Figure 1. Generalized and simplified SDWN Architecture. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 3. Overview of related work and trade-offs of different wireless experimental platforms. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 2. Main components of Mininet-WiFi. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 4. Bicasting over WiFi. (a) Sample topology Figure 4. Bicasting over WiFi. (a) Sample topology. (b) Bandwidth measurement between STA3 and H4. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 5. MultiPath TCP. (a) Topology setup. (b) Results. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 6. Realistic experiment in hybrid physical-virtual environments. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 7. Forwarding by SSID. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 8. Experimental validation by using R2lab. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 9. Signal propagation in R2lab and in different indoor propagation models implemented in Mininet-WiFi. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 10. Sample topology. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 11. Replaying network conditions. (a) IEEE 802. 11b Figure 11. Replaying network conditions. (a) IEEE 802.11b. (b) IEEE 802.11g. From: How Far Can We Go? Towards Realistic Software-Defined Wireless Networking Experiments Comput J. 2017;60(10):1458-1471. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxx023 Comput J | © The British Computer Society 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com