Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Ashok Kondur, MD, Alexandros Briasoulis, MD, PhD, Mohan Palla, MD, Anirudh Penumetcha, MD, Sagar Mallikethi-Reddy, MD, Apurva Badheka, MD, Theodore Schreiber, MD American Journal of Cardiology Volume 117, Issue 2, Pages 252-257 (January 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.034 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Meta-analysis for 30-day, all-cause mortality and stroke. It presents the number of events, number of patients in treatment, and control groups, odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for each trial, overall OR estimate with 95% CI and p value for association test, p value for heterogeneity test, and between-trial inconsistency (I2) measurements. American Journal of Cardiology 2016 117, 252-257DOI: (10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.034) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Meta-analysis for myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and acute kidney injury. American Journal of Cardiology 2016 117, 252-257DOI: (10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.034) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Meta-analysis for paravalvular regurgitation, permanent pacemaker implantation, and major vascular complications. American Journal of Cardiology 2016 117, 252-257DOI: (10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.034) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Funnel plot for the meta-analysis of the effects of TAVR versus SAVR on 30-day mortality. SE = standard error. American Journal of Cardiology 2016 117, 252-257DOI: (10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.034) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions