Summary Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
Advertisements

Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:
Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University Shaun Cole for Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Cosmological simulations.
Cosmological Constraints from Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
Tidal Alignments & Large Scale Structure Christopher Hirata Edinburgh, 22 Jul 2010 C.H., MNRAS 399:1074 (2009) – Redshift space distortions Elisabeth Krause.
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
What Figure of Merit Should We Use to Evaluate Dark Energy Projects? Yun Wang Yun Wang STScI Dark Energy Symposium STScI Dark Energy Symposium May 6, 2008.
Suzanne Staggs (Princeton) Rencontres de Blois, 1 June 2011 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT): Still More Cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background.
Dark Halos of Fossil Groups and Clusters Observations and Simulations Ali Dariush, Trevor Ponman Graham Smith University of Birmingham, UK Frazer Pearce.
WEIGHING THE UNIVERSE Celebrating Tsvi Piran Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University.
1 Studying clusters and cosmology with Chandra Licia Verde Princeton University Some thoughts…
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
Prospects and Problems of Using Galaxy Clusters for Precision Cosmology Jack Burns Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy University of Colorado,
Cosmology Zhaoming Ma July 25, The standard model - not the one you’re thinking  Smooth, expanding universe (big bang).  General relativity controls.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Dark Energy J. Frieman: Overview 30 A. Kim: Supernovae 30 B. Jain: Weak Lensing 30 M. White: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 30 P5, SLAC, Feb. 22, 2008.
Statistics of the Weak-lensing Convergence Field Sheng Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory Columbia University Collaborators: Zoltán Haiman, Morgan May,
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure Alexandre Refregier (Cambridge) Collaborators: Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (Cambridge) Richard.
Relic Neutrinos, thermal axions and cosmology in early 2014 Elena Giusarma arXiv: Based on work in collaboration with: E. Di Valentino, M. Lattanzi,
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
Constraining cluster abundances using weak lensing Håkon Dahle Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo.
Francisco Javier Castander Serentill Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (ICE/CSIC) Barcelona Exploiting the.
Cosmological Particle Physics Tamara Davis University of Queensland With Signe Riemer-Sørensen, David Parkinson, Chris Blake, and the WiggleZ team.
What’s going on with Dark Energy? Bill Carithers Aspen 2008.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
MASS-TO-LIGHT FUNCTION: from Galaxies to Superclusters MASS-TO-LIGHT FUNCTION: from Galaxies to Superclusters Celebrating Vera Rubin Neta A. Bahcall Princeton.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
The Distributions of Baryons in the Universe and the Warm Hot Intergalactic Medium Baryonic budget at z=0 Overall thermal timeline of baryons from z=1000.
 Acceleration of Universe  Background level  Evolution of expansion: H(a), w(a)  degeneracy: DE & MG  Perturbation level  Evolution of inhomogeneity:
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
23 Sep The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun Peking Univ./ CPPM.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
Zheng Dept. of Astronomy, Ohio State University David Weinberg (Advisor, Ohio State) Andreas Berlind (NYU) Josh Frieman (Chicago) Jeremy Tinker (Ohio State)
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Cosmology with Large Optical Cluster Surveys Eduardo Rozo Einstein Fellow University of Chicago Rencontres de Moriond March 14, 2010.
Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Effects Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood.
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
NEUTRINOS IN THE INTERGALACTIC MEDIUM Matteo Viel, Martin Haehnelt. Volker Springel: arXiv today Rencontres de Moriond – La Thuile 15/03/2010.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
TR33 in the Light of the US- Dark Energy Task Force Report Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Holger Israel Emmy Noether Research Group Argelander-Institut.
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
BAO Damping and Reconstruction Cheng Zhao
The Dark Side of the Universe
WEIGHING THE UNIVERSE Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University.
For the Large-Scale Structure Science Collaboration
Missing Thermal Energy of the Universe
The influence of Dark Energy on the Large Scale Structure Formation
Princeton University & APC
Cosmology With The Lyα Forest
Advisors: Tom Broadhurst, Yoel Rephaeli
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Lecture 2 IGM, Scaling Laws Clusters Cosmology Connection
STRUCTURE FORMATION MATTEO VIEL INAF and INFN Trieste
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys
Images: M. Blanton. Images: M. Blanton Figures: M. Blanton & SDSS.
High Energy Astrophysics: problems and expectations
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
Cluster Cosmology in Deep Fields
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
Presentation transcript:

Summary Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University The Warm/Hot Universe Summary Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University

The Hot Universe: Clusters Powerful tool for Cosmology Powerful tool for Tracing Large Scale Structure Structure Formation; ICM, gas, baryons, & Evolution The Warm Universe: IGM, Clusters/Groups Where are all the baryons? Tracing the IGM and Large-scale Structure Cosmology Soft excess in Clusters; Groups Test MOND

