NewRail and Research Coordination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SMEs in the. SMEs in FP7 - why? SMEs are at the core of European industry and key players in the innovation system. SMEs have to respond increasingly.
Advertisements

1-1 PRESENTER The Role of the Framework 7 Advisor Your Name Your Websites Websites
University of Trieste PHD school in Nanotechnology Writing a proposal … with particular attention to FP7 Maurizio Fermeglia.
The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) The IMI Call and Evaluation Process Eva Lindgren.
Antonella Cammisa Sapienza University of Rome EU and International Relations Area Vienna, 30 november 2007.
NIS-NEST Information days on FP7 2 - How to prepare a competitive EU research proposal NIS-NEST Information days on FP7 2 - How to prepare a competitive.
Oficina AproTECH de AETIC: Información y asesoramiento en la preparación de propuestas de I+D+I FP7: Project Management issues, Roles and.
RTD/E.2/JL1 CARERA THE IMPACT OF CAP REFORM ON THE EMPLOYMENT LEVELS IN RURAL AREAS Kick off meeting CRETE; 16 – 17 March 2006 Martin Greimel Project Officer.
Developing an FP6 Proposal and How We Can Help METU - Office of EU Affairs.
APRE Agency for the Promotion of European Research Lifecycle of an FP 7 project Caterina Buonocore Riga, 13th September, 2007.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
WP1 presentation Christian Jagersma Bucharest, 1-4 March 2010 Agentschap NL (NL Agency)
S L H C – P P Management Tools Kick-off Meeting April 8 th, 2008 Mar CAPEANS CERN This project has received funding from the European.
Slide: 1 Directorate General for Energy and Transport SAVE ENERGY AGENCIES Contractor meeting Brussels, 27 November 2002 Presentation by SAVE Agencies.
1 SME involvement in TransNEW and other EU projects Bogdan Cernat-Gruici Integral Consulting R&D Assessing, analysing and defining strategies for realising.
How to write a successful EU funded project proposal? Fred de Vries Brussels 21 April 2004 Seminar Networking eLearning Practitioners.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
Dr. Margaretha Mazura (EMF) ICT Day Opportunities to participate in EU ICT research projects San José, 16 February 2010 Principles of EU Research Funding.
Practical aspects Dr. Ir Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison “Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir.
Dr. Marion Tobler, NCP Environment Evaluation Criteria and Procedure.
ESTELA Summer Workshop, 26 June 2013 The EU-SOLARIS project.
LEONARDO TRANSFER OF INNOVATION PROJECT “MEDIA TECH: The future of media industry using innovative technologies ” No. LLP-LdV-ToI-11-CY Kick-off.
Contracts FP6. PRESENTATION OUTLINE è Legal Framework è Participation è Contract Structure è Collective Approach l signature and entry into force l collective.
DonQ – Air Project presentation. DonQ-Air – About project Objective: Objective: to encourage R&D activities in the aeronautic-related.
FP7 National Contact Points: Assistance during the proposal preparation Friday 31 st August, 2012 Anthea Fabri FP7 NCP Coordinator.
Danish Agricultural Advisory Service National Centre Possibilities and limits in a Specific Support Action By Erik Fog and Michael Tersbøl, DAAS European.
Technical Assistance Office SOCRATES / Lingua 1 and 2 Information seminar for co-ordinators of successful pre-proposals Carla Donda 28 January 2005.
EuCARD-2 is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement EuCARD-2 Governance.
FP6UK Roadmap to Participation Cliff Funnell UK National Contact Point for Waterborne Transport OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FP6UK SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Partnerships Horizon 2020 / Eurostars expert: Dr. Radosław Piesiewicz.
FISCO2 – Financial and Scientific Coordination Work Package dedicated to ENSAR2 management WP leader: Ketel Turzó WP deputy: Sandrine Dubromel ENSAR2 Management.
Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention Getting ready for COP-4.
Vice-Presidents’ Presentation Fall 2013 Getting from strategic directions to strategic initiatives 1.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
WP3 - Evaluation and proposal selection
COST, the networking instrument for researchers
TRANSPORT SCIENCE: INNOVATIVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
The 6th Framework Programme
Division Finances: Aligning Resources with Goals
ARTEMIS Brokerage Event Barcelona, December 14th 2010
EC project periodic and continuous reporting
BEYOND the BASICS What You Need to Know to Apply for and Administer
WP1 - Consortium coordination and management
Gunnar Buckau, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Germany
Peter Herrmann Celtic Office Director
12.2 Conduct Procurements The process of obtaining seller responses, selecting a seller and awarding the contract The team applies selection criteria.
Looking ahead to Horizon 2020 Multidisciplinarity in the context of Horizon 2020 Christina Miller Director UK Research Office
Research and Innovation Staff Exchange
Request for Proposal & Proposal
PMI North Area PMP Exam Study Group
Office of Grant Resources
John F. Kennedy High School Annual General Assembly of Parents
Sabrina Iavarone Senior User Services Officer
EU instruments of funding and technical assistance
Setting up an ERIC 11 May 2012 Richard Derksen
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Astrid Kaemena European Commission
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
ANTICORRP ANTICORRP General Assembly Meeting Administrative update
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
STATE OF AFFAIRS IN THE MISSOC PROJECT
TITLE Business Case YOUR LOGO BUSINESS CASE PRESENTATION 00/00/0000
The Preparation Phase: Part III: financial issues
MFSS Governance Version: 3.1 – May 2016.
Financial Support to Third Parties (cascade funding)
COGAIN Kick-Off 5-6 September, 2004 FINANCIAL GUIDELINES
WP 1 Management and Coordination
WMO Global Campus: Open Educational Practice in Action
Presentation transcript:

