An Integrated Approach to School Readiness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
After the Grant: Sustainability & Scale-up of the NC/CSEFEL Initiative NC/CSEFEL Panel Norman Allard Lanier DeGrella Brenda Dennis Khari Garvin Marta Koesling.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Oral Health Project Activities to Support Providers and National Partnerships Kathy Geurink, R.D.H., M.A.
Early Childhood Special Education RESOURCES.  Early Childhood Special Education Early Childhood Special Education Wisconsin Early Childhood Indicators.
National Head Start Association Leadership Institute January 29, 2009 Presentation by Joan Lombardi, Ph.D. Early Childhood Development: At the dawn of.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
OHS Region X TTA Created by ICF International for OHS Region X.
School Readiness: We’re Better Together
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Bennington County Head Start Child Outcomes Midpoint Data Report.
Prepared for the Office of Head Start by ICF International School Readiness Goals: Using Data to Support Child Outcomes.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Orientation to the Self-Assessment Process in Head Start.
Office of Head Start Administration for Children and Families
The Enhanced AMS 2.0: The Foundation.
Show Me the Money: Family Engagement in Family Financial Literacy
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
Professional Development BOOT CAMP
The Early Childhood Family Engagement Framework: Maryland’s Vision for Engaging Families with Young Children Jeffrey Capizzano President Maryland State.
FPG Child Development Institute
Using Formative Assessment
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
Head Start  Head Start was established in 1965 as part of President Johnson’s War on Poverty  It is the only early childhood program, then and.
New State Law goes into effect July 1, 2018 (HB1091)
2016 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Bennington County Head Start and early head start Report child outcomes school readiness goals.
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Recommendation: ASD Licensed Specialist
Early Childhood Special Education
Monitoring Children’s Progress
Texas Inclusion Activities Overview
February 21-22, 2018.
Family Engagement Policy
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Who Are We? United 4 Children (Birth –18) Child Day Care Association
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Presentation transcript:

An Integrated Approach to School Readiness NHSA Parent, Staff, and Leadership Conference 2016 Consuellis Hawkins-Crudup Karen McKnight

Session Outcomes Participants will identify data sources across service areas most connected with children’s outcomes, and a process for analyzing data when outcomes show a child’s skills are delayed. Participants will be able to use a data set to identify health, educational, disability or family issues impacting a child’s school readiness and the implications for interventions that may be needed at the classroom or administrative level. Participants will be able to operationalize a transdisciplinary approach to both analyzing and addressing factors affecting a child’s school readiness.

What is School Readiness? Definition: Children possessing the skills, knowledge, and attitudes necessary for success in school and for later learning and life.

OHS 4 Strategic Steps to SR 1 Adopt and align established child goals from the HS Early Learning Outcomes Framework (ELOF) 2 Create and implement a plan of action for achieving goals 3 Assess child progress on an ongoing basis and aggregate and analyze data 2-3 times per year 4 Examine data for pattern of progress for groups of children in order to develop and implement a plan for program improvement

1302.102 Achieving Program Goals HSPPS (i)Ensure data is aggregated, analyzed and compared in such a way to assist agencies in identifying risks and informing strategies for continuous improvement in all program service areas (ii) Ensure child-level assessment data is aggregated and analyzed at least three times a year, including for sub-groups, such as dual language learners and children with disabilities as appropriate c) Using data for continuous improvement

Partner Activity What data do you use to determine school readiness? What data do you collect for SR? What do you use it for? and how do you analyze it? Have you found trends? What has your analysis told you? Based on that data, what questions do you ask?

ECMHSP School Readiness Analysis Classroom Center Regional Grantee Analyzed three times per year/season Regional Education Specialists work with center/classroom in collecting and reviewing data Levels of Reporting: Aggregates all regions for a grantee report Reviews with Program Managers to discuss programmatic changes Grantee SR Manager supports the Regional Specialists to aggregate and analyze

Trends Age Group Lowest Mastery Skills Highest Mastery Skills Infants/Toddlers Cognition Language Physical Social-Emotional Preschoolers Science

Steps to Using Data Formulate a question 2015-Business Over Broadway Generate hypotheses Gather and generate data Analyze data and form conclusions Communicate results and take action Formulate a question or problem statement Generate a hypothesis that is testable Gather/Generate data to understand the phenomenon in question. Data can be generated through experimentation; when we can’t conduct true experiments, data are obtained through observations and measurements. Analyze data to test the hypotheses / Draw conclusions Communicate results to interested parties or take action (e.g., change processes) based on the conclusions. Additionally, the outcome of the scientific method can help us refine our hypotheses for further testing.

