Ecotoxicology Day 2. Adam Peters and Graham Merrington 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY
Advertisements

Francesca Arena European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate General Future data requirements related to bees for the authorisation of plant protection.
Summary Slide Some Industry views on POP/PBT identification in Europe.
PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
The Effects of Caffeine and Triclocarban on Gammarus pseudolimnaeus Jim Fietzer Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Whitewater.
Environmental risk assessment of chemicals Paul Howe Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, UK.
1 Development & Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Methods for Incorporating Aquatic Plant Effects into Community Level Benchmarks EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Tjalling Jager Dept. Theoretical Biology How to simplify biology to interpret effects of stressors.
Dose response relationships –A graph describing the response of an organism, population, or biological community to a range of concentrations of a xenobiotic.
Dose-response relationships Tjalling Jager Theoretical Biology.
Acute and Chronic Toxicity Testing. Standard Methods  Multiple methods have been standardized (certified) by multiple organizations American Society.
and Environmental Risk Assessment
Dose-response analysis Tjalling Jager Dept. Theoretical Biology.
Module 5 Writing the Results and Discussion (Chapter 3 and 4)
Toxicity Testing II P erforming a toxicity test. Toxicity testing Acute toxicity test –Short time frame exposure (96h) –“kill ‘em and count ‘em” –LC 50,
The Scientific Method Chapter 1.
Influence of the adopted methodological solutions on the assessments of the monetary poverty range. The case of Poland. Seminar on Poverty Measurement.
Exercise 6 Dose linearity and dose proportionality
PROTECTFP Numerical Benchmarks for protecting biota against radiation in the environment Methodology to derive benchmarks, selected methods used.
Experimental Data. The Nature of data b Data is the outcome of observation and measurement b Data may be acquired ê In the field ê By experiment.
Introduction to Ecotoxicology Francesca Tencalla Beltox Seminar, Part 6.1.
Dose-response analysis Tjalling Jager Dept. Theoretical Biology.
PROTECTFP Derivation of Environmental Radiological Protection Benchmarks an overview
©CropLife America 2014 Perspectives on the Derivation of Aquatic Life Criteria for Pesticides Jeffrey Giddings 1 and Dwayne Moore 2 on behalf of CropLife.
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Guide to Selecting Qualified WET Laboratories Robert N. Brent, Ph.D. DynCorp Science and Engineering Group.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
The Statistical Analysis of Data. Outline I. Types of Data A. Qualitative B. Quantitative C. Independent vs Dependent variables II. Descriptive Statistics.
Medical Statistics as a science
POPULATION STUDIES. Growth of populations FACTORS INCREASING POPULATION FACTORS DECREASING POPULATION BIRTH IMMIGRATION DEATH EMIGRATION.
Water Quality Criteria: Implications for Testing Russell Erickson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN, USA.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Three Broad Purposes of Quantitative Research 1. Description 2. Theory Testing 3. Theory Generation.
N318b Winter 2002 Nursing Statistics Specific statistical tests Chi-square (  2 ) Lecture 7.
C82MST Statistical Methods 2 - Lecture 1 1 Overview of Course Lecturers Dr Peter Bibby Prof Eamonn Ferguson Course Part I - Anova and related methods (Semester.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
Static Aquatic Mesocosms Workshop 'In-situ trialing for ecological and chemical studies in support of WFD implementation' May Palais Beaumont.
Biology-Based Modelling Tjalling Jager Bas Kooijman Dept. Theoretical Biology.
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD: It’s the method you use to study a question scientifically.
Transforming Our World: Delivering affordable medicines to anyone, anywhere, any day 1 Environmental hazards of substances Annex 1 – Part 4 of CLP Date:
MEASUREMENT OF TOXICITY By, Dr. M. David Department of Zoology, Karnatak University Dharwad.
Inferential Statistics Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Dose-response analysis Tjalling Jager. Contents Introduction  Why and how of ‘dose responses’  How to fit a curve to data points (statistics) Current.
Stats Methods at IC Lecture 3: Regression.
Modify—use bio. IB book  IB Biology Topic 1: Statistical Analysis
Outline Bioassay background (5 mins)
General Concepts in QSAR for Using the QSAR Application Toolbox
Making it more relevant! Higher-tier data and Weight of Evidence Day 2. Adam Peters and Graham Merrington 2017.
Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals (Part 1): Using the Standard Normal Lecture 8 Justin Kern October 10 and 12, 2017.
Identification of River Basin Specific Pollutants and Derivation of Environmental Quality Standards under Water Framework Directive: Turkish Experience.
Acute and Chronic Toxicity Testing
Bioaccumulation, PBTs, and SVHCs Day 2.
What is Ecology?.
STEM Fair Graphs & Statistical Analysis
The Effects of Fracking Fluid on Algal Growth
Characteristics of mixed stock
Statistical Analysis Error Bars
Successfully implementing EQSbiota?
What is Ecology?.
Assessing the value of measured data Day 1.
Nickel Risk Assessment
Essential data for a complete dossier
Marine Biotechnology Lab
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Statistical Thinking and Applications
Role of Higher Tier Data in the Derivation of the Ni EQS
Pelagic community Quality Standards for Cyanides for EQS setting under WFD Udo Hommen.
Living things and the environment
Tests of Significance Section 10.2.
Presentation transcript:

