The Downtown Parking Management Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US101: SE 16 th – SE 36 th Street (Lincoln City) )Project Community Advisory Committee July 11, 2007 Meeting.
Advertisements

Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Regional Bike Parking Workshop Marcia Maffei | Lane Transit District | point2point Jessica Roberts and Scott Mizée| Alta Planning + Design.
XAMA January 8, 2008 Downtown Parking. CITY OF XENIA DOWNTOWN PARKING FACTS The City of Xenia Zoning Ordinance requires all businesses to provide off-
Political Support Needed to Improve Transportation 06 | 25 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA | Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Market and Geary.
GreenPlan Downtown Design and Greenberg Development Services Report.
 Awarded Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Grant for integrated land use and transportation planning efforts ( )  Consultant.
Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
CITY OF IOWA CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING. GENERAL INFORMATION Presenters:Geoff Fruin – City Manager’s Office Chris O’Brien – Transportation Services Sessions:Monday,
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Cathedral Area Historic District Project Breaking A 50-Year Impasse:
Juneau Downtown Tourism Transportation Study May 27, 2003.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Draft Zoning Code City Council Work Session June 21, 2007.
Wollaston Center Parking Study April 16, Study Area 0.2 miles 4 min walk.
Fundamental Methods for Building More Walkable Communities Mark Fenton Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center University of North Carolina.
Efficiency through technology and collaboration Road Diet (Roadway Reconfiguration) Every Day Counts 3 Innovative Safety Initiative.
City of Alexandria, Virginia AD HOC GROUP ON A-FRAME & DIGITAL SIGNAGE June 3, :00 PM.
New Partners for Smart Growth 11th Annual Conference San Diego February 2, 2012 New Parking Standards for Affordable Housing.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
February 24, 2015 First Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15 
Draft Zoning Code Planning Commission Work Session June 20, 2007.
Transport Demand and Management Implementation Lessons Learnt from European Experience Rudolf M. Petersen Energy Efficiency Policies in the Land Transport.
South Lake Union On-Street Parking Plan November 1, 2005.
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
City of Portland SW 6 th Avenue & Jackson Street Intersection Solution Study 1 Presented By: Josh Crain Robert Acevedo Xiaowei Wu Chengxin Dai.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
SR 436 / SR 50 Area Redevelopment Plan Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C.
CTC Planned Development and Development Agreement Modification January 26, 2016 Planning Commission Hearing Greg Turner, Land Use Manager.
© ARRB Group Ltd Presented by Larry Schneider Principal Consultant Monday 29 th February 2016 City of Swan GUILDFORD PARKING.
Martin J. Walsh Mayor Michael Dennehy Commissioner Public Hearing January 20, 2015.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
Restricted Working Document – Interim Report Chamber Sign Task Force Fayetteville City Sign Review April 4,
Tonight’s Agenda  Project Overview  Existing Parking Summary  Post-It Note Exercise & Discussion  Parking Management Toolbox  Small Group Breakouts.
Planning Healthy Neighbourhoods Presenter: Stephanie Knox.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Portland’s Northwest District Parking Plan Development.
JUNE 2016 Downtown Bozeman, MT Comprehensive Downtown Parking Plan.
Community Input Meeting #4 July 8 & 9, Agenda City Staff & Project Team Why we are here Project overview Summary of previous community meetings.
Mobility for all Modes Update to the Transportation Chapter of the City’s Comprehensive Plan City Council May 27,
Complete Streets Training Module 4b – Designing for All Users.
SMART URBAN FUTURES PRESENTATION
Presentation Preview Introductions Purpose for Zoning Code Rewrite
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
West Chester Borough Master Parking Plan Framework
Center City Connector 101.
Downtown Parking Program Time Limit Evaluation
Pamlico Neighborhood of Norfolk, VA
Project Area Upper Village Middle Village Lower Village.
Pilot Project Evaluation
Transit-Oriented Affordable Housing
Downtown Core Parking Demand & Utilization Study Parking Management Advisory Board Meeting September 27, 2016.
City of Wilton Manors Long Term Parking Plan
Historic District Parking Management Plan
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
SMART URBAN FUTURES PRESENTATION
2017 citywide parking study
ROOSEVELT CITY GENERAL PLAN 2010
Multifamily Housing Tax Exemption Program
M14A/D Select Bus Service
254 East Union Street Pre Development Plan Review
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
Downtown Parking Update Parking Advisory Committee
Presentation transcript:

The Downtown Parking Management Plan

Part of the Downtown Specific Plan Update Parking Management Plan – Underway Synoptic Survey -Underway Update the Downtown Zoning and Codes Modify Other Downtown Specific Plan Sections Update 2003 DTSP

Improve Access and Parking Downtown

Improve Car, Bike and Pedestrian Mobility

Make the Downtown a Magnet for People

The Mission Develop and deploy the policies, programs and actions that will result in a more efficient and effective access to and use of parking resources and access for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians throughout the Downtown.

