Contact person Maria Riazantseva:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Properties of Broadband Magnetic Turbulence in the Reversed Field Pinch John Sarff D. Craig, L. Frassinetti 1, L. Marrelli 1, P. Martin 1,
Advertisements

E. E. Titova, B. V. Kozelov Polar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Russia V.Y.Trakhtengerts, A. G. Demekhov Institute of Applied Physics, Nizhny Novgorod,
Electron Acceleration in the Van Allen Radiation Belts by Fast Magnetosonic Waves Richard B. Horne 1 R. M. Thorne 2, S. A. Glauert 1, N. P. Meredith 1.
Statistical study of non-reconnection plasma jets as observed by the DOUBLE STAR spacecraft E. Amata 1, S. Savin 2, D. Ambrosino 1, L. Trenchi 1, M.F.
A REVIEW OF WHISTLER TURBULENCE BY THREE- DIMENSIONAL PIC SIMULATIONS A REVIEW OF WHISTLER TURBULENCE BY THREE- DIMENSIONAL PIC SIMULATIONS S. Peter Gary,
混合模拟 基本方程与无量纲化 基本方程. 无量纲化 方程化为 一些基本关系式 Bow shock and magnetosheath.
Which describes a variation of wave frequency ω(t) in a geometric-optic approximation [4]. Here n(ω) is the refractive index of the medium, is the vector.
Nanoflares and MHD turbulence in Coronal Loop: a Hybrid Shell Model Giuseppina Nigro, F.Malara, V.Carbone, P.Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica Università della.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Hybrid simulations of parallel and oblique electromagnetic alpha/proton instabilities in the solar wind Q. M. Lu School of Earth and Space Science, Univ.
DIPARTIMENTO DI FISICA Luca Sorriso-Valvo Sezione di Cosenza Intermittency in solar wind induced electric field Roberto Bruno Vincenzo Carbone.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Non-collisional ion heating and Magnetic Turbulence in MST Abdulgader Almagri On behalf of MST Team RFP Workshop Padova, Italy April 2010.
Accuracy of spacecraft measurements of solar wind plasma: Past, Present and Future John Podesta & John Steinberg Organizers Shine Workshop, July 6-10,
The turbulent cascade in the solar wind Luca Sorriso-Valvo LICRYL – IPCF/CNR, Rende, Italy R. Marino, V. Carbone, R. Bruno, P. Veltri,
Brief introduction of YINGHUO-1 Micro-satellite for Mars environment exploration J. Wu, G. Zhu, H. Zhao, C. Wang, L. Lei, Y. Sun, W. Guo and S. Huang Center.
Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, P. Cagas, A. Pitna, A. Komarek, K. Jelinek, F. Nemec University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics,
Intermittency beyond the ecliptic plane Anna Wawrzaszek, Marius Echim, Wiesław M. Macek, Roberto Bruno Mamaia, 6-13 September 2015 (1) Space Research Centre.
RUSSIAN SPACE MISSIONS FOR SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL SCIENCE ILWS-2011 A.A. Petrukovich, L.M. Zelenyi Space Research Institute V.D. Kuznetsov IZMIRAN.
Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, F. Nemec, A. Pitna, A. University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic G. Zastenker,
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL MONITORING OF THE INTERMITTENT DYNAMICS IN THE TERRESTRIAL FORESHOCK Péter Kovács, Gergely Vadász, András Koppán 1.Geological and.
Cusp turbulence as revealed by POLAR magnetic field data E. Yordanova Uppsala, November, 2005.
Large-Amplitude Electric Fields Associated with Bursty Bulk Flow Braking in the Earth’s Plasma Sheet R. E. Ergun et al., JGR (2014) Speaker: Zhao Duo.
PAPER I. ENA DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS. The Imager for Magnetopause-to- Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) missionis the first NASA Mid-size Explorer (MIDEX)
1 Multi-spacecraft, multi-scale investigation of intermittency and multifractal structure of turbulence in the terrestrial magnetosheath M. Echim (1,2),
TO THE POSSIBILITY OF STUDY OF THE EXTERNAL SOLAR WIND THIN STRUCTURE IN DECAMETER RADIO WAVES Marina Olyak Institute of Radio Astronomy, 4 Chervonopraporna,
XVII CLUSTER Workshop, Uppsala, 14 May 2009 Fan and horseshoe instabilities -relation to the low frequency waves registered by Cluster in the polar cusp.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Turbulence in the magnetosphere studied with CLUSTER data : evidence of intermittency Lamy H. 1, Echim M. 1,2, Darrouzet F. 1, Lemaire J. 3, Décréau P.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
