Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ExoMars UV Laser diode thermal vacuum test Alex Rousseau.
Advertisements

Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project FM8/14 PSR, Oct. 5, 2005 GLAST LAT Tracker Towers 8/14 Pre-Ship Review INFN-Pisa.
Palestine TV Test Jason Link University of Hawaii ANITA Collaboration Meeting at UCI 4/7/05 – 4/9/05.
Solar Orbiter EUS: Thermal Design Considerations Bryan Shaughnessy, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 Solar Orbiter EUV Spectrometer Thermal Design Considerations.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium Batteries for Aircraft Usage May 11, Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
1 GLAST LAT ProjectMechanical Systems Mechanical Systems Mechanical / Thermal Hardware November 2004 Status Marc Campell, Subsystem Manager.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems Radiator and X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Integration and Test 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby.
MPSRThermal- 1 UCB, Oct 26, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-SHIP REVIEW Thermal Christopher Smith University of California - Berkeley.
Usage Guidelines Throughout this template you will find tip-boxes to the left of the slides. To remove this box from the final presentation, simply click.
GoetzFIELDS iPDR – I&T SPP/FIELDS Integration and Test Preliminary Design Review Keith Goetz University of Minnesota 1.
SPP FIELDS V5 Antenna Mechanical Peer Review David Glaser, Paul Turin, Jeremy McCauley, John Bonnell, Dennis Seitz SSL UCB 7/17/13.
M. Diaz-AguadoFIELDS iPDR – Thermal Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PDR Thermal Subsystem Millan F. Diaz-Aguado SSL Berkeley
THEMIS F2/F3 IPSR and F4/F5 IPER 1 By Telecon, November 10, 2005 THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM2/FM3 PRE-SHIP REVIEW FM4/FM5 PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Thermal.
THEMIS/GBO Engineering Peer Review 1 UCB, Oct. 17, 2003 Ground Based Observatories (GBO) Observatory System Design Stewart Harris - UCB.
THEMIS Instrument Suite PERSuite T-V- 1 UCB, May 2, 2005 THEMIS Instrument Suite Thermal Vac Test Rick Sterling University of California, Berkeley.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Test Plan Michael Ludlam Space Sciences Laboratory.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 6.0 Subsystem Verif. Test Plan 1 GLAST Large Area.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 Presenter1 Thermal Control R.Eby Impact Boom Stowed and Deployed SWEA STE Magnetometer Bob.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW Boom PER 30 June RBSP EFW Spin Plane Booms Greg Dalton Space Sciences.
FM1 Instrument Suite Pre-Ship Review (PSR)Thermal-1UCB, September 21, 2005 THEMIS FM1 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) THERMAL Chris Smith University.
LAT TVAC Test Delta-PDR1 GLAST LAT Project25 May 2005 LAT Environmental Test Planning and Design Delta-Preliminary Design Review 25 May 2005 LAT T-Vac.
MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Critical Design Review May , 2011 Integration and Test Dave Curtis PFP Package Manager Mars.
GLAST LAT ProjectSeptember 15, 2006: Pre-Shipment Review 1 Integration and Test Presentation 11 of 12 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT Pre-Shipment Review.
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PEREnvironments- 1 Teleconference 8/30/2005 THEMIS Instrument FM2/3 Pre-Environmental Review Environments Jeremy McCauley University.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
F1, F3, F4, F5 PER 1 UCB, June 23, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Thermal Christopher Smith Thermal Engineer University of California - Berkeley.
June 16, 2015SPP/FIELDS SOC CDR: Integration & Test SPP/FIELDS Integration and Test SOC Critical Design Review Keith Goetz University of Minnesota
FM2/FM3 PSR FM4/FM5 PERSCM - 1UCB, November 10, 2005 THEMIS FM2/FM3 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) THEMIS FM4/FM5 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE- ENVIRONMENTAL.
1-1 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review November 19, 2012 STATIC Thermal Status Millan F. Diaz-Aguado Mars Atmosphere.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face, 14 April 2004 LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EGSE and Interface Verification Pat Hascall SLAC System.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 Thermal Design Christopher Smith RBSP Thermal Engineer Space.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Systems Engineering Michael Ludlam Space Sciences.
FM4/FM5 IPSRSYS - 1 UCB, May 5, 2006 THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM4/FM5 PRE-SHIP REVIEW SYSTEM OVERVIEW Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Spacecraft Level Testing and Verification Part 3 1.
1 SWEA pre-CDR Peer Review Particles and Fields Package (PFP) SWEA pre-CDR Peer Review Integration with PFP, Qualification, ATLO 2011 March 28 Dave Curtis.
Unit, Development and Subsystem Level Thermal Testing Part 2 1.
Rationale for Selected MIL-STD-1540E Thermal Test Requirement
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Thermal Analysis Christine Cottingham LM/GSFC 545 Hume Peabody GSFC.
1 PFP IPDR 2010/6/ Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Instrument Preliminary Design Review Integration & Test David Curtis, PF Package Manager.
EMI/EMC GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review
Rose Navarro HMI Lead Thermal Engineer
FIELDS MEP Thermal Vacuum Cycling iPER
FIELDS MEP & V5 Pre-Ship Review Thermal Summary
FIELDS V1234 Thermal Vacuum & Balance Tests iPER Draft
General overview Place : Institue of Space Astrophysic (IAS, Orsay)
FIELDS Mission Assurance Manager University of California, Berkeley
EIDP Status. Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPSR Management Apr 10, 2017.
THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM4/FM5 PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
FIELDS MEP & V5 Pre-Ship Review Thermal Summary
(EFW Systems Engineer) University of California, Berkeley
Agenda. Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPER Agenda Feb 2, 2017.
SPP FIELDS V1234 Thermal PSR
Solar Probe Plus – FIELDS Verification Instrument mini-PER (V5)
FIELDS SCM Thermal iPER
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPER EMC Feb 2, 2017
LAT Requirements Verification in TVAC
© The Aerospace Corporation 2008 Rationale for Selected MIL-STD-1540E Thermal Test Requirement John W. Welch The Aerospace Corporation TFAWS
Jason Link University of Hawaii
University of California, Berkeley
7E: Tower test plans GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem
Thermal Vacuum Test: Plans and Procedures
HMI Reliability Dale Wolfe Reliability Engineer LMSSC*ATC*LMSAL
Integration and Test Organization Chart
CONTOUR NGIMS Electronics Test History
Presentation transcript:

Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016 FIELDS V5 Thermal iPER Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016

V5 Thermal Cycling Objectives and Summary Test Objectives Qualify the flight model of the V5 instrument Verify that the V5 unit can bear the temperatures Provide workmanship and performance verification Component temperatures shall be tested to 10°C beyond flight model predicts Test Summary 1 survival and 6 operational thermal cycles will be complete in vacuum CPTs (Electrical Functional Test) will be conducted at the first and last operational cycles at cold and hot temperatures LPTs (same Electrical Functional Test) will be conducted for all other operational cycles

V5 Thermal Cycling Test Configuration Chamber configuration The V5 flight units will be tested in the UCB/SSL SNOUT1 thermal vacuum chamber There are four temperature zones for the TV test Chamber baseplate (heating & cooling) Chamber shroud (heating & cooling) Cold finger (cooling) Mounting plate heater (heating) Hardware configuration The flight unit will be fully assembled Micro-Faze K will be used to electrically isolate V5 from the chamber baseplate There are 2 configurations for the vacuum cycling Survival soaks and V5 warm-up characterization: Cold-finger and mounting plate heater Operational soaks: Remove cold finger and mounting heater, V5 will be hard mounted to chamber baseplate (less thermal mass for op cycling) V5 flight unit in bench test configuration

V5 Thermal Cycling Test Configuration Electrical configuration The harness will be connected to a feedthrough to connect to the V5 GSE external to the chamber The flight instruments will be controlled and internal thermistor monitored via the V5 GSE connected externally to the chamber

