Latmos UPMC/CNRS - ILRC 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Studying the Physical Properties of the Atmosphere using LIDAR technique Dinh Van Trung and Nguyen Thanh Binh, Nguyen Dai Hung, Dao Duy Thang, Bui Van.
Advertisements

1 This is the footer Ozone in the Tropical Tropopause Layer Geraint Vaughan What determines the ozone concentration in the tropical upper troposphere?
Preliminary results of the seasonal ozone vertical trends at OHP France Maud Pastel, Sophie Godin-Beekmann Latmos CNRS UVSQ, France  NDACC Lidar Working.
Centro de Investigaciones en Láseres y Aplicaciones (LASER RESEARCH CENTER AND APPLICATIONS ) (CITEFA-CONICET) Buenos Aires - Argentina Collaboration between.
Variability in Ozone Profiles at TexAQS within the Context of an US Ozone Climatology Mohammed Ayoub 1, Mike Newchurch 1 2, Brian Vasel 3 Bryan Johnson.
Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir stare ozone profiles using ozonesonde measurements during Arctic Research on the Composition.
Measured parameters: particle backscatter at 355 and 532 nm, particle extinction at 355 nm, lidar ratio at 355 nm, particle depolarization at 355 nm, atmospheric.
Assimilation of TES O 3 data in GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones, Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto Kevin Bowman Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
Seasonal Variations in the Mixing Layer in the UTLS Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto GEOS-Chem Meeting April 2009.
NDACC Working Group on Water Vapor NDACC Working Group on Water Vapor Bern, July 5 -7, 2006 Raman Lidar activities at Rome - Tor Vergata F.Congeduti, F.Cardillo,
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Atmospheric Measurements at Capel Dewi field station Prof. Geraint Vaughan.
Transport of CO and O 3 into the UTLS Region Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto.
Abstract Using OMI ozone profiles as the boundary conditions for CMAQ calculations significantly improves the agreement of the model with ozonesonde observations.
Results obtained with the Tropospheric Ozone DIAL System Using a YAG Laser and Raman Cells (A53Q – 0439) J. T. Sullivan 1,2, T. J. McGee.
Assimilation of EOS-Aura Data in GEOS-5: Evaluation of ozone in the Upper Troposphere - Lower Stratosphere K. Wargan, S. Pawson, M. Olsen, J. Witte, A.
Turbulence layers detection from ground-based Rayleigh lidar Alain Hauchecorne 1, and the MMEDTAC Team Charles Cot 1, Francis Dalaudier 1, Jacques Porteneuve.
UAH Ground-based Ozone Lidar - A New NDACC Lidar Station Member NDACC Lidar Working Group Meeting, NASA/JPL, Table Mountain, CA Nov. 4, 2013
Lidar remote sensing for the characterization of the atmospheric aerosol on local and large spatial scale.
Shi Kuang 1, Mike Newchurch 1, John Burris 2, Wesley Cantrell 1, Guanyu Huang 1 1 U. Of Alabama in Huntsville, 2 NASA/GSFC
Tropospheric Ozone Laminar Structures and Vertical Correlation Lengths Michael J. Newchurch 1, Guanyu Huang 1, Brad Pierce 3, John Burris 2, Shi Kuang.
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
MIR OZONE ISSUES Horizontal (STE) and vertical transport (long life time in UTLS) Photochemical production by precursors (biomass burning, lightning,..)
Operation of Backscatter Lidar at Buenos Aires (34.6 S / 58.5 W) for the Retrieval and Analysis the Atmospheric Parameters in Cirrus Clouds, Tropopause.
Mike Newchurch 1, Shi Kuang 1, John Burris 2, Steve Johnson 3, Stephanie Long 1 1 University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center,
TRENDS IN ATMOSPHERIC OZONE FROM A LONG-TERM OZONE CLIMATOLOGY Jane Liu 1,2, D. W. Tarasick 3, V. E. Fioletov 3, C. McLinden 3, J. H. Y. Jung 1, T. Zhao.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
