TRADE SECRET SEGMENT PROF. JANICKE 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRADE SECRETS. Outline of Presentation What are trade secrets Keeping them secret Trade secrets or patents Legal protection for trade secrets and remedies.
Advertisements

IN CONFIDENCE: PUTTING IN PLACE A TRADE SECRET PROTECTION PROGRAM Najmia Rahimi Senior Program Officer, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
WIPO - TCCIA WORKSHOP ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOR BUSINESS FOR SMEs Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, May 10 and 11, 2005 Keeping Confidence: Trade Secrets in.
TRADE SECRETS, UNFAIR COMPETITION, EMPLOYEE RAIDS AND EMPLOYEE COVENANTS Alan N. Greenspan Jackson Walker LLP.
Trade Secrets and Confidential Information
1 SSHHHH! It’s a Trade Secret Baron & Lamoureux March 5, 2015 Class 13.
Restrictive Covenants, Confidentiality Agreements, and Trade Secrets.
The University Startup Company Law Firm California Massachusetts Florida (310) Stephen P.
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON- COMPETE IN THE WORKPLACE Connie Dai, Attorney CUTLER & WILENSKY, LLP February 21,
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 10, 2009 Trade Secret – Part 2.
Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 5, 2007 Trade Secret – Part 1.
Employee Mobility Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Intro to Trade Secrets Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges
1 SSHHHH! It’s a Trade Secret Steve Baron April 6, 2006.
IP=Increased Profits How to Make Your IP Work For You Rachel Lerner COSE Fall 2006.
Protecting your company’s valuable information
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TRADE SECRETS COPYRIGHTS PATENTS.
20111IP Survey – Trade Secrets TRADE SECRET SEGMENT PROF. JANICKE 2011.
June 29, 2009 TRADE SECRET LAW.
F2009 TRADE SECRET SEGMENT PROF. JANICKE JUNE 2008.
LEE BURGUNDER LEGAL ASPECTS of MANAGING TECHNOLOGY Third Ed. LEGAL ASPECTS of MANAGING TECHNOLOGY Third Ed.
I’VE GOT A TRADE SECRET: Protection of Trade Secrets and Trademark Due Diligence January 28, 2009 Carl C. Butzer Jackson Walker L.L.P
3 Elements A Valuable Trade Secret Wrongfully Acquired Reasonable Precautions.
Protecting Trade Secrets in the United States 2007 US / China Legal Exchange (Xian, Beijing, Shanghai) Rex Hockaday, Caterpillar (China) Investment Co.,
How to Protect the Company’s Crown Jewels – Customers & Trade Secrets – Against Unfair Competition William M. Corrigan, Jr. Armstrong Teasdale LLP One.
1 Trade Secrets ___________________________ Business Organizations II Mike Brigner, J.D.
1 SSHHHH! It’s a Trade Secret Slides 1-19 Adapted from Steve Baron.
Enforcing IP Rights Involving Foreign Companies Greg Vogler Chicago, Illinois May 2013.
Trade Secrets & Protection of Trade Secrets ISYM540 Topic 5 – Info Assurance and Security Len Smith July 2009.
TRADE SECRETS Presented By Joseph A. Calvaruso Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 1 © AIPLA 2012.
Bryce K. Earl, Esq. and Thomas G. Grace, Esq Presentation To: Association of Corporate Counsel January 26, 2010 ______________________________ Covenants.
Trade Secret Law Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University, Atlanta.
Business Law.  Derives its legal system from England.  Common law is based on judge-made law. Set PRECEDENTS-(examples for settling similar disputes)
Seattle Intellectual Property Inn of Court TRADE SECRETS Introduction.
Trade Secrets Basics Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
Duty of Loyalty Employees owe duty of loyalty to employer -- even if no non-compete agreement Breaches: competing while employed, “seducing” customers.
Lexmundi.com TRADE SECRET PROTECTION IN THE DIGITAL AGE Eric H. Rumbaugh Partner Michael Best & Friedrich LLP Lex Mundi member firm for Wisconsin This.
Protection of Trade Secrets; current issues WIPO-UKRAINE SUMMER SCHOOL ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – JULY 2011.
WIPO - CEDA REGIONAL ROVING SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOR SMES Paramaribo, Suriname; Castries, St. Lucia; Kingston, Jamaica; and Santo Domingo,
1 1 Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Shhhh! Trade Secrets Update Yuichi Watanabe AIPLA IP Practice in Japan Committee January 27-28,
T RADE S ECRETS Copyright © 2010 by Jeffrey Pittman.
What Is A Trade Secret?. Trade Secrets Are Property: Intellectual Property.
20151IP Survey – Trade Secrets TRADE SECRET SEGMENT PROF. JANICKE 2015.
Intellectual Property. Confidential Information Duty not to disclose confidential information about a business that would cause harm to the business or.
TRADE SECRET SEGMENT PROF. JANICKE JULY Trade Secret Segment2 SOURCES OF LAW 45 STATES: UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT – CIVIL TEXAS: CASELAW DOCTRINES.
1 SSHHHH! It’s a Trade Secret Steve Baron April 3, 2003.
Guardians of the IP Law Galaxy: What Employment Lawyers Need to Know Howard L. Steele, Jr., Steele Law Group Penthouse, One Allen Center, Houston, Texas.
TRADE SECRETS workshop I © 2009 Prof. Charles Gielen EU-China Workshop on the Protection of Trade Secrets Shanghai June 2009.
DEFEND TRADE SECRETS ACT
Trade Secret Protection in Texas: TUTSA and DTSA
Drafting Key Commercial and Consumer Contract Terms
Privileged Information: Confidentiality and Disclosure
Astrachan Gunst Thomas, P.C.
SSHHHH! It’s a Trade Secret
Trade Secret Law Update
Dräger US – Trade Secrets CAP Training
Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
Trade Secret Definitions (common definition of value omitted)
SSHHHH! It’s a Trade Secret
Presentation To: Association of Corporate Counsel January 26, 2010
Honorable Ravi K. Sandill Dan Patton Howard L. Steele Jr.,
A day in the life of a trade secret lawyer
SSHHHH! It’s a Trade Secret
SSHHHH! It’s a Trade Secret
IP Survey – Trade Secrets
Protecting Trade Secrets in the US
Differences and similarities
Presentation transcript:

