Mu2e crystals qualification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
Advertisements

CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Tests of scintillators CsI, CsI(Na), BGO, NaI(Tl) CsI(Tl)
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
Nustar/crystal simulations B. Genolini Crystal: CsI(Tl) (Saint Gobain), wrapped with reflector (VM2000, Tyveck?) Geometry:
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
1 HF Laser/LED Calibration Studies L. Almeida, M. Baarmand, L. Caraway, M. Hohlmann, T. Qureshi, I. Vodopianov FLORIDA TECH 1->9 light splitter w/ pulsed.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
EXL/crystal simulations B. Genolini Simulation of NUSTAR crystals with Litrani Presentation of Litrani: simulation of.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
The Design of Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) October Lu Jun-guang.
Status of scintillator KLM study P. Pakhlov (ITEP)
Shashlik type calorimeter for SHIP experiment
CALICE Meeting DESY ITEP&MEPhI status report on tile production and R&D activities Michael Danilov ITEP.
PANDA electromagnetic calorimeters Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group INSTR08 28 Feb - 05 Mar 2008.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
Valery Dormenev Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk
1 Prototype Calibration System for Forward Hadron Calorimeter L. Almeida, M. Baarmand, L. Caraway, M. Hohlmann, T. Qureshi, I. Vodopianov FLORIDA TECH.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Lead Fluoride Calorimeter for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory October 31 st 2008.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
Gain stability and the LYSO beam radiation monitor measurements
Beam Halo Monitor : Q-bars+SiPMMike Albrow, 26 Aug 2010 A Beam Halo Monitor for the LHC based on Quartz Cherenkov Counters Mike Albrow (Fermilab) Features:
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
Linearity Tests The laser induced high noise pulses on the APD rendering it useless. We tried several methods to shield and filter the noise. With a stabilized.
Status and R&D development of Photon Calorimeter G. Atoian, S. Dhawan, V. Issakov, A. Poblaguev, M. Zeller, Physics Department, Yale University, New Haven,
Concept of NA62 IRC based on PWO scintillation crystals A.Fedorov, M. Korjik, A. Lobko Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk, Belarus A. Kourilin JINR,
Characterization of the QUartz Photon Intensifying Detector (QUPID) Artin Teymourian UCLA Dark Matter Group Dept. of Physics and Astronomy.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究セン ター 第 65 回年次大会 岡山大学.
PbWO 4 crystals Calorimeter Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Study of the Radiation Damage of Hamamatsu Silicon Photo Multipliers Wander Baldini Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare and Universita’ degli Studi di.
PID detector and EMC for HIEPAF 邵明,唐泽波 核探测与核电子学国家重点实验室 中国科学技术大学近代物理系.
A possible BGO Setup for the 2008 Beam Test Campaign
Energy and time resolution for a LYSO matrix
Physics and Calorimeter Requirements
Performance of scintillation pixel detectors with MPPC read-out and digital signal processing Mihael Makek with D. Bosnar, V. Gačić, L. Pavelić, P. Šenjug.
Activities and Results from PNPI GATCHINA
Ultra Cherenkov based SAC
from Saint Gobain studies
Mauro Raggi PADME Kick-off meeting Frascati, 20th-21st April 2015
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics
Properties of Recent SIC Crystals
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
superB Detector Workshop I University of Perugia and INFN
Development of a High Precision Axial 3-D PET for Brain Imaging
Report on Working Group # 2 The MU2E detector
大強度
Gamma Rays Detection LNF – | INSPYRE school Danilo Domenici
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
CLAS12 Forward Detector Element PCAL
Timing Counter Sept CSN I, Assisi 2004 Giorgio Cecchet.
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
LSO/LYSO Crystals for Future High Energy Physics Experiments
Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy
Calorimeter Backgrounds
Conceptual design and R&D Progress of STCF ECAL
Variable distance from beam.
Update on Ecal simulation
Presentation transcript:

