Nordic Cooperation on Ethical Review Procedures Nordforsk – nordic trial alliance MIKA SCHEININ 26.8.2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4 th Meeting of the EC International Dialogue on Bioethics Copenhagen, June 19 th, 2012 Large research and medical databases in clinical and research multi-centred.
Advertisements

Special populations- What makes them so special? AGAH Association for Applied Human Pharmacology Annual meeting 2004 Berlin 29. Februar 2004 Birka Lehmann.
The Oviedo Convention from the Perspective of DG Research Dr. Lino PAULA European Commission DG Research, Governance and Ethics Unit.
Implementation of the CoP in SLOVENIA Cooperation with data users Genovefa RUŽIĆ Deputy Director-General.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
A Blueprint For Clinical Research: Standard Operating Procedures
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
INTOSAI Compliance Audit Guidelines (ISSAI )
Horizontal Research Activities involving SMEs Joachim Ball, European Commission, DG RTD B3 n Co-operative Research n Collective Research General Introduction.
3rd Baltic Conference on Medicines Economic Evaluation, Reimbursement and Rational Use of Pharmaceuticals Pricing and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals.
Clinical Research Conference 2012 Legal, Ethical, and Social Dimensions of Clinical Research Takis Vidalis, Ph. D., Hellenic National Bioethics Commission.
Simon Brewin Overview of the National Supply Chain Reform Task Force.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Stakeholders In Clinical Research Government and Regulatory Bodies Professor Phil Warner.
Summary About me & AMRC About the EU Clinical Trials Regulation – what’s new Implementation timeline What does this mean for UK ethicists?
Terezia Sinkova EFSA The new EU Food Safety Agency.
Community Paramedic. Benchmark 101 We need a description of the epidemiology of the medical conditions targeted by the community paramedicine program.
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
The French National Agency for Research on Aids and Viral Hepatitis – Clinical Research Legislation: A French Experience Ingrid Callies Legal Counsel in.
Telematikplattform für Medizinische Forschungsnetze (TMF) e.V. TMF – A Common Platform for Medical Research Networks in Germany Improving the Organisation.
A major step towards a Europe for Health Directive on patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare DG SANCO D2 Healthcare Systems.
+ National and Institutional Guidelines on Conflict of Interest in Physician-Industry Relationships.
EUNetPaS is a project supported by a grant from the EAHC. The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the author(s). The EAHC.
Joint meeting of Baltic HRECs Riga, May 9-10, 2008 Some Remarks on Biomedical Research Ethics in Estonia Andres Soosaar Universtity of Tartu.
Warsaw, 5 th November 2012 Market Surveillance System of non-food products in Poland.
IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN Julian Fitzgerald (NC) IFTA, Inc. Board of Trustees 2007 Annual Business Meeting July 20-21, 2007 Chesterfield, MO.
Dr. Igor Codreanu Center of Dialysis and Renal Transplant Republican Clinical Hospital, Chisinau THE IMPACT OF THE OVIEDO CONVENTION ON LEGISLATION IN.
Promotion of an ICT dialogue between Europe and Latin America Horizon 2020 Dr. Margaretha Mazura, EMF Project Angels Webinar, 13 December 2012.
IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN. Vision Statement The model organization striving for full partner cooperation and member compliance.
1 CONSUMER ACADEMY Directorate General for Consumer Protection and Market Surveillance.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TEMPLATE Svilena Simeonova, Director of Internal Control Directorate, Ministry of Finance, Bulgaria.
Patients access to investigational drugs Steinar Aamdal Dept. of Clinical Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital.
Overcoming challenges in pediatric oncology product development: Regulatory oversight of multi-national clinical studies Ursula Kern, Advisory Committees.
Workshop on Standard operating procedures in the phytosanitary field, September Belgrad Serbia Monica Maria COJANU, Romania.
Ministry of Health Department for Nurses and Midwives Belgrade, January 2013 How to create and deliver a curriculum to comply with EU? Bridging.
Workshop on “EU Enlargement: Regulatory Convergence in Non-acceding Countries” Athens 7 – 8 November 2003 Regulatory Convergence and Technical Standards.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 1 – Free movement of goods Bilateral.
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Stab forskning, innovasjon og utdanning 2016: MOVING FURTHER WITH MEDICAL TAILORING MAIN SESSION 2: Patient Involvement in the Nordic Countries Building.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
Reconsidering requirements for research ethics in Lithuania
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
Regulation EU 536/2014 on clinical trials
ICH-GCP Avinash Kondawar M. Pharm Lead CRA
IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN
REGULATORY PROBLEMS IN CARING OUT PRE- AND POST- AUTHORISATION CLINICAL TRIALS Dr Penka Decheva GCP Inspector, BDA.
Good Clinical Practice
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
Peter Saundby President CIMP
The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
UEMS Multi Joint Committee on Sports Medicine
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
EXPLORING GLOBAL COOPERATION OPPORTUNITIES
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
In Argentina Ana Palmero Legal and Research Ethics Advisor
Is Data Protection a Fundamental Right Protecting the Individual?
AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPARENCY The Case of Mexico
IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN
The EDPS: competences and processing of personal data in EU funds
EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP
FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL RIGHTS IN EU
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Nordic Cooperation on Ethical Review Procedures Nordforsk – nordic trial alliance MIKA SCHEININ 26.8.2016

