Groundwater Vulnerability To Contamination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROTECTING AND PRESERVING GROUND WATER with MONITORING SYSTEMS and VULNERABILITY MAPS PAPATHEODOROU Konstantinos, Assoc. Professor 1 EVANGELIDIS Konstantinos,
Advertisements

PROCESS-BASED, DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS New generation Source waters and flowpaths Physically based.
Ground Water Mounding & P Evaluations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
2nd MINEO Workshop - Orléans, December 2002 MINEO Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Transport Modelling Principal investigators : Stuart Marsh and Stephane.
Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination in Texas
Environmental Modeling Basic GIS Modeling Suitability Index Modeling.
Vulnerability map of the Edwards Aquifer Rami Harfouch November 2009, Austin.
Distribution of Nitrate in Ground Water Under Three Unsewered Subdivisions Erin P. Eid Mike Trojan Jim Stockinger Jennifer Maloney Minnesota Pollution.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
Applications of Hydrogeologic settings in Groundwater vulnerability mapping in LaGrange County, Indiana, USA Solomon A. Isiorho, PhD Dept. of Geosciences.
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability.
Groundwater Vulnerability Is There a Groundwater Quality Problem? U.S. Geological Survey, IN Dept of Environmental Management, USEPA, and IN Dept of.
Oromia Water Works Design and Supervision Enterprise
Study of the groundwater vulnerability of Sockcho area by using GIS
GIS – BASED DRASTIC MODEL FOR ASSESSING
PROPOSAL FOR STATEWIDE GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY STUDY FOR MARYLAND By Olufunso S. Ogidan GEOG 596A 05 January 2010 A DVISER : D R. B ARRY E VANS.
Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Methodology for preparing hazard.
Application of GIS on Landslide Susceptibility and risk mapping
KELLY HAYDEN Applying GIS to Watershed Pollution Management.
HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.
Characterization of an Internal Drainage Basin Cave Using ArcGIS Brian Cowan.
 Climate is average of weather conditions for 30+ years  Climatologists employ many different tools to organize the wealth of information about earth's.
Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Romania Catalin Simota Research Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Bucharest - Romania.
OIL PRODUCTION, AGRICULTURE, AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN THE SOUTHEASTERN GULF COAST AQUIFER, TEXAS Paul F. Hudak University a/North Texas.
An Analysis of the Pollutant Loads and Hydrological Condition for Water Quality Improvement for the Weihe River For implementing water resources management.
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
STATEWIDE DRASTIC GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY STUDY FOR MARYLAND
Application CPA (Large Scale Map and Text Amendment): A request initiated by Alachua County to amend Conservation and Open Space Element as follows:
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
Hydrology is the science of water occurrence, movement and transport. Hydrology? Hydrogeology (hydro- meaning water, and -geology meaning the study of.
Management Application: Volume of Water in Storage (An Ogallala Example with Applicability to All Aquifers in Texas) Judy A. Reeves, Ph.D. Hydrogeologist,
AQUIFER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: PROJECT REVIEW COLUMBIA COUNTY June 11, 2009 Columbia County, Florida Advanced GeoSpatial Inc. Alan Baker, P.G. James.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Monitoring in the Lake Michigan Basin Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council.
Can Contamination Potential of Ground Water to Pesticides be Identified from Hydrogeological Parameters? Barnali Dixon University of South Florida Funded.
Application of Neuro-Fuzzy Techniques to Predict Ground Water Vulnerability B. Dixon, Ph.D. University of South Florida St. Petersburg, Florida 33701,
Data Exploration: Characterization of the Groundwater resources of the Leona Aquifer Lloyd Hemphill December 3, 2002.
Proposed Tools and Approach for Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessment (GWAVA) Using a Geographic Information System and Simulation Modeling Jack Barbash.
Modes of Sustainability Definition  In text  In aquifer-storage terms  In water-budget terms  In physical changes at the river (natural side)
DE Envirothon Aquatics Training: Groundwater – Surface Water Connection Chris Brown, Hydrologist Delaware DNREC Tank Management Section.
Richard B. Winston 1 and Joseph D. Ayotte 2 1 U.S. Geological Survey, MS Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston VA, 20192, United States of America,
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow & transport model) Adjust parameter values Design conceptual model Assess uncertainty.
Tunis-2014, April 3 rd. The beginning of charging was January 2009 and the beginning of monitoring of the impact of the treated wastewater was June 2,
Board of County Commissioners October 14, 2008 Vinzant Landing Swallet Santa Fe River.
Delineation of Ground water Vulnerability to Agricultural Contaminants using Neuro-fuzzy Techniques Barnali Dixon 1, H. D. Scott 2, J. V. Brahana 2, A.
Groundwater related research Dr Shafick Adams 21 July 2010.
Goal of Stochastic Hydrology Develop analytical tools to systematically deal with uncertainty and spatial variability in hydrologic systems Examples of.
Colorado River Water Resources Vulnerability Project for Hill Country Conservancy Daniel Zavala Araiza.
Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability through Statistical Methods I NWQMC May 7-11, 2006 San Jose, CA NWQMC May 7-11, 2006 San Jose, CA.
Ras Al Ein and Its Catchment Area Delineation Using Images ( Raster Maps) and GIS Techniques Refaat Bani-Khalaf.
Final Presentation of GIS in Water Resources
TOPMODEL and the role of topography and variable contributing areas in runoff production Learning objectives Be able to define and compute the topographic.
Project Modeling ORP-Ph
DRASTIC Source Water Assessment Method for
Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis and GIS to Determine Groundwater Contamination Combining multivariate statistical analysis with geographic information.
French groundwater monitoring networks
Modeling Natural Attenuation with GROUNDWATER SERVICES, INC.
Integrated groundwater modeling study in Addis Ababa area: Towards developing decision support system for well head protection Tenalem Ayenew And Molla.
Groundwater risk assessment in Regione Piemonte - Italy
Planned risk assessment in Sweden
GWB delineation in Finland
GIS – BASED DRASTIC MODEL FOR ASSESSING
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION in England & Wales
US Water Use Confined aquifer and potentiometric surface (height water will rise due to hydrostatic pressure).
Garrett Kilroy EPA Research Fellow Shannon PRB
Risk-Based Prioritization for Investigating Illicit Discharges Along TxDOT ROW Prepared by: G.O.A.T. – Geographers of Austin Texas INTRODUCTION MAPS METHODS.
Jos van Gils, Elena Semenzin, Muriel Gevrey, Peter Von der Ohe,
Lærke Thorling and Klaus Hinsby
KO meeting, Brussels, July 4th 2018
Presentation transcript:

