beta beams from He Ne 130(Frejus) >2015 6 , 16 T2KK Cosmic neut. Neutrino Telescopes

Allowed regions MINOS The results of the four different extrapolation methods are in excellent agreement with each other.

CP Violation Conditions for CP violation No two neutrinos are degenerate in mass No mixing angle is equal to 0 or Physical phase is different from 0 or   2 det C≠0, where C = - i [Ml Ml+, Mν Mν+] mass matrix ν ↔ ν β ≠ ν ↔ ν β α α Complex mixing matrix (3generations)

CP Violation : Jarlskog Invariant Formulars in Vacuum

T2KK (Subject of this workshop) expt T2KK (Subject of this workshop) Matter effects: sensitive to sin ( Δm L / 2 E) sin θ 2 kj 13 Sign of Δm , sin θ and sin δ can be observed U > 0.08 : twin HK, Japan and Korea Ishitsuka, Kajita, Minakata, Nunokawa U > 0.13 : 100Kton in Korea Hagiwara, Okamura, Senda RENO, Double CHOOZ,.. : U if U > 0.08 2 cp 31 13 if e3 e3 e3 e3

LBL Reactor Experiments (Other than RENO) Double-CHOOZ (프랑스) Braidwood (U.S.) KASKA (Japan) Daya Bay (China) Near Detectors Far Detector

√ Beta decay of 3H KATRIN ( KArlsruhe TRItium Neutrino Experiment ) m < 2.3 eV (95% CL) : Mainz m < 2.5 eV (95% CL) : Troiztk β β Effective mass in beta decay 2 m = Σ U m ej 2 = m νe j β j ________________________________ √ 2 2 2 m < 2.3 eV m1 can be larger than 2.3 eV. 0.67 m + 0.33 m + (<0.05) m β 1 2 3 KATRIN ( KArlsruhe TRItium Neutrino Experiment ) can reach down to 0.2 eV. Every thing is scaled up to 23m x 10m

* * Neutrinoless double beta decay u d e- ( 0.3 ~ 1.0 ) eV e- u d m < ( 0.3 ~ 1.0 ) eV ββ e- 2 U and CP phases u ej d * Nuclear unct. ~ a factor of 3 W+ νe νe u d u d e- e - e- - e u d u d W+ νe νe Majorana Neutrino

SN Neutrinos SN 1987A: unexpected bonanza Kamiokande II (12) IMB (8) Baksan (5) ( LSD: 5 hours earlier) m νe < 5.7 eV (95% CL) : Some well-motivated assumptions m νe < 30 eV : Model Independent S-K, SNO, LVD, KamLAND, AMANDA, MiniBOONE,… are ready !! Galactic SN: ~104 events Physics of SN explosion, some neutrino properties ( mag.mom., life time, charge radius,..) We have to wait. No control ! Sensitivity of ~ 3 eV due to intrinsic spread in time of neutrino burst If one sees a signal due to black hole formation , down to ~ 1.8 eV

Relic Neutrinos Neutrinos decoupled (relativistic at the time) 1.3 MeV for νe ~ at T = 1.5 MeV for νµ , τ T = ( 1.676 + 0.001) x 10-4 eV For m ~ O ( eV), they are non-relativistic, in fact since z ~ 103 ( m / eV) ° ν ν ν Neutrino number density: n + n = n = (111.9 ± 0.1) / cm3 ρ = ∑ m ( n + n ) 3 ° ° ° ν ν γ 11 ° ° ° Gershtein-Zeldovich Cowsik-McClelland ν νj j νj j Simply from Ω h2 < Ω h2 0.14 , we have ∑ m < 13 eV. ° ° ~ ν ~ M νj j How to detect them is one of the most challenging tasks in 21st century.

● As long as HDM is relativistic, HDM perturbations within the horizon Neutrinos as HDM ● As long as HDM is relativistic, HDM perturbations within the horizon are erased by “ Free – Streaming”. ● Free-streaming stops when HDM becomes non-relativistic at Zn-r . → If HDM dominates, top-down structure formation but, observation → bottom-up. Σ m j j → limit on Σ m j j ΔP(k) _ 0.1 ● ~ ( ) ( ) P(k) 1 eV ΩM h2

CMBR Relic neutrinos with mass of O (eV) are HDM (relativistic at decoupling). Due to free streaming, LSS formation is top-down, which is not the case. Free streaming HDM suppresses power spectrum at small wave lengths. Global fits of CMBR, SDSS Galaxies, SN Ia , Cluster Abundance, Weak Lensing, and Lyman Alpha Forest data give * ∑ m < 0.4 ~ 1.0 eV Better than β β, β , …... j j Weak Gravitational Lensing, yet to be improved Lyman- Alpha Experiment, very difficult. If we find ∑ m < 8 x 10-2 eV, the mass hierarchy can be resolved to be NORMAL! j j

⇒ 0 ≤ θ ≤ π / 4 covers 0 ≤ sin (2θ) ≤ 1 [ sin ( 2 θ ) , Δm ] Plot ⇒ 0 ≤ θ ≤ π / 4 covers 0 ≤ sin (2θ) ≤ 1 2 ( Light side ) Same for θ and π / 2 - θ Good enough for oscillations in vacuum What about π / 4 ≤ θ ≤ π / 2 ? ( Dark side ) 2 This can be covered if Δm < 0 is allowed. Use 0 ≤ θ ≤ π with a fixed sign for Δm . 2 2 2 ( Use either sin θ or tan θ ) ↘ Good for log scale

Summary m , m , m < O (eV) Two neutrinos are heavier than 8 x 10 eV. No lower mass bound exists for the lightest neutrino. If Σ m < 8 x 10 eV, the inverted hierarchy is ruled out. θ < 13 , θ = 35 , θ = 45 : U < 0.22 If U < 0.08 , it is difficult to measure θ and CP violation. Current cosmological data ⇒ Σ m ≤ O (eV) Lyman alpha forest, weak gravitational lensing, sharper image of CMBR ~ 1 2 3 -3 -3 ~ j o o o ~ ~ 13 12 23 e3 e3 13 j

13