Mu2e crystals qualification I. Sarra PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Mu2e Calorimeter: state of the art The Calorimeter consists of two disks with 674 CsI 34x34x200 mm3 square crystals: Rinner = 374 mm, Router=660 mm, depth = 10 X0 (200 mm) Each crystal is readout by two large area UV extended SiPM’s (14x20 mm2) Analog FEE is on the SiPM and digital electronics is located in near-by electronics crates Radioactive source and laser system provide absolute calibration and monitoring capability I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Mu2e Calorimeter: state of the art (2) High granularity crystal based calorimeter with: 2 Disks (Anuli) geometry to optimize acceptance for spiraling electrons Crystals with high Light Yield for timing/energy resolution  LY(photosensors) > 20 pe/MeV 2 photo-sensors/preamps/crystal for redundancy and reduce MTTF requirement  now set to 1 million hours/SiPM Fast signal for Pileup and Timing resolution  τ of emission < 40 ns + Fast preamps Crystals and sensors should work in 1 T B-field and in vacuum of 10-4 Torr and:  Crystals survive a dose of 100 krad and a neutron fluency of 1012 n/cm2  Photo-sensors survive 20 krad a neutron fluency of 3×1011 n_1MeV/cm2 I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Design: Crystals and Sensors choice TSV with SPL SiPMs BaF2 CsI Radiation Length X0 [cm] 2.03 1.86 Light Yield [% NaI(Tl)] 4/36 3.6 Decay Time[ns] 0.9/650 30 Photosensor RMD APD SiPM Wavelength [nm] 220/300 310 Undoped CsI Adequate radiation hardness Slightly hygroscopic 30 ns emission time, small slow component. Emits @ 310 nm. Comparable LY of fast component of BaF2. Lower cost (6-8 $/cc) Well know crystal. Mass produced before .. KTeV I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Design: meeting the requirements Energy resolution vs Deposited energies Data MC σ / E < 7% dominated by leakage and beam energy spread LNF Test Beam Mu2e Framework Simulation Simulation performed as a function of LY and many other variables  CsI+SIPM match requirements. Test beam with e- @ BTF, LNF 80 to 130 MeV  3x3 array of 30x30x200 mm3 CsI + MPPC Good energy ( 7%) and timing ( 110 ps) resolution Exp tests  Matching EMC requirements I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Design: Radiation hardness & cooling Crystals have been tested up to 100 krad and 1012 n/cm2 with 14 MeV neutrons i.e. the doses in the experiment with a safety factor of 3 applied.  No major issues/damages observed (LY drop 40% @ 100 krad)  Radiation hardness will be part of our QA test procedure  Effect of thermal neutrons on Radiation Induced Current being investigated Photosensors have been tested up to 20 krad and 3 x 10 11 n/cm2.  No problems with dose  With neutrons, sensors are still working but leakage current increases to too high values (a factor ~2000)  Cooling photo-sensors to 0 °C is needed. I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Crystals: Quality Control Transmittance of the pure CsI has been much improved from 2014 From left to right: SICCAS (2014 sample), Opto Materials and ISMA CsI crystals Spectrometer D2 lamp and diffusive sphere I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Crystals: Quality Control (2) To study the light yield and longitudinal uniformity of each crystal, we used a low intensity collimated 22Na source which irradiates them in a region of few mm2; The source is placed between the crystals and a small tagging system, constituted by a 3×3× 10 mm3 LYSO crystal, readout by a 3×3 mm2 MPPC; One of the two back-to-back 511 keV photons produced by the source is tagged by this monitor while the second photon is used to calibrate the crystal under test, which is readout by means of a 2” UV extended photomultiplier tube (PMT) from ET Enterprises. The whole system is inside a light tight black box. I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Crystals: Quality Control (3) For each crystal, a longitudinal scan is done in eight points, with 2 cm steps, with respect to the readout system. In the scan, the source and the tag are moved together along the axis of the crystal under test with a manual movement. A complete longitudinal scan takes about 10 minutes. We take 20000 events/point at 500 Hz. All crystals are tested wrapped with reflector material (Tyvek). I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Quality Control: Examples Charge distributions with the source placed in the central position; LY, defined as: To evaluate the longitudinal uniformity, LRU, we plot the light yield as function of the distance of the source from the PMT and we fit the number of photoelectrons produced per MeV with a linear function. I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Quality Control: Specifications Angular coefficients are used to evaluate the LRU. Specifications are defined according to samples characterized: Kharkov (Ukraine), Opto Materials (Italy), SICCAS (China) and Saint-Gobain (France); Crystal lateral dimension: ±100 µm, length: ±100 µm. Scintillation properties measured by a bi-alkali PMT with air gap, coupled to the crystal wrapped with two layers of Tyvek paper:  Light output (LO): > 100 p.e./MeV with 200 ns integration gate, will be defined as XX% of a candle crystal provided;  FWHM Energy resolution: < 45% for 22Na peak;  Fast (200 ns)/Total (3000 ns) Ratio: > 75%;  Light response uniformity (LRU): < 10%. Radiation hardness:  Normalized LO after 10/100 krad > 85/60%.  Radiation Induced Current (RIC) @1.8 rad/h: < 0.6 MeV. I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Quality Control: Specifications (2) I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Specifications: LO and FWHM ER Examples I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Specifications: F/S Ratio and LRU Examples I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

SPARES I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Radiation Damage (1) I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Radiation Damage (2) I. Sarra @ PADME ECal Meeting 8 September 2016

Laser monitoring system -1- The Mu2e laser system has the main purpose of: 1) Monitor the MPPC Gain 2) Allow fast debugging of FEE + setting (good experience during the last three test beams) A B C

Laser monitoring system -2- The laser will be split, by means of semi transparent mirrors to 8 beams and focused by optical lens to 1 mm diameter Fused Silica fibers. 1/3 of the light will be sent to a 2” diffusing sphere with 3 pin-diodes for monitoring  A Eight 60 m long fibers, routed from the counting room to the DS bulkhead brings the light to 8 2” diffusing spheres on the mechanical structure  B Each sphere, will have 1 pin diode for monitor and 3 bundles of 200 μm silica fibers. Each fiber will be inserted into a lodging in the back of the crystals close to the SIPM holders  C Laser Trigger will be synchronized with the DAQ Clock signals and delayed into the beam-off region. 0.13 mm2 *2400*1.4 = 5 cm2 perche’ non 8? Laser pulse Outside the DS Feed-throughs for 8 optical fibers 8 Pin Diode cables [coaxial] Total cross section < 10 cm2