Groundwater Vulnerability To Contamination Multi-Layer analysis of Geological Information Anteneh Z Abiy---MS Geoscinces Advisor- Professor Assefa Melesse

Objective To be able to map vulnerable aquifer zones Rank the degree of vulnerability A Problem Defined is a Problem Half Solved

Groundwater Vulnerability assessment Groundwater vulnerability assessment is a systematic approach to identify sites where groundwater is susceptible to pollution, It plays a vital role to well fields delineation and groundwater management, Groundwater Vulnerability is a function of: the nature of the geologic materials the physical environment, Nature of pollutants Pollutant source

Intrinsic Vulnerability The vulnerability of groundwater to contamination attributed to the nature of the geologic materials and the physical environment, The concept was primarily introduced by US National Research Council in 1993

Intrinsic Vulnerability Assessment--Types Physical process based methods: using the physical process of contaminant loading and transport

Intrinsic Vulnerability Assessment--Types Physical process based methods: using the physical process of contaminant loading and transport Statistical method: using the contaminant concentrations distribution or probabilities of contamination

Intrinsic Vulnerability Assessment--Types Physical process based methods: using the physical process of contaminant loading and transport Statistical method: using the contaminant concentrations distribution or probabilities of contamination Overlay-Index method: using the nature of geologic material and physical environment, only

Intrinsic Vulnerability Assessment--Types Physical process based methods: using the physical process of contaminant loading and transport Statistical method: define the contaminant concentrations distribution or probabilities of contamination Overlay-Index method: nature of geologic material and physical environment to control the spatial distribution of vulnerability of the groundwater in an area The first two require high level annalist and encore money, The third approach doesn’t show actual contaminant loads, however it is an important tool in planning

Overlay-Index methods of groundwater vulnerability assessment GOD (Foster 1987), DRASTIC (Aller et al., 1987), SEEPAGE (Moore and John, 1990), AVI (Van Stempvoort et al., 1993), SINTACS (Civita 1994), ISIS (Civita and De Regibus 1995), EPIK (Doerfliger and Zwahlen 1997) The German method (von Hoyer and Söfner 1998) IRISH (Daly and Drew 1999), Gogu et al., (2003; 2000),

DRi= DwDr + RwRr+AwAr+SwSr+TwTr+IwIr+CwCr The DRASTIC Model-- Parameters D – Depth to Water R – Net Recharge A – Aquifer Media S – Soil Media T – Topography I – Impact of Vadose Zone Media C – Hydraulic Conductivity of Aquifer DRi= DwDr + RwRr+AwAr+SwSr+TwTr+IwIr+CwCr

The DRASTIC Model-- Introduction Developed by EPA & National Water Well Assoc , Aller et al. (1987) Original publication: http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20007KU4.txt Most widely accepted, and applicable over a wide range of area Simplified qualitative Produces a relative-risk scale

The DRASTIC Model– Working Principle DRASTIC Weight the relative influence of the seven parameters to favor/ against to enhance vulnerability. Value in a scale of 1 to 5

The DRASTIC Model– Working Principle DRASTIC RATE the rate of importance of the verities in a parameter, Value of 1 to 10 High value to more susceptible categories Example Factors Range Rate   Topography/ slope (%) 0-2.8 2.8-8.5 8.5-14.8 14.8-21.9 21.9-29.7 29.7-38.2 38.2-48.8 48.8-96.2 96.2+ 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1

The DRASTIC Model– Working Principle EX: Topography Rate

S – Soil Media The DRASTIC Model– Working Principle Layer Index= Weight X Rate S – Soil Media

Aquifer Media Ar X 3 =

The DRASTIC Model– Working Principle DRASTIC INDEX = Sum Layer Weight X Layer Rate 5 X 4 3 2 1

The DRASTIC Model– Working Principle DRASTIC INDEX = DRi= DwDr + RwRr+AwAr+SwSr+TwTr+IwIr+CwCr Where: DRi= DRASTIC index w= weight of respective DRASTIC factor r=rate of respective DRASTIC factor

DRASTIC INDEX DRi= DwDr + RwRr+AwAr+SwSr+TwTr+IwIr+CwCr

Key Points Fractures in the Tana Sub-Basin Karst and High K in Florida