Japan Contribution to the HL-LHC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

A.KOVALENKO SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS for NICA BOOSTER & COLLIDER NICA ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION - 3 JINR, Dubna, November 05, 2008.
Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Preliminary Design of Nb 3 Sn Quadrupoles for FCC-hh M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC.
Trip Report on the visit to ICST of HIT, Harbin, China Derun Li Mike Green Steve Virostek Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (from December.
R. Ostojic, WAMSDO, 19 May 2008 LHC Insertion Region Upgrade Phase I 1.Upgrade goals and milestones 2.Review of IR systems: main findings 3.The emerging.
Development of Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators and Detectors in High Energy Physics Takakazu Shintomi and Akira Yamamoto On behalf of.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
Hall C Meeting SHMS Magnets and Support Structure Design and Procurement Status Paul Brindza January 26, 2009.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
11 T Dipole Experience M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC On behalf of CERN-FNAL project teams The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded.
Progress in D1 (since last collaboration meeting…) Michinaka SUGANO, Tatsushi NAKAMOTO KEK July 1,
Title – xxxx 1 LARP & US-HiLumi Contribution to the Inner Triplet Quadrupoles G. Ambrosio Cost and Schedule Review CERN, March 9 th -11 th 2015.
Technical agreement n 3 New SC Magnets activities P. Fessia (G. De Rijk), D. Reynet, J.M Rifflet.
Update on D1 M. Sugano, T. Nakamoto, S. Enomoto, H. Kawamata KEK The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Superconducting Corrector Magnet Progress Report P. Wanderer Superconducting Magnet Div; Dec. 15, 2007 T2K US B280 collaboration meeting.
General Considerations for the Upgrade of the LHC Insertion Magnets
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The Cosine Two Theta Quadrupole Magnets for the Jefferson Lab Super High Momentum Spectrometer (SHMS). P.B. Brindza, S.R. Lassiter M. J. Fowler Abstract—
11 T Dipole Project Goals and Deliverables M. Karppinen on behalf of CERN-FNAL collaboration “Demonstrate the feasibility of Nb3Sn technology for the DS.
Design modification and R&D of D1
1 Progress Report on Magnet R&D and Further Plans for CERN-KEK Collaboration Tatsushi NAKAMOTO KEK CERN-KEK Committee, 6 th meeting, CERN, Dec. 14, 2011.
11 T Dipole Project CERN Status M. Karppinen 11 T Management meeting 1 July 2013.
Q4 MAGNETS FOR HL-LHC J.M. Rifflet, M. Segreti, E. Todesco WP3 - Q4 magnets for HL-LHC 5th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual meeting Research supported.
E. Todesco INTERACTION REGION MAGNETS E. Todesco On behalf of the WP3 collaboration CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CERN, 27 th October 2015.
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
First Q4 cold mass engineering follow up meeting 16/03/2016 Q4 Status update H. Felice, M. Segreti, D. Simon and JM. Rifflet.
1 R&D Plan Proposal for CERN-KEK Collaboration Tatsushi NAKAMOTO KEK CERN-KEK collaboration: Magnet R&D Review at CERN, Dec. 13, 2011.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 LHQ Goals and Status Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab 2 nd LARP / HiLumi.
Inner Triplet Review 1 H. Prin AT/MEL Activities on the triplets at CERN Reception and Acceptance Triplet String Assembly in Building 181 Handling and.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
CERN, 11th November 2011 Hi-lumi meeting
Hardware Challenges and Limitations
HL-LHC Magnet components and assemblies
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Model magnet test results at FNAL
11 T Dipole Integration & Plans M. Karppinen
D2 Status The contract for the construction of the short model
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
Agenda 9:00  - Welcome ASG speaker 9:10 -  Introduction -       P.Fabbricatore 9:25 - The D2   magnets in HL-LHC   -  E. Todesco.
Q0 magnet, cooling, support ideas
Glyn Kirby Magnet AssemblyTechniques.
HL-LHC Corrector Magnet Design & Construction Activity Status
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
11 T Dipole Project Overview and Status
Introduction to the technical content The Q4 magnet (MQYY) for HL-LHC
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
MQXF updates P. Ferracin October 9th, 2014.
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
MQYY: superconducting Quadrupole magnet for Hl-lhc
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
HL LHC WP3 (magnets) TASK 2 ADVANCEMENT
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Review of Quench Limits
Qingjin XU Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP),
Presentation transcript:

Japan Contribution to the HL-LHC Tatsushi NAKAMOTO KEK HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop, 11-13 June 2014, CERN

Engagement to the HiLumi-LHC Desgin Study Participation from KEK A visiting scientist from KEK to CERN Another contribution to the LIU: PSB RF and PS damper

Possible Contribution to the HL-LHC (Plan) In-kind contribution 6 full-scale D1 beam separation magnets assembled in cryostats for the new insertion region. 4 for HL-LHC machine, 2 for spares. All cold masses to be evaluated at warm and cold. Only 1 or 2 full cryostats to be evaluated at cold. Accelerator Technology R&D Study on beam related performance limitation Beam diagnostics Japanese industry engagement As realized in the present LHC (cold compressor, superconductors, non-magnetic steel, cable insulation, etc.) items and scale depending on the funding

New D1 in IR (ATLAS, CMS) HL-LHC Nominal LHC HL-LHC Nominal LHC IT Quads.& D1 HL-LHC Corrector Package SC D1 IP IT Quads. Nominal LHC NC D1 Long Straight Section HL-LHC New Crab Cavity SC D1 Q4 D2 Nominal LHC NC D1 Pictures from P. Fessia Short distance btw D1 and D2. A large aperture of 150 mm. NEW D1 SC magnet for HL-LHC