Set-up of a ground-based Rayleigh lidar to detect clear air turbulence Alain Hauchecorne 1, Charles Cot 1, Francis Dalaudier 1, Jacques Porteneuve 1, Thierry.
Retrieval of Ozone Profiles from GOME (and SCIAMACHY, and OMI, and GOME2 ) Roeland van Oss Ronald van der A and Johan de Haan, Robert Voors, Robert Spurr.
Planetary Boundary-layer Ozone Flux using Ozone DIAL and Compact Wind Aerosol Lidar (CWAL) in Huntsville AL Guanyu Huang 1, Michael J. Newchurch 1, Shi.
LASE Measurements During IHOP Edward V. Browell, Syed Ismail, Richard A. Ferrare, Susan A Kooi, Anthony Notari, and Carolyn F. Butler NASA Langley Research.
Michael J. Newchurch 1*, Shi Kuang 1, Lihua Wang 1, Kevin Knupp 1, Thierry Leblanc 2, Raul J. Alvarez II 3, Andrew O. Langford 3, Christoph J. Senff 3,4,
Ozone time series and trends Various groups compute trends in different ways. One goal of the workshop is to be able to compare time series and trends.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
AIRS science team meeting Camp Springs, February 2003 Holger Vömel University of Colorado and NOAA/CMDL Upper tropospheric humidity validation measurements.
Institute of Atmospheric Physic
Monitoring of Eyjafjallajökull Ash Layer Evolution over Payerne- Switzerland with a Raman Lidar Todor Dinoev, Valentin Simeonov*, and Mark Parlange Swiss.
Layered Water Vapor Quick Guide by NASA / SPoRT and CIRA Why is the Layered Water Vapor Product important? Water vapor is essential for creating clouds,
A new method for first-principles calibration
Influence of Lightning-produced NOx on upper tropospheric ozone Using TES/O3&CO, OMI/NO2&HCHO in CMAQ modeling study M. J. Newchurch 1, A. P. Biazar.
Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.
TES and Surface Measurements for Air Quality Brad Pierce 1, Jay Al-Saadi 2, Jim Szykman 3, Todd Schaack 4, Kevin Bowman 5, P.K. Bhartia 6, Anne Thompson.
Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change A. Gaudel, O. R. Cooper, G. Ancellet, J. Cuesta, G. Dufour, F. Ebojie,
EOS-Aura MLS Validation Using Radiosonde Profiles During the WAVES Campaign Cassie Stearns August 10,2006 Dr. Bojan Bojkov and Dr. David Whiteman, Advisors.
Abstract We intercompare Stratospheric Column Ozone (SCO) and ozone profiles retrieved from GOME data with ozonesonde and SAGE-II data for GOME.
Breakout session – Chapter 6 Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change TOAR Workshop 1.03, Beijing, January 25 th 2016 A. Gaudel,
TTL workshop, Honolulu, October 17, 2012 The role of Stratospheric Aerosol and Ozone in Climate – AerOClim – Stratospheric and upper tropospheric processes.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Daily Tropospheric Ozone Residual from OMI-MLS
Andy Delcloo and Hugo De Backer
Application of OMI Ozone Profiles in CMAQ
S. Godin-Beekmann1, A. Pazmiño1, F. Goutail1, S. Khaykin1, M. R
CAST – sonde activities
Analysis of tropospheric ozone long-term lidar and surface measurements at the JPL-Table Mountain Facility site, California Maria J. Granados-Muñoz and.
Ozone monitoring with GOMOS-ENVISAT experiment version 6
Regional Radiation Center (RRC) II (Asia)
Summary Sondes RS 80 has dry bias. RS 92 virtually without bias
Huailin Chen, Bruce Gentry, Tulu Bacha, Belay Demoz, Demetrius Venable
LASE Measurements of Water Vapor During IHOP
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Validation of TES version 2 ozone profiles
INTEX-B flight tracks (April-May 2006)
An (almost) unexpected way to detect very thin diffuse (aged
Eureka Stratospheric Ozone Differential Absorption LIDAR revived
Why are TOLNet and NDACC Here Today?
NDACC Lidar measurements at OHP
Alexandre Baron, Patrick Chazette, Julien Totems
Presentation transcript:

