D0 mixing and charm CP violation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
1 D 0 -D 0 Mixing at BaBar Charm 2007 August, 2007 Abe Seiden University of California at Santa Cruz for The BaBar Collaboration.
1 D 0 -D 0 Mixing at BaBar Charm 2007 August, 2007 Abe Seiden University of California at Santa Cruz for The BaBar Collaboration.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
Recent Charm Results From CLEO Searches for D 0 -D 0 mixing D 0 -> K 0 s  +  - D 0 ->K *+ l - Conclusions Alex Smith University of Minnesota.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
Moriond EW, 3 Mar 2008Tagir Aushev (EPFL, ITEP)1  B → K S  0  0  B → K S K S  B → K S  0  B → D *+ D *-  B → a 1 , a 1 K, b 1 , b 1 K...  
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
1 Rare Bottom and Charm Decays at the Tevatron Dmitri Tsybychev (SUNY at Stony Brook) On behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations Flavor Physics and CP-Violation.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
03/19/2006 Md. Naimuddin 1 B s Mixing at the Tevatron Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) University of Delhi Recontres de Moriond 19.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
F. Martínez-Vidal IFIC – Universitat de València-CSIC (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration)  from B ±  D (*)0 [K S     ]K (*)±  in BaBar Outline.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
CLEO-c Workshop 1 Data Assumptions Tagging Rare decays D mixing CP violation Off The Wall Beyond SM Physics at a CLEO Charm Factory (some food for thought)
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
Present status of Charm Measurements
Tagir Aushev For the Belle Collaboration (EPFL, Lausanne ITEP, Moscow)
On Behalf of the BaBar Collaboration
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
CP violation and D Physics
New Physics Prospects in Mixing and CP Violation at Belle II
Time-dependent analyses at D0-D0 threshold
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Measurements of a and future projections
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
Search for Super-Penguins: CP Violation in B0->K+K-K0
For the BaBar Collaboration
Representing the BaBar Collaboration
new measurements of sin(2β) & cos(2β) at BaBar
Charm Mixing, CPV and Rare D0 decays at BaBar
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Charmless Quasi-two-Body Modes at BaBar
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
f3 measurements by Belle
The Measurement of sin2β(eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays with BABAR
Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo-suppressed D0 Decays
Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo-suppressed D0 Decays
Search for D0D0 Mixing at BESIII
Sin(2β) measurement with b→c transitions in BaBar
Measurement of f3 using Dalitz plot analysis of B+ D(*)K(*)+ by Belle
Presentation transcript:

D0 mixing and charm CP violation Moriond EW, 2010 La Thuile, March 8th 2010 Jordi Garra Ticó Universitat de Barcelona BaBar collaboration

Outline Introduction to mixing and CP violation. Standard model predictions and new physics. Recent results on D0 mixing. State of the art. Dalitz time dependent analysis of Ks + - and Ks K+ K- decays. Recent results on D0 CPV. Summary.

Introduction to mixing and CPV Mixing has been well measured in K, Bs and Bd systems. The and mesons are produced as flavor eigenstates, but evolve and decay as mixtures of the effective Hamiltonian eigenstates, and . Mixing can occur because flavor eigenstates differ from the effective Hamiltonian eigenstates. The change of base is . If there was no CP violation, is defined to be CP even, and CP odd. The mixing parameters are defined as The amplitudes of a or meson into a final CP eigenstate can be written as , . 3 types of CPV:

Standard model predictions and new physics Short distance contributions Mixing box diagrams. SM predicts small mixing effects. b quarks are CKM suppressed, and s and d quarks are GIM suppressed. They mainly contribute to the x mixing parameter. Long distance contributions Hadronic intermediate states. Expected to be dominant, but still small. Hard to estimate, since they are not perturbative. Predictions give x and y in the range [0.001, 0.01], and |x| < |y|. NP through new particles in loops If |x| >> |y| this could be a hint of NP. Not expected to find SM CPV (~10-3) with current sensitivity. Larger CPV would be evidence of NP. A. Falk et al., PRD 69, 114021 (2004) E. Golowich et al., PRD 76, 095009 (2007) Y. Grossman et al., PRD 75, 036008 (2007)

D0 production and selection Tagging at production: Inclusive D* production. Using D*±  D0 s± decays. The flavor of the D0 is determined by the charge of the s. Tagging at decay: The flavor can be determined by the wrong sign (WS) or right sign (RS) D0 decay products. ~ Selection: e+e-  cc events have high D0 momentum in the CM frame. Use momentum to reject BB events (pD0CMF > 2.5 GeV) Beam spot constraint determines t and t. It also improves mD and m = m(D0 s) – m(D0) resolutions. D0 decay vertex Beam spot x ~ 100 m y ~ 6 m D0 production vertex

