What Does Honesty Look Like

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Altruism as a Characteristic of Individuals Who Intend to Adopt Heather Buford Hanover College.
Advertisements

Self-Discrepancies on the Big Five Personality Factors METHOD “In each kind of self, material, social, and spiritual, men distinguish between the immediate.
11-3 Maudsley Personality Inventory Questions 1-6 measure Neuroticism (emotional stability/instability) – Answering “Yes” to most indicates more emotionally.
Margarida Pedroso de Lima Isabel Albuquerque Marcela matos FPCE, University of Coimbra, Portugal ATEE – 30 August, Budapest,
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad Study on Personality and Loneliness among the students of IIT Hyderabad -Jayashankar ( ES12B1011) Under the guidance.
Personality and Life Satisfaction: A Facet-Level Analysis Ulrich Schimmack Shigehiro Oishi R. Michael Furr David C. Funder.
1]Knoll, N., Burkert, S., & Schwartzer, R. (2006). Reciprocal support provision: Personality as a moderator? European Journal of Personality, 20,
Towards Customized User Interface Skins: Investigating User Personality and Skin Colour Batul Saati May Salem Willem-Paul Brinkman.
Introduction Method  Evaluation of ability to provide social support yielded scores with good internal consistency reliability.  There was moderate agreement.
Examination of Holland’s Predictive Pattern Order Hypothesis for Academic Achievement William D. Beverly and Robert A. Horn Northern Arizona University,
NEO-PI-R. Personality Inventories Look for good psychometrics Beware the Barnum Effect Construction strategies –Rational –Theoretical –Criterion-keying.
+ Big Five Personality Tests have Substantial Weaknesses By: Kelly Kubec and Jacob Toscano.
Traits, Five Factor Model Based on lexical approach –Important individual differences among people will have names –Should be words describing the same.
Today’s focus Interpersonal Skills Intrapersonal Skills
Personality and Mate Preferences Kali Thomas Tatianna Smith Tatiana Hughes.
Human Resources Training and Individual Development Personality Theories and Assessment March 3, 2004.
Environmentalism and Personality Simon Cohen Jeff Edgar Chris Latham-Warde Sanni Kujala.
The Dynamic Analog Scale: Using a Single Item to Measure Personality INTRODUCTION When measuring personality traits, personality psychologists typically.
Personality and professional interests in Angolan university students Liliana Faria 1, Joana Carneiro Pinto 2 & Nazaré Loureiro 3 1 Universidade Europeia;
FACETS Can Understanding Facets of Personality lead to a Better Understanding of Behaviour.
Five Factor Model of Personality and its Facets: “the 5 dimensions of personality are thought of as broad domains, with each domain being a multi-faceted.
Personality and the Trait, Humanistic, and Social Cognitive Perspectives.
Introduction Relationship between Extraversion and Delay Discounting of Social Interactions Sara L. Daugherty and Daniel D. Holt University of Wisconsin-Eau.
Approaches to Learning and the Acquisition of General Knowledge By Adrian Furnham, Andrew Christopher, Jeanette Garwood, and G. Neil Martin Personality.
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES: PERSONALITY. PERSONALITY  Unique set of traits and characteristics that are relatively stable over time and determine a person’s.
LORAS.EDU Abstract Introduction We were interested in exploring general stereotypes undergraduates might have about students who choose to major in artistic.
Personality:5 Factor Theory A personality trait is a disposition to behave in the same way repeatedly….in a variety of situations. States (behavior that.
Culture and Personality
The Effect of the Conscientious Responders Scale on Random Responding Rates in Psychological Questionnaires Noor Shubear, Zdravko Marjanovic, Lisa Bajkov,
Dare to Compare: An Examination of Initial Individual Differences in Students Enrolled in a Service-Learning Course Compared to Students Enrolled in a.
Measures Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Prostate (FACT-P). The FACT-P (Cella et al., 1993; Esper et al., 1997) is a widely-used self-report measure(e.g.,
Research Methods in I/O Psychology
Mindful Rest Training: Effects on Substance
Developmental change and stability of personality
Joane Adeclas & Taekyun Hur
Investigating Self-Selection Bias in Mindfulness Research
Effects of Self-Monitoring on Perceived Authenticity in Dyads
Roommate Closeness Development and Pathological Personality Traits
Personality notes 15-5 Objectives (14-19)
Multiculturalism and Its Links to Hostility
Midwest Nice, Southern Hospitality, and Coastal Cool
Authors *Dr. Asma Parveen *Uzaina
Entitlement Behaviors
Understanding yourself
Religiosity and Romantic Beliefs
A Preliminary Study of Music Experience, Creativity and Personality
Evaluating the Distinction Between Aversive Indecisiveness and Procrastination: Relationships with Anxiety, Anxiety Vulnerability, and Personality Traits.