V5 Thermal Cycling Test Configuration Thermocouples will be mounted along the flight unit, and harness to verify temperatures during thermal cycling Internal thermistor will verify that the temperatures have stabilized TC # Location Red limit cold (°C) Yellow limit cold (°C) Yellow limit hot (°C) Red limit hot (°C)   Baseplate -200 -140 75 90 Shroud Cold Finger -160 110 120 V5 electronics box, baseplate Heater zone 3 -150 115 V5 electronic box, top -145 -135 V5 mounting plate

V5 Thermal Cycling Test Profile The test duration for the combined thermal cycling test will take ~5 days (assuming 4 hour soaks) including set-up and take-down time Instrument functions Pre-test functional Hot and cold operation CPTs (op cycles 1 and 6) Hot and cold operation LPTs (op cycles 2 through 5) Post-test functional Test parameters The transition rate of the instrument is not to exceed 3°C per minute Start of soak is defined when the control temperature is within 1°C of the test temperature Soak is defined as a minimum of four hour at case temperatures with a change in temperature of ±1°C Temperature profile on following slide Future vacuum testing Additional vacuum exposure will occur on the flight hardware The V5 assembly will “ride-along” with the FIELDS MEP in thermal cycling 6 operational cycles from -25°C to 60°C 1 survival cycle from -30°C to 65°C

V5 Thermal Cycling Test Profile

Back-up

Handling & Contamination Control All test articles and test hardware to be bagged and kept in clean room Personnel are to handle only with appropriate gloves and contamination gowning EMECP specifications shall be practiced during flight hardware handling, test set-up and test operations Contamination control of the instrument must follow the specifications in the SPP-FIELDS Contamination Control Plan 

Test Abort, Real Time Activity Assessment and Success/Failure Criteria Minor anomalies will be evaluated and fixed or alleviated in an attempt to continue testing Examples of minor anomalies include temporary loss of thermocouple, minor problems with hardware (cable movement) or problems with vacuum facility Response to minor anomalies will be made by Test Conductors at test site Significant anomalies will result in abort of further testing The UCB Test Engineer has the authority to stop testing if deemed damage may be occurring to the hardware, the test equipment functioning is suspect, output data is questionable, or test is not compatible with this procedure All anomalies shall be reported as part of standard Project Problem/Failure Reporting. Success/Failure Criteria Adequate temperature data collected at steady state from all test cases Meet all S/C requirements

V5 Other Thermal Testing Completed thermal tests ETU test V5 ETU (EM) underwent a TB test on the APL boom Jan 2016 The thermal model has been correlated to the thermal balance test LN2 “shock test” on preamp Future thermal tests The V5 assembly will “ride-along” with the FIELDS MEP in thermal cycling 6 operational cycles from -25°C to 60°C 1 survival cycle from -30°C to 65°C Thermal balance test on boom during SPP Observatory test estimated 12/2017

V5 EDTRD Thermal Requirements Complete Description 0179   Throughout thermal balance and thermal cycle testing, each instrument subsystem or instrument component shall be powered unless there is an identified potential for damage and a waiver has been obtained from APL 0189 Instruments shall complete a successful thermal vacuum flight qualification testing program prior to delivery to the spacecraft 0190 Testing program shall consist of thermal vacuum balance and thermal vacuum cycle 0191 All instruments thermal test plans shall be provided to the SC thermal engineer for review and approval 0192 Flight predictions shall demonstrate at least 10°C of margin within the instrument operational or survival test temperatures with the exception that for active heater control, 5°C of temperature margin is acceptable at the lower test limit 0207 Instrument thermal vacuum cycle tests do not have to maintain the isolated coupling used during thermal balance. This should decrease transition time between cycles, thus total test time. Instrument component temperatures shall be based on flight model predictions if the isolation coupling is not flight-like 0208 Instrument component temperatures shall be tested to 10°C beyond flight model predictions 0209 Flight model testing shall complete six operational and one survival cycle 0212 CPT’s shall be conducted during instrument level TV testing 0213 Minimal functional tests shall be performed at all remaining plateaus if no CPT performed