Generate Hypotheses Education Health Family Disability Behavior Dental Culture Services Teacher experience Weight Engagement Teacher Interactions Premature Absences Number of children in the classroom Assessment Administration Vision/Hearing First time enroll Curriculum Implementation Accidents/ Incidents Days in center Special Health Care Needs Crisis Homelessness

Gather and Generate Data

Analyze Data and Draw Conclusions

Small Group Activity Using the sample data: What are your assumptions? What do you notice? What conclusions can you make? What’s missing?

Analysis tool in action

What factors are impacting language development? Program 1 Operates 5 centers Centers are open for approximately 4 months Serves 344 children Majority of children primary language is Spanish The Education Specialist led each center to systematically start implementing the analysis tool three times a season What factors are impacting language development?

Regional Level Program Improvement Used trends from the analysis tool to plan pre-service training and conduct classroom observations. Focused observations determined dual language strategies were inconsistently being implemented in English and Spanish. Program took action and identified the need to have trainings for staff in English and Spanish for all centers.

Center Level Program Improvement Core team members used analysis tool and valued identifying trends, and health factors, to discuss the impact of a child’s development. Determined the majority of children below had been referred for speech services. Majority of those referred had been declined by parents. Program took action to increase parenting knowledge of child development by preparing more parent trainings and conducting more home visits.

Classroom Level Program Improvement Bi-weekly team meetings were used to draw conclusions using the analysis table. Changes were made to the lesson plans, and classroom environments. Teachers became more focused on using intervention strategies learned during pre-service trainings. Number of children indicated on the analysis tool at the beginning of the season for language decreased by 50%.

Program 2 Operates 5 centers Centers are open approximately 5 months Serves 230 children Majority of children primary language is Spanish The Health/Disabilities Specialist systematically used the analysis tool to track every child in the region. Program wanted to increase PIR numbers and provide more services to children.

Regional Level Program Improvement Used trends from the analysis tool to flag areas of concern and provide direct technical assistance to the center. Information was sent to each Center Director, Early Childhood Education Coordinator and Health/Disabilities Coordinator.

Center Level Program Improvement Modified services to children and families based on data. Flagged areas of concerns which led to PIR for dental, hearing, and vision above 90%. Center operating less than 2 months was able to have children evaluated, diagnosed, and receive an IEP.

Common Themes Programs Reported Analysis Tool: Increased communication across core content areas Not time consuming Teachers have said: “Oh, this is why we are doing this.” It has really helped see the why. If staff don’t know the why of what they are doing, like assessing children, they won’t do a great job at it.

What have we learned?/Take Action Program Needs to: Collaborate to document family issues/concerns. Revise the procedure for developing Family Engagement School Readiness to link to the area of concern and document using the Interactive Literacy Activity (ILA) form. Formulate process for documenting ‘blood incidents’ in ChildPlus for accident/incidents. Develop Train the Trainer models for administering screening and assessments . Review process for making referrals and monitoring development. Refine coaching process for classroom staff to build teacher competencies.

Grantee Program Improvement The process for completing the Analysis Tool has been embedded in all content (ex. education, health, family service, etc.) service manuals. Case Management approach being used to modify services to children and families based on the data. Added a Dual Language Policy

Core Strategies Implement an integrated curriculum that addresses the essential domains of school readiness in the Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework: Ages Birth to Five (HSELOF, 2015). Aggregate and analyze child-level assessment data at least three times per year. Use that data in combination with other program data to determine grantees progress toward meeting its goals, to inform parents and the community of results, and to direct continuous improvement related to curriculum, instruction, professional development, program design and other program decisions

Core Strategies Provide early learning coaching to staff across program options and settings. Establish individualized Wellness Plans that promote healthy development for every child. Ensure a parent partnership process that promotes an understanding of their child's progress, provides support, and encourages learning and leadership. Provide ongoing communication with local schools, and other agencies receiving Early Head Start or Head Start children such as local preschool programs, to exchange information about children and programs and to align services for early learning, health, and family engagement. Create a learning community among staff to promote innovation, continuous improvement, and integrated services across education, family services, and health.

Continuous Improvement Everyone plays a role in ensuring an integrated, comprehensive program approach to establishing and achieving school readiness goals

Ultimately, we want to use data to tell the story of how programs are helping prepare children and families for the future…AND where children are in their journey toward being ready for school!

Closing Remarks What will you do differently to analyze and address factors to support school readiness at the classroom or administrative level?

Contact Information Consuellis Hawkins-Crudup School Readiness Manager East Coast Migrant Head Start Project 2700 Wycliff Road, Suite 302 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 (919) 926-3337 conusellis@ecmhsp.org