EFW DFB Systems Assurance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final/Shipout Inspection Approved for Public Release.
Advertisements

First Article Inspection Report
USING NASA QUALITY STANDARDS NASA Academy of Aerospace (AAQ) Quality Mini-Workshop Ken Crane Quality Engineering Technical Discipline Team Lead NASA SAFETY.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, ANick Virmani 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Tracker Subsystem Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST Large Area Telescope: Manufacturing Preparation Design Engineering Meeting Jerry Clinton 1 April 2003 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford,
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 15 Manufacturing & Processes 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Manufacturing.
GLAST LAT ProjectF2F, June 15, 2005 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Joseph Cullinan SLAC Performance & Safety Assurance Manager.
GLAST LAT ProjectTEM &TEM-PS Manufacturing Readiness Review – September 16, 2004 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Pat Lujan TEM.
First Article Inspection
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) MISSION ASSURANCE Brian Klatt January 3-4, 2008.
9 March 2004 GIFTS Blackbody Subsystem Critical Design Review Project Plan Status Fred Best & Evan Richards 9 March 2004.
From Research Prototype to Production
THEMIS Mission CDR JacksonUCB, June 14-18, 2004 Critical Design Review THEMIS Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California.
25-1 MAVEN IPSR October 30,31, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review October 30,31, : SMA Jorg Fischer, MAM Mars Atmosphere and Volatile.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE BRIAN KLATT MISSION ASSURANCE MANAGER.
GLAST LAT ProjectMay 25, 2006: Pre-Environmental Test Review Presentation 12 of 12 Quality Assurance 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Pre-Environmental Test.
1 PFP IPDR 2010/6/ Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Instrument Preliminary Design Review Safety and Mission Assurance Jorg Fischer, PFP SMA Manager.
THEMIS Instrument PDRParts- 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 Parts Requirements Preliminary Design Review Jorg Fischer University of California - Berkeley.
GLAST LAT ProjectApril 27, 2006: LAT Pre-Ship Review Presentation 12 of 12 Quality Assurance 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT Pre-Ship Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 15 Manufacturing Process 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Manufacturing Process.
24a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Mission Assurance Ron Kolecki Senior Systems Assurance Manager August 16-17, 2005.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review – June 30, 2005 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Joseph Cullinan SLAC Performance & Safety.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 3-4 Sept EFW INST+SOC PDR97 RBSP Electric Field and Waves Instrument (EFW) Product.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP-EFW SMA I-CDR RBSP EFW SMA Safety and Mission Assurance Instrument -
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 100 EFW DFB Systems Assurance Trent Taylor LASP.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Peer Critical Design Review, March 19-20, 2003 J. Clinton 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Electronics, Data Acquisition & Instrument.
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 LAT QA has hired a full-time on-site representative (Donald Knaepple)
THEMIS Instrument PDRMission Assurance- 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 THEMIS Mission Assurance Preliminary Design Review Ron Jackson University of California.
1 MAVEN Documentation Training. Date September 12, 2011 Particles and Fields Package (PFP) MAVEN - FLT Traveler Book Documentation Training Safety and.
Safety and Mission Assurance Lockheed Martin Space Operations (LMSO) Science, Engineering, Analysis, and Test Operation Safety and Mission Assurance Activity.
LAT-PR GLAST LAT ProjectManufacturing Readiness Review, Oct. 12, 2005 LAT Test Stand Manufacturing Readiness Review 1.Introduction Bill Olson.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 1 STEREO Product Assurance Ron Jackson
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 100 EFW DFB Systems Assurance Trent Taylor LASP.
01.Oct.01 SPIRE BSM Product Assurance Team Briefing 1 BSM Product Assurance Plan Team Briefing & PA plan roll-out Ian Pain.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January Instrument Pre-Environmental Review Safety and Mission.
EFW DFB Systems Assurance
Accelerator Operations Department Readiness (Part 2)
Software and Systems Integration
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
THEMIS Mission Assurance
ISUAL Product Assurance
Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission
University of California - Berkeley
Presentation Title Goes Here
0.0 Instrument Suite Name Presenter’s name
First Article Inspection
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
First Article Inspection (Per AS9102)
The Certified Quality Process Handbook 2nd edition Ch. 1: pp
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
BRIAN KLATT MISSION ASSURANCE MANAGER
SQA01 Guidance Material: FAI Review
KAMAN AEROSPACE GROUP L. Chodasiewicz - Supplier Quality Assurance.
ISSP On-Orbit QA To share with QLF the ISS approach to the On-Orbit Quality Assurance process and the current status NASA QLF
Customers Customers Input Output Product
First Article Inspection
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
{ TCS QMS Document Pyramid Tier 0 – Why Tier 1 - What
First Article Inspection (Per AS9102)
ESSI CHANGE AND nonconformity control SYSTEM
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Presentation transcript:

EFW DFB Systems Assurance Trent Taylor LASP

DFB LASP QA Organization LASP Engineering Director Configuration Management LASP Flight Assurance Manager Quality Assurance Engineer Quality Assurance Build Configuration Verification Safety Inspections Personnel Safety PMPCB, FRB, MRB Flight Hardware Safety Documentation and Records ESD Control Training and Certification Contamination Control Support Flight H/W & S/W Testing Lab Inspections

DFB PA Requirements and Safety Performance Assurance Matrix Status No open issues No waiver/deviation requests to date System Safety LASP provided initial safety input with CDRL MA-006 for PDR. There are no safety compliance issues with the EFW DFBs. LASP will provide any further safety input upon request.

