McKinney, TX Key Findings 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
Advertisements

Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
1. National Research Center, Inc.2 A turnkey citizen survey service offered by the INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL RESEARCH.
Council for Economic Education. City Hall is the center of government in your city or town. It is a very important place! The Mayor, City.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
RESEARCH AND TRAINING SPECIALISTS, INC Concord, North Carolina 2008 CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY Paul C. Friday, Ph.D. President
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
Outdoor Spaces Equal Healthy Places Planning for Virginia’s Outdoors.
Southern Apache County Community Health Survey Spring 2003.
CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions July 2013 Results of the 2013 Survey.
Kimball Area Community Survey Results. Methodology Mail survey Sample included Kimball, Banner and western Cheyenne Counties  Random sample of 649 households.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
Prepared for: Vancouver Police Department Resident and Business Survey Prepared by: NRG Research Group April 4, 2007.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
2009 Lane County Community Survey Demographic Breakdown.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
Survey conducted: November 6th, 8th – 10th,
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – APRIL 12, Strategic Action Plan Evaluation Results.
The National Citizen Survey™ Orland Park, IL Summary of Findings May 7, 2012 ©2012 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc Valmont Road,
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Citizen Survey Hampton City Council July 8, 2009.
Ashland, VA Key Findings January 6, 2015 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
The National Citizen Survey™ Ashland, VA Summary of Findings November 29, 2011 ©2011 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St.
Draft Central Coast Positive Ageing Strategy Community Partnerships & Planning May 2014.
Snoqualmie Retail Market Analysis Presented July 2, 2007 City of Snoqualmie.
The 2015 Grove City Community Attitudes Survey Saperstein Associates, Inc. | Summer 2015.
Understanding the Values and Priorities of Central Floridians Prepared for the Central Florida Partnership August 26, 2016.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
S TRATEGIC P LAN Vision, Values and Objectives. G ATHERING D ATA National Citizen Survey (NCS) NCS Survey Results Over Time Ashland by the Numbers Employee.
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Vision, Values and Objectives.
Arapahoe County, CO 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared by: Andrea Rasizer
2016 Employer Needs Survey Joshua Levy Senior Policy Analyst
FY 2018 Budget Engagement Pick Your Priority
Welcome to sia community talks
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
Built Environment and Physical Activity – updates
Tomahawk School District Community Survey Results
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
2017 Community Survey Town of Snowmass Village, CO
Nashville, Brown County CRI Presentation B
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits January 10, 2013.
Plymouth Community Parks and Recreation
City of Palo Alto Healthy Cities Performance Measures June 22, 2017
City of Palo Alto Healthy Cities Performance Measures August 24, 2017
Indiana Community Health Needs Assessment
Key Findings – Special Topics 2018
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
2017 Crozet Community Survey: Findings Related to Master Plan
A Community for a Lifetime A Senior Agenda
The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA
Summary of Findings May 26, 2009
21st Century All-American City VISION/ACTION PLAN
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
Safe, Secure, and Sustainable Communities
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
2017 Charlottesville Parks and Recreation Survey: Findings
The democratic case for in house council services
Purpose of engagement To engage with citizens, elected members and staff in identifying actions to achieve the goals of a new Stakeholder Engagement.
Collaborating With Community
Elgin St Thomas Cycling Master Plan
Focused General Plan Update Status Report & Visioning Overview
Presentation transcript:

McKinney, TX Key Findings 2017 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA

About NRC 20 years conducting survey research for local government Wrote the books on citizen surveying Industry pioneers Long-term partnerships with ICMA and NLC Charter members of AAPOR Transparency Initiative

About The NCS Community Livability Community Characteristics Communities are partnerships among... Residents Community-based organizations Govern-ment Private sector Community Livability Community Characteristics Governance Participation

Facets of Community Livability Safety Mobility Economy Recreation and Wellness Quality of Community Overall Community Engagement Natural Environment Built Environment Education and Enrichment

Geographic comparisons The NCS & McKinney First year conducting The NCS Scientific sample of 1,800 households 296 returned surveys; 17% response rate ±6% margin of error Expanded sample Online option Geographic comparisons

National Benchmark Comparisons

2017 National Benchmark Comparisons 105 received similar ratings 25 received higher ratings 1 received lower ratings

Education and Enrichment Recreation and Wellness Key Focus Areas Legend Higher than national benchmark Similar to national benchmark Lower than national benchmark   Most important Safety Built Environment Education and Enrichment Natural Environment Recreation and Wellness Mobility Economy Community Engagement

McKinney residents enjoy a high quality of life Key Finding #1 McKinney residents enjoy a high quality of life

Quality of Life in McKinney

Aspects of Community Quality Place to raise children Overall image Neighborhoods Overall appearance 9 10 in excellent or good Higher than national benchmark

Priorities for Improving Quality of Life #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Creating/ preserving open lands Retail, restaurant and entertainment options Recreation centers Outdoor entertainment venue Expanded hike and bike trail system 88% 92% 85% 83% 90% high or medium priority

Safety is a top community priority Key Finding #2 Safety is a top community priority

90% would recommend living in McKinney and Resident Loyalty 90% would recommend living in McKinney and 85% plan on remaining in the City very or somewhat likely

Feelings of Safety 96% 96% 93% Safe in neighborhood very or somewhat safe 96% Safe downtown/commercial area 93% excellent or good Overall feeling of safety

9 10 8 10 Safety Services in in Ambulance/EMS Fire Crime prevention 9 10 Ambulance/EMS in Fire Crime prevention or more excellent or good 8 10 Police in Fire prevention Animal Control or more Higher than national benchmark

McKinney Police Visibility How visible is the McKinney Police Department in your neighborhood and throughout the City (marked cars, foot, bike or mounted patrols)?

The Economy is an important and positive community feature Key Finding #3 The Economy is an important and positive community feature

Economy 80% 71% 58% 53% Overall economic health Economic development Cost of living Economy’s impact on future income Higher than national benchmark *Percent excellent or good or percent very or somewhat positive

Working in McKinney 70% 50% McKinney as a place to work Employment opportunities 50% excellent or good excellent or good Higher than national benchmark

Businesses, Services and Downtown Purchased goods or services 98% Vibrancy of downtown 82% excellent or good Place to visit 70% Shopping opportunities 61% Always, usually, or sometimes Quality of businesses and services 75% excellent or good excellent or good excellent or good Higher than national benchmark

Special Topics

City Priorities

Sources of Information City website Word-of-mouth City electronic newsletter City communications via social media Local newspapers City Council or other public meetings Talking with City officials Most used sources Least used sources

Airport Development Options

Conclusions Safety is an important community feature The Economy in McKinney is strong McKinney is a great place to live

Using Survey Results Monitor trends in resident opinion Measure government performance Inform budget, land use, strategic planning decisions Benchmark service ratings

Questions?

Thank you! Ashly Perez de Tejada Survey Consultant – Presenter Audrey Silliman Survey Specialist – Project Manager National Research Center, Inc. 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80301 303-444-7863 • nrc@n-r-c.com www.n-r-c.com