The Lotus Device Design & FIM Experiences with a Repositionable Self Expanding Percutaneous Aortic Valve Ian T. Meredith MBBS, BSc(Hons), Ph.D, FRACP,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve ® has been approved. The CoreValve ® System is not currently approved in the USA,
Advertisements

STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of aortic stenosis patients implanted with a self-expending bioprosthesis Sabine Bleiziffer German.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Lessons from TAVR Randomized Trials and Registries E Murat Tuzcu, MD Professor of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Financial disclosures: None PARTNER Executive.
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Dr Martyn Thomas Director of Cardiac Services Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust A Member of Kings Health Partners London.
TAVR Pearls Addressing the Shortcomings of the Current TAVR Generation
Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Replacement: a UK update. Dr Martyn Thomas Guys and St Thomas’ Hospital.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2008 (October 12-17, 2008 · Washington, DC) First-in-Human Report: Initial Experience with a Stentless and Retrievable.
Twelve Months and Beyond: Long-Term Results of the Direct Flow Medical Repositionable and Retrievable Pericardial Valve for Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
Ian T. Meredith AM MonashHeart, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Extending the Boundaries of TAVR: Future Directions
On behalf of the FORWARD Study Investigators
Late breaking news in heart valve disease
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
The Medtronic Ventor EngagerTM TAVI System
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Lotus Valve with Depth Guard First Report from the RESPOND Extension Study Nicolas M Van Mieghem, MD,
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable, Retrievable, Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California,Davis.
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
Review of the Latest OUS Data from the Self-Expanding Valve Studies
TAVR Requirements for the Cath Lab
First Report of One-Year Outcomes of the REPRISE I Feasibility Study of the Repositionable Lotus Aortic Valve Replacement System Ian T. Meredith.
Claret Cerebral Protection Device: Implications of the Sentinel Study
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
Trans-Apical Aortic Valve Implant:
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
TAVI Passed the Exam and is Ready for Clinical Use in Inoperable Patients Disclosures Research Funding and Speaking Honoraria: Edwards Lifesciences.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
University of Pennsylvania
Repositionable Percutaneous Replacement of a Stenotic Aortic Valve through Implantation of the Lotus Valve System 30-day Outcomes for the First 60 Patients.
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable Retrievable Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California, Davis.
TAVI „Catch me if you can!“
Keith Dawkins MD FRCP FACC FSCAI Global Chief Medical Officer
Two-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus™ Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe.
Opportunities to Study Valve Iterations and Modifications in the US
Updates From SURTAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients
Latest Data from Balloon Expendable Trials
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Insights from the NCDR® STS/ACC TVT Registry.
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Progress with the Sadra Medical Lotus™ Valve System
Technology Update and Status of Current Clinical Trials
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
Ganesh Manoharan Consultant Cardiologist
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
Second Generation Valves: What Will Be Different?
REPRISE I The Sadra Lotus Valve for TVAR
University Heart Center Hamburg
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION: THE TENDYNE GLOBAL FEASIBILITY TRIAL 1 YEAR OUTCOMES David WM Muller, MBBS,
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Presentation transcript:

The Lotus Device Design & FIM Experiences with a Repositionable Self Expanding Percutaneous Aortic Valve Ian T. Meredith MBBS, BSc(Hons), Ph.D, FRACP, FACC, FCSANZ, FSCAI, FAHA, FAPSIC Professor and Director of Monash HEART Southern Health & Monash University, Melbourne Australia

Ian T Meredith, MD, PhD Honoraria: Abbott Vascular Boston Scientific Corporation Medtronic, Inc.

All-cause mortality (%) TAVR Clinical Results Encouraging PARTNER B: All Cause Mortality Standard Rx Hazard ratio, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.40–0.74) P<0.001 TAVI ∆ at 1 yr = 19.0% p<0.001 49.7% 30.7% All-cause mortality (%) Months Numbers at Risk TAVI 179 138 122 67 26 Standard Rx 121 83 41 12 Leon M, Smith C, Mack M, et al. NEJM 2010;363:1597-1607

TAVR vs. AVR: Transfemoral Cost per QALY gained (Partner Cohort A) ∆ QALYs = + 0.068 ICER = dominant % dominant = 59.7 D 1-yr cost (TAVR - AVR) % <$50,000 per QALY = 74.7 Better QOL Less Expensive Complete Population M Reynolds, TCT 2011 D QALY (TAVR - AVR)

Current Clinical Concerns Performance Paravalvular AR Size and Deliverability Learning Curve and Ease of Use Clinical Events Stroke Bleeding Vascular Complications Mortality by Grade of AR -Sinning JM, et. al., EuroPCR 2011 Leon M, ACC 2011

Current Technology Gaps Matrix of Device Sizes Commercially Available Device Repositioning/retrievability Paravavular Leakeage Device Preparation challenges