DFB Suppliers and GIDEP LASP procures all flight parts and materials through vendors on LASP’s approved vendor list. LASP procures EEE parts directly from the manufacturer or through authorized distributors. LASP requires full traceability on all flight procurements. Program requirements are flowed through procurement documentation. Where necessary, procurement documentation may include source control documents (SCDs) and engineering documentation. LASP’s DFB contains no custom or non-standard EEE parts. LASP’s DFB procurements required no additions to the LASP approved vendor list. GIDEP Status LASP has responded to APL GIDEP evaluation requests meeting all delivery dates. There are no current GIDEP “hits” – no parts on the DFB are impacted by any Alert or Advisory.

Radiation Engineering Approval Screening/Qual Approval DFB EEE Parts Parts All EEE parts are procured to program requirements with no additional screening required with the exception of the following: JANTXV cavity devices (3 part types): GSFC will PIND test these parts. AD648/883B (OpAmp): GSFC will screen and qualify to EEE-INST-002 Level 2. No additional radiation testing is required. OP262GS (dual Op Amp - Plastic COTS). Parts were radiation tested by APL. GSFC will screen and qualify to EEE-INST-001 requirements. VTF100-267TBX (Resistor Network – COTS): GSFC will screen and qualify to EEE-INST-002 Level 2. Parts CE Approval Radiation Engineering Approval Screening/Qual Approval PMPCB Approval TOTAL EEE Parts 63 Detectors ASICs Hybrids 2

DFB Materials & Processes Materials and Processes MIL is up-to-date Regular meetings with PMPCB Will add PWB data when ordered (will be per required IPC specs) Limited Life Items DFB has no limited life items M&P Category Submitted Approved Pending Non-Metallic Materials 13 12 1 Metallic Materials 2 Fasteners 5 4 Processes

DFB Configuration Management LASP uses Agile software for Configuration Management Documents submitted, reviewed, and approved electronically All documents and records are searchable As-built records and as-run test procedures archived Follow LASP’s Document & Record Control Procedure Assembly Travelers (ATs) generated and archived in the system Flight Drawing/Document Status Drawings Release Date Documents Schematic 9/18/09 DFB Spec Released Rev D Layout FPGA Spec Draft 10/01/09, Prelim 12/01/09, Final 02/01/10 Fab, Assembly Instructions 10/01/09 Test Plan Prelim 10/01/09, Final 12/01/09 Test Results 1st Qtr ‘10

DFB Contamination & ESD Control Contamination Control All assembly performed at laminar flow-benches Class 10,000 cleanrooms available Packaging and shipping provisions to maintain low contamination exposure during transport ESD Control QA owns and implements the ESD control program LASP’s ESD Control Procedure meets ANSI/ESD S20.20 requirements All applicable personnel trained and certified by LASP’s NASA-trained Level B instructor Training certifications required for lab entry

DFB Inspections Mandatory Inspection Points and photo documentation specified in Fabrication & Assembly Instructions (FAIs) within ATs Plans to be worked out with APL for their MIPs Audit Assembly Traveler data package at each inspection point Check sign-offs, traceability, document revisions, etc. Verify acceptable lab temperature and humidity PWAs Inspect solder workmanship to NASA-STD-8739.2 and .3 Parts placement and orientation – per engineering drawings and FAIs Polymerics Inspect per NASA-STD-8739.1, FAIs, drawings, and in-house standards Check mix records, durometer hardness of cure samples Cables, Harnesses, Wiring Inspect crimps, solder and other workmanship to NASA standards Dimensions, shield terminations, shrink sleeve, etc. to FAIs, drawings, etc. Other Inspections Incoming/Receiving; Kitting; Pre-cap; Calibration of Equipment; Acceptance and Environmental Test Set-up; Flight Connector Safe-to-Mate

DFB Non-Conformance Reporting Non-conformances addressed per LASP’s Anomaly Reporting Plan Reporting Methods - Fabrication and Assembly Discrepancy Report (FADR) For rework-type non-conformances identified during fabrication/assembly - Non-Conformance Report (NCR) Level 1 NCR- for minor discrepancies Level 2 NCR- for test failures or any other anomaly that the Integrated Project Development Team (IPDT) determines to warrant Level 2. - Dispositions include: scrap, rework, return to supplier, refer to MRB Processing of Level 2 NCRs is consistent with standard Failure Review Board (FRB) practices. - Material Review Board (MRB) report Dispositions include: scrap, rework, return to supplier, repair by standard or non-standard procedures, use as-is, request for waiver

DFB Material Review Board (MRB) Process The LASP MRB will be chaired by the Project Manager or designee, and will at a minimum include QA and cognizant lead engineer(s) for MRB actions resulting in Class 2 changes. JHU/APL participation is required when MRB recommendation is to use as-is, repair, or causes a Class I change. A Class 1 change is defined as one that may, or will, result in a product that: Does not meet established functional or performance specifications Does not meet established physical envelope and/or ICDs Does not meet the established electrical ICDs Significantly and adversely affects cost and/or schedule Requires repairs other than approved standard repairs Will not meet structural, thermal, EMI/EMC, and/or ionizing radiation requirements Class 2 changes are those that do not fall within the parameters of a Class 1 change. Any condition requiring MRB action will be documented as a non-conformance.

This page intentionally almost blank