Chris Hendrickson cth@cmu.edu Technologies for Safe and Efficient Transportation National University Transportation Center Chris Hendrickson cth@cmu.edu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safe System Approach Eric Howard.
Advertisements

Pete Thomas Professor in Road and Vehicle Safety Vehicle Safety Research Centre Loughborough University, UK A review of ITS and their safety.
Vehicle-infrastructure integration: creating co-operative mobility systems and services Hearing EU Parliament, 22 January 2009 Hermann Meyer, CEO.
58 th Traffic Safety Conference Romell Cooks Regional Administrator Central Region May 10,
December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
G4 Apps The Impact of Connected Vehicles on Traffic Operations ISMA Traffic Expo October 1, 2014.
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Alrik L. Svenson US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration IntelliDrive.
Spring Sampling Frame Sampling frame: the sampling frame is the list of the population (this is a general term) from which the sample is drawn.
Connected Vehicles: The Future of Transportation Safety and Efficiency.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
Road Safety Audits Ghazwan al-Haji PhD student ”On whats goes wrong in road design and how to put it right safely”
Pacific Northwest Transportation Consortium University Transportation Center For Region 10 PacTrans Safety Research and Education Overviews Universities.
Hypothesis 1: Narrow roadways and roadways with higher speed limits will increase risk of vehicle/bicycle crash Hypothesis 2: Bicycle lanes and signage.
Research Priorities UTC Safety Summit Pittsburgh, PA ● March 19, 2015 Jessica B. Cicchino.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Michigan VII: Technology Improving Lives ITS Midwest Annual Meeting February 7, 2006 Gregory D. Krueger, P.E. Statewide ITS Program Manager Michigan Department.
Advancing Safety Through Innovation University Transportation Centers Safety Summit March 19-20, 2015 Jeffrey Onizuk Intelligent Transportation System.
1 State of Good Repair Research Vincent Valdes Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation July 9, 2009.
1. NV DMV FollowupProprietary and Confidential 2 Peloton Technology Founded 2011, Menlo Park CA To dramatically improve highway safety and the efficiency.
Cost Benefit Analysis Do Speed Cameras Produce Net Benefits? Evidence from British Columbia, Canada.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
1 Paul Pisano FHWA, Team Leader Road Weather & Work Zone Management Weather and the Connected Vehicle Presentation at the Connected Vehicle Program Public.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
Eric Eiswerth Safety Research Project Manager FORD AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY OFFICE 2011 AASHTO Annual Meeting The Vehicle of the Future: Greener, Safer, Smarter.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Winnable Battles: Data for Action Graphs and State Rates – Motor Vehicle Injuries U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control.
Overview of Road Safety in the United States Jeff Michael, Ed.D. Associate Administrator National Highway Traffic Safety Administration February 16, 2009.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
IntelliDriveSM Update
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
Michigan VII: Technology Improving Lives Safety Summit Lansing, MI February 28, 2006 Gregory D. Krueger ITS Program Manager Michigan Department of Transportation.
2 ITS Facts and Figures Founded in 1948 by the California state legislature in response to the deferred maintenance of transportation facilities during.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) UTC SAFETY SUMMIT MARCH 19-20, 2015.
TMALL 0143 Presentation engelsk v 1.0 Dr. Matts-Åke Belin Swedish Transport Administration Vision Zero Academy
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
B. RAMMAMURTHY Connected Vehicle Technology 6/6/2014 cse651 1.
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
Motorcycle safety in the US: Where are we? National Association of State Motorcycle Safety Administrators, Annual conference August 25, 2012.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Application of Autonomous Driving Technology to Transit - Functional Capabilities for Safety and Capacity Presentation to Federal Transit Administration.
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
Challenge: Numerous Governmental Layers
Which Alternative Fuel Technology is Best for Transit Buses?
Nevada Driving Summit May 25, 2016
Loughborough University research areas
Autonomous Vehicles in California
Unit 5 Forces and Motion.
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
New Findings on Crash Avoidance Technology
Envisioning the Future: Effects of Crash Countermeasures
Connected Vehicle Technology
The Importance of ADAS Technology
Smart Cities Institute
State Road 72 Safety Improvements
Exploratory Analysis of Crash Data
Side No-Zones.
NOW YOU HAVE DATA: WHAT DO YOU DO WITH IT?
Property & Casualty Market Suffers Significant Losses
2018 Summit of the National Association of State Motorcycle Safety
How technology and data can bring needed improvements to air quality and the environment Dr Dave Williams 8th November 2018.
Transportation Solutions to Connect Our Customers to Life’s Opportunities Trauma Net.
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
Sharing a Vision of the Road to Zero Bus Industry Safety Council
Munich Reinsurance America Services, Inc. Mobility Domain June 2019
Effects of an Aftermarket Crash Avoidance System on Warning Rates and Driver Acceptance in Urban and Rural Environments ADTSEA 2019 Burlington VT July.
©2018 Graphical Research. All rights reserved. Europe Automotive Camera Market to witness gains upto $5bn by 2025: Graphical.
Presentation transcript:

Chris Hendrickson cth@cmu.edu Technologies for Safe and Efficient Transportation National University Transportation Center Chris Hendrickson cth@cmu.edu

T-SET Administration Carnegie Mellon University Partnered with University of Pennsylvania T-SET managed jointly with Traffic21 Institute, Mobility21 UTC and Metro21 Institute. Emphasis on multi-disciplinary research, agency and corporate partnerships and technology deployments.

Thrust Areas Vehicle automation technologies In-vehicle technologies and human-computer interaction Connected vehicle technologies Mobility data analytics Infrastructure based technologies Pedestrian safety technologies Transportation policy

Bringing greater intelligence to vehicles 2007 2012

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Early Automation Features Observed insurance data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). 2012 FARS and GES used to estimate related fatal and non-fatal crashes, respectively. Co-authors: Corey Harper and Costa Samaras

Injury Crashes Addressed by Each Technology Here are the results of the analysis. The pie chart shows the upper bound percentage of crashes related to each technology. Out of the three technologies forward collision warning could prevent the most crashes while the most injury and fatal crashes are related to lane departure warning.

Three Existing Level 1 Technologies Will Dramatically Improve Safety Technology All Crashes Injury Crashes Fatal Crashes Blind Spot Monitoring 267,000 17,000 280 Lane Departure Warning 262,000 58,100 9,000 Forward Collision Warning 795,000 58,000 750 Total 1,320,000 133,100 10,100 Percent of Total Crashes 23.5% 8.2% 32.6% Source: Harper et al. 2016

Lower Bound Observed Net-Benefit About $4B Here is the lower bound net-benefit which assumes that every related crash not prevented is made less severe. Households are the only entity that accrues any cost from purchasing the technology. While all other entities are assumed to gain a benefit from deployment. Third-parties are entities such as uninvolved motorists or health care providers. QALYs are the benefits that arise from people living healthier lives from avoided or less severe crashes. The lower bound net-benefit is about $4 billion.

Upper Bound Potential Net-Benefit is About $200B The is the upper bound net-benefit which assumes that all related crashes are prevented. The upper bound net-benefit is about $214 billion. 10