TRADE SECRET SEGMENT PROF. JANICKE 2017

IP Survey – Trade Secrets SOURCES OF LAW 46 STATES HAVE: UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT – CIVIL ACTIONS TEXAS: 2013: adopted Uniform Trade Secrets Act Earlier: Caselaw Doctrines Based On 1st Rest. Of Torts (1939) ALSO HAS A CRIMINAL STATUTE TEX. PENAL CODE § 32.05 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 2

IP Survey – Trade Secrets FEDERAL LAW TOO: GOVERNMENT CIVIL ACTIONS AND CRIM. PROCEEDINGS – ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE ACT (1997) PRIVATE CIVIL ACTIONS – AVAILABLE UNDER PROTECT TRADE SECRETS ACT OF 2016 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

WHAT IS A “TRADE SECRET” (1) ANY COMPETITIVELY VALUABLE INFORMATION (2) THAT’S NOT WIDELY KNOWN OR EASILY FOUND OUT (3) THAT THE POSSESSOR HAS TAKEN REASONABLE STEPS TO KEEP FROM DISCLOSURE 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 4

IP Survey – Trade Secrets EXAMPLES MFG. METHODS MFG. MATERIALS BUSINESS PLANS PRODUCT DESIGN, BEFORE PUBLIC ACCESS 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 5

IP Survey – Trade Secrets USE, OR EVEN PLANNED USE, IN POSSESSOR’S BUSINESS IS NOT REQUIRED SECRECY OF INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS OR PROCESS STEPS IS NOT REQUIRED 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 6

THE PROBLEM OF CUSTOMER LISTS HAS CAUSED A CASE LAW QUAGMIRE OFTEN ARE EASILY LEARNED BY RIGHTFUL MEANS; HENCE NOT A “TRADE SECRET” BUT: CAN BECOME A SECRET BY ADDING PURCHASE HISTORY, PLANS, CONTACTS, ETC. 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 7