Latest Design Parameters of D1 Coil ID: 150 mm Integrated field:35 T m (26 Tm at present LHC) 5.59 T at 12 kA, Lcoil=6.3 m, E= 2.1 MJ Top: 1.9 K by HeII cooling Op. point (2D coil): 75 % Coil layout: 1 layer of 15.1 mm cable Better cooling. Saving space for iron yoke. Conductor: Nb-Ti LHC MB outer cable (by CERN) Structure: Collared yoke structure by keying RHIC dipole, LHC MQXA, J-PARC SCFM Enhancing iron material for stray field issue Field quality: < 10-4 at Rref = 50 mm Cold mass OD: 550 +10 x 2 = 570 mm Cryostat OD: 914 mm, same as MB cryostat Radiation, energy deposition: 20 MGy, ~2 mW/cm3 4 8 13 44 turns Stress management High saturation, stray field, flux return cryostat Radiation resistance, cooling capability 19

2m-long D1 Model Magnet Single-layer coil, 4-split spacer collars, collared yoke by keying f 60 mm HX hole Notches and f 34 mm holes for iron saturation effects Brass shoes Shell: SUS304L 4 split stainless steel spacer collars: NSSC-130S Same outer-interface for J-PARC SCFM jigs Collaring keys Horizontal split iron yoke: low-carbon steel (EFE by JFE steel) NbTi SC cable (LHC MB outer) + Apical insulation Radiation resistant GFRP (S2 glass + BT resin) wedges

Development of Radiation Resistant GFRP Target: 50 MGy or higher (< 20MGy expected in the D1) Irradiated in vacuum at RT, evaluated at RT. New GFRP Pipe (S2 glass & BT resin) Ordinary G10 (Epoxy) already showed significant degradation even at 10 MGy. New GFRPs (CE&Epoxy, BT, and BMI) show good radiation resistance up to 100 MGy. Flexural strength test (G10, 30MGy) GFRP (S2 glass & BT resin) will be adopted for the new D1

Design Tools Parameters, specification given by CERN (beam, radiation, cooling analysis) EM Design ROXIE, OPERA(for benchmarking in 2D and 3D) Structural Analysis ANSYS Quench Analysis Original code in KEK Opera ROXIE

Design Tools Engineering Preparatory work: bridge between ROXIE output (.catia, .cnc) and CAD/CAM modeling MS Excel w/ Visual Basic for Applications 3D CAD/CAM: coils NX7.5 (SIEMENS) for modeling Solid Edge for drawings 2D CAD: drawings for tooling and jig OneSpace Designer (CoCreate)

In-kind contribution: D1 magnet w/ cryostat It should be something like… MQXA in cryostats D1 (MBXF) for the HL-LHC (Plan) Cold mass in cryostat will be delivered by KEK with industry Possible supplies from CERN NbTi SC cables with insulation. Insulated cold bore-tube with tungsten shield HeII internal HX Accessories from Japan Vacuum and pressure vessels Pipe, fitting, ferrule, welding Signal wire Alignment target, special feature, etc… Compatibility with Japanese safety regulation Compatibility with CERN’s and/or European regulation In accordance with CERN’s guideline

Standard, Code JIS: Japan Industrial Standards Mostly compatible with other Standards (ISO…), but there are some discrepancies... Japanese products should basically follow JIS. Materials: metals, organic materials Mechanics Electricity Code for the D1 in terms of high pressure gas regulation: “Designated Equipment Inspection Code”

High Pressure Gas Regulation in Japan Fundamental law: “High Pressure Gas Safety Act” KHK (not KEK…): The High Pressure Gas Safty Institute of Japan. Inspection and certification for the equipment Local government (Ibaraki Prefecture for KEK) Approval for the equipment KEK MUST follow this Act. Following procedures are foreseen for the D1: 9m-deep vertical cryostat modification: Inspection in progress Horizontal HeII test facility (NEW): Plan The facility: Procedure just once D1 cold mass in cryostat for horizontal testing: Plan Procedure necessary for “every” D1 equipment.

Concern of Horizontal Testing in Japan Procedure for the D1 horizontal testing *This is NOT for “testing”. This is for something like “construction of facility”. D1 equipment (cold mass and cryostat) is categorized as “Designated Equipment” in “High Pressure Gas Safety Act”. Equipment MUST be inspected by KHK at the fabrication processes, even from the beginning. If passed, “Designated Equipment Inspection Certificate” will be issued. After “Completion inspection”, equipment is approved by local government. Procedure above usually takes quite a long time (e.g. 8 months for a J-PARC SC magnet system). Bottleneck of delivery schedule: serious concern for the D1 horizontal testing. If NO horizontal testing in Japan, we can omit the procedure for KHK and local government… Deliverables should be discussed and defined by KEK and CERN In any case, the D1 equipment must follow the CERN’s and/or European safety regulation.

Lessons from LHC IT: HX buckling HX was broken at the pressure test in the LHC tunnel (Dec. 2006). Buckling of corrugated copper pipe: annealed by brazing. Proper pressure test was not performed before delivery to CERN.

Lessons from LHC IT: Magnet Support Failure Broken bellows “spider” support MQXA was moved by 15 cm at the pressure test in the LHC tunnel. (Mar. 2007) Unbalanced force due to the difference of cross sections of pipes was not taken into account for the support design. Was specification of the pressure test defined well in the degin/fabrication phase?

Summary KEK has been engaged in the HL-LHC design study. Possible contribution has been discussed. Major in-kind contribution from Japan will be the D1 magnet system. Design study of the D1 is underway. Design tools: ROXIE, OPERA, ANSYS, CAD/CAM Development of 2m long model magnet Unique high pressure gas regulation in Japan Difficulty of a series of horizontal testing for the D1 Close communication and clear specification will be definitely necessary for successful delivery of the HL-LHC equipment as an international collaborative work.