The Parts of the Plan Context Parking Demand Parking Supply Parking Utilization Assessment Strategies and Measures

The Physical Context North Street Cleveland Street East Street Main Street East Street Lincoln Street

Main Street

Physical Context Considerations Distance: People will walk 1000 feet or more to shop and to a worthy destination - if the route is safe, comfortable, convenient and relatively attractive. Park here

Overly narrow or obstructed sidewalks

Inadequate tree canopies

Inadequate Street / Parking Lot Lighting Inadequate lighting on some north-south streets and public lots constrains pedestrian use because of safety and security concerns, particularly in the late fall, winter and early spring evenings.

Inadequate Pedestrian Street Lighting

Physical Context Considerations The Pathway: Walking by empty and boring storefronts and lots make the trip tedious and inconvenient. Inadequately shaded sidewalks make parking and walking uncomfortable in the summer.

Public and Private Signs Inadequate, confusing, unattractive and misplaced signage frustrates drivers and pedestrians.

The People Context: Interviews

Interviews Responses: Add Diagonal Parking Slow Traffic Speeds Add Stop Signs Add Parking Permits Need a Parking Garage Inadequate Street Lighting

Businesses Responses Add Diagonal Parking – Yes, need more on-street Traffic Speeds – Mixed, but slower is better Add Stop Signs – Mixed, but not if it diverts traffic Add Parking Permits – Yes and no Need Parking Garage – Yes Lighting Adequacy – Not good, a major deterrent Other - Some employees use core spaces and move their vehicles every two hours to avoid citations. Other - Keep parking free with two-hour or longer limits where necessary for on-street parking and lots.

Context: Parking Trends The new eight screen cinema will attract motorist who seek parking within walking distance of the theater, particularly during evenings and weekends. Each new Downtown commercial and residential development will likely increase parking demands. Millennials and younger, less car dependent, will reduce parking demands – if walking is an option. Autonomous private vehicles should reduce parking demand, but when and by how much? Similarly, autonomous transit or just better transit will reduce demand, but when and by how much?

Parking Demand: What Drives It?

Auto-Dependency, Inadequate Transit

Perception or Reality: Insufficient or Inconvenient Public Parking

Minimum Parking Requirements Multifamily: Studio: one space per unit 1 bedroom: one space per unit 2 bedroom: one and three-quarter spaces per unit 3+ bedroom: two spaces per unit. (D) Offices (except medical offices and clinics): one space for each four hundred square feet of gross floor area; (E) Retail stores, banks: one space for each three hundred square feet of gross floor area; (F) Restaurants, cafes, coffee shops, bars and establishments with on-site alcohol sales: one space for each three hundred square feet of gross floor area;

Parking Demand: How Many Public Spaces Required?

2017 Public Parking Demand* Weekday Daytime Parking Demand: 758 spaces Weekday Evening Parking Demand: 482 spaces Weekend Daytime Parking Demand: 525 spaces Weekend Evening Parking Demand: 556 spaces Average Weekday + Weekend Demand: 580 spaces Peak Weekday + Weekend Demand: 758 spaces *Combined on street and off street public parking, based on multiple recorded observations on January and February 2017.

Ten Year Estimated Demand: Opportunity Sites Other

Ten Year Estimated Public Parking Demand With Infill and Redevelopment: 334 Non-Residential Spaces Required At 30% Public: 100 Public Spaces Required

2027 Public Parking Demand 2017 Average Demand: 580 spaces 2017 Peak Demand: 758 spaces 2027 Additional 100 spaces 2027 Average Demand: 680 spaces 2027 Peak Demand: 858 spaces

The number of Downtown on-street and public parking lot spaces Public Parking Supply The number of Downtown on-street and public parking lot spaces

The Inventory: Walking and Counting

584 On-Street Spaces

1,044 Public Parking Lot Spaces

Total Public Parking Supply 584 On-Street + 1044 Lot Spaces = 1,628 Public Spaces

Supply vs. Peak Demand 2017 Peak Parking Demand: 758 spaces 2017 On-Street + Public Lot Supply: 1,628 spaces 2017 Supply – Peak Demand Total: + 870 spaces 2027 Supply – Peak Demand Total: + 770 spaces More than enough parking spaces – but where are they and how are they used?

Public Parking Utilization The total occupancy of on-street and public parking lots during peak hourly periods - noon to 1:00 PM and 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM, weekdays and weekends - a primary measure of parking usage, an indicator of driver parking preferences and behaviors during maximum use times.

Utilization: Walking and Counting Six Periods, Weekday and Weekend

On-Street Utilization Peak Occupancies Main Street Fifth / Sixth Peak Occupancies Main / Court / Lincoln College / First Cross / Pendegast

On-Street Utilization Public Lot Utilization Peak Occupancies Lots on Both Sides of Main 5 6 7 Main Street 8 9

Public Parking Utilization Utilization Averages: Weekday Noon to 1:00 PM: 44% Weekday 7:00 to 8:00 PM: 31% Weekend Noon to 1:00 PM: 34% Weekend 7:00 to 8:00 PM: 36% Weekday + Weekend: 39% 2017 utilization 39% x 1,628 spaces: 635 spaces used on average

Assessment The following evaluation or assessment of the physical conditions, the Context, Inventory, Demand, and Utilization investigations, and public engagement, precedes the formulation of recommended measures.

