Indiana University Intellectual Property policy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intellectual Property Policy and Procedures
Advertisements

1 © Copyright and other Intellectual Property. 2 What is intellectual property? Patents Trade Marks Designs Plant Breeders Rights Copyright Confidential.
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
Copyrights for Creatives April 16, 2014 Brocach Irish Pub.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Copyright Law David G. Post Temple Law School Feb. 2004
Jeremy Rowe Copyright Planning Issues.
History 2002 – Director of research and sponsored program develops IP policy Fall 2002 – Referral to review the policy February 2003 – Faculty affairs.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Age Series “Don’t I Own My Own Work?” Negotiating to Keep Your Copyright Intellectual Property in the Digital Age:
Protecting Your Scholarship: Copyrights, Publication Agreements, and Open Access Harvard University Office for Scholarly Communication May 11, 2009 Kenneth.
Policy On Intellectual Property. Differences With Senate Approved Version Format and structure Definition page is added Consolidates copyright and patent.
Ownership of Intellectual Property: Textbooks and Inventions Frank Lancaster UT Office of the General Counsel Presented at The University of Tennessee.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
Standards and Guidelines for Web Page Publishing December 9, 2009.
1 Copyright & Other Legal Issues. 2 WHAT IS COPYRIGHT? Copyright is the form of protection provided by the laws of the United States to authors of “original.
Office of the General Counsel1 COPYRIGHT and the TEACH Act The Technology, Education, and Copyright Harmonization Act Copyright © 2007 Villanova University.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
November 15, :30-300pm. Blackboard Update Blackboard Update Combining of Tickets – Only for cross-listed classes this spring Combining of Tickets.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Developing an IP Policy at Smaller Institutions James R. Zanewicz, J.D. Director Office of Technology Development.
Proposed Revisions Copyright Policy WSU Intellectual Property Committee.
Intellectual Property Laws and Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia.
The Basics of Intellectual Property Law Understanding IP by A. David Spevack, Office of Naval Research.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Philip.
IM NETWORK MEETING 20 TH JULY, 2010 CONSULTATION WITH 3 RD PARTIES.
Authorship, peer review and conflicts of interest.
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
Stephanie Roof, CRA Proposal Manager Sponsored Projects Administration BALL STATE UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Copyright Donna Min Shiroma School Library Services Advanced Technology Research Branch Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Student Support © September.
Entrepreneurship CHAPTER 8 SECTION 1.  When you develop a new product or service, you create an asset that must be protected.  Intellectual property.
Intellectual Property “The gift that keeps on giving.” Paul Royster, Coordinator of Scholarly Communications University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries June.
Teaching & the TEACH Act Paul Royster Coordinator of Scholarly Communications, UNL Libraries November 20, 2015.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Intellectual Property The Underdog of the Business World For More Details Please Visit:
Contract Compliance Training
Technology Transfer Office
So you’ve invented something?
Indiana Access to Public Records Act (APRA) Training
UTS Library 2016 workshop Copyright for Researchers
News You Can Use Office for Faculty Success Hurley Administration, Suite 135 Michael A. McPherson Associate Vice Provost for Faculty.
Author Rights Sarah A. Norris, Scholarly Communication Librarian,
Copyright Law David G. Post Temple Law School Feb David
Copyright and Open Licensing
ECE362 Principles of Design
Copyright and Open Licensing
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
Copyright and Course Websites
Contract Compliance Training
Pre-Close Rules of Engagement
Bonnie R. Nelson Professor Associate Librarian for Information Systems
Copyright and Higher Degree Students
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
Copyright law 101 Nicole Finkbeiner
For Bethel University Faculty & Students
Intellectual Property at Purdue
Copyright and Open Licensing
Presentation transcript:

Indiana University Intellectual Property policy

Who AND WHAT OF THE Intellectual property policy Who is covered under the Policy? Employees, full or part time Persons with a University appointment Whether or not these persons receive compensation Students, full or part time All other persons creating Intellectual Property using University resources What is covered under the Policy? All Intellectual Property created with University resources in whole OR in part. “University resources” is not exclusive to money and includes time, equipment, personnel, facilities, etc.