Introduction Methods Discussion Hypotheses Results References
Personality profile of people with opioid use disorder
ABSTRACT PROCEDURE CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES
Personality Strength Operationalization and Relationship With Within-Person Performance Variation Jennifer Green1, Patrick Bradshaw2, Elnora Kelly2, Mengmeng.
Assessment of Personality
The Correlation between Ambition and Lying
of Health Science Students
Personality An individual’s characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, and acting.
Assessment in Career Counseling
Personality Styles The Big 5.
Learning online: Motivated to Self-Regulate?
Erin M. Buchanan, Katherine D. Miller, Emily R. Klug, and the DOOM Lab
Interactive lecture ii Jolanta Babiak Winter semester 2018/2019
English Language Writing Apprehension of University English Major Students – A survey carried out in Kunming University of Science and Technology. 昆明理工大学.
Kristin E. Gross & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Personality Dispositions Over Time: Stability, Change, and Coherence
CONCEPTS TO BE INCLUDED
Validity.
Developmental change and stability of personality
Personality traits are internal characteristics that are stable, consistent over time, and displayed through multiple situations. Trait theories predict.
KEY TERMS TO BE COVERED Concepts having ‘dimensions’
Personality and interpersonal communication
Purpose and Hypothesis
Presentation transcript:

What Does Honesty Look Like What Does Honesty Look Like? A Personality Profile of Honest People Using the Big Five Facets Kimberly K. Hardy1, Patrick Beach2, Stephen Crowley1, Jared L. Talley1, & Sharlynn Thompson3, 1Boise State University 2Missouri State University 3University of Colorado at Colorado Springs RESEARCH QUESTIONS Which Big Five Factors of Personality are associated with the personality traits of honesty and dishonesty? 2) Are honesty and dishonesty viewed as two ends of one dichotomous trait, or are they viewed as two separate traits? RESULTS: Table 1. Personality facets associated with honesty. RESULTS It appears that the typical honest person is perceived to be highly Agreeable and Conscientious, mildly Extraverted and Open, and not very Neurotic. It appears that the typical dishonest person is perceived to be mildly Extraverted, Neurotic, and Open, and neither very Agreeable nor Conscientious. Although participants tended to rate honest and dishonest people in an opposing manner for some traits, this was not a universal pattern for all traits associated with honesty or dishonest. There were no significant correlations between participants ratings of honest and dishonest people for the overarching factor of Extraversion or for the personality facets of Gregariousness, Assertiveness, Excitement, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, Depression, or Self-Consciousness. DISCUSSION Consistent with previous research conceptualizing honesty as being worthy of its own overarching factor of personality [4], participants’ perceptions of an honest person did not fit neatly into one factor of the Big Five. Although there was some degree of overlap between perceptions of honest and dishonest people, this was not the case for every single pairing of traits. Consistently, participants rated the honest person as scoring high on Agreeableness and Conscientiousness, whereas they rated the dishonest person as scoring low on facets associated with these traits. Therefore, there appears to be some support for honesty and dishonesty relating to opposing ends of an overarching factor. However, consistent with research illustrating that honesty and dishonesty assess different behaviors [1], there was no association between participant ratings of the typical honest and dishonest person on facets of Extraversion and Neuroticism. Additionally, because different factors were observed to embody the honest and dishonest person, it appears that, although these traits are similar in nature to each other, they are not measuring precisely the same traits. Therefore, it appears that although honesty and dishonesty may be associated, they are not opposite ends of one dichotomous trait.   