Office of Planning & Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

WRITING Educational Objectives, Learning Outcomes Mi-Suk Shim, Ph.D. Spring 2006 DIIA.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Assessing student learning. Diagnostic - The gathering of information at the outset of a course or program of study to provide information for both the.
Blended Learning Rubric BMS Faculty Meeting – September 10.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
SEM Planning Model.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
The Academic Assessment Process
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Using a logic model to help you use the ePortfolio Implementation Framework Katherine Lithgow.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN DEGREE PROGRAMS CSULA Workshop Anne L. Hafner May 12, 2005.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
Office of Service Quality
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Canberra Chapter July PMI Chapter Meeting July 2007 PMCDF Competence Framework A presentation by Chris Cartwright.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
National 4 & 5 Physical Education. Documents available on website Unit by Unit approach to Performance (package 1) Unit by Unit approach to Factors impacting.
Office of Planning & Development
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
A community of learners improving our world
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Consider Your Audience
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Assessment of Student Learning
The Assessment Toolbox: Capstone Courses & Portfolios
Assessing Learning Outcomes
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
February 21-22, 2018.
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
ASSESSMENT: FORMATIVE & SUMMATIVE
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Office of Planning & Development Academic Assessment

Overview Assessment/why assessment? Elements of SAR Assessment cycle Where are we now? Moving forward Course assessment

The Word “Assess” From the Latin verb “assidere” = “to sit by” (e.g., as an assessor or assistant-judge, originally in the context of taxes) Hence “in assessment of learning” = “to sit with the learner” Implies it is something that we do with and for students and not to students Assessment is the art and science of knowing what students know It provides “evidence” of students’ knowledge, skills, and abilities “Evidence” supports instructors’ inferences of what students know and can do (it guides and informs instruction) Assessment has many components and results in accumulated evidence compiled as SAR

Why self assessment? Verify that the existing programs meet their outcomes Provide feedback for quality assurance of academic programs. Improve and maintain academic standards   Enhance students’ learning.

Self Assessment Report (SAR) Benchmarking Learning resources Program Periodic Assessment Student progression and achievement Validation (external) Stakeholders’ feedback mechanisms Monitoring and evaluation (internal)

Assessment cycle Institutional Faculty Department Program Course 1. Set outcomes 2. Create learning opportunities 3. Conduct assessment for selected outcomes 4. Analyze assessment results 5. Enact action plan for improvement 6. Evaluate impacts Institutional Faculty Department Program Course

Program periodic assessment criteria Outcome-based learning and benchmarking academic program content and delivery Assessment methods Student progression and achievement Learning resources Stakeholders feedback mechanisms Monitoring and evaluation (internal) Validation (external)

Where are we now? Moving forward… Are we aligned with where we want to go? Where do we want to go? Program improvement Program goals How can we do even better? What are we trying to do? What can we improve? What are our broad goals Action Plan Mission Program outcomes Are some things not going well? What should they achieve/learn? How do we know we are succeeding? How are we doing it? Course assessment Results/Analysis Career opportunities How do we know they did? Syllabus: Course outcomes/ Measurement methods Assessment criteria per course What should they be able to do/perform? What should they be able to do/perform after each course? Program specification I Assessment Program specification II

Course-Level Assessment Program-Level Assessment How is Course Level Assessment if Different from Program Level Assessment? Course-Level Assessment Assess course outcomes at the end of the course Often we assign grades to individual students Grading typically involves only one faculty member who is teaching the course Program-Level Assessment Assess program outcomes at the end of the program Evaluate aggregate student artifacts for purposes of program improvement, gatherings student videos, analyzing exam results, etc. Program assessment involves faculty teams across the program/ discipline

Course-Level Assessment

Course assessment plan-throughout the semester Course outcomes assessment plan template Course outcome Performance Standard/benchmark Timeline Use of results Course outcome (with target performance (60% UG, 70% G) assessment method (to evaluate expected outcomes (direct and/or indirect)) Target performance or achievement level for course outcome When data collected during the course delivery Data analysis Finding/results Action to be taken Date to be implemented and monitoring (closing the loop) students will utilize effective study skills to successfully complete course work Class exercises & research essay/presentation completion in portfolio 70% of students above target performance Weekly, end of semester 60% of students exhibit satisfactory or better exercise completion Almost there Continue to monitor exercises. Add a group exercise on study skills techniques Throughout the semester and during the following semester

Course assessment plan-at the beginning of the semester Course outcomes alignment with selected assessment methods   Assessment Tool Course Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Exams, Quizzes x Homework Assignment Laboratories Group Projects Oral Presentations Project training

Course assessment plan-at the beginning of the semester Course outcomes in relation to program outcomes NUTD 234 Type of emphasis Program outcome Course outcomes Assessment method Evidence/ assignment Minimum competence Strong: assigned numerical value of 3 in the program outcome matrix (A1) Recognize nutrition-related concerns during the life span and demonstrate abilities to manage these issues ? (2) ? Presentation Course final exam (Q2) Grade of presentation 60% Some: assigned numerical value of 2 in the program outcome matrix (3) (4)…  

Course assessment plan-at the beginning of the semester Program outcomes and strong emphasis courses program outcome Strong emphasis courses PO A1 MATH 101 CHEM 230 PO A2    NUTD 233 PO A3  NUTD 433 Course assessment-accumulate per PO at the end of the semester Goal metric for program outcome evidence Evidence Metric goal C2: ENME 210 presentation 90% above minimum competency  

Action Plan 50% prgms. 50% prgms. All prgms Periodic self assessment 9/10/2018 1st 18/19 50% prgms. 1st 17/18 50% prgms. 2nd 16/17 1st 16/17 1st 16/17 All prgms 2nd 15/16 Periodic self assessment 1st 15/16 All prgms Pilot Pilot Annual program monitoring including course assessment Establishing the baseline – academic program specifications to which SAR will be based later Develop the framework for QA processes for Academic programs  in terms of instructions and procedures 1st is first semester 2nd is second semester

Thank you