Assessment of Physical Conditions The Downtown contains more than enough public parking spaces but motorists use less than half! Some park-and-walk routes appear unsafe, uncomfortable, inconvenient or just to far to walk to. A primary constraint after sundown is an inadequacy of lighting on some north-south streets and in public lots. Some sidewalks front on empty, boring storefronts & lots Discomfort of inadequately shaded sidewalks and lots Inadequate, confusing, unattractive and misplaced public and private signage. How can you find a parking lot?

Assessment of Stakeholder Input Retailers want more on-street parking or lots close by Excessive traffic speeds – reduce below 25 mph Stop signs at Main Street may divert shopper traffic Parking limits inconsistent with Downtown venues Parking permits require management and enforcement Add a parking garage if other parking actions fail Improve lighting by innovative means (e.g., on buildings) Employees use core spaces so better lighting will help Free parking now, later consider fee-based parking Use excess private parking through Shared Parking Plan

Recommended Parking Management Strategies and Measures

Create a Park Once and Walk District

Measures: Increase public sidewalks widths to maintain widths that accommodate people walking together. Remove obstructions such as sign posts in the pathway. Add a sidewalk improvement plan to City capital improvement projects list. Collaborate with the Chamber of Commerce and the Historic Downtown Woodland Group to help. Increase sidewalk width

Measures: Improve street and parking lot lighting by installing lights on exterior building walls and other locations to increase illumination on sidewalks and public parking areas. Collaborate with the Chamber of Commerce and the Historic Downtown Woodland Group to help add exterior lighting at under-illuminated areas. Work with building owners to replace existing, inefficient luminaires with LEDs and to add new photovoltaic lighting to avoid wiring new luminaires and to save energy costs.

Measures: Increase shade tree canopy Collaborate with City Arborist and local groups to add appropriate trees and maintain existing stock. Work with property owners to help add shade trees on the front of their properties.

Measures: Infill empty lots and redevelopment underutilized sites. Collaborate with the Chamber of Commerce and the Historic Downtown Woodland Group to help with infill and redevelopment incentives. Incentivize infill and redevelopment with the new citywide up-zoning process

Measures: Improve public and private signage: Update and deploy a Downtown Signage Plan. Incorporate new a signage ordinance into the Downtown design and development standards.

Measure: add diagonal parking on the west side of 2nd Street between Main Street and Lincoln Street.

Measure: Calibrate the allowed time duration of on-street parking and public lot spaces to match business demands. For example, new cinema attendees will require three-hour parking spaces for most shows. Incentivize business employees to park away from prime shopping spaces. Consider employee or neighborhood parking permits, which require additional management to administer and enforce, if shared private parking and better lighting on non-timed street parking fail to satisfy parking needs 3

Measures: Develop shared parking agreements or plans for business and employee parking in underutilize private lots. Shared parking is a transaction between different land uses (a bank, a theater and a bar or restaurant) that contain off-street parking and different periods of parking demand, to allow the use of unused parking spaces by another that needs the excess parking. Work with Chamber of Commerce and the Historic Downtown Woodland Group to create a plan.

Over 1,000 spaces are available (2,937 total private spaces). Shared parking allows a use to reduce the amount of parking normally required if two or more uses have peak demand at different times of day or day of week. Liability insurance coverage is available and can be incorporated into the shared parking agreements.

Individual lot owners can create cross parking agreements or a private parking management company can broker agreements between users. Determine the number of spaces a business or lot owner will provide by day and time period – the supply – and the number of spaces a business needs for customers or employees by day and time period – the demand. Create a shared lot parking map and schedule. Match suppliers with potential users. Bring the parties together to work out specific agreements.

Other Recommended Measures Use Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to reduce travel demand or redistribute demand in space or time, for example, providing better transit options within and to and from Downtown. Change signal light timing on Main Street to slow traffic to below 25. 18-20 mph is an optimum speed for traffic flow and best viewing of storefronts and parking spaces.

Recommend holding off replacing signal lights with stop signs on Main Street in favor of signal light timing. Brief analysis: stop signs on the short blocks can cause backups and vehicles to divert to Court and Lincoln. It can be tested using flashing red signals over longer period.

Recommend that a Parking Garage is not necessary The Downtown contains enough parking provided that access to on-street and public lots is safe, convenient, attractive, and comfortable. As of March 2014, the median construction cost for a new parking structure is $18,038 per space. It’s more cost effective to improve the existing parking and access routes. Autonomous vehicles will reduce parking demands.

Next Steps Re