Recent D0 mixing and CPV analyses References in the first backup slide

Mixing searches

Life time ratio D0  h+ h- / D0  K- + D0 mixing and CPV alter the lifetime distributions of CP eigenstates h+h-. A good approximation are effective lifetimes ±, Measured magnitudes Mixing and CP observables are Lifetime average and asymmetry

Life time ratio D0  h+ h- / D0  K- + 540 fb-1 PRL 98, 211803 (2007) yCP = ( 1.31 ± 0.32 (stat) ± 0.25 (syst) )·10-2 A = ( 0.01 ± 0.30 (stat) ± 0.15 (syst) )·10-2 Mixing evidence at 3.2 PRD 78, 011105(R) (2008) 384 fb-1 Tagged: yCP = ( 1.03 ± 0.33 (stat) ± 0.19 (syst) )·10-2 y = ( -0.26 ± 0.36 (stat) ± 0.08 (syst) )·10-2 Mixing evidence at 3 PRD 80, 071103(R) (2009) Combined tagged + untagged: yCP = ( 1.13 ± 0.22 (stat) ± 0.18 (syst) )·10-2 Tagged Mixing evidence at 4.1

HFAG averages (measurements of yCP) http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/charm/index.html

Time dependent Dalitz plot analyses D0 Dalitz decays (D0  Ks + -, Ks K+ K-) Since evolution of mass eigenstates is known, the time dependent amplitude is Where May implement CP violation in the mixing May implement CP violation in the decay Sensitivity to mixing arises from the lifetime dependence on the point in the Dalitz plot. This provides sensitivity to the mixing parameters x and y, directly, if CP conservation in the decay is assumed. Phase space and life time dependences do not factorize. An accurate phenomenological decay model for the variation of the amplitude over the Dalitz plot is needed in order to have sensitivity to x and y.

Variables for time dependent Dalitz analysis (Ks h+ h-) Generic variables of the method: mD: The mass of the D0, obtained from the 4-momenta of the 4 charged particles of the decay channel. m: The mass difference between the D* and the D0, obtained from the 4-momenta of the charged particles of the decay channel, plus that of the soft pion. t: The life time of the D0, obtained from its flight length. t: The error on the life time (per event). The Dalitz variables m2AB, m2AC, m2BC. Each variable has been characterized, as well as the background. Several categories have been introduced in order to describe the signal and background.

Signal and bkg characterization for TD Dalitz analysis Definitions: True D0: it means that the 4 charged particles of the signal channel have been reconstructed and matched correctly. True s: it means that its mother is a D*± and has a D0 sister. Categories: For each category, the kinematic variables have been characterized separately, i.e., functions have been found to describe well their distributions. D0  Ks   BaBar Preliminary

BaBar model for time dependent Dalitz analysis (Ks h+ h-) Model taken from PRD 78, 034023 (2008) (BaBar). Z describe the angular distribution of the decay products. B,r are the form factors, usually parameterized using the Blatt- Weisskopf penetration factors. It accounts for the effect of the angular momentum of the resonance on the decay rate. Gr is a propagator that describes the resonance. Most of them are relativistic Breit-Wigner. Gounaris-Sakurai for 0. K-matrix / LASS for a better description of overlapping BW resonances ( and K S waves).

BaBar model for time dependent Dalitz analysis (Ks h+ h-) Preliminary BaBar Preliminary Dalitz plot distributions for D0  Ks   (left) and D0  Ks K K (right) from D*+  D0 + events after all selection criteria are applied.

BaBar systematics for time dependent Dalitz analysis (Ks h+ h-) Experimental systematic uncertainties. Fit bias. Signal and background yields. Efficiency map. Mistag. Mixing in the background. Dalitz background profiles. Dalitz normalization. D0 mass window. Final mixing fit cuts. SVT misalignment. Dalitz model systematic uncertainties. Different K-matrix solutions. Float parameters of some resonances. Different radii of the BW barrier factors. Fits with more and less resonances.

BaBar result for time dependent Dalitz analysis (Ks h+ h-) x = ( 0.16 ± 0.23 (stat) ± 0.12 (exp) ± 0.08 (mod) ) 10-2 y = ( 0.57 ± 0.20 (stat) ± 0.13 (exp) ± 0.07 (mod) ) 10-2 BaBar Preliminary Most precise direct measurement of x and y. Mixing significance at 1.9, similar to Belle (2.2). First combined analysis of D0  Ks   and D0  Ks K K. BaBar measurement favors a lower value for x than for y. Central point moves toward SM prediction. BaBar Preliminary

Previous results for time dependent Dalitz analysis (Ks h+ h-) PRL 98, 211803 (2007) 540 fb-1 Belle (with no CPV) BaBar Exclude the no-mixing hypothesis at 2.2. It also allows to fit for CPV in the interference. No evidence for CPV BaBar Preliminary BaBar and Belle results agree at less than 1.

