PTABLitigationBlog.com: PTAB Popularity and Reasons

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Patent Infringement Litigation Before the U.S. International Trade Commission By Timothy DeWitt 24IP Law Group USA 12 E. Lake Dr. Annapolis, MD
Advertisements

How To Enforce Your U.S. Patent Presented at: Patentgruppen Århus, Denmark Date: October 25, 2011 Presented by: Richard J. Basile Member St. Onge Steward.
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
Patent Strategy Under the AIA Washington in the West January 29, 2013.
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
What Do In-House Counsel Need to Know? AIA Proceedings Molly Kocialski, Senior Patent Counsel, Oracle Dion Messer, General Counsel - IP, Limelight Networks.
Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.
Patent Law A Career Choice For Engineers Azadeh Khadem Registered Patent Attorney November 25, 2008 Azadeh Khadem Registered Patent Attorney November 25,
BIPC.COM STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OF POST ISSUANCE PATENTABILITY REVIEW: THE NEW, OLD, AND NO LONGER Presented By: Todd R. Walters, Esq. B UCHANAN, I NGERSOLL.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 2 The Court System and Dispute Resolution Twomey Jennings Anderson’s.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association CURRENT TRENDS/EFFECTS OF AIA on US Patent Practice at the US Patent.
IPR Litigation System & Recent Case in Korea Hee-Young JEONG Judge of Daejeon District Court, KOREA April 22, 2015.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update October 22, Chief Judge James Donald Smith Patent Trial and Appeal Board United States Patent and Trademark.
©2002 Marger Johnson & McCollom PC, All Rights Reserved. Intellectual Property Presentation for 2002 High Technology Protection Summit Presented by Alexander.
A Comparative Analysis of Patent Post-Grant Review Procedures in the U
PRESENTATION TITLE 1 America Invents Act: Creating “Rocket Docket” Patent Trials in the Patent Office.
Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update on Inter Partes Disputes and the PTAB _____ John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson.
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
Chapter 2 The Court System and Dispute Resolution Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association EMERGING TRENDS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PRACTICE TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP.
Post Grant Challenges: Strategy and Considerations after the America Invents Act of 2011 IP Law & Management Institute November 7, 2011 Justin J. Oliver.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Comprehensive Volume, 18 th Edition Chapter 2: The Court System and Dispute Resolution.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates on the USPTO Chris Fildes AIPLA-JPAA Joint Meeting April 9, 2013.
Intellectual property research institute of australia IP Enforcement in Australia What’s Actually Happening in the Courts? Presentation by: Kim Weatherall.
About the Amendment of the Patent Law of China Yin Xintian WAN HUI DA Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency 17 April 2013.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The Presumption of Patent Validity in the U.S. Tom Engellenner AIPLA Presentation to.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Interplay between Litigation and the AIA __________ An Overview John B. Pegram Fish.
Challenges Associated With, And Strategies For, U.S. Patent Litigation Russell E. Levine, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP LES Asia.
PTO’s Proposals Regarding Amendments Permitted During Reexamination (A6/A7) Nancy J. Linck, Esq. Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck June 1,
Patent Protection During Exhibitions Wu Ningyan State Intellectual Property Office Date: Sept. 9, 2006.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update Statistics based first three years of AIA filings 3,655 petitions –3,277 (89.7%) inter partes review (IPR) –368 (10%)
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.
Peter C. Schechter Vice-Chair, AIPPI-US Div. of AIPLA Partner, Osha Liang LLP Post-Issuance Review Proceedings: Update & Trends in IPR & PGR 1 © AIPLA.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning BUSINESS LAW Twomey Jennings 1 st Ed. Twomey & Jennings BUSINESS LAW Chapter 2 The.
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues Hosted by: Update on U.S. Patent Legislation.
Trends Relating to Patent Infringement Litigation in JAPAN
Using the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) for Post Grant Pilot Applications How to identify relevant information in AIA proceedings at the Patent.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 5 – Motions Practice, Discovery, and Trial Management Issues 1.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 3 – The Patent Owner Preliminary Response 1.
Types of Courts Unit A Objective Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court System.
The Applicability of Patent-Agent Privilege After In re Queen’s University at Kingston Presented by Rachel Perry © 2016 Workman Nydegger.
Boston | Hartford | New York | Providence | Stamford | Albany | Los Angeles | Miami | New London | rc.com © 2015 Robinson & Cole LLPrc.com JIM NAULT, IP.
Omer/LES International/
Inter Partes Review and District Court
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 1 – PTAB Basics and Procedure
U. S. District Court Perspective on Patent Adjudication Barbara M. G
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 12 – PTAB Popularity and Reasons
Patent Practice in View Of PTAB AIA Proceedings
David Hricik Hope Shimabuku Carlo Cotrone Chris Kennerly
© 2006 Brett J. Trout Patent Reform Act of 2005 © 2006 Brett J. Trout
POST Grant RevieW UPDATES
CBM/PGR Differences Differences in time periods of availability, parties who have standing, grounds of challenge available, standards of review, and.
PATENT LAW TRENDS (walking around patent knowledge)
Inter Partes Review Best Practices 2018
Karl Renner Dorothy Whelan Chris Marchese
Prosecution Luncheon Patent February 2017
THE BEST DEFENSE CAN BE A GREAT OFFENSE AND SAVE THE EXPENSE OF TRIAL: Develop your game plan now for early disposition as a result of pre-trial motions.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics
Update and Practical Considerations
SAS Institute v. Iancu SAS appeals arguing § 318 requires deciding patentability of all claims challenged ComlimentSoft sues SAS for patent infringement.
IPRs: Coordination & Estoppel
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 4 – The Institution Decision
PTAB Bar Association Conference—March 2, 2017
The Supreme Court of the
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Presentation transcript:

PTABLitigationBlog.com: PTAB Popularity and Reasons

What Has Been the Reception of the PTAB? The original estimate…

Actual Filings Per Year Wildly (4x) more popular than expected

Reason 1 - Structural Collection of tech-savvy Administrative Law Judges (ALJ) Tasked with administering new, fast-paced post- issue patentability challenges Viable alternative to district court validity challenge Compare to Inter Partes Reexamination

Reason 2 – District Court Advantages Stays Fast paced PTAB Trials + Simplification of cases = Stays as an attractive option to judges Stays requested pre-institution – 50% Stays requested/renewed post-institution – 80%+ Discovery reprieve for accused infringer Delayed recovery for patent owner

Reason 3 - Results Over First Four Years Early institution rates over 80% Current institution rates trending toward 70%

Results Over First Four Years PTAB regularly holds claims unpatentable 80%+ kill rate once instituted

Action Item: Get up to speed now! Every patent litigation matter now includes consideration regarding PTAB strategy Patent Owners should prep case and complaint with an eye toward a likely challenge Accused infringers should look to PTAB as opportunity to duck immediate discovery costs and to flip the leverage in the case

Contacts Matt Johnson is one of the Firm’s primary contacts on practice before the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). mwjohnson@jonesday.com (412) 394-9524 http://www.jonesday.com/mwjohnson/ Dave Cochran leads the PTAB Litigation practice at Jones Day and has more than 20 years of experience providing a full range of patent legal services.  dcochran@jonesday.com (216) 586-7029 http://www.jonesday.com/dcochran/