Kinetic Alfvén turbulence driven by MHD turbulent cascade Yuriy Voitenko & Space Physics team Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium.
IMPORTANCE OF FAST MEASUREMENTS OF SOLAR WIND PARAMETERS AT THE IP SHOCK FRONT Moscow, February 6-10, 2012 Z. Němeček, J. Šafránková, L. Přech, O. Goncharov,
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
Relating the Equatorward Boundary of the Diffuse Redline Aurora to its Magnetospheric Counterpart Grant, Jeff 1 ; Donovan, Eric 1 ; Spanswick, Emma 1 ;
Observation of high kinetic energy density jets in the Earth’s magnetosheath E. Amata 1, S. P. Savin 2, R. Treuman 3, G. Consolini 1, D. Ambrosino, M.F.
1 MAVEN PFP ICDR May 23-25, 2011 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission Particles and Fields Science Critical Design Review May ,
Space Research Institute Russian magnetospheric & heliospheric missions.
Space Research Institute BMSW - Fast Monitor of Solar Wind Plasma Parameters for current and future missions. M. Riazantseva 1,2, G. Zastenker 1, J. Safrankova.
Intermittency Analysis and Spatial Dependence of Magnetic Field Disturbances in the Fast Solar Wind Sunny W. Y. Tam 1 and Ya-Hui Yang 2 1 Institute of.
17th Cluster workshop Uppsala, Sweden , May 12-15, 2009
-1- Solar wind turbulence from radio occultation data Chashei, I.V. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia Efimov, A.I., Institute of Radio Engineering.
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
Electric field, electric potential, and ‘density’ measurements at quasi-perpendicular collisionless shocks: Cluster/EFW measurements Stuart D. Bale, Ryan.
Stuart D. BaleFIELDS SOC CDR – Science Requirements Solar Probe Plus FIELDS SOC CDR Science and Instrument Overview Science Requirements Stuart D. Bale.
SST- Solid State Telescope ESA - Electrostatic Analyzer Science Measurement and Operational Requirements.
Turbulence in the Solar Wind
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
SEPT/STEREO Observations of Upstream Particle Events: Almost Monoenergetic Ion Beams A. Klassen, R. Gomez-Herrero, R. Mueller-Mellin and SEPT Team, G.
R. Maggiolo 1, M. Echim 1,2, D. Fontaine 3, A. Teste 4, C. Jacquey 5 1 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA); 2 Institute.
Exploring reconnection, current sheets, and dissipation in a laboratory MHD turbulence experiment David Schaffner Bryn Mawr College Magnetic Reconnection:
How can we measure turbulent microscales in the Interstellar Medium? Steven R. Spangler, University of Iowa.
48th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 30 – November 3, 2006, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania HIBP Designs for Measurement of the Electric.
Time-Dependence (structuring) of the Alpha-to-Proton Ratio (A He ) in the Solar Wind at 1 AU: Initial results, Implications, and Speculations Harlan E.
Generation of anisotropic turbulence in drifting proton-alpha plasmas Yana Maneva, S. Poedts CmPA, KU Leuven In collaboration with: A. Viñas and L. Ofman.
CHARACTERISTICS OF TURBULENT PROCESS IN THE SOLAR PHOTOSPHERE
An overview of turbulent transport in tokamaks
Turbulence wave number spectra reconstruction
35th International Cosmic Ray Conference
Rick Leske, A. C. Cummings, C. M. S. Cohen, R. A. Mewaldt,
Characterization of Field Line Topologies Near the Magnetopause Using Electron Pitch Angle Measurements D. S. Payne1, M. Argall1, R. Torbert1, I. Dors1,
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
Solar Wind Core Electrons
Third-Moment Descriptions of the Interplanetary Turbulent Cascade, Intermittency, and Back Transfer Bernard J. Vasquez1, Jesse T. Coburn1,2, Miriam A.
Wang, X.1, Tu, C. Y.1,3, He, J. S.1, Marsch, E.2, Wang, L. H.1
Meeting on Solar Wind Turbulence, Kennebunkport, June 4-7, 2013
Space activities at Charles University
Correlation Scales of the Turbulent Cascade at 1 AU Charles W
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Presentation transcript:

