Early Childhood Outcomes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Childhood Outcomes… Who, What, Where and How
Advertisements

Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Kansas Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Update 2011 –
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
REGIONAL WEBINARS OCTOBER & NOVEMBER, 2013 What If…? Understanding Part C Eligibility Determination, Assessment and Transition Requirements Through Scenarios.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
Approaches to Measuring Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Prepared for the NECTAC National Meeting on Measuring Child and Family Outcomes,
Building Outcome Data into a State On-Line Data System A birth through five project in Kansas Margy Hornback, Ed.D., Kansas Part B 619 Coordinator Kansas.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
JANUARY 6, 2014 VERNA THOMPSON Delaware 619 Meeting.
Issues and Strategies for Measuring Outcomes for Children with “Speech-Only’ Eligibility Jim J Lesko, Ed.D. Delaware Department of Education
Presented at State Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA) Conference San Antonio, Texas February, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment in Early Childhood: How Assessments.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Sarah Geldart – MA ESE – Additional Contact:
ECSE Indicator Trainings Lunch & Learn Series PPS Training: Basics, Tips, & Tricks Wendi Schreiter.
PREKINDERGARTEN DISABILITIES CONTACT MEETING MAY 9-10, 2012 Guidance Update for the BDI-2.
Special Education Procedures Information from Illinois Rules and Regulations Part 226 Special Education
Spencer County Preschool Update 2013 – 2014 SCHOOL YEAR.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Kate Rogers Vermont Agency of Education Early Childhood Special Education Coordinator/IDEA 619 Coordinator.
Child Outcomes Measurement Tools & Process A story of 3 conversions.
1 Early Intervention Program Referrals and Services March 18, 2016.
Purpose The purpose of Module 1 is to orient new staff to child outcomes measurement and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF).
4/21/2014 Indicator Review 2016 June 2016.
ARC Chairperson Training
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
Special Education and Nonpublic School Students
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
What are we required to do?
Changes For Student October Pupil Enrollment Collection 2015
Let’s Talk About Dates…
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International AUCD Meeting Washington, DC
Transitional Kindergarten Parent Information Meeting
Community Input Discussions:
Periodic, Annual Reviews and Transition Procedures
ARC Chairperson Training
Delaware Department of Education
Delaware Department of Education
IMS Data Summary Third in a series November 2010
TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy
Monitoring Children’s Progress
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Nancy Skorheim ND Section 619 Coordinator
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
State Performance Plan Indicator 7 Update
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009
Transitional Kindergarten Parent Information Meeting
Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
Preschool Outcome Reporting in Montana
Preschool Outcomes Measurement System SY Implementation
Identifying Documentation
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Delaware Department of Education
Indicator 11 Initial Evaluation Edit Checks (80 Day Timeline)
Presentation transcript:

Early Childhood Outcomes Enters and Exits

First Resource to refer to www.kskits.org

ENTER Requirements: All students ENTERing our EC services MUST have an Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Form completed within 30 calendar days of eligibility completed at the IEP and turned in with the IEP . Information for ECO is based on many sources, but one MUST be the Curriculum Based Measurement. Information reflects functioning of child across all environments therefore parents are a vital piece of information.

EXIT Requirements: Complete an ECO EXIT when student enters Kindergarten or exits services (moves or no longer qualifies) or before child turns 6 while in preschool. Use a 2nd ECO form for EXIT data, Part (b) to show GROWTH. Submit to MIS immediately. Complete and turn in with Kindergarten Transition meeting notes. This should be completed as a team, including parents. Information must be updated with new dates.

Confused on some requirements? For an initial data collection, if student is only going to be in EC services for LESS than 6 months, you do NOT need to do an ECO. (Initial eligibility in March, April or May before going to Kindergarten.) If a student moves in from another district or state, you must complete an ECO Enter within 30 calendar days. First and last date of service is the actual first and last day of service. Ex: If eligibility is determined on May 15 but services don’t begin until August 19, initiation of service is August 19. Last day includes ESY services.

SLPs and Rating Questions Q: Would it be possible to rate a child with severe articulation delay a 6 or 7 in all areas? A: for children with only one area of concern, the team may decide they have enough information to adequately rate the child a 6 or 7 in all three outcomes on the basis of record review, interview, observation, tests, and screening information. However not every child with speech-language concerns would be rated a 6 or 7 in all three outcomes. Decisions about ratings are based on data. Q: Is it possible that a child would be rated 6 or 7 and still be receiving speech services? A: Yes because decisions about ratings made on child outcomes are different than decisions about eligibility determination for special education services. Q: What is the purpose of exempting children with only one area of concern who could be rated a 6 or 7 in all three areas, from being tested using one of the approved CBAs? A: Children with minimal speech needs usually receive minimal speech services and may require less information about their functioning within an early childhood curriculum to rate them on the COSF. It is not a requirement to use one of the approved CBAs for speech-only students that were rated a 6 or 7 in all three outcomes. The entire CBA tool needs to be administered if a speech-only student can not be given a rating of a 6 or 7 in all three outcomes. However, who administers the various pieces of the tool is a team decision. If student ranks a 7 in all areas on the entry questions, mark “7” and evidence of : observation, age appropriate growth, no concerns

MIS Data is for Federal reporting and Indicator 7 compliance Needs from Amber and Wendy Questions for MIS?

Tri-County created forms to support your rating AEPS The Carolina Curriculum