Draft Elementary Education Preparation Standards: An Opportunity for Review and Feedback James McLeskey Teacher Education Division Conference Tempe,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Improving relevant standards. Aims and objectives Familiarize ourselves with best practice standards of teaching To think about how we can implement the.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Keys to Successful 21 st Century Educational Leadership Jazzar and Algozzine Chapter 8 Curriculum Considerations & Implementations.
EDUCATE ALABAMA & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PLAN Oak Mountain High School
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Update on Program Review Margie Crutchfield AACTE February, 2009.
Vermont Agency of Education 4 December 2015
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Draft Elementary Teacher Standards: Steering Committee Updates Ava Belisle-Chatterjee,
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Partnership for Practice
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
DEC, CEC, NAEYC Standards Alignment: A Tool for Higher Education Curriculum Development Council for Exceptional Children Annual Conference Boston, MA.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
How are HLPs used? Components of HLP identified.
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Objectives: To comprehend and know the different strands and specific performance indicators from domain 2 and 3. To appreciate the significance of learning.
Exploring the Personal and Social Capability for Secondary schools
NJCU College of Education
InTASC Standards: The Basics for Candidates
Exploring the Personal and Social Capability for Primary schools
A Tutorial on Program Supplement Assessments
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
English Learner Parent Academy
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
A Tutorial on Program Supplement Assessments
Colorado Department of Education
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

Draft Elementary Education Preparation Standards: An Opportunity for Review and Feedback James McLeskey Teacher Education Division Conference Tempe, AZ November 6, 2015

To View the Standards Document now Go To: www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZV9TSCZ Click on: view and print the standards document

CAEP’s Role as Facilitator August 1, 2015: ACEI (Association for Childhood Education International) ceases to function as the Elementary Teacher Preparation Program SPA CAEP’s Assumed Responsibility: Developing Standards and Coordinating Program Review for National Recognition: Standards Development: Independent Taskforce Program Reviews: Volunteer Reviewers/ Experts in Elementary Ed Field Using AIMS Reviewer Training: Facilitated by CAEP

Steering Committee for Elementary Teacher Standards 16-Member Steering Committee includes representatives from the following Specialized Professional Associations (SPA’s): Association for Childhood Education International Council for Exceptional Children International Literacy Association National Association for the Education of Young Children National Council of Teachers of English National Council for the Social Studies National Council of Teachers of Mathematics National Science Teachers Association

Steering Committee for Elementary Teacher Standards(Continued) 16-Member Steering Committee also includes representatives from other CAEP member organizations: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education American Federation of Teachers Council of Chief State School Officers National Board for Professional Teaching Standards National Education Association

Standards and Elements IN BRIEF The following standards and elements are presented in abbreviated format. Full descriptions of the standards and elements are provided at the web site used for feedback. Go to this site and click on ‘view and print the standards document’ for a full copy of the standards and elements. www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZV9TSCZ

STANDARD 1 - Understanding and Addressing Each Child’s Developmental and Learning Needs - STANDARD 1 KEY ELEMENTS (3): 1.a - Candidates know how each learner grows and develops, recognizing that patterns of development and learning vary individually within and across cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, ethical, and physical domains. 1.b - Candidates use their understanding of individual differences and diverse families, cultures, and communities to plan and implement inclusive learning experiences and environments that address learners’ needs and build on learners’ strengths, prior knowledge and experiences, abilities, talents, language, culture, family and community values, allowing them to advance as they demonstrate their mastery. 1.c - Candidates work respectfully and reciprocally with families, colleagues, and other professionals.

STANDARD 2 - Understanding and Applying Content and Curricular Knowledge for Teaching STANDARD 2 KEY ELEMENTS (5): 2.a – Candidates demonstrate and apply the elements of literacy. 2.b - Candidates demonstrate and apply understandings of major mathematics concepts, algorithms, procedures, applications and mathematical. 2.c - Candidates demonstrate and apply understandings and integration of the three dimensions of science and engineering practices. 2.d - Candidates demonstrate understandings, capabilities, and dispositions associated with the central concepts and tools in Civics, Economics, Geography, and History. 2.e - Candidates demonstrate understandings of developmental and differentiated learning, curricular standards, practices, the language of the disciplines, assessment, and learning progressions as they relate and connect to content knowledge for teaching.

