Definitions of ACK and CTS Timeout

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /272a Submission June 2001 S. Choi, Philips Research Slide 1 Problems with IEEE (e) NAV Operation and ONAV Proposal Javier del.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /605r3 Submission November 2001 S. Kandala, et. al. Slide 1 CFB Ending Rule under HCF Srinivas Kandala, Ken Nakashima, Yashihiro Ohtani.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /110 Submission May 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 QoS Support in : Contention-Free MAC Perspective Sunghyun Choi.
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
ACK Indication and EIFS
EA C451 (Internetworking Technologies)
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Considerations on short packet transmission overhead
MAC Calibration results
EDCF TCID, Queues, and Access Parameters Relationship
HCF medium access rules
PCF Model Progress Update Jan. 2001
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results
Link Metric for High Throughput Mesh
NAV Protection Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs, Research July 2003
Channel Access for WUR FDMA
20MHz Protection Mode Date: Authors: August 2008 Feb, 2008
Link Metric for High Throughput Mesh
New OFDM SERVICE Field Format for .11e MAC FEC
MDA Comments 1 Date: Authors: September, 2008 Feb, 2008
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
ACK operation in TDD SP Date: Authors: MAY 2018 Name
NAV Protection Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs, Research July 2003
HCF Duration Field Set Rules
Ack/BA for mmWave Distribution Networks
EIFS Correction Mathilde Benveniste Dongyan Chen
PCF vs. DCF: Limitations and Trends
Calibration using NDP Date: Authors: December 2006
Cleaning Up MAC/PHY Interface Timing
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll
Proposed Resolutions to RFI comments of LB 166 on IEEE s D7.0
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
HCF medium access rules
Power Efficient PS Poll
Date Submitted: [February 8, 2006]
Management Frame Channel Access Latency in TGh
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
Report of TGm – November 2004
A novel hidden station detection mechanism
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
HCF medium access rules
Coex RIFS Discussion Date: Authors: November 2006
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
HCF medium access rules
NAV Protection Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs, Research July 2003
More Simulations on Secondary CCA
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Outdoor Mesh MAC Protocol Issues & Considerations
802.11g Contention Period – Solution for Co-existence with Legacy
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
Channel Access for WUR FDMA
Decoding Latency for STBC and LDPC
NAV Clearing: Problems and Proposed Remedy
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning Poll Responses
Evaluation of Protocol efficiency
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
Presentation transcript:

Definitions of ACK and CTS Timeout Month 1998 doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/xxx May 2002 Definitions of ACK and CTS Timeout Sunghyun Choi Philips Research USA sunghyun.choi@philips.com S. Choi, Philips

Definitions of ACK & CTS Timeout May 2002 Definitions of ACK & CTS Timeout In 802.11-1999, they are mentioned in the text while the actual value is never defined in the text. The values are defined in the SDL in Annex C TGe decided not to use Annex C as the reference. Therefore, TGe needs to define them in the text accordingly. S. Choi, Philips

May 2002 According to 802.11-1999 Annex C, p. 346 ACKTimeout = SIFS + ACK Transmission Duration + SlotTime Annex C, p. 348 CTSTimeout = SIFS + ACK Transmission Duration + SlotTime “ACK Transmission Duration” is determined based on the PHY rate expected based on the rules in 9.6. ACK length = CTS length S. Choi, Philips

Problem with Current Definitions May 2002 Problem with Current Definitions The transmitter of an MPDU or an RTS does not need to wait for the whole ACK or CTS transmission time as defined in certain cases When CCA stays idle after an MPDU or an RTS for PIFS, it implies that the MPDU or RTS was not received by the receiver correctly. We can define two different values for ACK/CTS Timeout depending on the situation! (See the resolution of Comment #1805 in 02/084r9) S. Choi, Philips

May 2002 New Definition After the transmission of an MPDU (or RTS), ACK Timeout (or CTS Timeout) will be: PIFS when CCA stays idle during the following PIFS interval SIFS + ACK Transmission Duration + SlotTime when CCA becomes busy within the following PIFS interval S. Choi, Philips

May 2002 Normative Text In Clause 9.2.8, add the following at the end of the third paragraph: ACKTimeout is determined by PIFS if no PHY-CCA.indication(busy) is detected from the PHY during a period with a duration of (aSIFSTime + aSlotTime) starting at the PHY-TXEND.confirm. ACKTimeout is determined by (aSIFSTime + ACK_Time + aSlotTime) if PHY-CCA.indication(busy) is detected from the PHY during a period with a duration of (aSIFSTime + aSlotTime) starting at the PHY-TXEND.confirm, where ACK_Time is the transmission duration of an ACK frame at the PHY rate determined according to the rule found in Clause 9.6. S. Choi, Philips

May 2002 Normative Text In Clause 9.2.5.7, add the following the first and second paragraphs: The source STA shall wait CTSTimeout amount of time without receiving a CTS before concluding that the RTS failed. CTSTimeout is determined by PIFS if no PHY-CCA.indication(busy) is detected from the PHY during a period with a duration of (aSIFSTime + aSlotTime) starting at the PHY-TXEND.confirm. CTSTimeout is determined by (aSIFSTime + CTS_Time + aSlotTime), where CTS_Time is the transmission duration of a CTS frame at the PHY rate determined according to the rule found in Clause 9.6, if PHY-CCA.indication(busy) is detected from the PHY during a period with a duration of (aSIFSTime + aSlotTime) starting at the PHY-TXEND.confirm. S. Choi, Philips