Ecotoxicology Day 2. Adam Peters and Graham Merrington 2017

What is a ecotoxicology? Endpoints Test principles and interpretation Hypothesis testing Regression modelling/curve fitting Reliability and relevance 2017

What is a ecotoxicology? (ECHA 2011, R7b) again Typically standardised tests aimed at comparing different chemicals Simple tests on organisms which are readily cultured in the lab Standardised test procedures Performance of control animals critical for a valid test Tests usually performed under optimum conditions for the test species 2017

Endpoints? What counts as an effect? Acute – Mortality Chronic – endpoints relating to development, growth, or reproduction What kinds of plants and animals get tested? Unicellular green algae Water fleas (Daphnia) Fish 2017

Testing? (OECD 201, 202, 203, etc.) Acute Daphnia test 10 water fleas in plastic cups Are they alive or not? Prod with a pencil, does it move? If it doesn’t move it’s immobilised (presumed dead) Endpoint is immobilisation Assumed equivalent to mortality 2017

Results? 10 Water fleas (Daphnia) All alive – no effects All dead – 100% effects Lethal Concentration LC100, Effective Concentration EC100 5 dead, 5 alive – 50% effects LC50 or EC50 2017

Statistical Analysis ANOVA – Analysis of variance Requires replication at each test concentration level Identifies a difference from the control Used to identify the highest test concertation with no effects No Observed Effects Concentration (NOEC) Lowest test concentration at which a significant effect was observed Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) 2016

Alternative Approach Curve fitting Uses data from the entire experiment Allows more test concentrations with fewer replicates for each one Same total number of replicates Allows calculation of any effect level EC10, EC25, EC50, EC90 EC10 usually treated as equivalent to a NOEC for PNEC and EQS derivation in Europe 2016

Test Quality and Standardisation Most tests conducted to OECD standard guidelines Many also conducted to GLP Reliability criteria specific to each test Information in test guidelines Control performance? Minimum performance required for a valid test Usually based on endpoint used Standardised water chemistry common Different for different test species 2016

Chronic tests Usually same test species For deriving longer term thresholds more reliably Relevant endpoints growth or reproduction Algae population growth Daphnia reproduction (# of offspring) Fish growth (biomass, length) or development Rotifer population growth Plant root growth Molluscs growth (biomass, shell length) Insect growth (biomass, length) 2016

Data Sources Study summaries e.g. IUCLID/ECHA Study reports – if available Open literature Other reviews – OECD, ICCA, ESR, NICNAS, ECETOC Thresholds may not be directly usable, but data should have been reviewed and summarised Different interpretation of the same data may be required NOEC vs EC10 vs EC25, SSD vs deterministic, AF? 2017

What Data Counts Test data for a species which is not locally or regionally relevant is taken as being representative of other untested locally and regionally relevant species Include all reliable and relevant data Relevant endpoints should have a direct link to population viability Many behavioural endpoints are not relevant! 2017

Non standard tests Usually from research laboratories Different species and taxonomic groups which might be required to represent an ecosystem Insects, molluscs, plants, worms, etc. Can be difficult to assess adequacy of control performance without guidance Difficulties in drawing conclusions about the test Could also be standard species under non-standard test conditions, or in natural waters 2017

Summary Standardised species Standardised tests Standardised endpoints Existing regulatory summaries 2017

2016