STANDARD 3 – Assessing, Planning, and Engaging Learners for Instruction STANDARD 3 KEY ELEMENTS (6): 3.a - Candidates design, compose, select, adapt and administer formative assessments to gather data on student learning and engagement. 3.b - Candidates continually monitor, guide and revise instruction using data from formative assessments. 3.c - Candidates plan sequenced learning experiences to meet their goals based on educational goals and what they know about their students’ current needs and capabilities. 3.d - Candidates differentiate instruction to address the needs of each child through explicit planning and design.

STANDARD 3 – Assessing, Planning, and Engaging Learners for Instruction-Continued STANDARD 3 KEY ELEMENTS continued: 3.e - Candidates manage their classrooms effectively by involving children in designing social norms that assure safety, positive interpersonal interactions, and mutual respect. Candidates establish a consistent, organized, and respectful learning environment in which the norms, routines, and procedures for student behavior are positively stated and explicitly taught. Candidates construct and maintain a productive learning environment by adapting classroom procedures to each learner’s cognitive and motivational needs. 3 f - Candidates assess and build children’s motivations and engagement in learning by forming explicit plans to share control with students, make school learning relevant, sustain collaborative activities, and regulate cognitive challenge. They link academic work to learners’ interests, and assure that children perceive the personal benefits and values of school learning.

STANDARD 4 - Supporting each Child’s Learning using Effective Instruction STANDARD 4 KEY ELEMENTS (7): 4.a - Candidates use a variety of instructional practices that are designed to foster extended learner engagement, collaborative activity, and appropriate cognitive challenges to support the learning of every child. 4.b - Candidates teach a cohesive sequence of lessons to ensure the learning of every learner. 4.c - Candidates explicitly teach content, strategies, and skills to make clear what a learner needs to do or think about while learning academic content. 4.d - Candidates provide positive and constructive feedback to guide children’s learning, increase motivation, and improve engagement, leading to improved learning and behavior. 4.a. Direct Instruction included as example of one of these practices.

STANDARD 4 - Supporting each Child’s Learning using Effective Instruction STANDARD 4 KEY ELEMENTS continued: 4.e - Candidates lead whole class discussions in which the candidate and learners collaboratively investigate specific content, strategies, or skills. 4.f - Candidates organize and manage effective small group instruction that is used to differentiate teaching to meet the learning needs of each child by providing more focused, intensive instruction. 4.g - Candidates organize and manage individual instruction that is used to provide targeted, focused, intensive instruction that improves or enhances each child’s learning.

STANDARD 5 - Developing as a Professional STANDARD 5 KEY ELEMENTS (4): 5.a - Candidates use a variety of communication strategies to interact with learners, families, and colleagues, which heighten and promote shared learning for each child. 5.b - Candidates work collaboratively with colleagues, mentors, and school leaders demonstrating self-motivation, knowledge of current education policies and pedagogy, and the ability to establish and work toward common goals that directly influence every learner’s development and achievement. 5.c - Candidates build and implement a personal professional development plan based on the ongoing analysis of children’s learning, self-reflection, professional ethics, current research and contemporary best practice. 5.d - Candidates understand how children’s learning is enhanced through participation in learning communities such as, local, state, and national professional organizations and related professional networks and participate in such forums for their own continuing professional development.

Present Status of Steering Committee’s Work Draft Standards for Review and Feedback from CAEP’s State Partnership and Content Areas Committee Work in Progress: Supporting Explanations/Professional Knowledge Base Conceptualizing Program Review Process

ACEI/CAEP Standards Transition at a Glance September 2015 Draft standards out for public comment January 2016 Steering Comm. incorporates feedback Feb., 2016 2nd draft of standards sent out for public comment January 15, 2016 deadline for feedback.

ACEI/CAEP Standards Transition at a Glance-Part 2 April- June 2016 Steering Comm. finalizes draft of National Elementary Standards July 2016 National Elementary Standards submitted to SPCAC for approval

ACEI/CAEP Standards Transition at a Glance-Part 3 August 2016 SPACAC reviews and recommends standards for CAEP Board approval December 2016 CAEP Board approval of the National Elementary Standards

ACEI/CAEP Standards Transition at a Glance-Part 4 National Elementary Teacher Standards Approved in December 2016 and Adopted in January 2017 Transition Period: Four Review Cycles All Programs Will Use 2017 Elementary Teacher Standards Starting Spring 2019

Feedback/ Survey Link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZV9TSCZ

CAEP Contact: Banhi Bhattacharya: Banhi.Bhattacharya@caepnet.org