Limits to Development October 4th 2016 Frisby on the Wreake Neighbourhood Plan

Frisby on the Wreake Allocation by MBC 19/9/16 At the Extraordinary meeting of the full MBC on 19/9/16 the “considerations of sites allocations” report was discussed This proposed that Frisby “by % of population” be allocated 72 new homes, however after taking away the 3 new homes we have under construction /in the pipeline (approved) we should have been allocated a total of 69. The burning issue is that some rural hubs cant find SHLAA sites and are therefore claiming that they cannot take their share, which in turn has been reallocated to the remaining rural development service centres and hubs. This has resulted in Frisby taking an extra 9 new homes that results in a total of 78. Frisby has also been allocated a further 24 reserve sites that could be pushed our way in the event of other not being able to fulfil their allocation. For the record the vote was in favour of the allocation, this was mainly due to the fear of missing the MLP delivery deadline, however two councillors voted against it, our councillor Edward Hutchinson was one of them

Neighbourhood Plan Legislation (test case Uppingham) Can a neighbourhood plan allocate additional or alternative sites to those in a Local Plan? A neighbourhood plan can allocate additional sites to those in a Local Plan where this is supported by evidence to demonstrate need above that identified in the Local Plan. A neighbourhood plan can propose allocating alternative sites to those in a Local Plan, but a qualifying body (Parish Council) should discuss with the local planning authority why it considers the Local Plan allocations no longer appropriate. The resulting draft neighbourhood plan must meet the basic conditions if it is to proceed. National planning policy states that it should support the strategic development needs set out in the Local Plan, plan positively to support local development and should not promote less development than set out in the Local Plan or undermine its strategic policies. Nor should it be used to constrain the delivery of a strategic site allocated for development in the Local Plan. Should there be a conflict between a policy in a neighbourhood plan and a policy Source Practice Planning Guidance para 44 id41044

MBC SHLAA assessments for all land put forward GREEN – proceed able AMBER – proceed with caution RED –DO NOT PROCEED

NP needs to allocate sites for 78 houses ONLY THIS IS MBC Local Plan for Frisby 4x sites Total houses 118 FOTW Allocation 78 NP needs to allocate sites for 78 houses ONLY

MBC assessment and Rankings of the Sites

Village Envelope 2005

Great Lane Summary MBC assessed at 40 houses Planning application for 48 houses Proposed services for 61 houses Housing Number likely to be 48-61 houses

Water Lane Summary MBC assessed at 14 houses Application figure 30 houses Housing Number could be 14-30 houses

Land to the South (HO) Summary MBC assessed at 40 houses Consultation proposal 48 houses Application submitted to MBC 28/9/16 (48 houses) Housing Number as advised by our consultants realistically could be anywhere between 48-250 houses on the total land available. Mr Cook has never muted any figure above 48.

Rotherby Lane Summary MBC assessed at 24 houses Restrictions to building due to grade 2 listed property, renovation would have to be part of the development. SITE differs as a brownfield site (i.e. buildings already on site). HISTORICALLY BROWNFIELD SITES TEND TO BE PREFERENCE SITES FOR DEVELOPMENT BY COUNCILS Housing Number likely to be 24 houses

Limits to Development Options Housing numbers utilised for Great Lane and Land to South (Hall Orchard) are from actual planning applications that have been submitted to Melton Borough Council by the developers. Housing numbers utilised for Water Lane were supplied by Mrs Desmond Noble on 28/9/16 to Lisa Bailey and they are the numbers that will be utilised in the planning application that will be submitted shortly. “Two options were proposed at the consultation but the 30 house scheme was deemed more suitable for the village in its current situation and the feedback from the forms at the consultation supported the 30 also” . Housing numbers for Rotherby Lane are from the MBC SHLAA assessments and what they have submitted into the draft local plan

OPTION 1 TOTAL 102- 375 HOUSES Water Lane – 30 houses Land to South (HO) – 48 houses Rotherby Lane- 24 houses, restrictions of building apply so houses would have to be in keeping. Field behind not accepted as developable for 15- 20 years TOTAL 102- 375 HOUSES Field Not Included Field Not Included

(+ Rotherby Lane 24 houses?) OPTION 2 GT Lane – 48 houses Land to South (HO) – 48 houses TOTAL 88-311 HOUSES (+ Rotherby Lane 24 houses?) Field Not Included

OPTION 3 TOTAL 102-115 HOUSES GT Lane – 48 houses Water Lane – 30 houses Rotherby Lane- 24 houses, restrictions of building apply so houses would have to be in keeping. Field behind not accepted as developable for 15- 20 years TOTAL 102-115 HOUSES

(+ Rotherby Lane 24 houses?) OPTION 4 GT Lane – 48 houses Water Lane – 30 houses TOTAL 78-101 HOUSES (+ Rotherby Lane 24 houses?)

OPTION 5 TOTAL 72-85 HOUSES GT Lane – 48 houses Rotherby Lane- 24 houses, restrictions of building apply so houses would have to be in keeping. Field behind not accepted as developable for 15- 20 years TOTAL 72-85 HOUSES

Questionnaire Delivery Volunteers from October 5th 2016 What we need to do:- Deliver to your allocated households Explain to those who are unaware of what the situation is and make sure they understand we want ONE OPTION ONLY Give them time to complete the questionnaire Collect the completed questionnaires and return to Lisa Bailey