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve System Second generation TAVR system designed to address gaps with first generation systems Valve pre-attached to delivery system Easy device preparation Repositionable – proximal or distal for controlled and accurate valve placement Retrievable at any point up to release Valve functions early in deployment Adaptive seal designed to minimize paravalvular leakage

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve Delivery System Easy to Prepare Pre-Loaded System Deploy, Lock Release Unlock, Retrieve Intuitive Handle Design 2 Controls Release

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve Lotus™ Valve Pre-Loaded System Locking Mechanism Enables operator control of implant Nitinol Frame Designed for retrieval and repositioning Bovine Pericardium Long-term proven material Adaptive Seal Designed to minimize perivalvular leaks

The Lotus™ Valve System Product Design Goal Attributes Compared to First Generation Devices Edwards Sapien™ XT Medtronic CoreValve® BSC / Sadra Lotus™ Pre-loaded Delivery System   Reversibility of Deployment partial 1 Bovine Tissue Leaflet Material (porcine tissue) ≤18F Profile Paravalvular Sealing Component 1 - Retrievable up to and including full deployment, and prior to the implant release from the delivery system. Other Sources: Edwards.com, Medtronic.com, Sadramedical.com; The Lotus Valve System is an investigational device, not available for sale. Sapien and CoreValve are investigational devices in the U.S., and not approved for sale. See Glossary

The Lotus™ Valve System Procedure Steps Delivery Unsheathing Locking Assessment Release Final Result Release Images from Lotus Feasibility Study, 2010, HELIOS Klinikum Siegberg

The Lotus™ Valve System Repositionable and Retrievable Complete assessment is performed while valve is fully locked and still attached to the delivery system Unlock Resheath Complete Recapture Enabling repositioning or full recapture

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve 21 Fr FIM Study 10 patients enrolled: July 2007 – October 2008 6 patients implanted, 4 surviving Procedure time < 20 minutes No significant perivalvular leaks No valve migrations First patient implanted doing well 4 years after implant

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve 21 Fr FIM – 1 Year Follow-up

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve 18 Fr Feasibility Study 12 patients enrolled at 3 sites; 9 patients implanted with the Lotus™ Valve System First patient enrolled: April 13, 2010 at Essen Elisabeth by Prof. Grube Site # PI Pts Enrolled Pts Implanted 01 - Siegburg Dr. R. Mueller 4 02 - Essen Elisabeth Prof. E. Grube 2 03 - Essen University Prof. R. Erbel 3 Total 12 9

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve 18 Fr Feasibility Study Demographics Characteristic N=12 pts Age, years 84±3.8 Gender, Female 12 (100%) STS 7%±5.9 Euroscore 25%±9.6 NYHA Class III or IV EF 60%±7 CHF 2 (17%) CAD or CID 8 (67%) Hypertension Peripheral Vascular Disease 5 (42%)

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve 18 Fr Feasibility Study– 1 Year Follow-up

The Lotus™ Valve System REPRISE I Feasibility Study Objective Assess acute safety and performance of Lotus™ Valve System for TAVR in patients with aortic valve stenosis at high risk for surgical intervention Primary endpoint: Clinical procedural success, defined as device success without in-hospital MACCE Valve Size 23 mm valve  aortic annulus size 19-22 mm Sites: Monash Medical Center Royal Adelaide St. Vincent’s Hospital Prof. Ian Meredith (Principal Investigator) Prof. Rob Whitbourn Prof. Stephen Worthley

The Lotus™ Valve System REPRISE II Clinical Trial Objective Evaluate safety & performance of Lotus™ Valve System in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high risk for surgery Primary endpoint Device performance: 30-day Mean aortic valve pressure gradient Safety: 30-day all cause mortality Enrollment Up to 120 patients in Australia, France, Germany, UK Two valve sizes 23 mm  aortic annulus size 19-22 mm 27 mm  aortic annulus size 23-26 mm Rigor to support regulatory approvals

Sadra-BSC Lotus™ Valve REPRISE II Study VARC endpoints and definitions Patient selection with Case Review Committee oversight Frailty: Nutritional assessment Grip strength Gait speed Activities of daily living Cognitive function Physical activity Comprehensive aortic valve and iliofemoral analyses Modified Rankin Score at baseline and all follow-up visits, 30-day and 90-day after a neurological event Long term QOL assessments (baseline, 6 mo, 1, 3 and 5 yrs)

REPRISE II Patients’ Screening - Valve and Femoral Anatomy 21

Conclusions TAVR results in  both symptomatic and prognostic improvement in elderly high risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who would otherwise be treated medically Adverse events with first generation TAVR systems highlight opportunities to improve upon current outcomes The Lotus™ Valve System is designed to address many of the current challenges with first generation technology The REPRISE I and II clinical trials will assess the safety and performance of the Lotus Valve replacement system