PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Advisory Team for Environment, Food, and Health.
Advertisements

Overview of Developments: Environmental Protection Agency’s Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Bonnie Gitlin, Acting Director, Radiation Protection.
Remediation Challenges and Stakeholder Engagement: A Canadian Perspective Michael Binder President Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Presentation to the.
IRPA 13: Refresher Course RC 19
 Progress with the revision and consolidation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive Stefan Mundigl European Commission DG Energy and Transport.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
11 April th International High-Energy Physics Technical Safety Forum 1 Radiation Protection and Safety in High-Energy Physics Kenneth R. Kase, Ph.D.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 630 Effective and Committed Effective Dose Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-013 Roles and Coordination of Information.
First Steps in Response to a Radiological Terrorist Incident Dale Dusenbury,CHP North Carolina Division of Radiation Protection.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Contributing to the sustainable recovery of the Chernobyl affected areas S. Fesenko NAAL, IAEA.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 2 Conceptual.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Protective Action Guides for Radiological/Nuclear Incidents November 1, 2005 Craig Conklin Department of Homeland Security.
PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
THE RADIATION SAFETY IN A “DAILY LIFE” Introduction Volodymyr Berkovskyy.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Revision of the International Basic Safety Standards - BSS Status Report - Renate Czarwinski & Pascal Deboodt.
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61
EPRI Comments Re: NRC “Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal”
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM--FALL 2014 MEETING
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
Safe Drinking Water Act , CCL and Perchlorate
Focus on Changes from the 1992 Manual Sara DeCair, US EPA April 2015
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Lisa Edwards Sr. Program Manager, EPRI LLW Forum April 13-14, 2016
Transition To Keyhole, A Better Approach To Emergency Response Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Implementation of the Revised Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning,
 Progress with the revision and consolidation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive Stefan Mundigl, Vesa Tanner European Commission DG Energy.
Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
NRC Update of Low Level Waste Emerging Issues
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Transition To Keyhole, A Better Approach To Emergency Response Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
10 CFR Part 61 Low Level Waste Disposal Rulemaking Update
Update on New Federal Guidance for Dose and Risk Assessment
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
EPRI Development of Nuclear Power Plant Implementation Guide for NRC Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Presented.
Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operations
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
NRC’s Low-Level Radioactive Waste Program
Aquatic Facility Regulation and Guidance Reviews
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Summary A well planned preparation for the review during pre-licensing phase is a key factor to a successful review. Plan for the review should be prepared.
NRC Update of LLW Emerging Issues
2017 PAG Manual I hope you’re all prepared and excited to learn more about EPA’s updated, 2017 Protective Action Guide Manual – or as we often shorten.
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
2017 PAG Manual I hope you’re all prepared and excited to learn more about EPA’s updated, 2017 Protective Action Guide Manual – or as we often shorten.
National Environmental Monitoring Conference
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
CRCPD Update Presented to the National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference May 2004.
Current Radiation Protection Legislation in Slovakia
Status of Exceptional Events Implementation Guidance
Presentation transcript:

PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps November 7, 2016 Presented by: Dan Schultheisz U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Radiation Protection Division Presented to: Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Fall 2016 Meeting Saratoga Springs, NY

Presentation Overview 1992 PAG Manual Proposed Revisions Early phase Intermediate phase Late phase Drinking water PAG Questions for comment

PAGs Manual Protective Action Guides (PAGs) Manual (1992) Guidance for Action in Nuclear Emergencies Early, Intermediate Phases only Promised Water and Late Phase (Recovery) PAGs

2013 Draft PAG Manual - Proposed Clarifies the use of PAGs for all radiological incidents, including terrorism Lowers projected thyroid dose for KI, via FDA Requests input on drinking water guidance Refers to 1998 FDA food guidance Includes guidance for long-term site restoration Updates dosimetry from ICRP 26 to ICRP 60, by referring to FRMAC methods Published April 15, 2013 (78 FR 22257)

When Do PAGs Apply? Not for radioactively contaminated sites Releases, incidents, or accidents Public protection is the focus Guidance, not regulatory This is not CERCLA or Superfund Avoided dose ≠ safe limit to allow

Relationship of EPA and DHS PAGs DHS vetted the Early and Intermediate PAGs for RDDs or INDs and provided needed guidance for Late Phase (recovery) guidance in 2008 EPA PAG Manual incorporates this late phase guidance DHS document will ‘sunset’ when PAG Manual is finalized Planning Guidance for IND (2010) PAGs don’t apply well after an IND Scope and scale Priority on lifesaving and avoiding acute effects Short response timeframe Unique fallout decay curve Referenced in PAG Manual