Contact person Maria Riazantseva: orearm@gmail.com Space Research Institute High - frequency plasma turbulence observed on SPECTR-R in the solar wind and in the magnetosheath M. O. Riazantseva1, V.P. Budaev1,2, G. N. Zastenker1, L. S. Rakhmanova1, J. Safrankova3, Z. Nemecek3, L. Prech3 1 Space Research Institute (IKI) Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia 2 National research centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia 3Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Contact person Maria Riazantseva: orearm@gmail.com

BMSW instrument (experiment PLASMA-F) on board of spacecraft SPECTR-R Experiment PLASMA-F : BMSW – measurements of Solar wind (SW) and Magnetosheath (MSH) ion flow parameters (faraday cups) MEP – energetic particles(Si-detectors 20-1000 keV) BS MP The main objectives: Turbulence in the solar wind and the magnetosheath Fine structure of energetic particle acceleration SPECTR-R: Launched 18 July 2011 on highly elliptical orbit period of revolution 8.3 days Perigee 576 km;  apogee 340000 km = 53 Re;  inclination 51.3 deg. BMSW: - ion flux value and direction (time resolution 30 ms) plasma parameters in sweeping mode (most of the time): proton density , bulk speed, temperature, alpha particles/proton ratio ( resolution 3 s) plasma parameters in adaptive mode (separate time intervals): proton density, bulk speed and temperature (resolution 30 ms) BMSW instrument

The main principle of the BMSW instrument and features of the «new» BMSW laboratory sample of the new sensor DP-10-34. idea of the two part collectors Sensor – Faraday cap C2, C4 – grounding grid; C3 – control grid; C1 – suppressor grid Collector All the sensors are identical and directed along the axis of the device oriented to the sun. Sensors have collectors cut into two parts (one sensor can measure the direction of the flux in one plane). It provides flexibility, reservation and possibility to intercalibrate sensors in flight. Sensors are united in pairs (one pair - for measuring ion flux vector (magnitude and two angles with time resolution 30 ms), the second - for sweeping mode (measurements of full energetic spectrum, and Np, Vp, Tp, Na/Np with time resolution 1.5 s), the third - for adaptive mode (measurements of Np, Vp, Tp with the highest time resolution 30 ms)). Sensors will have wider angle diagrams ± 60. new BMSW will consist of two types of blocks – main and additional (to have the possibility to measure the particle from the direction not to the Sun ). new BMSW will be almost identical for all projects.

Strannik “Piligrim” - the nearest mission (launch ~2022): Outer magnetosphere orbit apogee 18-27 Re Perigee 0.3-11 Re inclination 51.8˚ deg. Launch ~2021-2022 combination of PLASMA-F and Resonance instruments fast plasma and energetic particle measurements (BMSW-S, TOTEM-I, KAMERA-OV, TOTEM-E, TDK-S, DOC-MS,); 3D electric and magnetic field measurements (instruments FM-PS, AMEF-WB, LEMI, HFA, RZ, ELMAVAN) Objectives: Thin boundaries, small scale structures and transient processes in critical points of energy transformation in magnetosphere (sub solar point of magnetopause, day cusps, plasmasheath in night tail), and also in the solar wind and magnetosheath Plasma turbulence up to electron scales