Latmos UPMC/CNRS - ILRC 2015 long term tropospheric ozone trends measured by lidar and ECC ozonesondes from 1991 to 2015 in Southern France G. Ancellet, A. Gaudel, S. Godin-Beekmann ECC LIDAR OHP NDACC Station 44N, 6E 700 m asl Surface ozone monitor Latmos UPMC/CNRS - ILRC 2015

OHP tropospheric ozone lidar Transmitter: Nd:YAG + SRS in D2 20 Hz, 10 mJ at 289 and 316 nm (266 nm not used) Receiver: 80 cm telescope diameter Grating spectrometer LICEL data acquisition system (analog + photocounting) Measurement altitude: 4-15 km asl (1991-1993) 3-15 km asl (1993-2011) 2.5-15 km asl (2012-today) Integration time ≈ 1 hour (sunset) 2 profiles per week on average O3 concentration accuracy (intercomparison campaigns with balloon and aircraft) ≤ 7 % Data removed in cloud or thick aerosol layers Overlap function correction in the 2-4 km range. Major changes: - March 1993: switch from 2 Raman cells (289/299 nm) to one (289/316 nm) - March 2012: switch to LICEL data acquisition, more stable optical design between laser and telescope Latmos UPMC/CNRS – LWG 2016

Ozone profile vertical/temporal averaging for the study of the interannual variability Lidar ECC NAO Pinatubo 2003 1991 1995 1996 2000 2001 2005 2006 2010 2011 2015 611 profiles 593 profiles 445 profiles 504 profiles 539 profiles Lidar 390 profiles 337 profiles 232 profiles 260 profiles 290profiles ECC 221 profiles 256 profiles 213profiles 244 profiles 249 profiles Surface O3 Latmos UPMC/CNRS -LWG 2016

Air mass transport assessment and PTU vertical profiles at OHP ERA interim ECMWF analysis 1° resolution 60 vertical levels: Temperature, humidity, PV vertical profiles from 0 to 20 km for each lidar and ECC profiles Flextra 4 days backward trajectories: 700 hPa, 500 hPa, 400 hPa, Tropopause Layer (2km below PV=1.5) Arctic Europe America Asia

Comparison of 5-year O3 seasonal averages Less southerly flow for lidar than for ECC in 2005-2013 Period 1991-1995 small transport differences Good proxy for ECC –lidar bias ≤-1 ppb Latmos UPMC/CNRS – LWG 2016

Trend above 6km are significant Trends - Global According to IPCC method trends are defined as Virtually certain: pvalue < 0.01 Very likely: pvalue < 0.1 Likely: pvalue < 0.34 About as likely as not: pvalue = 0.67-0.34 Unlikely: pvalue > 0.67 Very unlikely: pvalue > 0.90 Exceptionally unlikely: pvalue > 0.99 Trend above 6km are significant Decrease only at the surface for which there is ECC data only

Trends per region Number of data is reported on the figure for each year For Europe: - Trends are quite similar to the global trends For America: - Likely trend at 2-4km and higher than global - Not likely trends at 4-6km and close to the surface and trends values are lower than global

Trends per region Number of data is reported on the figure for each year Fore Arctic and Asia, very low sampling, not sure we can use it…

Trends per PV range Number of data is reported on the figure for each year For PV < 0.75 Pvu or PV > 0.75PVu trends quite similar to the global trends, Except for UT for which trend’s value is lower than for global (0.24ppbv/yr instead of 0.37ppbv/yr)

Conclusions 24-year regular tropospheric O3 measurements with two different instruments (ECC and lidar) Meteorological bias for lidar measurements and instrumental bias between ECC and lidar less than -1 ppbv for 5-year seasonal averages in the free troposphere (consistent with lidar accuracy during intercomparison campaign < 7%) Need to use both ECC and lidar measurements to improve the interannual variability analysis No O3 trend in the mid troposphere while there is a significant positive trend (3 ppbv/decade) below the tropopause At 700 hPa variable trend probably linked to NAO and large transport Decrease in the PBL (-1.4 ppbv/decade) consistent with ground-based ozone trend in Southern Europe Latmos UPMC/CNRS - LWG 2016

Latmos UPMC/CNRS - ILRC 2015 Perspectives Projet Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR) dans cadre IGAC: rendu en 2017 Réseau lidar troposphérique TOLNET aux USA associant NASA, NOAA, NCAR (coordination M. Newchurch, Huntsville) Activité de Ozone sonde expert group pour harmonization longues series de mesure: mise à jour des 1171 sondes OHP avec tous les paramètres permettant ce travail (merci à Nathalie Poulet !) Latmos UPMC/CNRS - ILRC 2015