HARD-TO-GET REQUIREMENT LIBERALLY CONSTRUED TO HELP TRADE SECRET OWNER EXAMPLE: OBSCURE PUBLICATION OR SUPPLIER’S NAME 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 8

REASONABLE-MEASURES-FOR- SECRECY REQUIREMENT TYPICAL: EMPLOYEE AGREEMENTS MARKING DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS “CONFIDENTIAL” CIRCULATING WRITTEN POLICY POSTING WRITTEN POLICY 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 9

IP Survey – Trade Secrets TYPICAL MEASURES (CONT’D): LIMIT TYPES OF EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE ACCESS LIMIT ACCESS TO PROJECT MEMBERS EXIT INTERVIEWS 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 10

IP Survey – Trade Secrets PROTECTIVE MEASURES CAN BE BY IMPLICATION RATHER THAN EXPRESS, BUT RISKY TO LITIGATE 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

SECRETS GIVEN TO EMPLOYEE IF OWNED BY THE EMPLOYER, THESE REMAIN OWNED BY EMPLOYER, UNTIL PUBLISHED BY EMPLOYER 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

IP Survey – Trade Secrets CASES LAMB-WESTON LEARNING CURVE 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

IP Survey – Trade Secrets 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

IP Survey – Trade Secrets 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

NEW SECRETS DEVELOPED ON-THE-JOB CONTRACT PROVISION FOR OWNERSHIP CONTROLS, IF THERE IS ONE IF THERE IS NO CONTRACT PROVISION, RESULT GOES BY THE EQUITIES “GENERAL SKILLS OF A CALLING” ARE ALWAYS OK FOR EMPLOYEE TO TAKE WITH HIM AND USE DEFINING THESE IS DIFFICULT 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 16

WHAT IS “MISAPPROPRIATION” USING UNDER WRONGFUL CONDITIONS: OBTAIN RIGHTFULLY, BUT USE IN BREACH OF AGREEMENT [MANY CASES] OBTAIN BY FRAUD OR INDUCING A BREACH OF CONFIDENCE [A FEW CASES] 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 17

THE KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENT WHERE SECRET IS IMPARTED TO AN EMPLOYEE OR OTHER PERSON IN CONFIDENCE: MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER UTSA (INCLUDING TEXAS) REQUIRES RECIPIENT “knew or had reason to know” THE INFO WAS “acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain its secrecy or limit its use” >>> 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

IP Survey – Trade Secrets MOST DEFENDANTS SAY THEY DIDN’T KNOW OF ANY “DUTY” BUT, “HAD REASON TO KNOW” IS GIVEN BROAD INTERPRETATION BY COURTS AND JURIES 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

WHAT IS NOT A MISAPPROPRIATION COPYING AN OPENLY AVAILABLE PRODUCT REVERSE ENGINEERING OF AN OPENLY AVAILABLE PRODUCT WHOLLY INDEPENDENT DESIGN ADOPTING THE DESIGN, AFTER DISCLOSURE UNDER CONTRACT OF NON-CONFIDENCE 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 20

IP Survey – Trade Secrets THE INFORMATION PER SE IS NOT PROTECTED ONLY THE IMPROPER OBTAINING OR USING IS BARRED 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

IP Survey – Trade Secrets CASES MANGREN CROUCH 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

MOST CASES INVOLVE RIGHTFUL LEARNING, AND THEN MISAPPROPRIATING TYPICAL PATTERNS: EMPLOYEES LEARN, THEN JUMP JOINT VENTURE PARTNER LEARNS, THEN VENTURE TERMINATES POTENTIAL BUYER OF BUSINESS LEARNS, AND SALE FALLS THROUGH 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 23

IP Survey – Trade Secrets TYPICAL PATTERNS (CONT’D): HARDER TO DECIDE: EXECUTIVE DRIVES THE DEVELOPMENT, THEN JUMPS HARDER TO DECIDE: VENDOR, AGENT, ADVISOR CONTRIBUTES THE SECRET – THEN USES FOR OTHER CLIENTS 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 24