Main objectives of investigation of turbulent characteristics in the solar wind and in the flank magnetosheath: to study properties of frequency spectra of the ion flux fluctuations on scales 0.01- 10 Hz and to show a variability of kinds of spectra (more than 1500 of spectra in SW and MSH). to analyze properties of probability distributions functions of the small-scale ion flux fluctuations and to explore the degree and nature of the differences between the experimental distribution functions from the standard (Gaussian) distribution functions. to compare the turbulent properties in the SW and in the flank MSH. to determine scaling characteristics of high order structure functions of ion flux fluctuations, to demonstrate their variability and to compare them with predictions of different models. to produce parameterization of scaling of the structure functions with log-Poisson model and to investigate the contribution of different geometry of dissipative structures.

Turbulent ion flux fluctuations on different scales Multiscale process : (Zeleniy & Milovanov, 2004) An example of typical turbulent ion flux fluctuations in the SW 2012 /07/15 (high resolution BMSW measurements 32 Hz) on interval of 8 hours (a), 20 min (b), 40 sec (c) . The high level of variations is observed on all scales  multiscale SW structure

Spectra with two characteristic slopes -5/3 Fb=2.4 P2= -2.85 Spectra with two characteristic slopes and the break point between them are repeatedly discussed both for the interplanetary magnetic field and for the SW plasma fluctuations ( see, for example, the review of Bruno, Living Rev. Solar Phys., 2013; and the review of Alexandrova et.al.,Space Sci. Rev.,2013) inertial range SW dissipation range Spectrum of the interplanetary magnetic field fluctuations (CLUSTER). Alexandrova et. al.,2013 SpaceScienceRev Spectrum of ion flux fluctuations in the SW 12/07/15 00:23-00:40 P1= -1.95 P2= -3.36 Fb=0.45 MSH inertial scale Also using BMSW measurements: Safrankova et.al., PRL 2013 – for ion density, velocity and temperature fluctuations in the SW ; Riazantseva et al., Phil. Trans. 2015 – for ion flux fluctuations in the SW ; Riazantseva et. al., Adv.Sp.Res 2016 – for ion flux fluctuations in the SW and MSH dissipation range Spectra with two characteristic slopes observed in ~ 50% in the SW and in ~ 47% in the MSH Spectrum of ion flux fluctuatuations in the MSH 11/10/30 09:23-09:40

<P1SW>=-1.6±0.2 <P2SW>=-2.9±0.5 <FbSW>=1.9±0.8 Hz The comparison of ion flux spectra with two characteristic slopes in the SW and MSH Ion flux fluctuation spectra in the MSH 24/10/2012 08:41 – 08:58 UT and in the SW 28/09/2011 09:30-09:20 UT Slopes of the spectrum in the MSH seems to be practically the same as in the SW . The break frequency changes in a wide ranges, but in a whole the Fb in MSH is usually more than twice less than in the SW ; In average on statistic in the SW (Riazantseva et.al., Adv.Sp.Res.2016): <P1SW>=-1.6±0.2 <P2SW>=-2.9±0.5 <FbSW>=1.9±0.8 Hz <P1MSH>=-1.75±0.2 <P2MSH>=-3.0±0.4 <FbMSH>=0.9±0.5 Hz Statistics: in the SW 363 spectra (calculated on17 min. intervals) in the MSH 427 spectra The distribution of spectra indexes

Spectra with flattening around the break Pp= - 1.1 P2= - 2.9 Fb1= 0.08 Fb2= 2.4 SW Spectrum of electron density fluctuations in the SW on ISEE1-2 (Celnikier et al., Sp. Sci. Rev.,1983) Spectrum of ion flux fluctuations in the SW 11/09/29 03:08-03:25 Spectrum with flattening observed in ~ 32% the SW intervals and in ~ 18% in the MSH). The flattening in the MSH is observed at lower frequencies. P2= -3.6 Pp= -0.7 P1= -2.3 Fb2=0.35 Fb1=0.02 MSH Plasma fluctuation spectra with flattening between low and high frequency parts of them are observed also in: Unti et.al., Astrophys. J. 1973.; Celnikier et.al., Astron. Astrophys., 1987; Chen et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012.) Also using BMSW measurements: Safrankova et.al., Astrophys. J. 2015 -for ion density in the SW Spectrum of ion flux fluctuations in the MSH 12/10/31 15:42-15:59