Nordic Trial Alliance: Mission The purpose of the NTA is to make it easier to carry out clinical research in the Nordic countries. The aim is to enhance Nordic cooperation in clinical trials. Increased Nordic cooperation will lead to a rise in the number of joint clinical trials and boost the attractiveness of the Nordic countries as partners in research. It will also promote knowledge transfer as well as increased efficiency and research output. The aim is a Common Nordic Clinical Research Area

New EU Regulation 536/2014 Scope: clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (repeals Directive 2001/20/EC) Aim: harmonized common procedures, faster and more efficient and predictable authorization of trials – while societal interests and human rights and dignity of participants are protected Aim: to foster European competitiveness

Common Nordic procedures: why? Small populations, few patients in each country, but together we are 26 million Now: many different forms to fill in each country, different requirements for information, not cost-efficient to start a trial Similar moral and cultural values and similar public health care systems provide a good basis for harmonization Harmonization would benefit both academic and industry-sponsored research and would promote joint Nordic trials

Aspects left to evaluate by each country in the new EU Regulation compliance with the requirements for informed consent compliance of the arrangements for rewarding or compensating subjects and investigators; compliance of the arrangements for recruitment of subjects with the requirements set out in Chapter V; compliance with Directive 95/46/EC = data protection; suitability of the investigators; suitabilility of the trial sites; arrangements for damage compensation; compliance with the applicable rules for the collection, storage and future use of biological samples of the subject.

Language requirements Article 26 The language of the application dossier, or parts thereof, shall be determined by the Member State concerned. Member States, in applying the first paragraph, shall consider accepting, for the documentation not addressed to the subject, a commonly understood language in the medical field.

Annex I of the Regulation Defines the contents of the application dossier Most items refer to the entire application and the study protocol Some aspects are defined per member state concerned

How to achieve harmonization? A detailed analysis of the differences between Annex I of the Regulation and the currently required information in the Nordic countries will have to be performed. An analysis of the legislation pertaining to items K-Q of Annex I is needed in each country, and this legislation should be harmonized. The Nordic countries should produce joint templates and guidance for documentation related to items K-Q – this is the task of the current NTA extension project. Urgent request to the Nordic ministries: Set up a joint ministerial task force!

How to achieve harmonization? Establishment of a Nordic Clinical Research Area is not a project, it is a process. Each Nordic country must now set up its own Ethics Committee system for evaluation of clinical trials, striving for Nordic harmonization. Present and future actions should be coordinated by a joint Nordic body, who provides templates, guidance, education and oversight.

NTA WP1 on Ethics Report published at http://nta.nordforsk.org/news/report-on-the-ethical-review-process-for-clinical-trials-in-the-nordic-countries Extension project just started: documents and other tools for implementation Next meeting in connection with NTA’s Annual Stakeholder Meeting in January, 2017 Contact: Mika Scheinin (NTA Project Leader), University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, email mschein@utu.fi