IP Survey – Trade Secrets HARDEST CASES: FLY-OVERS ONE DECIDED CASE TRAILING SHOULD BE OK TRASH COLLECTING MAY BE OK ON THE TRADE SECRET FRONT; PERILOUS ON CRIMINAL FRONT; AND BAD PRESS 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 25

IP Survey – Trade Secrets CASES CHICAGO LOCK SMITH v. DRAVO DUPONT v. CHRISTOPHER 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

IP Survey – Trade Secrets REMEDIES INJUNCTION IS THE KEY REMEDY PREVAILING U.S. VIEW (AND NEW TEXAS STATUTE VIEW): IF INFO HAS BEEN MADE PUBLIC BY OWNER, INJUNCTION SHOULD: BE LIMITED TO LEAD-TIME, NOT PERPETUAL TIME IT TOOK P IS A ROUGH RULE OF THUMB; SHOULD TAKE D AS LONG 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 27 27

IP Survey – Trade Secrets EXAMPLE OF LEAD-TIME INJUNCTION: P SPENT 3 YEARS IN DEVELOPING THE INFO D NEEDED ONLY 1 YEAR, DUE TO MISAPPROP. D SHOULD BE ENJOINED FROM USE FOR 2 YEARS 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

IP Survey – Trade Secrets DAMAGES ARE AVAILABLE COMPENS. AND PUNITIVE [UTSA: UP TO TREBLING] CAN BE UNJUST ENRICHMENT PLUS P’S LOSS OF BUSINESS CAN BE TREBLED IF WILLFUL OR MALICIOUS [TWICE THE ACTUAL DAMAGES, AS PUNITIVE COMPONENT] 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 29

IP Survey – Trade Secrets TR. SEC. CASES SOMETIMES INVOLVE PRELIM. INJUNC. HEARING SELDOM GO TO TRIAL VERY HIGH SETTLEMENT RATE 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

INJUNCTION AGAINST WORKING FOR A PARTICULAR COMPETITOR CAN BE HANDLED PER NO-COMPETE CONTRACT IN MOST STATES, INCLUDING TEXAS WHERE NO CONTRACT, THIS TYPE OF INJUNCTION IS COMMONLY SOUGHT TO PROTECT THE SECRET ARGUMENT: WORKING FOR “THEM” IN “THIS MANNER” WILL INHERENTLY DIVULGE COUNTER-ARGUMENT: NEED TO EARN A LIVING 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 31

IP Survey – Trade Secrets COMMON JUDICIAL RELUCTANCE RE. NO-COMPETE INJUNCTION WHERE NO CONTRACT PROVISION JUDGES DO NOT WANT TO KILL JOBS JUDGES DO NOT WANT TO DEPRIVE FAMILIES OF LIVELIHOODS >>> 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 32

IP Survey – Trade Secrets POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS: INJUNCTION REQUIRES KEEPING PERSON ON PAYROLL AND WORKING INJUNCTION REQUIRES PROVIDING MINIMUM CONSULTING FEES AND POSSIBLE WORK INJUNCTION LIMITED TO WORKING IN COMPETITOR DIVISION MOST LIKELY TO CAUSE BREACH 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

IP Survey – Trade Secrets CASE WEED-EATER 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

SPECIAL PROBLEM: STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ONE VIEW: MISAPPROPRIATION IS AN ONGOING TORT, NEW VIOLATION EVERY DAY HENCE, ONLY OLD MISUSES ARE CUT OFF; DAMAGES AND INJUNCTION ARE AVAILABLE FOR RECENT/FUTURE VIOLATIONS 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 35

SPECIAL PROBLEM: STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ANOTHER VIEW: ORIGINAL MISAPPROPRIATION STARTS A SINGLE CLOCK; WHEN IT RUNS, ALL ACTION IS BARRED TEXAS SOLUTION: SINGLE WRONG, SINGLE RUNNING -- BUT FROM DISCOVERY DATE (KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN) 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets 36

IP Survey – Trade Secrets CASE SCHALK 2017 IP Survey – Trade Secrets