Categories of intellectual property The two main categories of Intellectual Property under the Policy are: 1) Patentable Intellectual Property and 2) Copyrightable Works

Categories of intellectual property Trademarks are addressed by a separate policy, which can be located at: http://policies.iu.edu/policies/categories/financial/licensing-trademarks/FIN-LT-licensing-and-trademark-policy.shtml Questions regarding trademarks should be sent to Val Gill, Director of Licensing and Trademarks, vkgill@iu.edu.

What is patentable intellectual property? “‘Patentable Intellectual Property’ describes inventions, discoveries, and manufacturing designs that have been conceived or first actually reduced to practice, and are novel, useful, and non-obvious, and therefore likely to be subject to protection under United States patent law.” Examples: chemical compound, drug, machine

Process for patentable works When a patentable invention is developed, the creator notifies IURTC (Indiana University Research and Technology Corp.). IURTC has forms for this: http://iurtc.iu.edu/process/tech-comm/disclosure.shtml. IURTC is the organization assigned to hold and manage the University's Intellectual Property. IURTC will then determine whether or not the University would like to seek patent protection and will notify the creator within 60 days. Evaluations are conducted by subject matter experts, and they consider factors such as: If comparable technologies are already on the market How this discovery compares to those technologies Whether the discovery may require a patent or copyright The time and investment that will be needed to bring the discovery to market The size and growth potential of market demand for this technology

Process for patentable works Once someone develops an invention subject to this Policy (with University resources), they assign their right, title, and interest in the invention to the University. And so… “The University owns and shall have the sole right to determine the disposition of Patentable Intellectual Property under this Policy, including decisions concerning patent licensing and sale.” If the work is patented and has commercial application, the creator will share in the distribution of revenues based on the schedule in the Intellectual Property Policy.

What is copyrightable intellectual property? “‘Copyrightable Intellectual Property’ describes original works of authorship that have been fixed in a tangible medium of expression, including books, articles, music, software, traditional or electronic correspondence, and instructional materials (including Online Instructional Materials), that are likely to be subject to protection under United States copyright law.” IU’s Intellectual Property Policy divides the larger category of Copyrightable Intellectual Property into two sub-categories: Traditional Works of Scholarship and University Works

Traditional works of scholarship Traditional Works of Scholarship refers to scholarly and creative works, regardless of form, that have been created by academic appointees or students, and are: Not Patentable IP, Not works that have been the subject of Exceptional University Support, and Not works that have been the subject of external grants or contracts

Traditional Works of Scholarship Examples include: Scholarly publications and journal articles Books Poems and works of music or art Instructional material such as syllabi, assignments, and tests Play scripts and theatrical productions Research bulletins Monographs Non-patentable software

allocation Of RIGHTS for Traditional Works of Scholarship “The University shall assert no claims to copyright ownership in or to distribution of revenue from Traditional Works of Scholarship.” However, the University may use Traditional Works of Scholarship that have been created for ordinary classroom and program use for administrative purposes, which can include: Course equivalency exams (i.e. assessing transfers), Accreditation review; and “Other functions that allow the University to fulfill its responsibilities for accountability.” In the case of Online Instructional Materials, if the creator leaves the University, IU retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide, unlimited license to use and revise the content for online instruction.

Traditional works of scholarship An important take-away: THE CREATOR HOLDS THE COPYRIGHT This means that the creator – and not IU legal counsel– is responsible for defending and monitoring copyright status, making all necessary filing to protect the work, and negotiating agreements relating to the work (e.g. copyright permissions and licensing).

What are University Works? There are four categories of University Works. #1: Copyrightable Intellectual Property that has been specifically commissioned by a University office, and, except as expressly provided otherwise in writing, includes recordings of performances, presentations, talks, or other educational or extracurricular activities of University students, faculty, staff, visitors, and/or third parties, that are made by or at the request of the University.