Early Phase 1992 Evacuation/Shelter 1-5 rem (10-50 mSv) thyroid/skin 5, 50 x higher KI 25 rem (250 mSv) thyroid dose (adult) Worker 5, 10, 25+ rem (50, 100, 250+ mSv) 2013 Evacuation/Shelter 1-5 rem (10-50 mSv) (no organ dose specified) KI threshold 5 rem (50 mSv) thyroid dose (child) Worker 5, 10, 25+ rem (50, 100, 250+ mSv)

Potassium Iodide (KI) Actions FDA recommends a multi-pronged approach: A simplified approach: Provide KI to public if 5 rem (50 mSv) child thyroid dose projected This is a supplemental action where evacuation is the primary protection

Guidance for Emergency Workers Dose (rem) Activity Condition 5 All None 10 Protecting valuable property Lower dose not practicable 25* Lifesaving or protection of large populations * Greater than 25 rem for lifesaving only to volunteers aware of the risks

Intermediate Phase 1992 Relocate population ≥ 2 rem (20 mSv) first year (projected dose) 0.5 rem (5 mSv) any subsequent year 5 rem (50 mSv) over 50 yrs Apply dose reduction techniques < 2 rem (20 mSv) 2013 Relocate population ≥ 2 rem (20 mSv) first year (projected dose) 0.5 rem (5 mSv) any subsequent year (removed 50-year Relocation PAG) Apply dose reduction techniques < 2 rem (20 mSv)

Re-entry Matrix New quick reference matrix Public, workers re-entering Relocation area to work during cleanup Basis: Relocation PAGs Assumptions: Detailed exposure scenarios in Operational Guidelines Do it yourself: RESRAD-RDD software

Drinking Water PAG 1992 Promised 2013 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations provide emergency actions Increased monitoring Notifications Comments sought on whether, and what value, an emergency PAG for water should be considered

Drinking Water PAG Comments sought on whether, and what value, an emergency PAG for water should be considered Other related guides from WHO, IAEA, DHS, FDA may inform your input

FDA Food PAGs 1992 1982 FDA guidance NCRP 39 methodology Preventive PAG 0.5 rem (5 mSv) whole body and 1.5 rem (15 mSv) thyroid Emergency PAG 10 times higher, depends on impact Dose only, no activity levels provided 2013 1998 FDA guide, by reference ICRP 56 & NRPB methods One set of PAGs 0.5 rem (5 mSv) whole body dose or 5 rem (50 mSv) to most exposed organ or tissue Dose and derived intervention levels (DILs) provided

Late Phase: Cleanup/Waste Disposal Planning guidance for cleanup and disposal Outlined process to define cleanup goals Processes for implementation and consensus Description of potential disposal options Pre-planning will facilitate decision-making Process-driven rather than specific PAG levels

Summary of Comments ~5,000 comments received Clarification and additional explanation, e.g: Distribution of KI and elimination of thyroid PAG KI still viewed as secondary protective action? Elimination of 50-year PAG Derivation of PAG levels Some concern about reference to other documents Support for FRMAC methods Late phase planning guidance beyond PAGs Concern about responsibility/capacity for waste

Proposed Drinking Water PAG Published on June 10, 2016 (81 FR 37589) Two-tier PAG based on projected first-year dose during the intermediate phase 500 mrem for general population (over 15 years old) 100 mrem for more sensitive populations Health-based levels for providing alternative sources Consistent with FDA food PAG Default Derived Response Levels (DRLs) for Cs-137, I-131, Sr-90/Y-90 as key radionuclides Does not affect daily drinking water standards

Comments on Drinking Water PAG More than 60,000 comments received Comments supported lower or higher levels Drinking water MCLs consistent with daily standards 2 to 20 rem consistent with international guidance Comments related to implementation DRLs for other radionuclides not provided No requirement to limit to one year of exposure Sources serving both population “tiers”

Next Steps Both documents undergoing OMB review Plans to facilitate implementation by states Anticipate about 1 year to incorporate into state plans Training opportunities through webinars/conferences For more information See our web page at http://www.epa.gov/radiation/rert/pags.html OR CONTACT Sara DeCair (decair.sara@epa.gov)