Comparison Variable t r d Extraversion 8.72* .05 .85 Friendliness 11.51* -.19* 1.30 Assertiveness 6.16* -.08 .64 Activity Level 5.16* -.15* .52 Cheerfulness 14.15* -.24* 1.59 Agreeableness 22.49* -.66* 2.96 Trust 21.17* -.41* 2.60 Morality 25.93* -.42* 3.15 Altruism 20.30* -.50* 2.49 Cooperation 15.84* -.44* 1.94 Modesty 9.24* -.17* 1.03 Sympathy 15.47* -.52* 1.91 Conscientiousness 22.33* -.65* 2.90 Self-Efficacy 14.72* -.13 1.60 Orderliness 8.22* -.43* .98 Dutifulness 33.95* -.67* 4.49 Achievement Striving 18.84* -.53* 2.37 Self-Discipline -.36* 1.73 Cautiousness 13.01* -.44 1.61 Openness to Experience 7.54* -.27* .86 Artistic Interest 11.12* 1.36 Emotionality 15.18* -.31* 1.74 Intellect 9.86* 1.14 INTRODUCTION Honesty is an important dispositional quality that embodies telling the truth, respecting property, and honoring contracts [1] Honesty is an important trait that most people view as desirable in partners, business associates, and themselves [2] One of the most widely used models of personality, The Big Five Factor Model [3], does not incorporate the trait of honesty [4] Therefore, one purpose of this study is to investigate if honesty closely aligns with facets central to one of the Big Five Factors Additionally, because previous research using qualitative methods suggests that honesty and dishonesty are inherently different constructs [1], another aim of this project is to verify this finding using quantitative methods METHOD Participants and Procedure 198 participants (140 women, 57 men, 1 not reported) from a large Western university completed online surveys for course credit Participants provided informed consent prior to beginning the survey Participants completed the survey online from a location of their choosing The survey consisted of 3 sections. Participants were either presented with questions asking them to rate an honest person or a dishonest person on various items before responding to a set of demographic questions. The honest and dishonest questions were presented to participants in a random, counterbalanced order so that half of participants rated an honest person first and half rated a dishonest person first Participants were debriefed upon completion of the study Measures: The Big Five Factors Participants rated their perceptions of the typical honest and typical dishonest person using modified versions of the 120-item International Personality Item Pool Inventory [IPIP; 5] The IPIP was modified so that participants responded to the prompt: “Please rate to what extent you believe that each statement below is descriptive of the typical HONEST person.” Participants were also given a similar prompt to rate the typical DISHONEST person. Each individual item begin with the phrase: “An Honest (Dishonest) Person…” Participants that rated to what extent they agreed with each item on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree Responses were coded to reflect a higher degree of the trait of interest The IPIP consists of 6 facets per Big Five Factor (Extraversion: friendliness, gregariousness, assertiveness, activity level, excitement, cheerfulness; Agreeableness: trust, morality, altruism, cooperation, modesty, sympathy; Conscientiousness: self-efficacy, orderliness, dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline, cautiousness; Neuroticism: anxiety, anger, depression, self-consciousness, immoderation, vulnerability; Openness: imagination, artistic interest, emotionality, adventurousness, intellect, liberalism). 4 items were used to assess each of the 6 facets per factor, for a total of 24 items per factor. *p < .05; ┼ < .06. REFERENCES [1] Beach, P., Crowley, S., Hardy, K. K., Talley, J. L., & Thompson, S. (in preparation). A folk conception of honesty: Empirical exploration into honesty and dishonesty. [2] Weber, M. (2012). The role of character strengths in adolescent roSmantic relationships: An initial study on partner selection and mates' life satisfaction. Journal of adolescence, 35, 1537-1546. [3] McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1995). Trait explanations in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 9, 4, 231-252. [4] Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). Honesty-Humility, the Big Five, and the Five-Factor Model.  Journal Of Personality, 73(5), 1321-1353.  [5] Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. D. Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, vol. 7 (pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press. Table 2. Personality facets associated with dishonesty.   Comparison Variable  t r d Extraversion Gregariousness -1.93┼ -.06 -.22 Excitement -9.12* -.09 -.96 Neuroticism -11.40* -.25* -1.31 Anxiety -2.34* -.10 -.28 Anger -12.64* -.35* -1.50 Depression -12.75* -.12 -1.37 Immoderation -11.80* -.27* -1.35 Vulnerability -7.85* -.15* -.84 Openness to Experience Imagination -4.06* .16* -.38 Liberalism -8.07* -.41* ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks to research assistants Mackenzie Case, Sara Couture, Drew Lindgren, McKenzie Lyons, and Camille Tibbitts for their help with this project. CONTACT INFORMATION For more information about this presentation or about The Honesty Project Lab, please contact Dr. Kimberly K. Hardy at kimhardy@boisestate.edu.