NewRail and Research Coordination Prof. Mark Robinson, Director, NewRail

and engineering excellence’ Mission Statement ‘Maintain and enhance our position as the leading University based Railway Research Centre in Europe’ ‘ To be globally recognised and respected as a Rail Research Centre through our innovation, quality and engineering excellence’

Key Focus Areas Strategic Research Academia Consult

7th Framework Project (2 Year) TRANSNEW is a multi-national initiative supported by the European Commission whose aims are to support transport research activities in the new member states, evaluating each countries research capability in addition to the potential exploitation of the synergies between air and surface transport modes TRANSNEW European Commission 7th Framework Project (2 Year) 15 Partners, 12 Countries

Key Research Areas Research Rail Vehicles Rail Infrastructure Rail Systems Rail Freight & Logistics

7th Framework Project (3 Year) SECURE METRO is a multi-national initiative supported by the European Commission whose aims are to increase safety and security of metro vehicles from terrorist attack by explosives and firebombs reducing the impact of such attacks on passengers, staff, infrastructure and property SECURE METRO European Commission 7th Framework Project (3 Year) 11 Partners, 5 Countries

7th Framework Project (4 Year) FIRE-RESIST is a multi-national initiative supported by the European Commission whose aims are to develop novel, cost effective, high performance, lightweight polymer matrix composite materials with a step-change improvement in fire behaviour Fire Resist FIRE-RESIST European Commission 7th Framework Project (4 Year) 18 Partners, 9 Countries

NewRail Coordination activities in FP7 SecureMetro started 1.1.2010 TransNEW started 1.1.2010 FIRERESIST approved and contract negotiation started Feb .2010 project will start September 2010 Keep in regular touch with the Technical Officer good and bad news Always be one step ahead, turn up with a revised technical annex having sent it the week before the meeting. See if they would like to meet for dinner the night before. Do not start a project July or August, they will expect the Deliverables even if Europe is on holiday and you will lose impetus if starting just before a long break. 8

Proposal preparation The proposal is your own idea and within reason you can decide what to include: Which partners you want. The role of the partners. The budget. For the proposal work mainly on your own to prepare the proposal Do not create a proposal preparation committee. At least 20 days per project plus travel all at University expense (Deirdre is good for 50% particularly for new players). ? 9

Contract Negotiation Influence where any budget reduction occurs. Roles and budgets can be modified. The consortium may lose key partners, so it is the Coordinator’s role to provide acceptable replacements. Need to convince the TO that the project is still viable. Responsible for preparing the Annex I, Nicola Dolman is great at preparing the Financial Forms and works closely with the coordinator. Contract Negotiation takes at least 10 days, sometimes longer. Travel will also be needed. 10

Contract Agreements Main University Role. Consortium Agreements and Grant Agreements etc. Create very few issues for the Coordinator. These aspects are very well supported by Nicola and her team. TIP – There is usually a year between the start of a contract negotiation and actually getting the contract. It is sensible to use this time to produce the reporting, dissemination guidelines and template. This includes format/style of reports, power point and other templates. It is often better to adapt previous versions rather than starting from scratch. 11

Kick Off Can select the venue. Can select the format. Can decide on the date. EC can insist that it is Brussels. EC can request that certain items are included on the agenda. EC can express a preference for a date – this is then accepted by the consortium. The kick-off meeting/reception/dinner/gifts are funded by the Coordinator. Set the Standard. 12

Coordination - what/who makes an effective coordinator NewRail usually have a Coordination team featuring an experienced coordinator and a project manager. Coordinator is a figure-head, usually the source of idea for the proposal and respected by the Consortium. Experienced at managing and/or coordinating European projects. Project Manager is well organised, with good time management and should have some experience of WP leadership in the past. The Coordinator and project manager should be comfortable with each other. The Coordination team should be experts in the area in order to settle technical disputes. 13

What’s involved in coordinating an FP7 project The ease of coordination is very much dependent of the quality of the proposal. If WPs, Gantt charts and deliverables need to be clear. The partner responsible is identified, as well as the partners contributing through tasks. The Coordinator’s role is to merely push these activities along. The Coordinator is ultimately responsible for everything: non-submission of deliverables and quality control of deliverables. Quality management procedures should be addressed in the proposal. The Coordinator can not afford to let a project fail! Reputations can be lost easily by 1 bad project. 14

Perks - the benefit of coordinating FP7 projects, both for the individual and the University Publications and Conferences Opportunity to work with a Technical Officer – Evaluation, Information on new calls, etc. Travel. Visiting Professor Build a research team Membership of influential bodies University European Visibility International outputs RA and PhD funding. Equipment. The coordinator can submit their cost statement last. 15

Cons - disadvantages of coordinating FP7 projects Individual The buck stops here – no passing ! No extra budget to solve problems – we build in a RISK budget, try and identify risks in the proposal and in the Annex. Technical Officer – The Customer is always right! Travel may be too much if things are not running smoothly. Key partners may withdraw Deliverables may take a lot more effort to produce than you imagine As a UK partner there is a lot of English language correction and assistance work required and expected. University Not FEC 16

Ioan Buciuman Technical Director of Romanian Railway Authority (AFER)