Clusters: Powerful Tool for Cosmology Cluster Mass (Temp) Function and its Evolution   Ωm Ω  Baryon (Gas) Fraction and its Evolution  Ωm Ω  Baryon Acoustic Oscillations using Clusters  Ωm Ω  (‘Standard Ruler’) M/L Function  Ωm Cluster Shape   Ωm 

Cluster Abundance and Evolution  Powerful method to determine m , 8 , w 8 = Amplitude of mass fluctuations ncl (z~0)  8 m0.6 ~ 0.35 ncl (hi z)  Breaks degeneracy  m=0.2+-0.05 and 8=0.9+-0.1 Need accurate Mass calibration for precision cosmology  8 (galaxies)(obs) ~ 0.9 If Mass ~ Light (on large scale)  8(m)~ 0.9

Mass-Function SDSS Clusters (Bahcall, Dong, et al ‘02) Best-fit MF: m=0.2 and 8=0.9

Ωm -  (Clusters MF)

Cluster Abundance Evolution  8 (Bahcall & Bode)

Cosmological Constraints (Bahcall & Bode) (from Low and Hi redshift cluster abundance) Low z Hi z

Evolution of Cluster XLF (Mantz etal 08)

Dark Energy Task Force ‘07 Clusters Stage II (current) error-bars W vs DE Stage III (next) Pess. Optim.

Dark Energy Task Force: Stage-3 Comparison ALL CL SN WL BAO

Dark Energy Task Force: Stage-4 Comparison (Space) WL SN SN+wL+BAO SN+WL BAO CL

Cluster Method: DETF Strong statistical benefits Largest systematic errors (vs. SN, BAO, WL?) Need to control systematics due to non-linear astrophysical processes (baryon physics; baryon evolution; ICM; etc) Need accurate and reliable Mass calibration (accurate comparisons of lensing, X-ray, SZ, Opt) Clusters: Important method when combined with SN or BAO (which measure only d(z)), in order to test both DE and GR (CL measure both d(z) and gravitational growth)

m from Baryon Fraction b/m = 0.18 +- 0.02 h=0.7 (Clusters; CMB) b = 0.042 +- 0.004 (BBN; CMB)  m = 0.24 +- 0.04

Baryon Fraction vs. Scale ( 0.18) (Bahcall & Martin ‘07)

Evolution of Cluster Gas Fraction (Allen et al 07)

Cosmology: Evolution of Gas Fraction (Allen 07)

Comlogical constraints from Gas Fraction (Allen etal 07)

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: SDSS (Eisensteain etal 05)

BAO: Cluster Correlation Function (Bahcall and Soneira 1983)

BAO: Cluster Correlation Function (Bahcall and Soneira 1983)

Mass-to-Light Function (Bahcall, Lubin & Dorman ‘95; Bahcall and Fan ‘98)

Cluster M/L Function from SDSS (Sheldon et al 07)

Cluster M/L : SDSS Ω m= 0.2

Shape and Alignment of Clusters  The Shape of Clusters  Alignment of Cluster Pairs  Evolution of Shape & Alignment  New Tool in Cosmology:  Cluster Ellipticity  Superclusters: Filaments or Pancakes?

Evolution of Cluster Ellipticity <E> versus Redshift and Mass (Hopkins, Bahcall, etal ’05) 0.6 <E> 0.5 0.4 0.3 1 2 3 Redshift

Cluster Ellipticity   (Ho, Bahcall, Bode ‘06)

Clusters Shape and Alignment Clusters are Triaxial > More so at earlier times <Ecl> ~ 0.3 to 0.5 (z ~ 0 to 3) Strong Cluster Alignment to ~100 Mpc Alignment and Ellipticity increase with z  New Tool in Cosmology: <Ecl>  8 m w

Clusters: Tool for LSS, Structure Formation and Evolution, ICM, baryons Large Scale Structure (CF, Pk, SCs) Evolution of baryon fraction; gas vs. gal Baryon Fraction vs. Mass or T ( heating, cooling, winds) ICM Physics; Cooling, heating, AGNs, non-thermal Soft excess emission in clusters Substructure; merging clusters; high-velocity mergers (e.g., Bullet Cluster) Ellipticity and alignment of clusters vs. z

The Warm Universe Where are all the baryons? Tracing the IGM Tracing the Large-scale structure, SCs Evolution of the warm IGM and its LSS Groups of galaxies; Mass-Function Cosmology: comparison with LCDM Other…

Superclusters: Filaments or Pancakes? (Wray, Bahcall, Bode, etal ‘06) 1 1D - Filaments 3D - Spherical a3/a2 Triaxial 2D - Pancakes a2/a1 1 0.6

Summary The Hot Universe: Clusters Powerful tool for Cosmology (Ωm Ω  ) Need accurate Mass calibration and baryon evolution! Powerful tool for Tracing Large Scale Structure Structure Formation; ICM, gas, baryons, & Evolution The Warm Universe: IGM, Clusters/Groups Where are all the baryons? Tracing the IGM and Large-scale Structure Cosmology Soft excess in Clusters; Groups Test MOND

Dark Energy Task Force: BAO

DETF