CPV searches

Time integrated CPV searches, D0  +-(0), K+K-(0) CP even final states. Single Cabibbo suppressed modes. Standard model predicts CPV in these modes to be ~10-4-10-5. Evidence of CPV with current experimental sensitivity is sign of physics beyond SM. Based on the measurement of the asymmetries of the partial decay widths It includes the 3 possible sources of CPV. Y. Grossman et al., PRD 75, 036008 (2007) Experimental difficulty: Forward-backward asymmetry in e+e-  cc production.

Time integrated CPV searches, D0  +-(0), K+K-(0) 385.8 fb-1 PRL 100, 061803 (2008) aCPKK = ( 0.00 ± 0.34 (stat) ± 0.13 (syst) )·10-2 aCP = ( -0.24 ± 0.52 (stat) ± 0.22 (syst) )·10-2 385 fb-1 PRD 78, 051102 (2008) aCP0 = ( -0.31 ± 0.41 (stat) ± 0.17 (syst) )·10-2 aCPKK0 = ( 1.00 ± 1.67 (stat) ± 0.25 (syst) )·10-2 532 fb-1 No evidence of CPV at the level of 10-2 PLB 662, 102-110 (2008) aCP0 = ( 0.43 ± 1.30 )·10-2

Summary BaBar and Belle have established evidence for mixing, confirmed by CDF. No single mixing measurement exceeds 5, but combined measurements exclude the no-mixing hypothesis at more than 10.2. No evidence of any kind of CPV (direct, mixing or interference).

BACKUP SLIDES

Recent D0 mixing and CPV analyses

Time dependence of suppressed hadronic decays  is the strong phase between the D0->f (DCS) and D0-> f (CF). Mixing is implied through non-zero values of x' or y'. Do not allow for measurement of x and y parameters directly. Example: D0  K+ -. Contributions from: Doubly Cabibbo suppressed (DCS) decay D0  K+ - Mixing and Cabibbo favoured (CF) decay D0  D0  K+ - Interference DCS Interference Mixing

Time dependence of suppressed hadronic decays 384 fb-1 PRL 98, 211802 (2007) x'2 = ( -0.22 ± 0.30 ± 0.21 ) · 10-3 y' = ( 9.7 ± 4.4 ± 3.1 ) · 10-3 Mixing evidence at 3.9 PRL 100, 121802 (2008) 1.5 fb-1 400 fb-1 PRL 96, 151801 (2006) x'2 = ( -0.12 ± 0.35 ) · 10-3 y' = ( 8.5 ± 7.6 ) · 10-3 RD = ( 0.304 ± 0.055 )·10⁻2 x'2 < 0.72·10-3 @ 95 % CL y' ∈ ( -9.9·10-3, 6.8·10-3 ) @ 95 % CL RD = ( 0.377 ± 0.008 ± 0.005 )·10⁻2 Mixing evidence at 3.8 No-mixing excluded at 2.0

The BaBar experiment 5 layered silicon vertex tracker (SVT) 40 layered drift chamber (DCH) Cerenkov detector for PID (DIRC)

Dalitz time dependent analysis of D0  Ks + - and D0  Ks K+ K-

Selection criteria for Ks h+ h- Reject true D0 from B decays Selection efficiency: 14.2 % for Ks   = 431922 events 12.6 % for Ks K K = 60058 events Purity: 97.8 % for Ks   99.8 % for Ks K K Reduce contamination of fake Ks, specifically in D0  4  and D0    K K events.

Signal and background characterization Example: signal pdfs.

The Dalitz model  S wave: Scattering part expressed as the K-matrix, and production part expressed as the production vector. K S wave: The LASS parameterization is used to describe this component. P wave: The vector contribution is represented by the  0(770), (782) and the Cabibbo allowed and DCS K*(892). RBW is used for them all, except GS for the 0(770). D wave: The tensor part of the amplitude is given by the K*2(1430)± and the f2(1270) Efficiency over the Dalitz plot is also taken into account.

The Dalitz model for D0

Fit strategy Step 1: Fit for the parameters of {mD, m, t, t}. Dalitz integrated. Step 2: Time integrated Dalitz fit (amplitudes, phases, masses and widths of the resonances). Shapes for {mD, m, t, t} are taken from step 1. Neglect mixing. Step 3: Time dependent Dalitz fit. Shapes for {mD, m, t, t} are taken from step 1, but float category yields. Extract mixing parameters and CPV.

Data – MC comparison Ks   Ks K K