Spectra with peak around the break F=0.4 SW Spectrum of ion flux fluctuations in the SW 12/04/05 11:16-11:33 Spectrum of magnetic field fluctuations in the MSH (CLUSTER). (Alexandrova et. al.,2006 JGR) MSH F=0.13 Spectra with peak around the break observed in ~ 19 % in the MSH and in ~ 3 % in the SW. Peaks around the break on spectra of the magnetic field fluctuations in the MSH were investigated in Alexandrova et. al., JGR, 2004 and 2006. It was shown that they are the sign of Alfven vortices Spectrum of ion flux fluctuations in the MSH 12/02/09 11:29-11:46

Dynamic of ion flux fluctuation spectra in MSH 12/02/09 10:29-12:02

Spectra with nonlinear descent on high frequencies SW Spectrum of ion flux fluctuations in the SW 1109/29 01:51-02:08 Spectrum of magnetic field fluctuation in the SW (CLUSTER). (Alexandrova et. al., 2012 APJ) MSH High frequency part of the ion flux fluctuation spectra can not be approximated by linear fashion in ~ 6 % in the SW and in ~ 11 % in the MSH. In Alexandrova et al. Astrophys. Journ. 2012 the exponential character of such descent for spectra of the interplanetary magnetic field fluctuations was demonstrated. Spectrum of ion flux fluctuations in the MSH 11/11/29 03:58-04:15

Variability of ion flux fluctuation spectra spectra with two characteristic slopes spectra with flattening around the break spectra with peak around the break spectra with nonlinear descent on high frequencies Other types of spectra SW 50% 32% 3% 6% 9% MSH 47% 18% 19% 11% 5%

Variability of probability distribution functions on small time scales Experimental distribution (BMSW) Experimental distribution (BMSW) Gaussian distribution Gaussian distribution An example of PDF of ion flux fluctuations on scale 0.1 s in the SW 28/09/2011 03:59-04:16 UT - symmetric view An example of PDF of ion flux fluctuations on scale 0.1 s in the SW 28/09/2011 3:16-03:33 UT - asymmetric view No Gaussian PDF’s of different forms is the result of intermittency in the turbulent SW flow

Variability of probability distribution functions for different time scales An example os PDFs of ion flux fluctuations in the MSH (solid line) on scales of 1/8 s (a); 1 s (b); 64 s (c); and 2048 s (d), and corresponding Gaussian distributions (dashed line) for period of 2011/10/13 15:11-18:35 UT. PDFs strongly differ from Gaussian distribution on scales less than 1 s, this difference disappears toward large scales. Also using BMSW measurements: Chen et.al., Astrophys. J.let,. 2014; Riazantseva, Phil. Trans. 2015. By previous results: see for example (Bruno et al., JGR 2003; Alexandrova et al., Phys Rev. Let. 2009) by magnetic field measurements, and (Bruno et al., JGR, 2003, Riazantseva, AIP Conf. Proc. 2010) for plasma measurements.

The variability of flatness value in the SW and in the MSH structure function of q order ( - scale parameter) : Sq()~ q/3 – for Gaussian PDF Sq()~  (q) – no Gaussian PDF MSH Flatness (4th-order of moment) : Flatness coeficients are strongly different for various intervals. In average a tendency of flatness increasing from large to smaller scales are observed and (according to the approach of Bruno et al., JGR, 2003 ) demonstrate the multifractal signal and high level of intermittency. The dependence of flatness coefficient from the time scale parameter  for different time intervals in the SW and MSH. Solid line – an average flatness. Green line F = 3 for Gaussian distribution