What are University works? #2: Copyrightable Intellectual Property created by non-academic appointee employees (i.e., staff). #3: Copyrightable Intellectual Property developed through external funding (e.g., grants) – but note, the funding agreement supersedes this Policy.

What are University Works? EXCEPTIONAL university SUPPORT #4: Copyrightable Intellectual Property developed with Exceptional University Support. What is Exceptional University Support? Financial or other support for research and teaching activities that exceeds the norm for faculty or student teaching or research in that field or department. This will often depend on the circumstances. In the case of Online Instructional Materials, this includes designated technical assistance in developing an online course (e.g. audio-visual department personnel or a graduate assistant); purchase of specialized software, hardware, or third party services for a specific project; and special release of student or faculty responsibilities to allow time for the project to be developed. Again, this all must EXCEED the norm for traditional courses.

exceptional university support Another important take-away: In all instances of Exceptional University Support, a written agreement must be signed between the University and the creator making explicit the work’s status as having received Exceptional University Support (and therefore being a University Work).

exceptional university support What Exceptional University Support is NOT: Ordinary library services Sabbatical funding Ordinary clerical or administrative support Use of office or lab supplies and equipment Funding for endowed chairs The award of competitive internal research or teaching grants Merely assigning a faculty member to teach a course that uses instructional materials that are provided to students electronically For Online Instructional Materials, Exceptional University Support is NOT: Basic instructions on web composing and the online instructional process Occasional troubleshooting and use of University servers and software Ordinary use of University servers and software platforms Consultation with relevant University offices with respect to creator’s rights under the IU Intellectual Property Policy

Process for University works The division of the University that has commissioned or provided Exceptional University Support for the work must notify IURTC and give IURTC its opinion about the commercial potential of the work. As with patents, IURTC will determine whether or not to take up the work. If IURTC declines, the division of the University may instead manage (but not own) the copyright in consultation with the Office of the Vice President and General Counsel. “The University owns and retains all right to use and commercialize University Works.” Much like with patents, the creator assigns his or her right, title, and interest in the work to the University.

Role of IU general counsel Copyright questions regarding University Works shouldbe sent to the Office of the Vice President and General Counsel, and copyright will be held by The Trustees of Indiana University, as opposed to individual authors. “The Office of the Vice President and General Counsel is the only source of legal advice within the University and shall only provide legal advice to the University, nor to individual authors with respect to work in which they own the copyright.”

Allocation of rights for University works Regarding the revision of University Works: IU agrees to respect the rights of the author(s), either withdrawal or revise works that have become obsolete, consult with creators no longer employed at IU regarding proposed revisions, provide authors the first offer to create any desired revisions, and provide all creators the opportunity to request withdraw or revision of their authored Works for academic integrity purposes. IU will acknowledge those who have made a substantial contribution to a University Work, unless otherwise preferred by the contributor. University bears responsibility for defending and protecting these works. However, authors do have the ability to request the University take legal action if the work is being infringed upon.

Other aspects of the Intellectual Property policy Dispute resolution is handled by the Intellectual Property Council. In general, a creator has 30 days to challenge a decision of IURTC or the University, and a return decision is expected back in another 30 days. The Creator or the Council can appeal up to the President, whose decision is final. More details about and functioning and makeup of the Council can be found in the Intellectual Property Policy. The details of the revenue sharing provisions have not been included here for the sake of brevity. The full provisions can also be found in the Intellectual Property Policy. Although the Intellectual Property Policy described here is the official and default Policy of the University, exceptions can be made by written agreement with the consent of the President.

For more information Contact University Works: Jennifer Westerhaus Adams, Associate General Counsel jeweadam@iu.edu Traditional Works of Scholarship: Naz Pantaloni, Copyright Program Librarian nazapant@indiana.edu IURTC and Patentable Intellectual Property: Bill Brizzard, Director of Technology Commercialization bbrizzar@iu.edu The full Intellectual Property Policy is available here: http://policies.iu.edu/policies/categories/administration-operations/intellectual-property/intellectual-property.shtml