The analysis of high order structure function in the SW and in the MSH The dependence of structure functions of high orders q from time scale parameter  on interval in the SW 28.09.2011 02:39 – 03:05 UT and on interval in the MSH 22.11.2011 09:15 – 12:45 UT The dependence of high orders structure functions from structure function for q= 3 on interval 28.09.2011 02:39 – 03:05 UT on interval in the MSH 22.11.2011 09:15 – 12:45 UT In accordance with Benzi et al., Phys. Rev. 1993, linear dependence of the structure function of q-th order from the structure function of 3-th order in wide range of scales demonstrate the extended self similarity and generalized multi-scale invariance at time scales >> linear correlations

The comparison of experimental scaling of the structure functions for ion flux fluctuations in the SW and in the MSH with model scaling SW MSH The experimental scaling ζ(q)/ ζ(3)-q/3 for several 26 min intervals (different colors for different intervals) vs order q in the SW during the period 09/10/2011, 08:02-18:53 UT (left panel) and in the MSH during the period 07/10/2011,04:37-09:06 UT (right panel), scaling for Kolmogorov model (K41) (dashed line– q/3) , log-Poisson model of She –Leveque (solid line Δ= β=2/3), and Biskamp and Mueller model (dashed dotted line). Non-linear scaling of the structure functions is strongly differed from Kolmogorov model scaling and it is predominantly close to the log-Poisson model

Parameterization of the structure functions by the log-Poisson model. Intermittent turbulence Scaling of the structure function according to She –Leveque - Dubrulle model (She & Leveque, Phys.Rev. Let., 1994; Dubrulle, Phys.Rev. Let., 1994): Non intermittent turbulence β – characteristic of the intermittency (β=1 → (q)=q/3 Kolmogorov model without intermittency), Δ - parameters related to geometry of dissipation structure and edge effects, scaling of most intermittent dissipative structure l ~ l - Δ. For isotropic 3D (She -Leveque model) Δ= β=2/3 The high level of intermittency is observed for ion flux flow in the SW and in the MSH. Non intermittent flow is observed only in 10% of intervals. The distributions of β and Δ parameterization coefficient for ion flux fluctuations in the SW and in the MSH

Parameterization of the structure functions by the log-Poisson model. Scaling of the structure function according to Biskamp and Mueller model for two-dimensional dissipative structures (Biskamp and Mueller, Phys Plasmas, 2000) : Scaling of the structure function according to model for 1-D filament-like dissipative structures ( Budaev, Phys.Lett. A, 2009 ) : gf is close to 3 – the filament structure dominate in the process. The analysis of structure function scaling according to log-Poisson model show the dominant contribution of filament structures in turbulent processes in the SW and in the MSH. The distributions of g and gf parameterization coefficient for ion flux fluctuations in the SW and in the MSH

Conclusions: Different shapes of spectra of ion flux fluctuations in the SW and the MSH can be observed. Spectra with two characteristic slopes are observed in near to 50% of cases both for the SW and the MSH , spectra with flattening around the break - in 30% for the SW and in 20% for the MSH , spectra with peak - in 3% for the SW and in 20% for the MSH , spectra with nonlinear descent on high frequencies -in 6% for the SW and in 10% for the MSH . This is the demonstration of the nonstationary character of SW turbulence. The observations in the SW and in the flank MSH demonstrate practically the same mean value of characteristics slopes, whereas the break frequency in the MSH is twice less than in the SW . PDF’s of ion flux fluctuations in the SW and the MSH strongly differ from Gaussian distribution on scales ~0.1-10 Hz. In average the flatness grow towards the small scale and demonstrate the multifractal signal and high level of intermittency. The flow in the MSH is usually less intermittent than one in the SW . The analysis of high order structure functions show the nonlinear dependence from scale parameters, in this way the trivial self similarity is not satisfied, but the extended self similarity in plasma turbulence both in the SW and MSH can be observed. Statistical characteristics of ion flux fluctuations in the SW and the magnetoshath can vary significantly for different intervals, however for the most part of cases they can be described by Log-Poisson model. The analysis of structure functions scaling in the frame of log-Poisson approach has shown the observation of intermittent character of flow with dominant contribution of filament-like structures.